Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > MrIntelligentDesign

Pages: (42) < ... 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 >

dazz Posts: 247 Joined: Mar. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 03 2015,15:57    Quote (sparc @ Nov. 03 2015,20:09) It would be bizarre if Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Journal of Experimental Psychology: General had really considered Eddy's Physics of Intelligent Design as he claims on Amazon:      Quote Review The original manuscript of this science book was peer-reviewed by many professional scientists in our generation. Here are the comments: "...stimulating to others' thinking..." - NATURE, Manuscript Administration, Nature "...our decision (rejection) is not necessarily a reflection of the quality of your research but rather of our stringent space limitations." - SCIENCE Journal "...This is certainly a provocative and interesting manuscript..." -  Behavioral and Brain Sciences "...I read your paper and I found the question you raise to be interesting and the work to be very good in many respects..." -  Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Especially when one finds the very same reviews for each of his different ID "books": The New Intelligent Design, Turning The Scientific World Upside Down Atheism and Intelligent Design Psychology Of Intelligent Design Biology Of Intelligent Design Intelligent Design must explain Peer-Review and the New Intelligent Design: a documentary Four identical reviews for seven different "books"! Edgar "scumbag" Postardo, A.K.A. MrRetard forgot to include the rest of the text in his review Quote Thank you for submitting your manuscript "Article title" which we are regretfully unable to offer to publish. It is Nature's policy to return a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees. Decisions of this kind are made by the editors of Nature's according to the demanding editorial criteria of the journal. In the present case, while your findings may well prove stimulating to others' thinking about such questions, we regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively on this occasion. It's obviously a template response for crackpots like him. Can someone notify Amazon of this so that his books get removed for good?

EmperorZelos Posts: 81 Joined: Oct. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 04 2015,00:34    Quote (dazz @ Nov. 03 2015,15:57) Quote (sparc @ Nov. 03 2015,20:09) It would be bizarre if Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Journal of Experimental Psychology: General had really considered Eddy's Physics of Intelligent Design as he claims on Amazon:      Quote Review The original manuscript of this science book was peer-reviewed by many professional scientists in our generation. Here are the comments: "...stimulating to others' thinking..." - NATURE, Manuscript Administration, Nature "...our decision (rejection) is not necessarily a reflection of the quality of your research but rather of our stringent space limitations." - SCIENCE Journal "...This is certainly a provocative and interesting manuscript..." -  Behavioral and Brain Sciences "...I read your paper and I found the question you raise to be interesting and the work to be very good in many respects..." -  Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Especially when one finds the very same reviews for each of his different ID "books": The New Intelligent Design, Turning The Scientific World Upside Down Atheism and Intelligent Design Psychology Of Intelligent Design Biology Of Intelligent Design Intelligent Design must explain Peer-Review and the New Intelligent Design: a documentary Four identical reviews for seven different "books"! Edgar "scumbag" Postardo, A.K.A. MrRetard forgot to include the rest of the text in his review Quote Thank you for submitting your manuscript "Article title" which we are regretfully unable to offer to publish. It is Nature's policy to return a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees. Decisions of this kind are made by the editors of Nature's according to the demanding editorial criteria of the journal. In the present case, while your findings may well prove stimulating to others' thinking about such questions, we regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively on this occasion. It's obviously a template response for crackpots like him. Can someone notify Amazon of this so that his books get removed for good? Done it twice now.

dazz Posts: 247 Joined: Mar. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 04 2015,01:46    Quote (EmperorZelos @ Nov. 04 2015,07:34) Quote (dazz @ Nov. 03 2015,15:57) Quote (sparc @ Nov. 03 2015,20:09) It would be bizarre if Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Journal of Experimental Psychology: General had really considered Eddy's Physics of Intelligent Design as he claims on Amazon:        Quote Review The original manuscript of this science book was peer-reviewed by many professional scientists in our generation. Here are the comments: "...stimulating to others' thinking..." - NATURE, Manuscript Administration, Nature "...our decision (rejection) is not necessarily a reflection of the quality of your research but rather of our stringent space limitations." - SCIENCE Journal "...This is certainly a provocative and interesting manuscript..." -  Behavioral and Brain Sciences "...I read your paper and I found the question you raise to be interesting and the work to be very good in many respects..." -  Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Especially when one finds the very same reviews for each of his different ID "books": The New Intelligent Design, Turning The Scientific World Upside Down Atheism and Intelligent Design Psychology Of Intelligent Design Biology Of Intelligent Design Intelligent Design must explain Peer-Review and the New Intelligent Design: a documentary Four identical reviews for seven different "books"! Edgar "scumbag" Postardo, A.K.A. MrRetard forgot to include the rest of the text in his review   Quote Thank you for submitting your manuscript "Article title" which we are regretfully unable to offer to publish. It is Nature's policy to return a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees. Decisions of this kind are made by the editors of Nature's according to the demanding editorial criteria of the journal. In the present case, while your findings may well prove stimulating to others' thinking about such questions, we regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively on this occasion. It's obviously a template response for crackpots like him. Can someone notify Amazon of this so that his books get removed for good? Done it twice now. Thank you

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 04 2015,02:22    Quote (dazz @ Nov. 03 2015,15:57) Quote (sparc @ Nov. 03 2015,20:09) It would be bizarre if Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Journal of Experimental Psychology: General had really considered Eddy's Physics of Intelligent Design as he claims on Amazon:      Quote Review The original manuscript of this science book was peer-reviewed by many professional scientists in our generation. Here are the comments: "...stimulating to others' thinking..." - NATURE, Manuscript Administration, Nature "...our decision (rejection) is not necessarily a reflection of the quality of your research but rather of our stringent space limitations." - SCIENCE Journal "...This is certainly a provocative and interesting manuscript..." -  Behavioral and Brain Sciences "...I read your paper and I found the question you raise to be interesting and the work to be very good in many respects..." -  Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Especially when one finds the very same reviews for each of his different ID "books": The New Intelligent Design, Turning The Scientific World Upside Down Atheism and Intelligent Design Psychology Of Intelligent Design Biology Of Intelligent Design Intelligent Design must explain Peer-Review and the New Intelligent Design: a documentary Four identical reviews for seven different "books"! Edgar "scumbag" Postardo, A.K.A. MrRetard forgot to include the rest of the text in his review Quote Thank you for submitting your manuscript "Article title" which we are regretfully unable to offer to publish. It is Nature's policy to return a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees. Decisions of this kind are made by the editors of Nature's according to the demanding editorial criteria of the journal. In the present case, while your findings may well prove stimulating to others' thinking about such questions, we regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively on this occasion. It's obviously a template response for crackpots like him. Can someone notify Amazon of this so that his books get removed for good? My PEER-REVIEW book was a documentary...I censored everything so that people who were involved are protected by religious freaks like you...

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 04 2015,02:24    Quote (EmperorZelos @ Nov. 04 2015,00:34) Quote (dazz @ Nov. 03 2015,15:57) Quote (sparc @ Nov. 03 2015,20:09) It would be bizarre if Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Journal of Experimental Psychology: General had really considered Eddy's Physics of Intelligent Design as he claims on Amazon:        Quote Review The original manuscript of this science book was peer-reviewed by many professional scientists in our generation. Here are the comments: "...stimulating to others' thinking..." - NATURE, Manuscript Administration, Nature "...our decision (rejection) is not necessarily a reflection of the quality of your research but rather of our stringent space limitations." - SCIENCE Journal "...This is certainly a provocative and interesting manuscript..." -  Behavioral and Brain Sciences "...I read your paper and I found the question you raise to be interesting and the work to be very good in many respects..." -  Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Especially when one finds the very same reviews for each of his different ID "books": The New Intelligent Design, Turning The Scientific World Upside Down Atheism and Intelligent Design Psychology Of Intelligent Design Biology Of Intelligent Design Intelligent Design must explain Peer-Review and the New Intelligent Design: a documentary Four identical reviews for seven different "books"! Edgar "scumbag" Postardo, A.K.A. MrRetard forgot to include the rest of the text in his review   Quote Thank you for submitting your manuscript "Article title" which we are regretfully unable to offer to publish. It is Nature's policy to return a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees. Decisions of this kind are made by the editors of Nature's according to the demanding editorial criteria of the journal. In the present case, while your findings may well prove stimulating to others' thinking about such questions, we regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively on this occasion. It's obviously a template response for crackpots like him. Can someone notify Amazon of this so that his books get removed for good? Done it twice now. Once Amazon read my science books and found that I am not telling a lie, they will surely block you..

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 04 2015,02:26    Quote (N.Wells @ Nov. 03 2015,08:50) Quote Atheism and Intelligent Design (Kindle Edition) = 0 The New Intelligent Design, Turning The Scientific World Upside Down (Kindle Edition) = 4!!! Psychology Of Intelligent Design (Kindle Edition) = 0 Physics of Intelligent Design = 0 Biology Of Intelligent Design (First Edition edition) = no sales rank available Intelligent Design must explain = no sales rank available Philosophy Of Intelligent Design = no sales rank available Guide A Child To Enjoy School = no data Peer-Review and the New Intelligent Design: a documentary = no data Going by the World Population Clock at http://www.worldometers.info/world-p....ulation that's 7,378,371,981 - 4 satisfied customers combined with a massive uptick in sales: great going, Edgar!!!  Next stop, Stockholm! As you can see that I am not selling my science books..I wrote them as my own documentaries for my new discoveries..READ THEM or LEAVE THEM.. I don't care...

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 04 2015,02:37    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,10:26) Quote (N.Wells @ Nov. 03 2015,08:50) Quote Atheism and Intelligent Design (Kindle Edition) = 0 The New Intelligent Design, Turning The Scientific World Upside Down (Kindle Edition) = 4!!! Psychology Of Intelligent Design (Kindle Edition) = 0 Physics of Intelligent Design = 0 Biology Of Intelligent Design (First Edition edition) = no sales rank available Intelligent Design must explain = no sales rank available Philosophy Of Intelligent Design = no sales rank available Guide A Child To Enjoy School = no data Peer-Review and the New Intelligent Design: a documentary = no data Going by the World Population Clock at http://www.worldometers.info/world-p....ulation that's 7,378,371,981 - 4 satisfied customers combined with a massive uptick in sales: great going, Edgar!!!  Next stop, Stockholm! As you can see that I am not selling my science books..I wrote them as my own documentaries for my new discoveries..READ THEM or LEAVE THEM.. I don't care... Well that's good, because Edgar absolutely nobody gives a fuck. You can't even give them away as spam. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

ChemiCat Posts: 532 Joined: Nov. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 04 2015,03:10    Quote I don't care... So the money order isn't on the way? I'll drop a hint so that you will buy my books, (whisper) I am your Intelligent Agent! But don't tell everybody here!

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 04 2015,03:37    Quote (k.e.. @ Nov. 04 2015,02:37) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,10:26) Quote (N.Wells @ Nov. 03 2015,08:50)   Quote Atheism and Intelligent Design (Kindle Edition) = 0 The New Intelligent Design, Turning The Scientific World Upside Down (Kindle Edition) = 4!!! Psychology Of Intelligent Design (Kindle Edition) = 0 Physics of Intelligent Design = 0 Biology Of Intelligent Design (First Edition edition) = no sales rank available Intelligent Design must explain = no sales rank available Philosophy Of Intelligent Design = no sales rank available Guide A Child To Enjoy School = no data Peer-Review and the New Intelligent Design: a documentary = no data Going by the World Population Clock at http://www.worldometers.info/world-p....ulation that's 7,378,371,981 - 4 satisfied customers combined with a massive uptick in sales: great going, Edgar!!!  Next stop, Stockholm! As you can see that I am not selling my science books..I wrote them as my own documentaries for my new discoveries..READ THEM or LEAVE THEM.. I don't care... Well that's good, because Edgar absolutely nobody gives a fuck. You can't even give them away as spam. I only sell my science books to those who are serious people...

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 04 2015,05:51    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,11:37) Quote (k.e.. @ Nov. 04 2015,02:37) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,10:26)   Quote (N.Wells @ Nov. 03 2015,08:50)   Quote Atheism and Intelligent Design (Kindle Edition) = 0 The New Intelligent Design, Turning The Scientific World Upside Down (Kindle Edition) = 4!!! Psychology Of Intelligent Design (Kindle Edition) = 0 Physics of Intelligent Design = 0 Biology Of Intelligent Design (First Edition edition) = no sales rank available Intelligent Design must explain = no sales rank available Philosophy Of Intelligent Design = no sales rank available Guide A Child To Enjoy School = no data Peer-Review and the New Intelligent Design: a documentary = no data Going by the World Population Clock at http://www.worldometers.info/world-p....ulation that's 7,378,371,981 - 4 satisfied customers combined with a massive uptick in sales: great going, Edgar!!!  Next stop, Stockholm! As you can see that I am not selling my science books..I wrote them as my own documentaries for my new discoveries..READ THEM or LEAVE THEM.. I don't care... Well that's good, because Edgar absolutely nobody gives a fuck. You can't even give them away as spam. I only sell my science books to those who are serious people... Nevermind that your false so called "science" is worth less than a fart, you're even more hopeless as a salesman. If you had a half a clue the Discovery Institute would promote your lost cause. Heck even by their low standards your nonsense doesn't rate. Get some professional mental health help before it's too late Edgar. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 04 2015,14:12    Quote (k.e.. @ Nov. 04 2015,05:51) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,11:37) Quote (k.e.. @ Nov. 04 2015,02:37)   Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,10:26)   Quote (N.Wells @ Nov. 03 2015,08:50)     Quote Atheism and Intelligent Design (Kindle Edition) = 0 The New Intelligent Design, Turning The Scientific World Upside Down (Kindle Edition) = 4!!! Psychology Of Intelligent Design (Kindle Edition) = 0 Physics of Intelligent Design = 0 Biology Of Intelligent Design (First Edition edition) = no sales rank available Intelligent Design must explain = no sales rank available Philosophy Of Intelligent Design = no sales rank available Guide A Child To Enjoy School = no data Peer-Review and the New Intelligent Design: a documentary = no data Going by the World Population Clock at http://www.worldometers.info/world-p....ulation that's 7,378,371,981 - 4 satisfied customers combined with a massive uptick in sales: great going, Edgar!!!  Next stop, Stockholm! As you can see that I am not selling my science books..I wrote them as my own documentaries for my new discoveries..READ THEM or LEAVE THEM.. I don't care... Well that's good, because Edgar absolutely nobody gives a fuck. You can't even give them away as spam. I only sell my science books to those who are serious people... Nevermind that your false so called "science" is worth less than a fart, you're even more hopeless as a salesman. If you had a half a clue the Discovery Institute would promote your lost cause. Heck even by their low standards your nonsense doesn't rate. Get some professional mental health help before it's too late Edgar. LOL!!! I have the best science...TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT.. But leaving it will mean disaster to you...

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 04 2015,14:23    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,15:12) Quote (k.e.. @ Nov. 04 2015,05:51) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,11:37)   Quote (k.e.. @ Nov. 04 2015,02:37)   Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,10:26)     Quote (N.Wells @ Nov. 03 2015,08:50)     Quote Atheism and Intelligent Design (Kindle Edition) = 0 The New Intelligent Design, Turning The Scientific World Upside Down (Kindle Edition) = 4!!! Psychology Of Intelligent Design (Kindle Edition) = 0 Physics of Intelligent Design = 0 Biology Of Intelligent Design (First Edition edition) = no sales rank available Intelligent Design must explain = no sales rank available Philosophy Of Intelligent Design = no sales rank available Guide A Child To Enjoy School = no data Peer-Review and the New Intelligent Design: a documentary = no data Going by the World Population Clock at http://www.worldometers.info/world-p....ulation that's 7,378,371,981 - 4 satisfied customers combined with a massive uptick in sales: great going, Edgar!!!  Next stop, Stockholm! As you can see that I am not selling my science books..I wrote them as my own documentaries for my new discoveries..READ THEM or LEAVE THEM.. I don't care... Well that's good, because Edgar absolutely nobody gives a fuck. You can't even give them away as spam. I only sell my science books to those who are serious people... Nevermind that your false so called "science" is worth less than a fart, you're even more hopeless as a salesman. If you had a half a clue the Discovery Institute would promote your lost cause. Heck even by their low standards your nonsense doesn't rate. Get some professional mental health help before it's too late Edgar. LOL!!! I have the best science...TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT.. But leaving it will mean disaster to you... How will not accepting your notions as the definitive last word on intelligence damage us?  What harm will come to us for not adopting what we haven't yet adopted?  Why only now? What positive benefits, what actions and activities will take place under acceptance of your notions that aren't already being taken? Bluntly, what good is it? Gary at least wrote some software.  Useless software, but it shows willing.  The last time you were asked, the only changes you could identify were that you become rich and famous.  In pretty much those words. That's no benefit to anyone but you.

EmperorZelos Posts: 81 Joined: Oct. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 05 2015,09:51    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,02:22) My PEER-REVIEW book was a documentary...I censored everything so that people who were involved are protected by religious freaks like you... Yeah no, you are censoring to cover your ass. If those publications said that they have nothing to fear and their names should, like with any scientific work, contain the name. Give us the names so we can contact them and confirm what you say is true.

EmperorZelos Posts: 81 Joined: Oct. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 05 2015,09:51    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,02:24) Once Amazon read my science books and found that I am not telling a lie, they will surely block you.. Not at all because we have reason to suspect you are using dishonest tactics and it has nothing to do with the actual content of your book you imbecile.

EmperorZelos Posts: 81 Joined: Oct. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 05 2015,09:52    Hey guys, I actually have his "physics" book, anyone want a laughable read of it?

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 05 2015,10:16    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,22:12) Quote (k.e.. @ Nov. 04 2015,05:51) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,11:37)   Quote (k.e.. @ Nov. 04 2015,02:37)   Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,10:26)     Quote (N.Wells @ Nov. 03 2015,08:50)     Quote Atheism and Intelligent Design (Kindle Edition) = 0 The New Intelligent Design, Turning The Scientific World Upside Down (Kindle Edition) = 4!!! Psychology Of Intelligent Design (Kindle Edition) = 0 Physics of Intelligent Design = 0 Biology Of Intelligent Design (First Edition edition) = no sales rank available Intelligent Design must explain = no sales rank available Philosophy Of Intelligent Design = no sales rank available Guide A Child To Enjoy School = no data Peer-Review and the New Intelligent Design: a documentary = no data Going by the World Population Clock at http://www.worldometers.info/world-p....ulation that's 7,378,371,981 - 4 satisfied customers combined with a massive uptick in sales: great going, Edgar!!!  Next stop, Stockholm! As you can see that I am not selling my science books..I wrote them as my own documentaries for my new discoveries..READ THEM or LEAVE THEM.. I don't care... Well that's good, because Edgar absolutely nobody gives a fuck. You can't even give them away as spam. I only sell my science books to those who are serious people... Nevermind that your false so called "science" is worth less than a fart, you're even more hopeless as a salesman. If you had a half a clue the Discovery Institute would promote your lost cause. Heck even by their low standards your nonsense doesn't rate. Get some professional mental health help before it's too late Edgar. LOL!!! I have the best science...TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT.. But leaving it will mean disaster to you... So your argument ad nausium has sunk to hopeless, weak and idle threats now? Edgar you're a loser. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

EmperorZelos Posts: 81 Joined: Oct. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 05 2015,11:56    For fun! http://www.skepticblog.org/2010....a-crank Crank list, how many of the points does MrIDiot here score?

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2015,00:26    Quote (EmperorZelos @ Nov. 05 2015,11:56) For fun! http://www.skepticblog.org/2010.......a-crank Crank list, how many of the points does MrIDiot here score? You have 100/100 points as CRANK...

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2015,00:27    Quote (EmperorZelos @ Nov. 05 2015,09:51) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,02:24) Once Amazon read my science books and found that I am not telling a lie, they will surely block you.. Not at all because we have reason to suspect you are using dishonest tactics and it has nothing to do with the actual content of your book you imbecile. YOU HAVE no science at all!

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2015,00:52    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 06 2015,08:27) Quote (EmperorZelos @ Nov. 05 2015,09:51) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,02:24) Once Amazon read my science books and found that I am not telling a lie, they will surely block you.. Not at all because we have reason to suspect you are using dishonest tactics and it has nothing to do with the actual content of your book you imbecile. YOU I HAVE no science at all! Fixed loser. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

EmperorZelos Posts: 81 Joined: Oct. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2015,05:04    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 06 2015,00:26)   Quote (EmperorZelos @ Nov. 05 2015,11:56) For fun! http://www.skepticblog.org/2010.......a-crank Crank list, how many of the points does MrIDiot here score? You have 100/100 points as CRANK... Cute, want  us to go through it? Cranks tend to work in isolation from their colleagues. Nyet, I work and ask what others think, this is however you as you don't engage the scientific community You: 1 Me: 0 Cranks tend to be paranoid. I have no paranoia about anything, I think that the scientific process works fantasticly within the expected norm. You however say there is a conspiracy against you. You: 2 Me: 0 Cranks tend to consider themselves geniuses. While I consider myself above average i don't think of myself as a genius ever, you however have displayed this all the time in your own hubris. You: 3 Me: 0 Cranks tend to regard their colleagues and critics as stupid. I consider other mathematicians and others to be as smart as others and anyone whom can display their knowledge I take their opinion and value it, so no I don't regard them as stupid. You however have constantly called everyone else being stupid. You: 4 Me: 0 Cranks tend to believe there is a conspiracy against them. We already established this is you! You: 5 Me: 0 Cranks tend to criticize the work of big names in science. OH YES THIS IS YOU! You go only against Darwin but none of the others that came after that supported his work or anything. You: 6 Me: 0 Cranks tend to invent their own terminology Defiunately you, we have had this demonstrated time and time again here iwth your "intelle" and "naturelle" or whatever you call it. You: 7 Me: 0 DING DING DING DING DIIIIING The conclusion has been reached! IN THE RETARDED CORNER WE HAVE EDGAR WITH NO LESS THAN 7, COUNT THEM! 7 POINTS! IN THE SANE CORNER WE HAVE THE INDOMINABLE EMPERORZELOS WITH A MIGHTY 0 POINTS! FEEL THE PUUUUUNNNCCCHHHH

EmperorZelos Posts: 81 Joined: Oct. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2015,05:05    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 06 2015,00:27) Quote (EmperorZelos @ Nov. 05 2015,09:51) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,02:24) Once Amazon read my science books and found that I am not telling a lie, they will surely block you.. Not at all because we have reason to suspect you are using dishonest tactics and it has nothing to do with the actual content of your book you imbecile. YOU HAVE no science at all! You don't have it, we've asked you for your peer reviewed publications and you've given squat but your idiotic books. You have been dishonest.

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2015,06:34    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 06 2015,01:27) Quote (EmperorZelos @ Nov. 05 2015,09:51) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 04 2015,02:24) Once Amazon read my science books and found that I am not telling a lie, they will surely block you.. Not at all because we have reason to suspect you are using dishonest tactics and it has nothing to do with the actual content of your book you imbecile. YOU HAVE no science at all! So what? How is the presence or absence of scientific credentials relevant to a critique of your nonsense? How is refusal to accept your incoherent, self-contradictory, useless idiocy relevant to any science other than whatever science you think is all about 'intelligence'? You have conspicuously failed to indicate so much as a single research topic, a single positive impact, a single change that acceptance of your swill would have. The lacks, failings, flaws, or abundances, successes, purities of your challengers are irrelevant to the content of the challenge.  That content is what you seem to be most eager to avoid confronting. Yet another sign of a crank.

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2015,11:25    Here's a little follow-up, Edgar. What would your notions have contributed to the scientific research into terraforming Mars, specifically, restoring the Martian atmosphere? How would your notions have impacted past theorizing, past understanding of where the atmosphere went? How would your notions have improved our understanding of where the atmosphere went? Those are all current scientific questions.  We who have science are aware of this work, we understand it, at least in broad outline.  We are puzzled that you seem to feel this does not count as science simply because it as irrelevant to your absurdist notions about intelligence as those notions are to planetary science.

Wesley R. Elsberry Posts: 4991 Joined: May 2002 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2015,12:53    Back in 2001, I told William Dembski that scientists are, at basis, pragmatists. I told him that if he could show that his notions could actually produce results consistently and reliably, none of the philosophical arguments would matter; scientists will adopt anything that works. But somehow you have to show that what you have does work. Not that it is pretty words on a page that you are proud of, but that someone else looking to get a job done can pick it up and use it as a tool, and either be able to do something useful or do something useful faster as a result. I'm not sure that there have been any practical applications of Dembski's stuff. In 2011, it was still the case that there were no fully worked-out non-trivial examples of his GCEA being applied, and only four attempts at any example at all with any math whatsoever. -------------- "You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

Texas Teach Posts: 2084 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2015,16:17    Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Nov. 06 2015,12:53) Back in 2001, I told William Dembski that scientists are, at basis, pragmatists. I told him that if he could show that his notions could actually produce results consistently and reliably, none of the philosophical arguments would matter; scientists will adopt anything that works. But somehow you have to show that what you have does work. Not that it is pretty words on a page that you are proud of, but that someone else looking to get a job done can pick it up and use it as a tool, and either be able to do something useful or do something useful faster as a result. I'm not sure that there have been any practical applications of Dembski's stuff. In 2011, it was still the case that there were no fully worked-out non-trivial examples of his GCEA being applied, and only four attempts at any example at all with any math whatsoever. Do you have any sense of whether Dembski thought his math was right? -------------- "Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr "I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2015,20:35    Quote (Texas Teach @ Nov. 06 2015,16:17) Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Nov. 06 2015,12:53) Back in 2001, I told William Dembski that scientists are, at basis, pragmatists. I told him that if he could show that his notions could actually produce results consistently and reliably, none of the philosophical arguments would matter; scientists will adopt anything that works. But somehow you have to show that what you have does work. Not that it is pretty words on a page that you are proud of, but that someone else looking to get a job done can pick it up and use it as a tool, and either be able to do something useful or do something useful faster as a result. I'm not sure that there have been any practical applications of Dembski's stuff. In 2011, it was still the case that there were no fully worked-out non-trivial examples of his GCEA being applied, and only four attempts at any example at all with any math whatsoever. Do you have any sense of whether Dembski thought his math was right? Dembski's math for intelligence was not even right when he talks about intelligence. He also followed "complexity" from erroneous Darwin, thus, Dembski too will be put to shame. He needs to support me and use my math...

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2015,20:36    Quote (NoName @ Nov. 06 2015,11:25) Here's a little follow-up, Edgar. What would your notions have contributed to the scientific research into terraforming Mars, specifically, restoring the Martian atmosphere? How would your notions have impacted past theorizing, past understanding of where the atmosphere went? How would your notions have improved our understanding of where the atmosphere went? Those are all current scientific questions.  We who have science are aware of this work, we understand it, at least in broad outline.  We are puzzled that you seem to feel this does not count as science simply because it as irrelevant to your absurdist notions about intelligence as those notions are to planetary science. YOU ARE REALLY CRAZY!!! The reason why we have science today because we use intelligence and not ToE in knowing Mars, or even LHC, etc... You must be out of your mind!

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2015,20:37    Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Nov. 06 2015,12:53) Back in 2001, I told William Dembski that scientists are, at basis, pragmatists. I told him that if he could show that his notions could actually produce results consistently and reliably, none of the philosophical arguments would matter; scientists will adopt anything that works. But somehow you have to show that what you have does work. Not that it is pretty words on a page that you are proud of, but that someone else looking to get a job done can pick it up and use it as a tool, and either be able to do something useful or do something useful faster as a result. I'm not sure that there have been any practical applications of Dembski's stuff. In 2011, it was still the case that there were no fully worked-out non-trivial examples of his GCEA being applied, and only four attempts at any example at all with any math whatsoever. My math for intelligence works since the calculation works in real life...

N.Wells Posts: 1836 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2015,21:15    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Nov. 06 2015,20:37) My math for intelligence works since the calculation works in real life... But you've shown that it doesn't.  You've shown that you can't even count to two until after you've decided whether the desired answer needs to be above or below 1.5.

Pages: (42) < ... 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard