Antievolution.org - Antievolution.org Discussion Board -Topic::Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread

Albatrossity2

Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,15:28

Quote (JohnW @ July 12 2007,15:08)

Quote (JAM @ July 12 2007,14:58)

Yeah, but did it change his mind (whether he admitted it or not) or anyone else's?

Guess I'll have to break the news
That I got no mind to lose

- Ramones

We need to get Behe to calculate the probability of this one - As I was reading JohnW's post, the random shuffling of iTunes started up Cretin Family (from the Ramone's Adios Amigos album). Gotta love this line "I'm never wrong don't tell me what to do".

Next tune (playing now) is the Sex Pistols' God Save the Queen. That must be for Louis... "No future, no future, no future for you."

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
� � � � � � � � � � � � - Pattiann Rogers

stephenWells

Posts: 127
Joined: April 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,15:32

Quote (Zachriel @ July 12 2007,12:41)

Quote (Hermagoras @ July 12 2007,11:38)

It would be good if Sal could start by spelling tectonics correctly.
(Unrelated plug: my sister is kind of an expert on the actual science on this issue.)

I thought you were a scholar of rhetoric. That's just a classic Appeal to Big Sister, argumentum ad magnus soror.

Argumentum ad magnam sororem, o uneducated barbarian thou.

Arden Chatfield

Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,15:55

Quote (JAM @ July 12 2007,15:20)

Quote (JohnW @ July 12 2007,15:08)

Quote (JAM @ July 12 2007,14:58)

Yeah, but did it change his mind (whether he admitted it or not) or anyone else's?

Guess I'll have to break the news
That I got no mind to lose

- Ramones

I wanna be sedated...

I assume it also means he's gotta tell 'em that he's got no cerebellum...

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

C.J.O'Brien

Posts: 395
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,15:57

Hereby nominating JAM as Tard-mine employee of the month.

This facility has operated for 8 days without an irony-meter-related injury.

--------------
The is the beauty of being me- anything that any man does I can understand.
--Joe G

franky172

Posts: 160
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,15:58

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ July 12 2007,15:55)

Quote (JAM @ July 12 2007,15:20)

Quote (JohnW @ July 12 2007,15:08)

Quote (JAM @ July 12 2007,14:58)

Yeah, but did it change his mind (whether he admitted it or not) or anyone else's?

Guess I'll have to break the news
That I got no mind to lose

- Ramones

I wanna be sedated...

I assume it also means he's gotta tell 'em that he's got no cerebellum...

These guys act like they never got their diploma from Rock N Roll High School

Dr.GH

Posts: 2333
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,17:11

Quote (Bob O'H @ July 12 2007,11:57)

Quote

But man, a story with Nephilim, Dinosoars, an exploding Earth would be pretty exciting.

Dinosoars? I guess they would be the pterodactyls.

Bob

OOOHH. I want graphic sex between the bene elohim and the daughters of man to produce those Nephilim dudes.

--------------
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."

L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"

Dr.GH

Posts: 2333
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,17:22

Quote (JAM @ July 12 2007,14:28)

Why aren't there any creationist fossil hunters?

Welcome. I have enjoyed your noble efforts to bring light to the dark bowels of UD.

Sadly, there are creationist fossil hunters. Lots of them.

Edited by Dr.GH on July 12 2007,17:23

--------------
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."

L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"

"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank

Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,17:48

Quote (Dr.GH @ July 12 2007,17:11)

OOOHH. I want graphic sex between the bene elohim and the daughters of man to produce those Nephilim dudes.

And that whole "Noah's daughters getting him drunk and trying to screw him" thingie . . . .

Ya know, in all honesty, I don't understand why the porn-meisters haven't made an XXX-rated version of the Bible. Heck, just in Genesis, there's enough sex to make a 2-hour video. Beats heck out of "Flesh Gordon".

Hey, I wonder why the FUNDIES haven't gone ahead with that project. Just think how many poor lost sinner souls they could, uh, reach with it . . . . And ya know, so many of them have longstanding experience with porn, like Bakker and Swaggart, that there'd be no lack of technical advisors . . . .

(thinks about it for a moment)

OK, let's do it. Who wants to help put up the funding? I'll volunteer to play "Adam". No, no --- on second thought, I want to be "Noah". That way I get, what, two or three "daughters" at once . . . . ?

(There ya go, FTK. There's something else for you to bitch about. Enjoy. Sorry there are no retards involved. But hey, I'm willing to try anything, ya know.)

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

GCT

Posts: 1001
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,18:22

Quote ("Rev Dr" Lenny Flank @ July 12 2007,18:48)

Quote (Dr.GH @ July 12 2007,17:11)

OOOHH. �I want graphic sex between the bene elohim and the daughters of man to produce those Nephilim dudes.

And that whole "Noah's daughters getting him drunk and trying to screw him" thingie . . . .

Ya know, in all honesty, I don't understand why the porn-meisters haven't made an XXX-rated version of the Bible. �Heck, just in Genesis, there's enough sex to make a 2-hour video. �Beats heck out of "Flesh Gordon".

Hey, I wonder why the FUNDIES haven't gone ahead with that project. �Just think how many poor lost sinner souls they could, uh, reach with it . . . . And ya know, so many of them have longstanding experience with porn, like Bakker and Swaggart, that there'd be no lack of technical advisors . . . .

(thinks about it for a moment)

OK, let's do it. �Who wants to help put up the funding? � �I'll volunteer to play "Adam". � � No, no --- on second thought, I want to be "Noah". �That way I get, what, two or three "daughters" at once . . . . ? � � �;)

(There ya go, FTK. �There's something else for you to bitch about. �Enjoy. �Sorry there are no retards involved. �But hey, I'm willing to try anything, ya know.)

I think you want to be Lot, not Noah. Lot got his daughters preggers. Noah had sons.

Zachriel

Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,18:34

Quote (stephenWells @ July 12 2007,15:32)

�

Quote (Zachriel @ July 12 2007,12:41)

� �

Quote (Hermagoras @ July 12 2007,11:38)

It would be good if Sal could start by spelling tectonics correctly.
(Unrelated plug: my sister is kind of an expert on the actual science on this issue.)

I thought you were a scholar of rhetoric. That's just a classic Appeal to Big Sister, argumentum ad magnus soror.

Argumentum ad magnam sororem, o uneducated barbarian thou.

Lapsus calami, lector benevole.

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

Arden Chatfield

Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,19:37

Quote (Zachriel @ July 12 2007,18:34)

Quote (stephenWells @ July 12 2007,15:32)

� �

Quote (Zachriel @ July 12 2007,12:41)

� � � �

Quote (Hermagoras @ July 12 2007,11:38)

It would be good if Sal could start by spelling tectonics correctly.
(Unrelated plug: my sister is kind of an expert on the actual science on this issue.)

I thought you were a scholar of rhetoric. That's just a classic Appeal to Big Sister, argumentum ad magnus soror.

Argumentum ad magnam sororem, o uneducated barbarian thou.

Lapsus calami, lector benevole.

Sic transit gloria mundi - 'thus passes the glory of the world on a Monday'.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

Dr.GH

Posts: 2333
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,19:50

Quote (GCT @ July 12 2007,18:22)

Quote ("Rev Dr" Lenny Flank @ July 12 2007,18:48)

Quote (Dr.GH @ July 12 2007,17:11)

OOOHH. I want graphic sex between the bene elohim and the daughters of man to produce those Nephilim dudes.

And that whole "Noah's daughters getting him drunk and trying to screw him" thingie . . . .

Ya know, in all honesty, I don't understand why the porn-meisters haven't made an XXX-rated version of the Bible. Heck, just in Genesis, there's enough sex to make a 2-hour video. Beats heck out of "Flesh Gordon".

Hey, I wonder why the FUNDIES haven't gone ahead with that project. Just think how many poor lost sinner souls they could, uh, reach with it . . . . And ya know, so many of them have longstanding experience with porn, like Bakker and Swaggart, that there'd be no lack of technical advisors . . . .

(thinks about it for a moment)

OK, let's do it. Who wants to help put up the funding? I'll volunteer to play "Adam". No, no --- on second thought, I want to be "Noah". That way I get, what, two or three "daughters" at once . . . . ? ;)

(There ya go, FTK. There's something else for you to bitch about. Enjoy. Sorry there are no retards involved. But hey, I'm willing to try anything, ya know.)

I think you want to be Lot, not Noah. Lot got his daughters preggers. Noah had sons.

Yeah, Noah got banged by his son Ham after he passed out drunk, Gen 9:21. That was why there were slaves from Africa until the Christians invented different reasons, like the pre-Adamites.

Hubert (I am not a creationist) Yockey quotes Gilbert and Sullivan's 1885 "The Mikado" in his attack on origin of life research. He does not comment that the lyric begins "I am in point of fact a particularly haught and exclusive person of pre-Adamite ancestry descent." Rather he blathers on about Ernst Haeckel

--------------
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."

L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"

stevestory

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,20:06

Quote (Dr.GH @ July 12 2007,20:50)

Yeah, Noah got banged by his son Ham after he passed out drunk, Gen 9:21.

First I've heard of that. Admittedly, it's been years since I read the bible--I couldn't even read David Plotz's commentary more than the first few episodes--but I don't remember much homosexual incest. Heterosexual, sure, but not homosexual.

stevestory

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,20:08

(switching to observer mode. Watching Deadwood Season 3 disc 3 and drinking cheap vodka--how can you not drink cheap booze while watching Deadwood?--so I better switch to non-typing mode)

Arden Chatfield

Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,20:12

Quote (stevestory @ July 12 2007,20:08)

(switching to observer mode. Watching Deadwood Season 3 disc 3 and drinking cheap vodka--how can you not drink cheap booze while watching Deadwood?--so I better switch to non-typing mode)

Dude, doesn't that either belong on the bathroom wall or in the foodie/booze thread?

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

stevestory

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,20:18

It was kind of pursuant to the matter of whether I would respond to the questions I raised here a moment before. Otherwise, you're right, I would have put that there. Check your inbox, btw.

"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank

Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,20:24

Quote (GCT @ July 12 2007,18:22)

I think you want to be Lot, not Noah. �Lot got his daughters preggers. �Noah had sons.

Whatever. As long as I get to pick 'em.

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

Dr.GH

Posts: 2333
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,20:24

I have written a 7+ page article on Psalm 89 (unfinished). In the that piece I note that, "In a theme that will later be written and added to the Bible as Genesis 1, the God of Israel, Yahweh or El (formal plural Elohim), is credited with the creation of the ancient powers of Heaven and Earth, the defeat of primordial chaos (the sea), and (in common with Canaanite El) the creation of all other gods and the Assembly of Gods (bene elohim).

The sources for the entire praise hymn in Psalm 89:5-14 can be drawn back to the pre-monarchy, even pre-exodus period of 1,400-1,300 BC. The Ba'l Haddu epics are known from about that time, and they serve as the bulk of the later part of the hymn. The opening verses 5-8 are also part of that tradition, but reflect the association of Yahweh and the supreme Canaanite god El. The mixed use of El, and Yahweh within the hymn places this composition to around 1,100 BCE. The next portion of the psalm brings the story forward from the pre-Exodus era to the time of the Davidic Covenant, or also about 1000 BCE."

In the pre-exhilic portion that is attested in Ugaritic tablets is a banquet hosted by El for the "host of El" or "the sons of God." Most of the tablet is a list of beverages served, which included "a nursing woman for every pair of celebrants." I had to read that a few times. The opening lines of the praise hymn in Psalm 89, vss. 5-8, identify Yahweh by His renown within the "assembly of the holy ones" (v.5), the sons of the heavenly beings (v.6), the council of the holy ones (v.7), and in verse 8 God Yahweh is identified as the "God of hosts" "surrounded by his faithful." The name Yahweh in verse 8 balances the name El used in verse 7 (see also Gen 33:22 El elohe yisra'el literally "El, god of the patriarch Israel." The council/assembly/host/"sons of" are the very same bene elohim from Genesis 6:2, "the sons of God" providing an answer to the question of who God spoke to in Genesis 3:22. The Council of Yahweh is biblically also attested in Psalm 82, the 'adat El , or literally "Council of El." We can now see that the hearld Ethan while praising God is reminding all, even Yahweh!, that the Divine Covenant was properly witnessed by the Council of the Gods.

What a party!

--------------
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."

L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"

Hermagoras

Posts: 1260
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink)

Posted: July 12 2007,21:50

Quote (JAM @ July 12 2007,15:06)

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ July 12 2007,15:01)

Of course not, Jesus was watching.

Jokes aside, I'd like to know your impressions without having to wade through the sewage of another mind so soon after my UD marathon with Sal and Jehu.

Do you think we could be disciplined enough to test these rhetorical approaches experimentally?

Welcome, JAM! I really enjoyed your work on UD. As far as changing minds goes, their reaction to your arguments confirmed one of my favorite sentences in modern prose:

"In the confrontation between belief and evidence, belief is no pushover."

That's Barbara Herrnstein Smith, from her book Belief and Resistance: Dynamics of Contemporary Intellectual Controversy (Harvard UP, 1997).

--------------
"I am not currently proving that objective morality is true. I did that a long time ago and you missed it." -- StephenB

http://paralepsis.blogspot.com/....pot.com

djmullen

Posts: 327
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: July 13 2007,01:56

Salvador:

Quote

If not, it would be good material for the journal we�ve been talking about informally.

What?? �Are they going to start another journal that won't publish for a year at a time because of a "dearth of articles"?

djmullen

Posts: 327
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: July 13 2007,02:23

Quote (GCT @ July 12 2007,18:22)

� � �

Quote ("Rev Dr" Lenny Flank @ July 12 2007,18:48)

� � �

Quote (Dr.GH @ July 12 2007,17:11)

OOOHH. �I want graphic sex between the bene elohim and the daughters of man to produce those Nephilim dudes.

And that whole "Noah's daughters getting him drunk and trying to screw him" thingie . . . .

Ya know, in all honesty, I don't understand why the porn-meisters haven't made an XXX-rated version of the Bible. �Heck, just in Genesis, there's enough sex to make a 2-hour video. �Beats heck out of "Flesh Gordon".

I think you want to be Lot, not Noah. �Lot got his daughters preggers. �Noah had sons.

If anybody here wants to absolutely laugh their butts off while watching a good, straight forward exposition of (part of) the Old Testament, then you want to get a DVD of "The Real Old Testament", which is surely the funniest Biblical movie ever made.

It's shot as a reality show, where we get to watch episodes from the OT and then the characters are interviewed, documentary style, afterwards. �Lot and his randy daughters are very definitely covered!

Here's a very quick sample of what to expect, including two of the main characters, God (he's the one with the white beard) and the Serpent ("I go by Snake."):

http://www.realoldtestament.com/

As I recall, it starts in the Garden of Eden, with an introduction to God and then to Adam. �Problems soon arise (from memory):

Adam and God are talking, then...

Adam: "Look! Sheep! �Excuse me... Hey, Sheep, oh Sheep! �Over here, Sheep!"

Next scene, God is walking alone: "I'm worried about Adam."

Next scene, Eve is born from Adam's rib. �("I think he's so much happier with Eve than just a full set of ribs.") �Both are nude, by the way, but the naughty bits are blanked out.

Other scenes: Jacob gets screwed working for a wife

The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, complete with Lot's Wife ("That's how everybody refers to me. �I have a name, I'm Myra. �Myra Lot.") turning into a pillar of salt

The seduction of Lot by his daughters (Lot: "Who's your daddy, who's your daddy!")

Abram's wife giving him her slave for sex, ("I'm young again! �I'm young again!)

Cain and Abel ("I had a stick and I had a brother I didn't like and you put them together...") and many more scenes I can't remember.

You might also look at:

http://www.pchfilms.com/PCHFilmsTROT_Home/trothome.htm

and http://www.ifilm.com/video/2421264

If you don't love this movie, you're a tard.

franky172

Posts: 160
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink)

Posted: July 13 2007,07:00

Oh dear God.

Dembski has decided to spend some of his time dissecting the "Jesus Tomb Math" (which has already been rather strongly criticized in the mainstream media as a rather elaborate sham). Not to be outdone by the hundreds of other people who took a stab at what appears to be some perhaps shoddy mathematics, Dembski tries. What is interesting about this is two-fold. First, Dembski put his refutation of the Jesus tomb math on the Baylor Evolutionary Informatics Lab website! (here!

He makes it a point to provide links to his other "evolutionary informatics" papers, none of which have yet to appear in any journal (and I have read some of them, I reserve judgement until I get a chance to really read them in depth), but what in God's name is a website devoted to the Jesus Tomb doing on an evolutionary informatics website? Compounding matters is the lack of introduction, conclusions, or analysis on the website - it's just a collection of scripts (the links to which are currently broken) and plots.

I also appreciate this from the website:

There has been no consideration given to the historical evidence for the resurrection of Christ that conflicts with his being buried. With a link to "Leader U", which posits the following 5 pieces of evidence that the resurrection is true:

1: The Bible says that Jesus was buried and later his tomb was empty.
2: Paul says Jesus rose from the grave.
3: The story of the resurrection is old.
4: The story is simple.
5: Women probably discovered the tomb.
6: Other biblical stories also say the tomb was empty.

Well, I'm convinced.

Edit: 2 more things.
1) I should mention that the paper proper has introduction, conclusion, etc. The website lacks these

2) The website goes on to cite quotations arguing against the use of statistics. Why?

lkeithlu

Posts: 321
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: July 13 2007,07:38

I was under the impression that Dr. Dr. D was not too popular at Baylor. (as well as not AT Baylor) How did he get access to post on their server?

Wesley R. Elsberry

Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink)

Posted: July 13 2007,07:41

His buddy, Robert Marks, is on the inside.

--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

lkeithlu

Posts: 321
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: July 13 2007,07:44

Oooooh
BTW, Wild Bill has a birthday this Wednesday
Born the same day as me
I'm so ashamed....

Mr_Christopher

Posts: 1238
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: July 13 2007,09:16

Quote (franky172 @ July 13 2007,07:00)

Oh dear God.

Dembski has decided to spend some of his time dissecting the "Jesus Tomb Math" (which has already been rather strongly criticized in the mainstream media as a rather elaborate sham). �Not to be outdone by the hundreds of other people who took a stab at what appears to be some perhaps shoddy mathematics, Dembski tries. �What is interesting about this is two-fold. �First, Dembski put his refutation of the Jesus tomb math on the Baylor Evolutionary Informatics Lab website! �(here!

He makes it a point to provide links to his other "evolutionary informatics" papers, none of which have yet to appear in any journal (and I have read some of them, I reserve judgement until I get a chance to really read them in depth), but what in �God's name is a website devoted to the Jesus Tomb doing on an evolutionary informatics website? �Compounding matters is the lack of introduction, conclusions, or analysis on the website - it's just a collection of scripts (the links to which are currently broken) and plots.

I also appreciate this from the website:

There has been no consideration given to the historical evidence for the resurrection of Christ that conflicts with his being buried. �With a link to "Leader U", which posits the following 5 pieces of evidence that the resurrection is true:

1: The Bible says that Jesus was buried and later his tomb was empty.
2: Paul says Jesus rose from the grave.
3: The story of the resurrection is old.
4: The story is simple.
5: Women probably discovered the tomb.
6: Other biblical stories also say the tomb was empty.

Well, I'm convinced.

Edit: 2 more things.
1) I should mention that the paper proper has introduction, conclusion, etc. � The website lacks these

2) The website goes on to cite quotations arguing against the use of statistics. �Why?

This "Evolutionary Informatics Lab
Baylor University" web site appears to have nothing to do with evolution. Nothing at all.

Read the home page and poke around some.

http://web.ecs.baylor.edu/faculty/marks/Research/EILab/index.html

It's a sham/scam from Demsbki and this Robert Marks person.

--------------
Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

Mr_Christopher

Posts: 1238
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: July 13 2007,09:24

And while Dimbski is getting all hot and horny going after these jesus tomb myths how come he hasn't used some of his math skilz to prove what a scam the Bible Codes are? �Oh wait, you say he published an article favorable to the Bible Codes? �Hmm...You mean Dimsbki believes in the Bible Codes?

Oh my goodness.

--------------
Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

Richardthughes

Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: July 13 2007,10:26

ID Predicts this? :

http://www.cnn.com/2007....ex.html

Set DI to spin cycle extreme.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

Darth Robo

Posts: 148
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: July 13 2007,10:56

"New fossil discovery in Ethiopia has been dated from between 6000 and 3.8 million years old (the time of Adam) bearing all the hallmarks of design by a creator. Darwinist scientists are already covering up all evidence of intelligent design in their bid to stamp out scientific knowledge in order to prop up their flawed, satanic theory. More news as it unfolds. Praise the Lord."

--------------
"Commentary: How would you like to be the wholly-owned servant to an organic meatbag? It's demeaning! If, uh, you weren't one yourself, I mean..."

Arden Chatfield

Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink)

Posted: July 13 2007,11:19

Quote (Darth Robo @ July 13 2007,10:56)

"New fossil discovery in Ethiopia has been dated from between 6000 and 3.8 million years old (the time of Adam) bearing all the hallmarks of design by a creator. �Darwinist scientists are already covering up all evidence of intelligent design in their bid to stamp out scientific knowledge in order to prop up their flawed, satanic theory. �More news as it unfolds. �Praise the Lord."

You've been listening to FTK too much.

You forgot "it's just a deformed monkey, not an early human".

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

	Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution