RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < ... 245 246 247 248 249 [250] 251 252 253 254 255 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 24 2006,15:40   

Quote (hereoisreal @ Oct. 24 2006,19:29)
Quote (Shirley Knott @ Oct. 24 2006,11:33)
Keep in mind as well that numbers surely do lie -- as soon as they are attached to 'real existents'.
Conclusive proof:
2 + 2 = 4
2liters (water) + 2liters (alcohol) ~= 4liters of solution.
QED

But of course neither Sal nor zero understand squat about logic, argument, evidence, or numbers, so this is for the benefit of those with more than 2 brain cells to rub together...

no hugs for thugs,
Shirley Knott

Shirley, I do too. I know that two apples
make a pair.

A Horse has 2 back legs
It also has forelegs.
that’s SIX legs.
Six is an even number, but odd for a mammal.
The only number that is odd and even is infinity.
God is infinate, as are horses’ legs.
Horses are real - so God must be too.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 24 2006,17:58   

Quote from Arden Chatfield
Quote
I've often wondered how DT feels about the fact that since he's eventually forced to ban anyone at all intelligent there, the blog he polices is now top heavy with obvious dimwits, most of whom are indeed dumber than he is. I suspect he understands this situation perfectly well and continually wonders why he doesn't get a smarter class of wingnut at UD.

I wonder more about Dembski.  He must have started out with all his Ph.D.'s expecting to set the world on fire and hoping to change intellectual history, but look at where he is now and the people who inhabit his reality.  That has to rankle.

  
k.e



Posts: 1948
Joined: Mar. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 24 2006,19:28   

Quote
I wonder more about Dembski.  He must have started out with all his Ph.D.'s expecting to set the world on fire and hoping to change intellectual history, but look at where he is now and the people who inhabit his reality.  That has to rankle.


Pseudo science thrives on sychophants and Dembski doesn't give a flying fig as long as they have money.

Plus he is not that proud that he won't take compliments from complete morons, a vote is a vote.

--------------
The conservative has but little to fear from the man whose reason is the servant of his passions, but let him beware of him in whom reason has become the greatest and most terrible of the passions.These are the wreckers of outworn empires and civilisations, doubters, disintegrators, deicides.Haldane

   
Reluctant Cannibal



Posts: 36
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 24 2006,21:06   

Quote (Altabin @ Oct. 24 2006,16:06)
"By the way, they do."  Would it be at all churlish to ask for, like, some details?  Because that would be quite interesting.  After all, the problem of reconciling free will and divine foreknowledge has plagued Christian theology since, well, the beginning - and you claim to have some equations to resolve it for good.

I'm not much of a mathematical theologian, but I think I know the answer to this one.

Dimensions == Degrees of freedom.
More degrees of freedom, more free will.

Now I don't know how many degrees of freedom you need for free will to operate, but it's gotta be more than 3.

  
nuytsia



Posts: 131
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,01:54   

Amazing flame fractals take your breath away

Unfortunately the subsequent comments just seem to confirm the stereotype of software engineers....

 
Quote
Also Nature (God) uses OOP
This is true too, look at all living things and you will see OOP in the genetic code. Look at eyes, for example. You will see the re-use of objects across species. Ears, noses, lungs, livers, kidneys, tongues, hair, teeth, it just goes on and on. On top of that, He made it self replicating and self sustaining. The Master Programmer definitely knew what He was doing.
Posted: 10/04/2006 @ 23:19

And in reply...
 
Quote
how far is it from math to Intelligent Design?
You are right, math is everywhere in nature... But does math happen by itself or is it part of Intelligent Design? Does something come of nothing? No, I think not. Time has come to admit we humans are not at the top of evolution. Anyway the fractals are really really beautiful and inspiring. Thanks to Rodger for sharing this.
Posted: 10/05/2006 @ 12:52


Nice pictures though...

   
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,02:03   

<blockquote> Rick already had perceived that if God exists He must have more than one purpose in creating. So, we talked about God’s seven different purposes in creating the universe. In light of these seven purposes, Rick wanted to know exactly what we humans are supposed to do. </blockquote>

For help with this consult "The Seven Habits of Highly Effective Dieties," wherein is revealed God's planner for your life.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
bourgeois_rage



Posts: 117
Joined: Mar. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,03:42   

Quote (nuytsia @ Oct. 25 2006,06:54)
Amazing flame fractals take your breath away

Unfortunately the subsequent comments just seem to confirm the stereotype of software engineers....

Not all of us computer engineers are this dense.

--------------
Overwhelming Evidence: Apply directly to the forehead.

   
Alan Fox



Posts: 1556
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,05:59   

Hi

I have slipped back into a little lurking as my wife is away for a few days visiting her folks. In the short time since starting my "cold turkey" things seem to have gone even further downhill for ID in the blogosphere. The only activity on ISCID seems to be JAD lamenting his ban from the Richard Dawkins site (classic performance from John, matched by how quickly and comprehensively he was shown to be a crank by posters unaware of his history). ARN has the ridiculous life engineer being repeatedly torn to shreds by rational posters who seem to outnumber (in bodies and IQ) the rump of IDers still posting. As for Ovewhelming Evidence, well, what can I say? It is beyond parody.

But Uncommon Descent has degenerated to the point it that I don't find it exasperating or funny any more. One reason for this (apart from the hammer blow of the Kitzmiller decision) is the absence of dissent. Dembski's inability to respond to polite and reasoned sceptics such as Tom English, Carl Sachs (Carlos) and Allen MacNeill has resulted in an echo chamber of unremitting idiocy, with the undercurrent of a creationist agenda becoming ever more apparent. Dave Springer's ploy of engineering excuses to ban perceived unsympathetic posters has backfired.

As one reformed blogger who has been banned a few times there, may I say that I now think attempting to post comments at UD which attempt to put an alternative view may now be counterproductive. (Mind you, apart from Chris Hyland, who has had a shot or two fired over his bow, I am not sure who is left to take or ignore my suggestion.)

So, what about a boycott of Uncommon Descent. No further attempts at posting there unless a fairer moderation policy is implemented.

  
dhogaza



Posts: 525
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,06:08   

Not that we need any further proof that Sal's a wingnut but ...
Quote
I was an OEC, but I would not be too quick to give the geology of Charles Lyell (Darwin’s inspiration) a free-pass.

The strata do not agree with being laid down over long periods of time. A few centimeters of erosion every 1000 years would wipe out the continents in 100 million years. Even if the Earth is old, the current interpretation of geology just based on this is scientifically unsustainable.

So with a wave of his hands he disproves our scientific understanding of geologic processes, just as he earlier disposed of evolutionary biology.

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,06:14   

Quote

So, what about a boycott of Uncommon Descent. No further attempts at posting there unless a fairer moderation policy is implemented.


Hasn't basically everyone already stopped posting to UD?

   
Alan Fox



Posts: 1556
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,06:28   

I guess that's why I could only think of Chris Hyland as a sceptic still posting there.

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,06:40   

Intelligent Design is dying. Their blogs are becoming increasingly boring. Same ol numbnuts, sitting around, posting fantasies on blogs about the glorious revolution. Any day now.

But there are still occasional bits to enjoy. Like TardMac saying "my special pleading is actually far more reasonable and rational than your special pleading".

That's a direct quote.

Overwhelming Evidence has all the ambience of a deserted barn.

   
Jim_Wynne



Posts: 1208
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,06:44   

Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 25 2006,11:40)
Overwhelming Evidence has all the ambience of a deserted barn.

Before all the horseshite has been swept out.

--------------
Evolution is not about laws but about randomness on happanchance.--Robert Byers, at PT

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,08:07   

According to my calculations, this photo has 1.5 buttloads of CSI.



So I guess it was designed.

   
Ved



Posts: 398
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,08:25   

Hey, we all know that the Huge Native American wasn't designed, but it's iPod was!

  
BWE



Posts: 1902
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,08:39   

It's like a freak show out there. It's so hard to comment on their ideas because they are so waaay dumb that it's like they belong to a different species. Hmmm. I've heard that before. Now where was it?

The Wired interview thread is priceless. There are some things money can't buy.

--------------
Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered
When wished on the morning star
Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it
Look what it's done so far

The Daily Wingnut

   
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,08:56   

Quote (N.Wells @ Oct. 24 2006,22:58)
I wonder more about Dembski.  He must have started out with all his Ph.D.'s expecting to set the world on fire and hoping to change intellectual history, but look at where he is now and the people who inhabit his reality.  That has to rankle.

My sense about Dembski is when he first set out to do ID, he was a zealot who really believed all the hype about how ID was going to vanquish 'materialism' and 'naturalism' from science once and for all. (And of course it's safe to assume he thoroughly believed this was what God wanted.) So he took the gamble of staking his entire career on what was/is essentially a fringe theory. He bet the farm on it, basically.

People who take that kind of gamble are of course rewarded handsomely if the fringe theory in question triumphs, but they're fucked if it tanks or stays out on the fringe. Given how things have actually turned out for ID, it's essentially shackled Dembski to something that's in disgrace, and which has destroyed his career.

ID had its shot, the inevitable happened, and Dembski's left with nothing to do but sell redundant books to the rubes and serve as a 'scientific advisor' to the likes of Ann Coulter. I think Dembski senses this, but most of his followers are no better than the Japanese soldiers hiding out in the jungles, still fighting World War 2 twenty years after it's over.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,09:25   

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ Oct. 25 2006,14:56)
Quote (N.Wells @ Oct. 24 2006,22:58)
I wonder more about Dembski.  He must have started out with all his Ph.D.'s expecting to set the world on fire and hoping to change intellectual history, but look at where he is now and the people who inhabit his reality.  That has to rankle.

My sense about Dembski is when he first set out to do ID, he was a zealot who really believed all the hype about how ID was going to vanquish 'materialism' and 'naturalism' from science once and for all. (And of course it's safe to assume he thoroughly believed this was what God wanted.) So he took the gamble of staking his entire career on what was/is essentially a fringe theory. He bet the farm on it, basically.

People who take that kind of gamble are of course rewarded handsomely if the fringe theory in question triumphs, but they're fucked if it tanks or stays out on the fringe. Given how things have actually turned out for ID, it's essentially shackled Dembski to something that's in disgrace, and which has destroyed his career.

ID had its shot, the inevitable happened, and Dembski's left with nothing to do but sell redundant books to the rubes and serve as a 'scientific advisor' to the likes of Ann Coulter. I think Dembski senses this, but most of his followers are no better than the Japanese soldiers hiding out in the jungles, still fighting World War 2 twenty years after it's over.

That's the route Bob Park explains in Voodoo Science: The Road From Foolishness to Fraud. By now Dembski surely knows ID doesn't work, but he's gone to all this trouble and he's getting paid for it. Why turn off the spigot of honoraria and royalties and followers? Just keep your mouth shut and watch them continue to buy your books.

And why not? I'd probably be flogging them harder, if I were Dembski. I'd have Salvador at the airport selling flowers.

   
Seizure Salad



Posts: 60
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,09:48   

Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 25 2006,11:40)
Overwhelming Evidence has all the ambience of a deserted barn.


Seriously. With a daily reach of approximately 0 people, Overwhelming Evidence is definetely a failed website.

The major problem with Intelligent Design is that it's boring. Boring! Sooooo incredibly booooring. I nod off every single time I try to read UD. I can only imagine how disappointed Dembski's target market, "young people", must feel when they boot up that godawful blog. The last thing I would want to do if I were a teenage creationist is be forced to read Salvador Cordova. Or, even worse, Denyse O'Leary, to who most teenagers are intellectually superior anyway.

They've gotten so wrapped up in their own fringe culture that they're incapable of appealing to anyone but vulnerable zealots.

  
Tracy P. Hamilton



Posts: 1239
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,09:49   

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ Oct. 25 2006,13:56)
 
Quote (N.Wells @ Oct. 24 2006,22:58)
I wonder more about Dembski.  He must have started out with all his Ph.D.'s expecting to set the world on fire and hoping to change intellectual history, but look at where he is now and the people who inhabit his reality.  That has to rankle.

My sense about Dembski is when he first set out to do ID, he was a zealot who really believed all the hype about how ID was going to vanquish 'materialism' and 'naturalism' from science once and for all. (And of course it's safe to assume he thoroughly believed this was what God wanted.) So he took the gamble of staking his entire career on what was/is essentially a fringe theory. He bet the farm on it, basically.

People who take that kind of gamble are of course rewarded handsomely if the fringe theory in question triumphs, but they're fucked if it tanks or stays out on the fringe. Given how things have actually turned out for ID, it's essentially shackled Dembski to something that's in disgrace, and which has destroyed his career.

ID had its shot, the inevitable happened, and Dembski's left with nothing to do but sell redundant books to the rubes and serve as a 'scientific advisor' to the likes of Ann Coulter. I think Dembski senses this, but most of his followers are no better than the Japanese soldiers hiding out in the jungles, still fighting World War 2 twenty years after it's over.


He could admit he was wrong, and do something useful.

Think that likely, given his personality?

--------------
"Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV

"The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen

"We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

  
hereoisreal



Posts: 745
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,09:53   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Oct. 24 2006,20:40)
Quote (hereoisreal @ Oct. 24 2006,19:29)
Quote (Shirley Knott @ Oct. 24 2006,11:33)
Keep in mind as well that numbers surely do lie -- as soon as they are attached to 'real existents'.
Conclusive proof:
2 + 2 = 4
2liters (water) + 2liters (alcohol) ~= 4liters of solution.
QED

But of course neither Sal nor zero understand squat about logic, argument, evidence, or numbers, so this is for the benefit of those with more than 2 brain cells to rub together...

no hugs for thugs,
Shirley Knott

Shirley, I do too. I know that two apples
make a pair.

A Horse has 2 back legs
It also has forelegs.
that’s SIX legs.
Six is an even number, but odd for a mammal.
The only number that is odd and even is infinity.
God is infinate, as are horses’ legs.
Horses are real - so God must be too.

Richardthughes:
"The only number that is odd and even is infinity".
***********************************
Richard, O is as real as infinity. Is Zero odd and even?
Zero ( here, in reality, O is real )
hereoisreal

--------------
360  miracles and more at:
http://www.hereoisreal.com/....eal.com

Great news. God’s wife is pregnant! (Rev. 12:5)

It's not over till the fat lady sings! (Isa. 54:1 & Zec 9:9)

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,10:00   



"Tracy baby I gots ta get paid"

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,12:04   

Quote (hereoisreal @ Oct. 25 2006,14:53)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Oct. 24 2006,20:40)
Quote (hereoisreal @ Oct. 24 2006,19:29)
 
Quote (Shirley Knott @ Oct. 24 2006,11:33)
Keep in mind as well that numbers surely do lie -- as soon as they are attached to 'real existents'.
Conclusive proof:
2 + 2 = 4
2liters (water) + 2liters (alcohol) ~= 4liters of solution.
QED

But of course neither Sal nor zero understand squat about logic, argument, evidence, or numbers, so this is for the benefit of those with more than 2 brain cells to rub together...

no hugs for thugs,
Shirley Knott

Shirley, I do too. I know that two apples
make a pair.

A Horse has 2 back legs
It also has forelegs.
that’s SIX legs.
Six is an even number, but odd for a mammal.
The only number that is odd and even is infinity.
God is infinate, as are horses’ legs.
Horses are real - so God must be too.

Richardthughes:
"The only number that is odd and even is infinity".
***********************************
Richard, O is as real as infinity. Is Zero odd and even?
Zero ( here, in reality, O is real )
hereoisreal



It was satire, zero.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
ScaryFacts



Posts: 337
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,13:00   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Oct. 25 2006,18:04)
It was satire, zero.

Find the pattern in this:


   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,17:37   

Yeah this is off-topic, but go watch Nick Matzke tear poor Casey Luskin a new one.

   
Altabin



Posts: 308
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 25 2006,23:57   

OK, so Dimbski posts a transcript from a book signing with Dawkins, which he purports to be shocked at.  Dawkins, in effect, says that, yes, in a sense if we follow through the logic of determinism, we would have to blame atoms for the the terrible things people do.  BUT, he acknowledges that we feel like we are free, that he doesn't have a philosophical solution to this problem, and it's a contradiction, a grey area, that he just has to live with.

Dimbo smirks when Dawkins says this has nothing to do with his views on religion - implying (WD, that is) that it has everything to do with religion, though in his mealy-mouthed way he won't commit to saying it on UD.

The UD footsoldiers, following their Dear Leader's cue, jump all over Dawkins - if only he believed in God, he wouldn't need to live with this contradiction any more!  Yet one more proof that materialism is wrong!!

At which point, JaredL jumps in with a few very astute posts, pointing out politely that theists seem to be no better off than materialists.  If God creates everything, he must also be responsible for Dawkins and the God Delusion; and arguing that there is free will gets you nowhere if you also believe God is omniscient.  The conclusion:  
Quote

The classical theist is also a determinist, unless he simply declares, by fiat, free will and infallible foreknowledge are logically compatible, and this despite the argument given in my post at #5.

The UnDead reply politely -- as they usually do to anyone with some intelligence who visits them -- but mostly cluelessly, simply repeating again and again that there is free will, or merely asserting that there is no contradiction, or observing that it sure feels like we have free will (which no one, even Dawkins, denies).  Some do attempt to make reasoned responses, however, and it's beginning actually to look like that rarest of things: an interesting discussion on UD which actually might produce some productive philosophical argument and change some minds.

Eventually, you guessed it, the WAD makes the only intellectual contribution he's ever made to any thread at UD:  
Quote

JaredL: You are herewith limited to two theological posts on any thread. Your confidence in your theological position is out of keeping with its pedigree. Augustine, the Cappadocian Fathers, and Thomas were not slouches and did not derive the reductio ad absurdum that you do. Let’s get this thread back on track, which is the connection between atheistic Darwinism, determinism, and the inability, as a matter of practical life, to live out the latter.

Pathetic.  I agree, it's time to leave them to their own irrelevance.

--------------

  
hereoisreal



Posts: 745
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 26 2006,00:33   

Quote (Shirley Knott @ Oct. 24 2006,11:33)
Keep in mind as well that numbers surely do lie -- as soon as they are attached to 'real existents'.
Conclusive proof:
2 + 2 = 4
2liters (water) + 2liters (alcohol) ~= 4liters of solution.
QED

But of course neither Sal nor zero understand squat about logic, argument, evidence, or numbers, so this is for the benefit of those with more than 2 brain cells to rub together...

no hugs for thugs,
Shirley Knott

Shirley, is zero real?

O + 4 = 4

O + (-4 )= -4

Zero

--------------
360  miracles and more at:
http://www.hereoisreal.com/....eal.com

Great news. God’s wife is pregnant! (Rev. 12:5)

It's not over till the fat lady sings! (Isa. 54:1 & Zec 9:9)

   
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 26 2006,01:19   

Quote
Pathetic.  I agree, it's time to leave them to their own irrelevance.


I would miss the endless mirth.

After JaredL's theological smackdown another WD sycophant quickly realized he also risked the dour clergyman's withering gaze.  He saved himself through the following obsequious bootlick:

Quote
Sometimes I get carried away, as you can see by my last post. It entirely fits the comment you made in the prior one, and goes contra to the stated thems of the article.

Please delete it, and I apologize!


You can't make this stuff up!  

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
hereoisreal



Posts: 745
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 26 2006,01:41   

Quote (ScaryFacts @ Oct. 25 2006,18:00)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Oct. 25 2006,18:04)
It was satire, zero.

Find the pattern in this:


It took me a few minutes to figure out your message.  First I only saw a two inch square of chaos.
Speaking of patterns, the IDOL (intelligent designer of life) made a pattern.  It took him 80 days and nights on a mountain top
to create and 40 days and nights in the desert to tweak.
Exd 25:9 According to all that I shew thee, [after] the pattern of the tabernacle, and the pattern of all the instruments thereof, even so shall ye make [it].
Exd 25:40 And look that thou make [them] after their pattern, which was shewed thee in the mount.
Num 8:4 And this work of the candlestick [was of] beaten gold, unto the shaft thereof, unto the flowers thereof, [was] beaten work: according unto the pattern which the LORD had shewed Moses, so he made the candlestick.
Jos 22:28 Therefore said we, that it shall be, when they should [so] say to us or to our generations in time to come, that we may say [again], Behold the pattern of the altar of the LORD, which our fathers made, not for burnt offerings, nor for sacrifices; but it [is] a witness between us and you.
1Ch 28:11 Then David gave to Solomon his son the pattern of the porch, and of the houses thereof, and of the treasuries thereof, and of the upper chambers thereof, and of the inner parlours thereof, and of the place of the mercy seat,
1Ch 28:12 And the pattern of all that he had by the spirit, of the courts of the house of the LORD, and of all the chambers round about, of the treasuries of the house of God, and of the treasuries of the dedicated things:
1Ch 28:18 And for the altar of incense refined gold by weight; and gold for the pattern of the chariot of the cherubims, that spread out [their wings], and covered the ark of the covenant of the LORD

Will he build what he planed?
Does a bear shit'n the woods?

Zero

--------------
360  miracles and more at:
http://www.hereoisreal.com/....eal.com

Great news. God’s wife is pregnant! (Rev. 12:5)

It's not over till the fat lady sings! (Isa. 54:1 & Zec 9:9)

   
GCT



Posts: 1001
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 26 2006,01:43   

Quote (Altabin @ Oct. 26 2006,04:57)
OK, so Dimbski posts a transcript from a book signing with Dawkins, which he purports to be shocked at.  Dawkins, in effect, says that, yes, in a sense if we follow through the logic of determinism, we would have to blame atoms for the the terrible things people do.  BUT, he acknowledges that we feel like we are free, that he doesn't have a philosophical solution to this problem, and it's a contradiction, a grey area, that he just has to live with.

I was at that talk and was rather surprised that Dawkins answered the way he did.  I would have thought that he had heard similar questions before and had thought about it.  Perhaps he has, but meant that he hasn't come to any sort of conclusion.  At least he was honest about it, which is more than WAD can say.

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < ... 245 246 247 248 249 [250] 251 252 253 254 255 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]