NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Sep. 09 2016,20:08) | | Quote (Texas Teach @ Sep. 09 2016,17:11) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ Sep. 08 2016,22:00) | | Quote (Texas Teach @ Sep. 08 2016,20:55) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ Sep. 08 2016,19:44) | Question answered!
| Quote | [–]Baconmusubi, Evolutionist 2 points 2 hours ago
If I'm using Time Tree correctly, the Asian elephant and tulip poppy ancestors diverged around 1.5 billion years ago when eukaryotes diversified. I think this link should show the same results I found.
So to answer your question, the common ancestor was a primitive eukaryotic cell. |
|
Congratulations, Gary. You finally learned something you should have picked up in high school. And really should have known before telling biologists they're wrong. |
You are making no sense at all. But that's par for your course, whatever it is..... |
I'll explain, and I'll use small words so you'll be sure to understand. You should have learned enough about the tree of life in high school biology class to have answered your own question about the common ancestor of plants and animals. At the very least you should have been able to look it up with less effort than asking us.
But my second complaint was that you know so little about evolution and the history of life but still think you are qualified to tell actual scientists that they are all wrong about it. You complain about the theory of evolution without understanding even high school level things about it.
In short, you are a n00b. |
Dimwit, I already guessed the right answer. I thought it would be fun to try getting a second opinion to verify that, from this forum. I guess it only figures that I would have to be bashed for it.
And does anyone know where N.Wells is? It's not like them to miss a good weird question like that one. |
There goes the point, flying well over Gary's head, yet again
The question is neither 'good' nor 'weird'. As with all matters you attempt to judge, you are not qualified to have an opinion.
This is why Texas Teach rates you as a 'n00b'. Personally, I think he gives you far far too much credit -- n00bs are generally entrants eager to participate in whatever topic area they are addressing. You are so far out in the wilderness, so blinded by your own inanities that you can't even see the relevant fields. You're barely a wannabe. With years of effort, you might rise to the level of n00b.
|
