Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Uncommonly Dense Thread 5

Pages: (527) < ... 242 243 244 245 246 [247] 248 249 250 251 252 ... >

fnxtr Posts: 3504 Joined: June 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 24 2016,22:15    Quote (k.e.. @ Oct. 24 2016,08:42) Quote (KevinB @ Oct. 24 2016,18:34) Quote (k.e.. @ Oct. 24 2016,10:29)     Quote (Bob O'H @ Oct. 24 2016,18:07)     Quote (sparc @ Oct. 24 2016,02:11) Deepest sock ever?         Quote 12 Truth Will Set You FreeOctober 20, 2016 at 8:15 am REW @ 8: Good point. Casey Luskin is a true champion in the ID movement.         Quote 15 Truth Will Set You FreeOctober 20, 2016 at 8:44 am bornagain77 @ 14: Well done!         Quote 27 Truth Will Set You FreeOctober 21, 2016 at 5:47 am [...] You continue to do great work, bornagain77. [...]         Quote 29 Truth Will Set You FreeOctober 21, 2016 at 9:16 am Kairosficus @ 28: Good work, [...] Well, unless kf is actually k.e. You rotten swine! I would imagine that if you really were "kairosficus" you wouldn't give a fig! If I was kf I'd be over at Magenta's place enjoying banana daiquiris  instead of drawing vogon invasion maps. I was always more partial to Columbia, me own self. -------------- "[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory "Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

Ptaylor Posts: 1180 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2016,00:40    I'm disappointed. I heard of Jack Chick's death a good 12 hours ago, and still no mention of this at UD. -------------- We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.” -PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

fusilier Posts: 252 Joined: Feb. 2003 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2016,06:41    Quote (Ptaylor @ Oct. 25 2016,01:40) I'm disappointed. I heard of Jack Chick's death a good 12 hours ago, and still no mention of this at UD. :( C'mon, you know it's  All Science All the Time over at UD, so why would religious tracts be on the table? Oh wait, it's nearly Halloween, just time enough to get a couple of gross of tracts to hand out to the kiddies.... -------------- fusilier James 2:24

Cubist Posts: 558 Joined: Oct. 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2016,06:43    Quote (Ptaylor @ Oct. 25 2016,00:40) I'm disappointed. I heard of Jack Chick's death a good 12 hours ago, and still no mention of this at UD. :( Why would there be? Jack Chick was a Christian who proselytized in comic-book format; so far, UD is all science. There is clearly no reason at all for any of UD's contributors or regular posters to mention Chick's death.

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2016,09:54    Quote (Cubist @ Oct. 25 2016,14:43) Quote (Ptaylor @ Oct. 25 2016,00:40) I'm disappointed. I heard of Jack Chick's death a good 12 hours ago, and still no mention of this at UD. :( Why would there be? Jack Chick was a Christian who proselytized in comic-book format; so far, UD is all science. There is clearly no reason at all for any of UD's contributors or regular posters to mention Chick's death. They'll all follow him to a deadline obituary. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Henry J Posts: 5786 Joined: Mar. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2016,11:06    Re "Oh wait, it's nearly Halloween, just time enough to get a couple of gross of tracts to hand out to the kiddies.... " Or, hand out some gross tracts...

timothya Posts: 280 Joined: April 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 26 2016,05:13    Kairosfocus quotes Corinthians 1:18 in the UD thread about the Columbine movie: "“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the discernment of the discerning I will thwart.” Standard argument in favour of anti-intellectualism in this day and age. I hope this sort of rubbish doesn't fly in the Carribean. -------------- "In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal loaves of bread." Anatole France

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 26 2016,07:40    Quote (timothya @ Oct. 26 2016,13:13) Kairosfocus quotes Corinthians 1:18 in the UD thread about the Columbine movie: "“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the discernment of the discerning I will thwart.” Standard argument in favour of anti-intellectualism in this day and age. I hope this sort of rubbish doesn't fly in the Carribean. Is Trump running for Mayor of Manjack Heights? -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

fnxtr Posts: 3504 Joined: June 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 26 2016,08:58    -------------- "[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory "Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

Bob O'H Posts: 2564 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 26 2016,14:37    Help! Help! I'm being oppressed! Quote The paper says what it says. I’ll let the readers, and administrator, decide who is being forthright. If you persist in pestering me I will request you be banned for trolling. -------------- It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

Woodbine Posts: 1218 Joined: June 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 26 2016,14:49    I think Batsh^t found 'moreover' on his word-of-the-day bog roll - and has yet to return.

paragwinn Posts: 539 Joined: Mar. 2008 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2016,00:33    Quote (Bob O'H @ Oct. 26 2016,12:37) Help! Help! I'm being oppressed!     Quote The paper says what it says. I’ll let the readers, and administrator, decide who is being forthright. If you persist in pestering me I will request you be banned for trolling. Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system! We must convene a council of the anarcho-syndicalist commune! Who is the executive officer this week? -------------- All women build up a resistance [to male condescension]. Apparently, ID did not predict that. -Kristine 4-19-11 F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc. The whole thing is F/N ridiculous -Seversky on KF footnote fetish 8-20-11 Sigh. Really Bill? - Barry Arrington

Lethean Posts: 292 Joined: Jan. 2014 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2016,01:10    Quote (Bob O'H @ Oct. 26 2016,14:37) Help! Help! I'm being oppressed!       Quote The paper says what it says. I’ll let the readers, and administrator, decide who is being forthright. If you persist in pestering me I will request you be banned for trolling. -------------- "So I'm a pretty unusual guy and it's not stupidity that has gotten me where I am. It's brilliance." "My brain is one of the very few independent thinking brains that you've ever met. And that's a thing of wonder to you and since you don't understand it you criticize it." ~Dave Hawkins~

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2016,08:08    Quote (paragwinn @ Oct. 27 2016,08:33) Quote (Bob O'H @ Oct. 26 2016,12:37) Help! Help! I'm being oppressed!     Quote The paper says what it says. I’ll let the readers, and administrator, decide who is being forthright. If you persist in pestering me I will request you be banned for trolling. Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system! We must convene a council of the anarcho-syndicalist commune! Who is the executive officer this week? -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Ptaylor Posts: 1180 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2016,16:14    Heh - the only remotely science-oriented comment over there in the past few hours has come from DillyGill, who is seriously doubting that NASA has landed a craft on Mars. UD link -------------- We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.” -PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

stevestory Posts: 13407 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2016,17:13    from ptaylor's link:   Quote 1 DillyGillOctober 27, 2016 at 7:08 am How do we know they have ever landed on Mars? Evolutionists are big on calling into question witness testimony. So who exactly is witnessing for the Mars landings? The authority of NASA of course. Why should we trust them? Are they under threat of death to tell it how it is? I don’t doubt we shoot rockets upwards. I don’t doubt people are employed to monitor the rover who really think it is on Mars, I don’t doubt they made the thing. I doubt very much that it is Mars though. www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7D3S9u6S5Y What the fuck. Edited by stevestory on Oct. 27 2016,18:32

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2016,17:24    Quote (Ptaylor @ Oct. 27 2016,14:14) Heh - the only remotely science-oriented comment over there in the past few hours has come from DillyGill, who is seriously doubting that NASA has landed a craft on Mars. UD link Crank magnetism at its finest. I suppose after building that gigantic movie set for the fake moon landings, NASA might as well repurpose it as fake Mars. -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

Henry J Posts: 5786 Joined: Mar. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2016,20:13    When somebody finally invents a fusion rocket (or whatever) that can accelerate at 1g straight for several days*, so that somebody can reach Mars in under 3 days with good timing (or a week or so with bad timing), would these people believe it then? *(Accelerate 1st half of trip, decelerate 2nd half)

stevestory Posts: 13407 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2016,21:25    Quote (Henry J @ Oct. 27 2016,21:13) When somebody finally invents a fusion rocket (or whatever) that can accelerate at 1g straight for several days*, so that somebody can reach Mars in under 3 days with good timing (or a week or so with bad timing), would these people believe it then? *(Accelerate 1st half of trip, decelerate 2nd half) well, remember this part: Quote I don’t doubt we shoot rockets upwards. I don’t doubt people are employed to monitor the rover who really think it is on Mars, I don’t doubt they made the thing. I doubt very much that it is Mars though. he thinks that all the scientists and engineers at NASA are all hoodwinked. Somebody's tricken em. Do you know how dumb +/ clueless you have to be to think that scenario doesn't have any obvious problems? So who knows what he's capable of believing, and for how long.

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 27 2016,23:03    Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 27 2016,21:25) Quote (Henry J @ Oct. 27 2016,21:13) When somebody finally invents a fusion rocket (or whatever) that can accelerate at 1g straight for several days*, so that somebody can reach Mars in under 3 days with good timing (or a week or so with bad timing), would these people believe it then? *(Accelerate 1st half of trip, decelerate 2nd half) well, remember this part:   Quote I don’t doubt we shoot rockets upwards. I don’t doubt people are employed to monitor the rover who really think it is on Mars, I don’t doubt they made the thing. I doubt very much that it is Mars though. he thinks that all the scientists and engineers at NASA are all hoodwinked. Somebody's tricken em. Do you know how dumb +/ clueless you have to be to think that scenario doesn't have any obvious problems? So who knows what he's capable of believing, and for how long. With a name of "DillyGill" I gotta believe it's one of us church burnin' ebola boys taking the piss with the UDiots. All with a nod to the late great Frilly Gilly.   -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

sparc Posts: 2088 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 28 2016,06:54    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Oct. 27 2016,23:03) Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 27 2016,21:25)   Quote (Henry J @ Oct. 27 2016,21:13) When somebody finally invents a fusion rocket (or whatever) that can accelerate at 1g straight for several days*, so that somebody can reach Mars in under 3 days with good timing (or a week or so with bad timing), would these people believe it then? *(Accelerate 1st half of trip, decelerate 2nd half) well, remember this part:   Quote I don’t doubt we shoot rockets upwards. I don’t doubt people are employed to monitor the rover who really think it is on Mars, I don’t doubt they made the thing. I doubt very much that it is Mars though. he thinks that all the scientists and engineers at NASA are all hoodwinked. Somebody's tricken em. Do you know how dumb +/ clueless you have to be to think that scenario doesn't have any obvious problems? So who knows what he's capable of believing, and for how long. With a name of "DillyGill" I gotta believe it's one of us church burnin' ebola boys taking the piss with the UDiots. All with a nod to the late great Frilly Gilly.   :) you beat me to it -------------- "[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God." - William Dembski -

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 28 2016,11:13    Quote (sparc @ Oct. 28 2016,04:54) Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Oct. 27 2016,23:03) Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 27 2016,21:25)   Quote (Henry J @ Oct. 27 2016,21:13) When somebody finally invents a fusion rocket (or whatever) that can accelerate at 1g straight for several days*, so that somebody can reach Mars in under 3 days with good timing (or a week or so with bad timing), would these people believe it then? *(Accelerate 1st half of trip, decelerate 2nd half) well, remember this part:     Quote I don’t doubt we shoot rockets upwards. I don’t doubt people are employed to monitor the rover who really think it is on Mars, I don’t doubt they made the thing. I doubt very much that it is Mars though. he thinks that all the scientists and engineers at NASA are all hoodwinked. Somebody's tricken em. Do you know how dumb +/ clueless you have to be to think that scenario doesn't have any obvious problems? So who knows what he's capable of believing, and for how long. With a name of "DillyGill" I gotta believe it's one of us church burnin' ebola boys taking the piss with the UDiots. All with a nod to the late great Frilly Gilly.   :) you beat me to it Hadn't thought of that. Moar!  Take it away, timothya: Quote You are absolutely correct, DillyGill. I took a close look that the pictures from the Mars Rover and found that ***they show exactly the same rocks as appear in the background of the Moon landing pictures***. Proof positive for anyone with eyes to see. If he isn't a sock, this is a rare (ivory-billed woodpecker rare) sighting of someone at UD actually doing research.  Barking-mad research, but it's a start. -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

ChemiCat Posts: 532 Joined: Nov. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 28 2016,12:25    Quote I don’t doubt we shoot rockets upwards. I don’t doubt people are employed to monitor the rover who really think it is on Mars, I don’t doubt they made the thing. I doubt very much that it is Mars though Of course it isn't Mars. I'm the one who replaced the grey dust with red dust on the Moon set and painted the rocks... Just a minute there's someone at the door.. back in a mo.....

timothya Posts: 280 Joined: April 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 28 2016,13:11    Quote (JohnW @ Oct. 28 2016,11:13) Quote (sparc @ Oct. 28 2016,04:54)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Oct. 27 2016,23:03)   Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 27 2016,21:25)     Quote (Henry J @ Oct. 27 2016,21:13) When somebody finally invents a fusion rocket (or whatever) that can accelerate at 1g straight for several days*, so that somebody can reach Mars in under 3 days with good timing (or a week or so with bad timing), would these people believe it then? *(Accelerate 1st half of trip, decelerate 2nd half) well, remember this part:       Quote I don’t doubt we shoot rockets upwards. I don’t doubt people are employed to monitor the rover who really think it is on Mars, I don’t doubt they made the thing. I doubt very much that it is Mars though. he thinks that all the scientists and engineers at NASA are all hoodwinked. Somebody's tricken em. Do you know how dumb +/ clueless you have to be to think that scenario doesn't have any obvious problems? So who knows what he's capable of believing, and for how long. With a name of "DillyGill" I gotta believe it's one of us church burnin' ebola boys taking the piss with the UDiots. All with a nod to the late great Frilly Gilly.   :) you beat me to it Hadn't thought of that. Moar!  Take it away, timothya:   Quote You are absolutely correct, DillyGill. I took a close look that the pictures from the Mars Rover and found that ***they show exactly the same rocks as appear in the background of the Moon landing pictures***. Proof positive for anyone with eyes to see. If he isn't a sock, this is a rare (ivory-billed woodpecker rare) sighting of someone at UD actually doing research.  Barking-mad research, but it's a start. I have always thought of irony as the finest type of humour. -------------- "In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal loaves of bread." Anatole France

Glen Davidson Posts: 1100 Joined: May 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 28 2016,14:15    Quote (timothya @ Oct. 28 2016,13:11) Quote (JohnW @ Oct. 28 2016,11:13)   Quote (sparc @ Oct. 28 2016,04:54)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Oct. 27 2016,23:03)     Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 27 2016,21:25)       Quote (Henry J @ Oct. 27 2016,21:13) When somebody finally invents a fusion rocket (or whatever) that can accelerate at 1g straight for several days*, so that somebody can reach Mars in under 3 days with good timing (or a week or so with bad timing), would these people believe it then? *(Accelerate 1st half of trip, decelerate 2nd half) well, remember this part:       Quote I don’t doubt we shoot rockets upwards. I don’t doubt people are employed to monitor the rover who really think it is on Mars, I don’t doubt they made the thing. I doubt very much that it is Mars though. he thinks that all the scientists and engineers at NASA are all hoodwinked. Somebody's tricken em. Do you know how dumb +/ clueless you have to be to think that scenario doesn't have any obvious problems? So who knows what he's capable of believing, and for how long. With a name of "DillyGill" I gotta believe it's one of us church burnin' ebola boys taking the piss with the UDiots. All with a nod to the late great Frilly Gilly.   :) you beat me to it Hadn't thought of that. Moar!  Take it away, timothya:   Quote You are absolutely correct, DillyGill. I took a close look that the pictures from the Mars Rover and found that ***they show exactly the same rocks as appear in the background of the Moon landing pictures***. Proof positive for anyone with eyes to see. If he isn't a sock, this is a rare (ivory-billed woodpecker rare) sighting of someone at UD actually doing research.  Barking-mad research, but it's a start. I have always thought of irony as the finest type of humour. Still, the rocks do look a lot alike in both places. I wonder if that mystery can ever be solved... Glen Davidson -------------- http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 28 2016,15:36    Quote (timothya @ Oct. 28 2016,11:11) Quote (JohnW @ Oct. 28 2016,11:13)   Quote (sparc @ Oct. 28 2016,04:54)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Oct. 27 2016,23:03)     Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 27 2016,21:25)       Quote (Henry J @ Oct. 27 2016,21:13) When somebody finally invents a fusion rocket (or whatever) that can accelerate at 1g straight for several days*, so that somebody can reach Mars in under 3 days with good timing (or a week or so with bad timing), would these people believe it then? *(Accelerate 1st half of trip, decelerate 2nd half) well, remember this part:       Quote I don’t doubt we shoot rockets upwards. I don’t doubt people are employed to monitor the rover who really think it is on Mars, I don’t doubt they made the thing. I doubt very much that it is Mars though. he thinks that all the scientists and engineers at NASA are all hoodwinked. Somebody's tricken em. Do you know how dumb +/ clueless you have to be to think that scenario doesn't have any obvious problems? So who knows what he's capable of believing, and for how long. With a name of "DillyGill" I gotta believe it's one of us church burnin' ebola boys taking the piss with the UDiots. All with a nod to the late great Frilly Gilly.   :) you beat me to it Hadn't thought of that. Moar!  Take it away, timothya:   Quote You are absolutely correct, DillyGill. I took a close look that the pictures from the Mars Rover and found that ***they show exactly the same rocks as appear in the background of the Moon landing pictures***. Proof positive for anyone with eyes to see. If he isn't a sock, this is a rare (ivory-billed woodpecker rare) sighting of someone at UD actually doing research.  Barking-mad research, but it's a start. I have always thought of irony as the finest type of humour. Feh.  I thought I'd seen that name before, but I couldn't remember where. Didn't one of the UD regulars turn out to be a 9/11 troofer, or am I misremembering? -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

stevestory Posts: 13407 Joined: Oct. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 28 2016,17:38    maybe. PaV's an HIV truther but since he's been pressed on it he's gone quiet.

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 28 2016,17:53    Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 28 2016,15:38) maybe. PaV's an HIV truther but since he's been pressed on it he's gone quiet. No, this was a few years ago, and I may be wrong.  UD isn't the only place I go to laugh at the silly people. -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 28 2016,21:02    Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 28 2016,22:15) Quote (timothya @ Oct. 28 2016,13:11) Quote (JohnW @ Oct. 28 2016,11:13)   Quote (sparc @ Oct. 28 2016,04:54)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Oct. 27 2016,23:03)     Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 27 2016,21:25)       Quote (Henry J @ Oct. 27 2016,21:13) When somebody finally invents a fusion rocket (or whatever) that can accelerate at 1g straight for several days*, so that somebody can reach Mars in under 3 days with good timing (or a week or so with bad timing), would these people believe it then? *(Accelerate 1st half of trip, decelerate 2nd half) well, remember this part:         Quote I don’t doubt we shoot rockets upwards. I don’t doubt people are employed to monitor the rover who really think it is on Mars, I don’t doubt they made the thing. I doubt very much that it is Mars though. he thinks that all the scientists and engineers at NASA are all hoodwinked. Somebody's tricken em. Do you know how dumb +/ clueless you have to be to think that scenario doesn't have any obvious problems? So who knows what he's capable of believing, and for how long. With a name of "DillyGill" I gotta believe it's one of us church burnin' ebola boys taking the piss with the UDiots. All with a nod to the late great Frilly Gilly.   :) you beat me to it Hadn't thought of that. Moar!  Take it away, timothya:     Quote You are absolutely correct, DillyGill. I took a close look that the pictures from the Mars Rover and found that ***they show exactly the same rocks as appear in the background of the Moon landing pictures***. Proof positive for anyone with eyes to see. If he isn't a sock, this is a rare (ivory-billed woodpecker rare) sighting of someone at UD actually doing research.  Barking-mad research, but it's a start. I have always thought of irony as the finest type of humour. Still, the rocks do look a lot alike in both places. I wonder if that mystery can ever be solved... Glen Davidson Quick, to the Design Lab Gordo. Just add a little CSI from this beaker and sprinkle some PPPS over the red herring then bake for 14 years. Viola! -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Henry J Posts: 5786 Joined: Mar. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 28 2016,23:48    Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 28 2016,13:15) Quote (timothya @ Oct. 28 2016,13:11) Quote (JohnW @ Oct. 28 2016,11:13)   Quote (sparc @ Oct. 28 2016,04:54)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Oct. 27 2016,23:03)     Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 27 2016,21:25)       Quote (Henry J @ Oct. 27 2016,21:13) When somebody finally invents a fusion rocket (or whatever) that can accelerate at 1g straight for several days*, so that somebody can reach Mars in under 3 days with good timing (or a week or so with bad timing), would these people believe it then? *(Accelerate 1st half of trip, decelerate 2nd half) well, remember this part:         Quote I don’t doubt we shoot rockets upwards. I don’t doubt people are employed to monitor the rover who really think it is on Mars, I don’t doubt they made the thing. I doubt very much that it is Mars though. he thinks that all the scientists and engineers at NASA are all hoodwinked. Somebody's tricken em. Do you know how dumb +/ clueless you have to be to think that scenario doesn't have any obvious problems? So who knows what he's capable of believing, and for how long. With a name of "DillyGill" I gotta believe it's one of us church burnin' ebola boys taking the piss with the UDiots. All with a nod to the late great Frilly Gilly.   :) you beat me to it Hadn't thought of that. Moar!  Take it away, timothya:     Quote You are absolutely correct, DillyGill. I took a close look that the pictures from the Mars Rover and found that ***they show exactly the same rocks as appear in the background of the Moon landing pictures***. Proof positive for anyone with eyes to see. If he isn't a sock, this is a rare (ivory-billed woodpecker rare) sighting of someone at UD actually doing research.  Barking-mad research, but it's a start. I have always thought of irony as the finest type of humour. Still, the rocks do look a lot alike in both places. I wonder if that mystery can ever be solved... Glen Davidson It is rock science, after all.

Pages: (527) < ... 242 243 244 245 246 [247] 248 249 250 251 252 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard