The whole truth
Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012
|
| Quote (Louis @ May 24 2012,13:59) | | Quote (rhmc @ May 24 2012,20:50) | | Quote (Schroedinger's Dog @ May 24 2012,11:53) | | So, still not answered, how did Abbie done fuck good? |
for something louis doesn't want to talk about, he sure spends a lot of time talking about it. |
Oh sorry, was I posting above my approved limit?
Am I talking about Elevatorgate? No.
Am I talking about talking about Elevatorgate with people I think incapable of talking about it sensibly? Yes.
Does this difference escape a simpleton like you? Yes.
Did I start this? No.
Did I refuse to accept my answer that I am fucked off to the back teeth with the topic and not bothering with certain people on the topic? No.
Are you just a pointless shit stain lacking both the intellectual ability and courage to do anything but snipe because your likkle fee fees are bruised? Why that would be a yes. How about you fuck off.
Got any other "clever" remarks? Go on. I'm sure I've done something you can whine about like the waste of flesh you are. Surely someone can come and make a really insightful remark about the amount of times I've said fuck or the length of my posts. You know, something substantial.
Fuck me, what a waste of space.
Louis |
Louis said:
"Am I talking about Elevatorgate? No.
Am I talking about talking about Elevatorgate with people I think incapable of talking about it sensibly? Yes."
So, you're being nitpicky on that point, but when rhmc said...
"srsly? ell oh fuckin' ell.
is that pz's version of "crossing the street" or is he just a chickenshit?
pretty funny. abbie could have some fun with that. i certainly would."
...you read something into his comments that no one with a clue would have done, and when rhmc pointed out that he "indicated nothing about your support or lack thereof for pz's position", which is true and honest, what did you do? Did you 'honestly' and 'sensibly' realize and admit that what you read into his words is wrong? Did you 'discuss' it 'honestly' and 'sensibly', or did you make an erroneous assumption and then blast him?
And then, when rhmc said...
"for something louis doesn't want to talk about, he sure spends a lot of time talking about it."
...how did you respond?
You like to be nitpicky when it comes to words, so let's take a nitpicky look at his words. He didn't specifically say that you are spending a lot of time talking about "Elevatorgate", and he didn't say that you are doing so in your recent comments in this thread on this site. And for all you know he was referring to the talking you've done about Abbie's fuckups, or elevatorgate, or talking about elevatorgate, or talking about 'Abbie's fuckups', or talking about talking about talking about talking, on this site and/or other sites, throughout the whole big stink about it all. He MAY have meant that you are talking a lot about elevatorgate, or Abbie's fuckups, and he MAY have meant that you are talking a lot about them here and now, but you don't know that. You could have asked him what he specifically meant, and you could have 'discussed' it honestly and sensibly but you instead assumed something, went on a rampage, and are acting like a joe g clone.
You obviously get thoroughly pissed when people 'assume' things or make comments that aren't what you think are nitpickingly accurate and honest in regard to your words and actions, but you're doing EXACTLY those things when you address others. For someone who nitpickingly expects others to perceive your words and actions with anal retentive precision and no assumptions, and who says they're so concerned with honest and sensible discussion, you've got a helluva a lot to learn about honestly, sensibly, and charitably perceiving and addressing others.
You would do well to ASK questions and be clear on what other people are saying before going off like an atom bomb, and when you make erroneous assumptions and it's clearly pointed out to you you'd be wise to admit your mistakes and not keep digging a hole.
It seems to me that there's a similarity in how you're responding and the way the woman in the elevator responded to that situation. Maybe you should both take up writing soap opera scripts.
I'll remind you that you have talked a lot about "Elevatorgate" and/or 'Abbie's fuckups', whatever they allegedly are, not only on this site but on other sites too. Just because you say that that's not what you're talking about right now doesn't mean that you aren't talking about them in some way right now or that you haven't talked a lot about them, including more specifically, on this site and others in the recent past.
FYI: I read some of the "Elevatorgate" stuff awhile back but haven't kept up with it and I don't remember who "Abbie" is (by name anyway). Based on what I read, my opinion is that the woman in the elevator is a paranoid drama queen. I can't imagine why a woman would get bent out of shape just because a guy invites her to his room for coffee, or a drink, or whatever it was that he offered. It's no wonder that many men won't approach women with friendly offers, even though many women wonder why men won't approach them, and want men to approach them (well, certain men anyway). Does anyone remember the skit on SNL with Tom Brady in briefs?
I can't help but wonder if the woman in the elevator would have been upset if the guy had been Tom Brady, or Pierce Brosnan, or Brad Pitt. And if it had been one of those guys or someone similar, and she had reacted the way she did, I wonder how different all the talk about the situation would be.
Overall, to me, she made a huge deal out of nothing, and should have kept the whole thing to herself. If that's all it takes for her to be offended and to make a public stink about it, then she has lead a very sheltered life and needs to get out more.
And since I'm stating some opinions I might as well state my opinion about FTB, or at least on what the initials "FTB" stand for: Banning people JUST for disagreeing is bullshit, and while I agree with some of the things PZ Meyers says I think that he is a hypocrite, a jerk, and a drama queen in some important ways.
Edited by The whole truth on May 24 2012,19:20
--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34
But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27
|
