Acartia_Bogart
Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014
|
| Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ May 04 2016,18:53) | | Quote | ziggy lorencMay 4, 2016 at 5:49 pm
KF — “ZL, you need to realise…”
Could you possibly be any more condescending?
The only thing I need to realize, and I realized it a long time ago, is that you are completely incapable of interacting on a mature level with anyone who disagrees with your cherished views. This has been pointed out to you on numerous occasions, by numerous people, yet you blame your inadequacies on me (and others).
I have debated SB quite fruitfully, sometimes heatedly. Somewhere along the line I offended him and apologized for it. Because he did not deserve it.
With respect to SB, he has responded to the request to provide evidence that SSM has been negative for society. I happen to disagree with him that his examples are the result of SSM or that they are an indication of anything systemic. You, on the other hand, have been asked to provide evidence that we are heading towards the cliff (repeatedly) and have done nothing but throw abuse at the people making the request.
You refer to people who disagree with you as “people of your ilk”, or “fellow travellers”, and worse. SB and Mr. Murray and Aleta and Clavdivs and Phinehas and Origenes are able to disagree with each other and keep it civil. You, on the other hand, come across as a spoiled little brat who is not used to having anyone disagree with him.
I have wasted far too much of my time trying to have some sort of meaningful communication with you. I should have heeded my earlier advice and ignored you. Much in the same way that I would avoid a piece of dog shit on the sidewalk.
|
|
And from Origenes:
| Quote | 741
OrigenesMay 4, 2016 at 5:48 pm
"Kairosfocus,
ZL, you need to realise you have been championing a side that began with projections of hate speech and bigotry (…)"
There you go again …
Let’s say, arguendo, that I agree on a particular topic with Adolf Hitler. Just one topic. Now does that imply that I “champion” all Adolf’s ideas?
Obviously NOT I would say. It does NOT follow.
So why do you keep insisting (and warning) that I (and anyone else who accepts SSM) side with Marxists, nihilists, evolutionists and so forth?
CLAVDIVS: If you continue with the “fellow traveller” rhetoric I will not refrain from reminding you that, by your logic *not mine*, someone who opposes gay marriage is a “fellow traveller” with the KKK.
What is unclear about this? Why is this not a wake up call? |
Mullings just can't seem to get a break.
|
