RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (22) < ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... >   
  Topic: FL Debate Peanut Gallery, Keep it Clean!< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 06 2009,00:37   

well i'm disappointed that we don't get to talk about toothed vaginas consuming the universe at the end of time and comparing that to Fold's little PP hypothesis.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 08 2009,00:34   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Oct. 21 2009,10:31)
Fallacies used by Floyd to date

(snip)

There's 4 or 5 I didn't include because he'll use them when it comes to the ID is science part.

He also divided by zero and improperly resolved the leading-tone.

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
FloydLee



Posts: 577
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,07:25   

[quote]For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.

For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:

Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. [QUOTE]

You say this is a "lie", Quack.  But you didn't give any reason why that's so.  Tell me why it's a lie?

  
FloydLee



Posts: 577
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,07:29   

test

  
FloydLee



Posts: 577
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,07:33   

Okay, just checking things out.  

Hey Quack:  you recently said that the following NT passage is a "lie",

Quote
For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.

       For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:

      Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.

(1Thes 4:15)


But you never really offer any good reasons why this should be characterized as a "lie."  So, tell me why?

FL

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,07:49   

Quote (FloydLee @ Dec. 23 2009,07:33)
But you never really offer any good reasons why this should be characterized as a "lie."  So, tell me why?

It's not happened, it's never going to happen and there is no evidence that it could ever possibly happen. It's not even wrong.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Robin



Posts: 1431
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,07:53   

Quote (FloydLee @ Dec. 23 2009,07:25)

[quote]You say this is a "lie", Quack.  But you didn't give any reason why that's so.  Tell me why it's a lie?[/quack]

Funny, but I can't find where Quack said this was a lie. Can you point that out FL?

--------------
we IDists rule in design for the flagellum and cilium largely because they do look designed.  Bilbo

The only reason you reject Thor is because, like a cushion, you bear the imprint of the biggest arse that sat on you. Louis

  
Robin



Posts: 1431
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,07:55   

Quote (Robin @ Dec. 23 2009,07:53)
[/quote]
[quote=FloydLee,Dec. 23 2009,07:25]

Quote
You say this is a "lie", Quack.  But you didn't give any reason why that's so.  Tell me why it's a lie?


Funny, but I can't find where Quack said this was a lie. Can you point that out FL?

--------------
we IDists rule in design for the flagellum and cilium largely because they do look designed.  Bilbo

The only reason you reject Thor is because, like a cushion, you bear the imprint of the biggest arse that sat on you. Louis

  
Robin



Posts: 1431
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,08:12   

Quote (Robin @ Dec. 23 2009,07:55)

Quote

Funny, but I can't find where Quack said this was a lie. Can you point that out FL?


Ahhh...nevermind. Found it over on the geology thread. Why you didn't post your question there is beyond me, FL, but whatever. Have at it.

--------------
we IDists rule in design for the flagellum and cilium largely because they do look designed.  Bilbo

The only reason you reject Thor is because, like a cushion, you bear the imprint of the biggest arse that sat on you. Louis

  
FloydLee



Posts: 577
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,08:52   

Quote
Why you didn't post your question there is beyond me, FL, but whatever.

Already tried it.  No matter what ATBC thread I may respond to, my reply is automatically re-directed to this one thread.  That's why.

However, no complaints about that.  As you confirmed, Quack did say that the Rapture text is a "lie."  So I'm just asking him why he said that.

***

Meanwhile, Oldman says,
   
Quote
it's never going to happen

But how do you KNOW that it's never going to happen?

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,09:18   

ah, the return of the zombie part 52.

yay.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Chayanov



Posts: 289
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,09:18   

Well, gee, in that verse you quoted Paul said Jesus will come back in his lifetime, and since Paul's dead and Jesus didn't come back, I don't see where the "out" is.

Oh yeah. And there's no evidence outside of the Bible that Jesus ever actually existed.

--------------
Help! Marxist literary critics are following me!

  
rhmc



Posts: 340
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,09:27   

Quote (Lou FCD @ Dec. 23 2009,10:18)
ah, the return of the zombie part 52.

yay.

yes.  something to amuse us during the solstice celebrations.

:)

  
ppb



Posts: 325
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,09:57   

Quote (Chayanov @ Dec. 23 2009,10:18)
Well, gee, in that verse you quoted Paul said Jesus will come back in his lifetime, and since Paul's dead and Jesus didn't come back, I don't see where the "out" is.

Oh yeah. And there's no evidence outside of the Bible that Jesus ever actually existed.

No, that whole "Paul is dead" thing is just a rumor.

--------------
"[A scientific theory] describes Nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense. And it agrees fully with experiment. So I hope you can accept Nature as She is - absurd."
- Richard P. Feynman

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,10:22   

Quote (FloydLee @ Dec. 23 2009,08:52)
But how do you KNOW that it's never going to happen?

But how do you KNOW that it's going to happen?

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Dr.GH



Posts: 2333
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,10:30   

Quote (ppb @ Dec. 23 2009,07:57)
Quote (Chayanov @ Dec. 23 2009,10:18)
Well, gee, in that verse you quoted Paul said Jesus will come back in his lifetime, and since Paul's dead and Jesus didn't come back, I don't see where the "out" is.

Oh yeah. And there's no evidence outside of the Bible that Jesus ever actually existed.

No, that whole "Paul is dead" thing is just a rumor.

Yeah, In fact Paul outlived John, and George.

--------------
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."

L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"

   
Chayanov



Posts: 289
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,10:39   

Quote (ppb @ Dec. 23 2009,09:57)
 
Quote (Chayanov @ Dec. 23 2009,10:18)
Well, gee, in that verse you quoted Paul said Jesus will come back in his lifetime, and since Paul's dead and Jesus didn't come back, I don't see where the "out" is.

Oh yeah. And there's no evidence outside of the Bible that Jesus ever actually existed.

No, that whole "Paul is dead" thing is just a rumor.

Of course, the Beatles were bigger than Jesus.

--------------
Help! Marxist literary critics are following me!

  
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,10:46   

That's easy. Just read the text. I consider it just another piece of BS but at face value, it is addressed to people alive at the time it was spoken or written. Some of them even will still be alive when the unbelievable events promised shall happen.

But with 2k years hindsight we know that not only are they all dead and gone a long time now, the events did not take place, and won't ever happen.

Since we now [B]know[B] that what was promised did not come true, the promise was a lie back then, and will forever remain a lie.

Jonas Gardell, author of  "Om Gud" (About God) and  "Om Jesus" (about Jesus) is honorary doctor at the Theological Faculty at Lunds University, Sweden.

He doesn't call it a lie but is otherwise of the same opinion: The events promised in 1 Thess 4:13-17 did not happen.

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
Badger3k



Posts: 861
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,10:56   

Quote (ppb @ Dec. 23 2009,09:57)
Quote (Chayanov @ Dec. 23 2009,10:18)
Well, gee, in that verse you quoted Paul said Jesus will come back in his lifetime, and since Paul's dead and Jesus didn't come back, I don't see where the "out" is.

Oh yeah. And there's no evidence outside of the Bible that Jesus ever actually existed.

No, that whole "Paul is dead" thing is just a rumor.

I heard he died in strawberry fields.  You sure it's a lie - if you read the bible backwards, it clearly says "I killed Paul"

--------------
"Just think if every species had a different genetic code We would have to eat other humans to survive.." : Joe G

  
Badger3k



Posts: 861
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,10:57   

Quote (Badger3k @ Dec. 23 2009,10:56)
Quote (ppb @ Dec. 23 2009,09:57)
Quote (Chayanov @ Dec. 23 2009,10:18)
Well, gee, in that verse you quoted Paul said Jesus will come back in his lifetime, and since Paul's dead and Jesus didn't come back, I don't see where the "out" is.

Oh yeah. And there's no evidence outside of the Bible that Jesus ever actually existed.

No, that whole "Paul is dead" thing is just a rumor.

I heard he died in strawberry fields.  You sure it's a lie - if you read the bible backwards, it clearly says "I killed Paul"

There should be a question mark at the end of that, dammitall!

--------------
"Just think if every species had a different genetic code We would have to eat other humans to survive.." : Joe G

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,11:19   

That verse seems a bit muddled to me. These seem less susceptible to interpretation:

http://bible.cc/mark/9-1.htm

Quote
And he said to them, "I tell you the truth, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the kingdom of God come with power."


http://bible.cc/luke/9-27.htm

Quote
I tell you the truth, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the kingdom of God."


--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
RDK



Posts: 229
Joined: Aug. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,11:19   

Quote (FloydLee @ Dec. 23 2009,08:52)
But how do you KNOW that it's never going to happen?

But Floyd, how do you KNOW that communist alien mutant cows aren't controlling your brain via a femtotech chip from the safety of a planet millions and millions of light years away?

Oh and they're invisible.

--------------
If you are not:
Leviathan
please Logout under Meta in the sidebar.

‘‘I was like ‘Oh my God! It’s Jesus on a banana!’’  - Lisa Swinton, Jesus-eating pagan

  
ppb



Posts: 325
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,13:00   

Quote (Chayanov @ Dec. 23 2009,11:39)
Quote (ppb @ Dec. 23 2009,09:57)
 
Quote (Chayanov @ Dec. 23 2009,10:18)
Well, gee, in that verse you quoted Paul said Jesus will come back in his lifetime, and since Paul's dead and Jesus didn't come back, I don't see where the "out" is.

Oh yeah. And there's no evidence outside of the Bible that Jesus ever actually existed.

No, that whole "Paul is dead" thing is just a rumor.

Of course, the Beatles were bigger than Jesus.

I have an inordinate fondness for Beatles.

--------------
"[A scientific theory] describes Nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense. And it agrees fully with experiment. So I hope you can accept Nature as She is - absurd."
- Richard P. Feynman

  
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,13:33   

Quote (Dr.GH @ Dec. 23 2009,10:30)
   
Quote (ppb @ Dec. 23 2009,07:57)
 No, that whole "Paul is dead" thing is just a rumor.

Yeah, In fact Paul outlived John, and George.

Hmm... Paul and Ringo... bass and drums... Entwhistle and Moon are gone... whaddaya think? Peter, Paul, Roger, and Ringo? Could work...

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
Robin



Posts: 1431
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,13:54   

Quote (fnxtr @ Dec. 23 2009,13:33)

Quote
Quote (Dr.GH @ Dec. 23 2009,10:30)
   
Quote (ppb @ Dec. 23 2009,07:57)
 No, that whole "Paul is dead" thing is just a rumor.

Yeah, In fact Paul outlived John, and George.

Hmm... Paul and Ringo... bass and drums... Entwhistle and Moon are gone... whaddaya think? Peter, Paul, Roger, and Ringo? Could work...


I don't know...both Pete and Paul would want to lead. Some bad juju there...

--------------
we IDists rule in design for the flagellum and cilium largely because they do look designed.  Bilbo

The only reason you reject Thor is because, like a cushion, you bear the imprint of the biggest arse that sat on you. Louis

  
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,14:09   

Quote (ppb @ Dec. 23 2009,13:00)
 
Quote (Chayanov @ Dec. 23 2009,11:39)
   
Quote (ppb @ Dec. 23 2009,09:57)
     
Quote (Chayanov @ Dec. 23 2009,10:18)
Well, gee, in that verse you quoted Paul said Jesus will come back in his lifetime, and since Paul's dead and Jesus didn't come back, I don't see where the "out" is.

Oh yeah. And there's no evidence outside of the Bible that Jesus ever actually existed.

No, that whole "Paul is dead" thing is just a rumor.

Of course, the Beatles were bigger than Jesus.

I have an inordinate fondness for Beatles.

Of course, beetles are bigger even with God than Jesus.

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,14:53   

If not, why did He make so many of them?

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
FloydLee



Posts: 577
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,15:21   

Quote
Well, gee, in that verse you quoted Paul said Jesus will come back in his lifetime, and since Paul's dead and Jesus didn't come back, I don't see where the "out" is.


Good!  At least you've offered a sincere answer to the question.  So let's look at the text again (and a little bit of context too) in 1 Thess. chapter 4 (New International Version):

[quote]13 Brothers, we do not want you to be ignorant about those who fall asleep, or to grieve like the rest of men, who have no hope.

14 We believe that Jesus died and rose again and so we believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in him.

15 According to the Lord's own word, we tell you that we who are still alive, who are left till the coming of the Lord, will certainly not precede those who have fallen asleep.

16 For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first.

17 After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever.

18 Therefore encourage each other with these words. [quote]

Notice first, regarding the text, that Paul never says anything about Jesus returning within Paul's own lifetime (or anyone else's) in this specific text.

Notice secondly, regarding the context, what Paul said in the very next chapter (chap. 5):

Quote
"Now, brothers, about times and dates we do not need to write to you, for you know very well that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night."


"A thief in the night", Paul says.  Unexpected and sudden. So both the text and context are clear:  Paul does NOT know when Jesus will appear.  

Paul is NOT claiming that Jesus will return within his lifetime or within the lifetimes of his readers.  He ALSO doesn't say that it won't happen that way either.  It's not up to him to say either way, and he doesn't.

Furthermore, The context clearly shows that Paul gave this brief information about the Rapture, with the explicit purpose of helping the Thessalonian Christians to hang on to their hope in God when faced with death, either their own, or of friends or family in Christ.  Paul's purpose was NOT to claim that Jesus was coming back in Paul's lifetime or anyone else's.  

Indeed, as a follower of Jesus, Paul was in no position to state any dates anyway, for even Jesus clearly specified that no human knew the time when He would appear.

Quote
But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels in heaven, but my Father only. (Matt. 24:36-44)


******

So when you look at this information, it becomes clear that Paul is NOT saying that Jesus would return in the Rapture during Paul's lifetime.  For Paul (and his readers), it was maybe si, maybe no.  But what was certain was that Jesus WOULD return and the Rapture would take place unexpectedly and sudden.  

Therefore there isn't any rational reason to refer to the text regarding the Rapture as a "lie".  It COULD happen.  Tonight.  2010.  2100. You and I simply don't know.

So here's the kicker: either you're prepared right this minute for Jesus' Return and all its implications--like today, like right now--or you are not.

If your honest answer is "I'm not ready"---then what do you intend to DO about it?

Quote
"Remember what it says: 'Today when you hear his voice, don't harden your hearts as Israel did when they rebelled.'"  (Heb. 3:15, NLT)


FloydLee

  
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,15:32   

Quote
"A thief in the night", Paul says.  Unexpected and sudden. So both the text and context are clear:  Paul does NOT know when Jesus will appear.  

Nothing we can do about it; the bible is ambiguous! But when it has been said that this is going to happen while some of you are still alive, a statement that about "unexpected and sudden" doesn't override that, does it?

When you are dead, everything(or nothing) is unexpected or sudden....

No amount of fancy interpretation can nullify a promise given: Some of you will stille be alive when this happens. Is that too difficult to understand? Do you need a course in how to use your brain?

I suggest you find someone else to debate this with. As far as I am concerned, unless you can prove it is true, my claim that it is false stands. It can't be both, do you understand that?

Do you claim that it doesn't say what it says?

Sigh.

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
FloydLee



Posts: 577
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 23 2009,15:37   

Quote
Of course, the Beatles were bigger than Jesus.

John Lennon's famous declaration, of course.

Btw, this is the same John Lennon who privately asked for spiritual help from the late evangelist Oral Roberts.  

Rev. Roberts sent a private reply to Lennon.  The media apparently never found out about this.  Would you like to know exactly what that reply was, and would you lke to find out what happened to Lennon afterwards?  

If so, please check this out:

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/januaryweb-only/001-22.0.html

Floyd Lee

  
  634 replies since Sep. 09 2009,12:17 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (22) < ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]