Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > A reality check for "design theorists"

Mr_Christopher Posts: 1238 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Jan. 24 2006,05:54    Ok, Behe popularizes the notion of irreducible complexity back in the early/mid 1990s.  This was not an original idea, BWT, Behe forgot to credit the originator of the theory Behe claimed as his own.. Anyhow, since then Dembski has come out with a few theories that are dependent on Behe's.  In over 10 years the intelligent design cult still has yet to publish a single intelligent design peer reviewed data in any legitimate science journal. They have not improved upon or come up with any new ideas or any new evidence.  Behe's nutty ideas have been refuted time and time again.  They still cling to the "if it looks shiny and new, someone musta done it" theory. The Ministry of Truth (aka the "Discovery" Institute) continues to claim there are all these "design" theorists and "scientists" workin in labs and doing science.  In over a decade they have yet to provide a shred of evidence of a creator. They have had over a decade and they have yet to bring anything legitimate to the table.  When are they going to produce? -------------- Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

Charliecrs Posts: 4 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Jan. 24 2006,06:54    "The Ministry of Truth (aka the "Discovery" Institute) continues to claim there are all these "design" theorists and "scientists" workin in labs and doing science.  In over a decade they have yet to provide a shred of evidence of a creator." Lets be fair shall we. Over 150yrs there has bee 0 evdiences for evolution [Darwin-in]. My main problem with the theory is that its often repeated as Fact - but where are they? I mean we still have people 'quietly' looking for the transtional fossils that were supposed to be so aboundent. Yet when one is found that might fit the possibily of such evolutionist are quick to jum the gun and say we have the proof of evolution. While im saying okay you may of found one but how many other speice were there ? where are other millions ?. A closer examination of the one supposed t-from and do we have a raging debate & rebuttals. Charlie

Mr_Christopher Posts: 1238 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Jan. 24 2006,06:58    "Over 150yrs there has bee 0 evdiences for evolution [Darwin-in]. " Charlie, perhaps others here will waste their time chatting with you about evolution.  I have better things to do. best of luck to you and your intelligent design creationism cause. -------------- Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

JMax Posts: 12 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Jan. 24 2006,07:37    Here is a link to www.talkorigins.org     Please educate yourself No evidence for Macroevolution? Also a whole list of common misconceptions of anti-evolutionists Here

Mr_Christopher Posts: 1238 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Jan. 24 2006,07:54    My favorite objections to evolution from creationists include: 1) Why are there no half man half monkeys walking around? 2) No one was around 15 billion years ago so evolution requires faith and is therefore a religion 3) Why haven't all monkeys evolved into humans? 4) Evolution has never been proven 5) Piltdown man proves evolution is wrong And lastly, evolution is a theory in crisis... -------------- Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard