RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (4) < [1] 2 3 4 >   
  Topic: More good news< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Dr.GH



Posts: 2333
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 06 2008,21:53   

Home schooling is a major effort by the far-right to isolate childern from science education. Today in California, a State Appellate court ruled that home schooling parents in California must have valid teaching credentials.

From the LA Times,
Quote

Parents who lack teaching credentials cannot educate their children at home, according to a state appellate court ruling that is sending waves of fear through California's home schooling families.

Advocates for the families vowed to appeal the decision to the state Supreme Court. Enforcement until then appears unlikely, but if the ruling stands, home-schooling supporters say California will have the most regressive law in the nation.


The first burst of "Christian Academies" was in the early 1970s when  
desegregation laws had resulted in court cases forcing school race integration.  The "Christian" "Conservatives" quickly established seperate, segregated schools based on their "Christian" "Conservative" values.  They also began a campaign for "vouchers" to remove funding for public schools.  If the public schools would dare teach those "mudbloods" then Christian Conservatives should not pay for them.

It is not an accident that these "Christian Conservatives" are the core of the creationist movement.

The Libertarian wing of the far-right are also enemies of public education, but only for the purest of motives.  The same motives that promote clear cutting forests.  The same motives that oppose anti-racist labor laws.

--------------
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."

L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"

   
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,07:54   

Thank you, yes, this is a lovely little stay tuned story.

Too bad the reporter missed the obvious line, that the Creo's will "appeal to a higher authority".

Oh, well, probably a newbie assigned at this point.

I'm looking forward to a reporter with the "all hell breaks loose" story.

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
Dr.GH



Posts: 2333
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,08:57   

Hehheh.  Good.

--------------
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."

L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"

   
dheddle



Posts: 545
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,10:31   

Count me out of the glee over this one. This is simply a case, it seems to me, that you are delighted because something bad has happened to someone you don't like--the homeschooling families who tend to be religious. But this is just one more instance of the intervention of the omniscienct nanny state. And I suspect people who jump for joy when the state intervenes into the personal lives of citizens in "a good way" will be equally outraged if the state intervenes in a way that violates what they believe is a fundamental right.

I sent both my boys to public schools, but being devoutly religious I know probaby 50 or so families that homeschool their children. On average, in my experience, the home-scooled children are more prepared for college than the public school students, including in math and science. It is not unusual for a homeschooled kid to be doing calculus in about the ninth-grade age group. Yes, some (a surprising minority) will do the YEC/Bob-Jones science, but most use decent text books. (True, they won't teach evolution, but they won't teach creationism either--they will teach biology "factoids", parts of plants, ecosystems, etc., exactly what my kids got at the best public high school in New Hampshire.) There is no way that you can justify that clamping down on homeschooling is good because the students will now receive a better education: the data don't support it, nor the anecdotal evidence such as the well-known fact that some of the nation's most elite colleges recruit homeschooled students.

As for the credentials, that is a red herring. (This is, as almost anyone should be willing to admit, a union issue.) And especially when it comes to math and science. In personal experience, and also professionally through educational outreach from the national lab where I do my research, I have come across too many credentialed teachers who are math phobic and science phobic (and, of course, some outstanding teachers, but as far as math science goes, that's the exception) . There is no way that it is manifestly obvious that forcibly placing all the homeschooled students into their local public schools will result in their receiving a better scince/math education. No way.

So jump for joy that the fundies took a big loss, but don't pretend the reasons are pedgogical, because you can't make that case beyond platitudes. Nasty evidence like scores on standarized tests say otherwise. Just be honest and admit that you are delighted that the nanny state (this time at least) stuck it to someone you despise--and don't worry too much about who they stick it to next time.

So no, I don't think this is good news at all.

--------------
Mysticism is a rational enterprise. Religion is not. The mystic has recognized something about the nature of consciousness prior to thought, and this recognition is susceptible to rational discussion. The mystic has reason for what he believes, and these reasons are empirical. --Sam Harris

   
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,11:28   

I have been hesitant in my enthusiasm for homeschooling, but from what we're seeing at the museum I share Heddle's concerns - more and more kids are being homeschooled and they are tending to out-perform other students. With the internet resources out there, at least in relation to art databases, the curricula that are being constructed, at least in Minnesota and at least with regard to art, are quite good. Evolution and the age of the earth do come up with regard to our collection, and after a flurry of "We don't believe cats change into dogs" comments our ratings are "excellent" from homeschoolers.

So I'm taking a wait-and-see approach here. Remember that adage about good intentions. After what NCLB did to Minnesota schools, heretofore considered among the best in the nation, I'm cautious here about "credentials."

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,11:40   

Quote (dheddle @ Mar. 07 2008,08:31)
Count me out of the glee over this one. This is simply a case, it seems to me, that you are delighted because something bad has happened to someone you don't like--the homeschooling families who tend to be religious. But this is just one more instance of the intervention of the omniscienct nanny state. And I suspect people who jump for joy when the state intervenes into the personal lives of citizens in "a good way" will be equally outraged if the state intervenes in a way that violates what they believe is a fundamental right.

I see this as the court recognising the right of all children, regardless of who their parents are, to get an education.  The court is simply ruling that those who home-school their children need to know what they're doing, and be able to show that they know what they're doing.  If we changed a few words:

Quote
Parents who lack surgery credentials cannot remove their children's spleens at home, according to a state appellate court ruling that is sending waves of fear through California's home surgery families.

would it still be an "intervention of the omniscient nanny state"?

Quote (dheddle @ Mar. 07 2008,08:31)
I sent both my boys to public schools, but being devoutly religious I know probaby 50 or so families that homeschool their children. On average, in my experience, the home-scooled children are more prepared for college than the public school students, including in math and science. It is not unusual for a homeschooled kid to be doing calculus in about the ninth-grade age group. Yes, some (a surprising minority) will do the YEC/Bob-Jones science, but most use decent text books. (True, they won't teach evolution, but they won't teach creationism either--they will teach biology "factoids", parts of plants, ecosystems, etc., exactly what my kids got at the best public high school in New Hampshire.) There is no way that you can justify that clamping down on homeschooling is good because the students will now receive a better education: the data don't support it, nor the anecdotal evidence such as the well-known fact that some of the nation's most elite colleges recruit homeschooled students.

Clamping down on bad homeschooling is good because those students will (or at least should) now receive a better education.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,12:00   

I've heard much anecdotal support for the idea of homeschooling getting better results than public education.

I'd like to see the studies that show that, however.

I'm certainly in favor of the state ensuring that a parent-teacher knows his or her ass from a hole in the ground.  A parent who teaches their kids that the earth is 6000 years old, demonstrably does not.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
carlsonjok



Posts: 3326
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,12:09   

Quote (Lou FCD @ Mar. 07 2008,12:00)
I'm certainly in favor of the state ensuring that a parent-teacher knows his or her ass from a hole in the ground.  A parent who teaches their kids that the earth is 6000 years old, demonstrably does not.

Why should any home-school that teaches that be treated any separately than any of the private schools that do so?  The implication of your statement, whether it is what you intended or not, would be that all such private schools should be shut down, as well.  I can easily see that failing constitutional muster, presumably under the free exercise clause.

--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,12:27   

Quote (dheddle @ Mar. 07 2008,10:31)
Count me out of the glee over this one. This is simply a case, it seems to me, that you are delighted because something bad has happened to someone you don't like--the homeschooling families who tend to be religious. But this is just one more instance of the intervention of the omniscienct nanny state. And I suspect people who jump for joy when the state intervenes into the personal lives of citizens in "a good way" will be equally outraged if the state intervenes in a way that violates what they believe is a fundamental right.

I sent both my boys to public schools, but being devoutly religious I know probaby 50 or so families that homeschool their children. On average, in my experience, the home-scooled children are more prepared for college than the public school students, including in math and science. It is not unusual for a homeschooled kid to be doing calculus in about the ninth-grade age group. Yes, some (a surprising minority) will do the YEC/Bob-Jones science, but most use decent text books. (True, they won't teach evolution, but they won't teach creationism either--they will teach biology "factoids", parts of plants, ecosystems, etc., exactly what my kids got at the best public high school in New Hampshire.) There is no way that you can justify that clamping down on homeschooling is good because the students will now receive a better education: the data don't support it, nor the anecdotal evidence such as the well-known fact that some of the nation's most elite colleges recruit homeschooled students.

As for the credentials, that is a red herring. (This is, as almost anyone should be willing to admit, a union issue.) And especially when it comes to math and science. In personal experience, and also professionally through educational outreach from the national lab where I do my research, I have come across too many credentialed teachers who are math phobic and science phobic (and, of course, some outstanding teachers, but as far as math science goes, that's the exception) . There is no way that it is manifestly obvious that forcibly placing all the homeschooled students into their local public schools will result in their receiving a better scince/math education. No way.

So jump for joy that the fundies took a big loss, but don't pretend the reasons are pedgogical, because you can't make that case beyond platitudes. Nasty evidence like scores on standarized tests say otherwise. Just be honest and admit that you are delighted that the nanny state (this time at least) stuck it to someone you despise--and don't worry too much about who they stick it to next time.

So no, I don't think this is good news at all.

Oh come off it Heddle. Get off your high horse.

We have been living in what you call a Nanny State since this country was founded.  We are a nation of laws, not personalities (present administration exempted for some damn reason).

I have 3 kids.  2 went to a "Christian School" through 4 and 6 grade.  Youngest has only attended public schools.  They have all out-performed the norm, and the youngest is kicking some ass in math and science, and turned down attending gifted class at the local high school.  I am sure that there is actual science out there to back up my anecdotal story.

You wrote:  "Just be honest and admit that you are delighted that the nanny state (this time at least) stuck it to someone you despise--and don't worry too much about who they stick it to next time."

Yes I am delighted that the we, the people, stuck it to someone I despise!  It's called democracy.  If you don't like it, try a theocracy - I hear they have a nice one in Iran you might like.

edited:  I changed the metaphor?

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
Mr_Christopher



Posts: 1238
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,12:29   

OT sorta...I have never really understood what appears to the the left's (color me a lefty, fyi) opposition to vouchers.  Yeah it takes money away from public school, it also takes a body out of the public school system thus in theory the money "lost" would balance with one less body in class.

As a parent I have no desire for my children to step foot in a public high school.  We plan to send ours to private school instead and I'd love to get some of my school taxes refunded in the form of a voucher that I could use to help pay for their private school education.

Just sayin'...

edit: hey heddle watch who you color "gleeful" over this homeschool thing.  Some, like me, could care less about the home school "system".  I am neither gleeful nor concerned.

--------------
Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,12:35   

Quote (Mr_Christopher @ Mar. 07 2008,12:29)
OT sorta...I have never really understood what appears to the the left's (color me a lefty, fyi) opposition to vouchers.  Yeah it takes money away from public school, it also takes a body out of the public school system thus in theory the money "lost" would balance with one less body in class.

As a parent I have no desire for my children to step foot in a public high school.  We plan to send ours to private school instead and I'd love to get some of my school taxes refuned in the form of a voucher that I could use to help pay for their private school education.

Just sayin'...

edit: hey heddle watch who you color "gleeful" over this homeschool thing.  Some, like me, could care less about the home school "system".  I am neither gleeful nor concerned.

Private High School in my area: $9,400.

http://www.viator.k12.il.us/prospects/finance.htm

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
dheddle



Posts: 545
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,12:40   

J-Dog,

Quote
Yes I am delighted that the we, the people, stuck it to someone I despise!  It's called democracy.  If you don't like it, try a theocracy - I hear they have a nice one in Iran you might like.


My friend, I'm somewhat disappointed. I argue that ending homeschooling would not obviously, by a long shot, result in improved education for those students. That is perhaps debatable.  But you tell me that if I don't like it I should try living in the theocracy of Iran. That seems well below your argumentative standards, which I have come to see as, while often caustic, nevertheless almost universally clever and amusing. Go live in Iran? --- America, love it or leave it? Really, now.

P.S. I feel compelled to point out that I'm a Baptist, and we make a credible claim to having introduced to the western world the modern concept of separation of church and state. The last place I'd want to live in is a theocracy.

Mr. Christopher,

Understood.

--------------
Mysticism is a rational enterprise. Religion is not. The mystic has recognized something about the nature of consciousness prior to thought, and this recognition is susceptible to rational discussion. The mystic has reason for what he believes, and these reasons are empirical. --Sam Harris

   
Mr_Christopher



Posts: 1238
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,12:40   

Quote (J-Dog @ Mar. 07 2008,12:35)
Quote (Mr_Christopher @ Mar. 07 2008,12:29)
OT sorta...I have never really understood what appears to the the left's (color me a lefty, fyi) opposition to vouchers.  Yeah it takes money away from public school, it also takes a body out of the public school system thus in theory the money "lost" would balance with one less body in class.

As a parent I have no desire for my children to step foot in a public high school.  We plan to send ours to private school instead and I'd love to get some of my school taxes refuned in the form of a voucher that I could use to help pay for their private school education.

Just sayin'...

edit: hey heddle watch who you color "gleeful" over this homeschool thing.  Some, like me, could care less about the home school "system".  I am neither gleeful nor concerned.

Private High School in my area: $9,400.

http://www.viator.k12.il.us/prospects/finance.htm

One of the schools I have in mind for my daughter runs closer to 12k per year.  

Yeah I'm all for vouchers :-)

--------------
Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

  
Ra-Úl



Posts: 93
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,12:41   

My son, now 18, was home schooled because his mother thought the public school environment was turning him into a little beast; she though his dislexia was not being properly addressed, also. The result is not an astonishingly accomplished student, but a well-adjusted young man. Heddle's example of students doing vcalculus at a ninth grade age, seems to me something done by parents who both value mathematics and who know calculus. Tom is not science oriented, but Tom's mother and I both know mathematics and science, specifically human paleontology and osteology, and he has a good grasp of biology. His main accomplishements are in art and language: his writing is exemplary, for a young person who learned to read around twelve, his vocabulary extensive and precise. He reads his work in public, he blogs his drawings and stories, and will go to college to work on both. Considering the often casual job we did with him, I think most of the credit goes to a wilfull but curious boy who was not really adedicated student, but who came out of this ahead of his age group in language, and at least at his age group in social studies, math and science. It takes more dedication than I had, but his mom did not work for years to ensure his instruction. She took education courses at a local university, and had a school teacher friend help with his curriculum. I have friends who home schooled their children because thei lived in isolated areas, and who have gotten their children into Ivy League schools. They are liberals, Christian but not fundamentalists, and accept modern science. Not all home schoolers are reactionary science deniers, and some become able teachers even in areas that are not their main strengths.

Ra-Úl

--------------
Beauty is that which makes us desperate. - P Valery

  
Dr.GH



Posts: 2333
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,12:44   

My glee is that some standards are going to be enforced.  

You must be able to have a historical and social perspective.  Historically, public education, and the labor union movement have been the strongest forces for social equality in the USA.  Social inequality is rampant in societies that disallow poor people education along with lack of basic nutrition and health care.  

Wealthy families certainly can provide better health care, and better educational opportunities for their children.  They also buy them out of trouble- "rehab" instead of felony convictions for drug use.  However, public schools can provide a solid basic education along with some nutritional and medical support.  I don't even care if the poor childern are religious right, in fact many will be.  The ruling yesterday in California was the result of a physical abuse case in which the family court judge discovered that the other childern were not being educated.  The wealthy sponsors of the anti-school movement are the same southern racists that control the Republican party today, a result of school desegregation, and Nixon's "southern strategy" in the 1970s.

So one source of glee is that anything that attacks public education attacks social justice.

The larger social picture is that a well educated public is the most critical factor in preservering what is left of the Constitution, and is essential for making more rational choices about scientific research goals and responding to such things as global warming, HIV-AIDS, etc.  I would other wise not care if the religious extremists on the creationist fringe isolated themselves, and doomed their childern to sweeping and shoveling.  (Or journalism).

There is no question that well educated, well motivated and economically well off parents will be excellent home schoolers.  I would rather see them involved with their community.  I would rather see their knowledge and enthusiasm helping more than just their childern.  (More of that social justice thing).

Edited to add: Several people have observed that they are now for vouchers.   Of course- why pay for the education of other peoples childern.  We have no childern and I demand all my taxes back that paid for your brats.  You breeders have used the roads and parks more than I do, I want that money back too.  Fair play?

Edited by Dr.GH on Mar. 07 2008,10:50

--------------
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."

L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"

   
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,12:57   

Heddle - Sorry to disappoint you, I will try to do better in the future!  I was attempting to take your argument to it's nth degree, and as an action-oriented kind of guy, proposed a fair and balanced, win-win solution.

Christopher - That's a lot of fund-raising dude!  (Does that include the uniforms BTW?)

Ra-Ui - Congratulations - you should feel proud - our kid's success is what it is all about, and I think you had to work extra hard to make it come out okay.  Good on you.

Doc GH - Yeah.  I hear you - we do like the parks - thanks for chipping in - I can send you pictures of us smiling in parks all across the country - where's your closest park?

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
Mr_Christopher



Posts: 1238
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,13:07   

Dr G, just to be clear, *I* don't have an issue paying school taxes (i.e. educating other people's kids) I'd just love it if I could get some education money to go towards my own childrens private education.

I don't see that happening and I'm not losing any sleep over it.  The bottom line is I am not relying or nor expecting the state to educate my children.

--------------
Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

  
bystander



Posts: 301
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,14:46   

I agree with David and I don't think that this is a good idea. I think a better idea would be to recognise homeschooled kids officially and enforce a ciriculum on the kids. This means that the homeschoolers can teach any crackpot things they want but they must also teach a minimum of english, math, science etc.
You would do this be having standardized testing every couple of years.
This happens in Australia with homeschooled kids and private schools. They have to teach the ciriculum first which includes evolution before anything else.

  
Amadan



Posts: 1337
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,15:53   

I'm with the nay-sayers on this one.

Here in Ireland the Constitution recognises parents as the primary educators of their children. Now while that is historically grounded in Catholic doctrine, it is a position I support. In fact, it simply recognises reality.

Legally, it doesn't mean that parents can just opt their kids out of education. In fact, home-schooling here requires approval of standards etc much as the California judgment seems to. However, that is not assessed simply by reference to a teaching qualification, which would be a disproportionate barrier. Instead, the parents have to show that the curriculum and methods they use are good enough, and the kids are periodically assessed by the Dept of Education.

--------------
"People are always looking for natural selection to generate random mutations" - Densye  4-4-2011
JoeG BTW dumbass- some variations help ensure reproductive fitness so they cannot be random wrt it.

   
PennyBright



Posts: 78
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,16:22   

Hrmphh.  I think CA is taking it too far to demand that homeschooling parents have the same teachers credentials as public school teachers -- teaching your own child/children is a different kind of pedagogy then teaching a large group of unrelated children from varied backgrounds.   I don't know what degree of state oversight existed before, though,  so it may or may not be an improvement on the earlier situation.

Personally,  I like the OH regulations fairly well though I think they wimp out on curriculum issues by allowing the exception

"...home education shall not be required to include any concept, topic, or practice that is in conflict with the sincerely held religious beliefs of the parent..."

However,  OH homeschoolers are overseen by a certified teacher who assesses the childrens skill yearly and reports to the local superintendent of schools.   I'd like to see 'assessment' better defined then it is currently - right now it is *very* easy to get someone to rubber stamp assessment forms.   I wish they were a bit more rigorous.

I do wish to point out that the view of homeschoolers as wholly motivated by religion is a broad (and necessarily inaccurate) generalization.   It's just that we secular homeschoolers are a quiet minority in the homeschooling movement,  and spend most of our time on things like science museums, classical theatre and camping, rather then political activism.  I'd estimate that our local homeschooling community is about 85% religiously driven.

For a decent overview of the research on homeschooling, see the research bibliography at Nels Tomlinson's website: http://geocities.com/nelstomlinson/research.bibliography.html  It's been a few years since he's updated it,  but it's a fairly comprehensive collection of info about the research out there, and some relevant case law for those in the US.  Bias note - Nels is a homeschooler.   However I've seen no evidence to suggest that he's left out relevant research that may be negative to homeschoolers - if you know of any,  let me know,  and I'll be sure to include it in the future when I reference his site.

--------------
Conversation should be pleasant without scurrility, witty without affectation, free without indecency, learned without conceitedness, novel without falsehood. - Shakespeare (reputedly)

  
Assassinator



Posts: 479
Joined: Nov. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,16:50   

Quote
There is no question that well educated, well motivated and economically well off parents will be excellent home schoolers.  I would rather see them involved with their community.  I would rather see their knowledge and enthusiasm helping more than just their childern.  (More of that social justice thing).

I agree with that, although I think that parents can never be real honest educators for there children. But it's stupid to think you can ignore parents in education, and parents who know what they're doing should be involved with school (homework assignments, extra lessons outside school, workshops etc). But ofcourse, only parents who know what they're doing. Most parents I know and see around here are FAR from qualified to teach stuff, and that doesn't have anything to do with religion (except for the religious-extremist part of the population from the village I live in), they simply don't know enough.
In the end, it's not about what the parents want, it's about what the kids want. Let them explore, discover, make own choices and let them learn from mistakes.

  
Dr.GH



Posts: 2333
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,22:01   

Quote
Doc GH - Yeah.  I hear you - we do like the parks - thanks for chipping in - I can send you pictures of us smiling in parks all across the country - where's your closest park?
 Hey, the pics would be great!

We have a single lot (40x100 feet) city park two blocks away.  Slides and swings for the little ones.  We have lots of apartment houses in the neighborhood, and the kids have very few places to play.  There are two quite large parks on the bluffs overlooking the harbor, and down by the river channel there is a large city park (land owned actually by the water district) where the little league baseball, and youth socker league play.

--------------
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."

L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"

   
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 07 2008,23:02   

Quote (dheddle @ Mar. 07 2008,11:31)
True, they won't teach evolution, but they won't teach creationism either--they will teach biology "factoids", parts of plants, ecosystems, etc., exactly what my kids got at the best public high school in New Hampshire.) There is no way that you can justify that clamping down on homeschooling is good because the students will now receive a better education: the data don't support it, nor the anecdotal evidence such as the well-known fact that some of the nation's most elite colleges recruit homeschooled students.

Determining the relative effectiveness of homeschooling is probably impossible, given the fact that parents who home school self-select along several dimensions (motivation to home-school, felt sense of competence TO home school, time and resources, etc.). A randomized trial isn't going to happen. Suffice it to say that the data (as reported by Heddle) indicates that those who do self-select seem to do an adequate job.

Vis the watered down content of the public presentation of biology, that has a long history nationwide, and surely occurred in response to creationist/fundamentalist pressures, and the desire on the part of school systems to avoid conflict since Scopes (which was a defeat for education, not a victory). The fact that fundamentalism/creationism has managed to impair science education and advance ignorance in both private and public venues is nothing to celebrate.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 08 2008,00:43   

Isn't there some social retardation that occurs with homeschooling? I may be wrong.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
dheddle



Posts: 545
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 08 2008,06:36   

Richard,

Quote
Isn't there some social retardation that occurs with homeschooling? I may be wrong.


Richard, I am not sure whether you are joking or not, but I'll answer as if you were serious and I'll answer anecdotally.

In my experience home-schooled kids socialize just fine. They are, I'm sure you know, not recluses. They get a lot of exposure to other kids either by extracurricular activities (you probably know, by virtue of the fact that their parents are still paying taxes, in most states they can be in the school orchestra, Latin club, etc.) They also tend to be part of home-schooled groups that organize group activities and, for the younger kids, playtimes. And finally they tend to be members of churches and church youth groups.

Are some of them weird? Yes indeed. Surely, however, we'd agree that a lot of kids in public school are weird.

I think it is a myth that they are social misfits.

Reciprocating Bill,

Quote
Vis the watered down content of the public presentation of biology, that has a long history nationwide, and surely occurred in response to creationist/fundamentalist pressures, and the desire on the part of school systems to avoid conflict since Scopes (which was a defeat for education, not a victory). The fact that fundamentalism/creationism has managed to impair science education and advance ignorance in both private and public venues is nothing to celebrate.


That’s a fair point. That science education among home-schoolers  being “as bad” as the public school science education is nothing to celebrate. But let’s separate two reasons why public school science education is bad.

1) Public schools, because of low pay, have trouble recruiting (in general—there are of course glorious exceptions) competent math and science teachers—who in most cases can earn twice as much or more in industry. This is a congenital defect. If you fix this problem then you will presumably fix it by improving public schools across the board, and at that time fewer parents will opt for home schooling.

2) The science curriculum is bad in the public schools, in part due to the influence of creationists in the community. This is the point you are making, I think. That if we did have a good biology curriculum in the public schools, then the public schools could leap ahead of the home schools. But I don’t think so—because what the state often does (and should do) is mandate that the homeschoolers pass a standardized test that is based on the state’s approved curriculum. If a hefty evolution content is added to the curriculum, then the homeschoolers would have to study that content and pass the test. One could say “yeah but their parents will be telling them just study this ‘crap’ to pass the test” and that would be true and besides the point. Parents have always been allowed to tell their kids what they think is crap. And it would also conveniently ignore the fact that a great deal of public schooling involves “studying for the (standardized) test.”

--------------
Mysticism is a rational enterprise. Religion is not. The mystic has recognized something about the nature of consciousness prior to thought, and this recognition is susceptible to rational discussion. The mystic has reason for what he believes, and these reasons are empirical. --Sam Harris

   
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 08 2008,07:11   

Quote (dheddle @ Mar. 08 2008,07:36)
1) Public schools, because of low pay, have trouble recruiting (in general—there are of course glorious exceptions) competent math and science teachers—who in most cases can earn twice as much or more in industry. This is a congenital defect. If you fix this problem then you will presumably fix it by improving public schools across the board, and at that time fewer parents will opt for home schooling.

Of course, it is the same general political strata (the religious right) that both advocates home schooling and opposes "government schools." They seek to impair public education - e.g. attempts to eliminate the Department of Education, oppose taxation and/or support regressive tax codes, establish voucher programs, etc. They've been first in line to block means to substantial nationwide improvement of public education through, for example, increased teacher salaries to attract better talent, reduced class size, etc.
         
Quote
2) The science curriculum is bad in the public schools, in part due to the influence of creationists in the community. This is the point you are making, I think. That if we did have a good biology curriculum in the public schools, then the public schools could leap ahead of the home schools. But I don’t think so—because what the state often does (and should do) is mandate that the homeschoolers pass a standardized test that is based on the state’s approved curriculum. If a hefty evolution content is added to the curriculum, then the homeschoolers would have to study that content and pass the test.

Let's do it. The religious right has been a drag on education in all settings. So I don't need public education to "leap ahead" of home schooling - let them leap together. If it improves the science education children in home schooled and private settings, that would be great too.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
philbert



Posts: 20
Joined: Feb. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 08 2008,07:40   

Quote (carlsonjok @ Mar. 07 2008,12:09)
Quote (Lou FCD @ Mar. 07 2008,12:00)
I'm certainly in favor of the state ensuring that a parent-teacher knows his or her ass from a hole in the ground.  A parent who teaches their kids that the earth is 6000 years old, demonstrably does not.

Why should any home-school that teaches that be treated any separately than any of the private schools that do so?  The implication of your statement, whether it is what you intended or not, would be that all such private schools should be shut down, as well.  I can easily see that failing constitutional muster, presumably under the free exercise clause.

I'd happily bite this bullet and say that, yes, the private schools should also be shut down. The philosopher Stephen Law has a series of blog posts on this topic, and advocates a similar conclusion, essentially arguing from equality concerns - and noting the unacceptability of letting so much turn on the 'luck' of being born to some parents or others.

So far as the "free exercise" line of arguments go in favour of homeschooling (and private schools), I think they've got a fairly obvious flaw: the classic (and sane) limit of any person's liberties is the liberties of someone else. A parent's "free exercise" doesn't extend to determining the lives of other people just because those other people happen to be their children.

  
carlsonjok



Posts: 3326
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 08 2008,08:46   

Quote (philbert @ Mar. 08 2008,07:40)
 
Quote (carlsonjok @ Mar. 07 2008,12:09)
 Why should any home-school that teaches that be treated any separately than any of the private schools that do so?  The implication of your statement, whether it is what you intended or not, would be that all such private schools should be shut down, as well.  I can easily see that failing constitutional muster, presumably under the free exercise clause.

I'd happily bite this bullet and say that, yes, the private schools should also be shut down. The philosopher Stephen Law has a series of blog posts on this topic, and advocates a similar conclusion, essentially arguing from equality concerns - and noting the unacceptability of letting so much turn on the 'luck' of being born to some parents or others.

Oh dear God, I don't even know how to say this diplomatically, but having read some of Law's justification all I can say is that it is a huge pile of rubbish.  While picking a few quotes out to encapsulate a position is inherently problematic, I think the following summarizes his argument.
 
Quote
However, it is clear, is it not, that the statistics revealing how the mere 7 percent who are privately educated come to dominate the high status professions strongly suggest that private education has a powerful effect when it comes to enhancing the life chances of those lucky few?

and
 
Quote
And by significantly boosting your own kids' life chances, you do inevitably restrict the life chances of other kids.

So, his argument is essentially that private schools must be banned because they are too good at what they do. Ignoring for a moment that we are talking about the opposite situation of private/home schools being poor at providing an education,  I have to state my revulsion at this.  The idea that we need to work towards equal opportunity by ensuring that everyone has the same crappy education is the worst sort of social engineering.
 
Quote

So far as the "free exercise" line of arguments go in favour of homeschooling (and private schools), I think they've got a fairly obvious flaw: the classic (and sane) limit of any person's liberties is the liberties of someone else. A parent's "free exercise" doesn't extend to determining the lives of other people just because those other people happen to be their children.

Young children are not capable of rational decisions regarding their own education.  While the government has a responsibility to ensure that access to an education is available, it is not it's responsibility to supplant the parent as the guiding force in the child's development, just because you don't happen to like what that parent may be teaching. In other words, while ignorance may well in part be hereditary, it is manifestly not incurable.

--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
philbert



Posts: 20
Joined: Feb. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 08 2008,09:03   

Quote (carlsonjok @ Mar. 08 2008,08:46)
Oh dear God, I don't even know how to say this diplomatically, but having read some of Law's justification all I can say is that it is a huge pile of rubbish.  While picking a few quotes out to encapsulate a position is inherently problematic, I think the following summarizes his argument.
   
Quote
However, it is clear, is it not, that the statistics revealing how the mere 7 percent who are privately educated come to dominate the high status professions strongly suggest that private education has a powerful effect when it comes to enhancing the life chances of those lucky few?

and
   
Quote
And by significantly boosting your own kids' life chances, you do inevitably restrict the life chances of other kids.

So, his argument is essentially that private schools must be banned because they are too good at what they do. Ignoring for a moment that we are talking about the opposite situation of private/home schools being poor at providing an education,  I have to state my revulsion at this.  The idea that we need to work towards equal opportunity by ensuring that everyone has the same crappy education is the worst sort of social engineering.

Well, first, I'm not relying on Law's argument - I just meant to note that he'd dealt with this question, recently and from another direction.

But I really do think you're reading him uncharitably, if you're characterising his argument like that. Read on in his stuff, and you'll find a lot more about how the private schools achieve their superior results (when they do) by disproportionate use of resources (per student), circuitous support through devices such as charitable status (for themselves, and for the donations to them), and often a decent helping of taxpayer money heaped on top under various pretenses. So the point is rather that everyone really could have a superior education available to them, if things were handled more fairly. (Note in particular his October 7 posting, on this point.)

  
silverspoon



Posts: 123
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 08 2008,09:10   

Doesn’t California allow state approved home school correspondence courses? I know my state does (or did) some years ago.  Due to an injury we used such a course for our son for a few months. The requirements from what I remember at that time for home schooling were a) A state approved correspondence course. b) The parent could develop the curriculum if they had some advanced degree or other. I don‘t remember what the degree had to be in, I just remember it didn’t have to be in teaching, nor required the parent to be a certificated teacher. There may have been a provision for opting out of either a or b on religious grounds. I was glad to have the option of a correspondence course since the cost of a tutor (always an option in shot term situations) was more than we could bare at the time.

I think requiring certified teaching requirements for home school parents to be way over the top. In my case, such a requirement would have imposed a financial strain on our family since we would have had to hire a tutor.  

Full disclosure: California is one of the few states I have never been in. I want to be 3000 miles away when  Catastrophic Plate Tectonics ala John Baumgardner resumes. I suspect that’s why the ICR is moving its base of operations to Texas. Also, I avoid Kansas like the plague since my mother-in-law lives there.

--------------
Grand Poobah of the nuclear mafia

  
  92 replies since Mar. 06 2008,21:53 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (4) < [1] 2 3 4 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]