RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (500) < ... 172 173 174 175 176 [177] 178 179 180 181 182 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 2, general discussion of Dembski's site< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 28 2009,14:48   

Oops, for the love of peat&moss, I shouldn't have said Tribune7 actually read anything. I should have known better than that, and realized that they're all pinning their hopes on this lecture. Well, can't view video at work. I read the paper.

(Which means I can't watch the Judge Judy video again much as I'd like to.)

Kirk Durston is the guy that Jeff Shallit reduced to ash last year.

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 28 2009,14:55   

Where's page 177?

Oh, there it is.

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 28 2009,15:49   

Quote
2) so I am Richard Dawkins worst nightmare

It's worth adding a link to the source of that, for full amusement value
     
Quote
I am Richard Dawkins’ worst nightmare — a former militant atheist and Darwinist, who finally realized that everything he believed about everything that mattered was wrong.

He goes on to say
   
Quote
I am curious. Where are the Safe Harbor organizations founded by fundamentalist atheist groups like those promoted by Richard Dawkins?

And then, possibly most amusing of all, in the comments he says
   
Quote
Denyse is working on my story. She is far more eloquent than I.

Beat that!

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 28 2009,15:50   

Quote (carlsonjok @ Jan. 28 2009,13:58)
Quote (sparc @ Jan. 28 2009,13:34)
   
Quote
27 January 2009
Missile Guidance Systems and Darwinian Logic
GilDodgen

Seemingly nobody informed Gil that the most effective weapon of the ID movement is BS carpet bombing.

That is probably because no one is paying attention to Gil anymore. His repertoire is rather limited:

Pick one these:
   
Quote

a) I am a musician and evolution can't explain music and art
b) I program computers and DNA is a program
c) You can't simulate evolution without making random changes to the computer
d) I can divide 1 by a really larger and get a really small number
e) I used to be an atheist

and one of these:
   
Quote

1) therefore Darwin is wrong.
2) so I am Richard Dawkins worst nightmare
3) and anyone can see the probability is greater than the number of particles in the universe.

Concatenate the two together and you have the entirety of Gil's contribution to ID.

NAILED IT!*




* Gill just called - He thinks his Ruffled Shirt = Dembski's Sweater... He always feels so "Special"  when he wears it.

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
carlsonjok



Posts: 3326
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 28 2009,16:08   

Quote (J-Dog @ Jan. 28 2009,15:50)

* Gill just called - He thinks his Ruffled Shirt = Dembski's Sweater... He always feels so "Special"  when he wears it.

You mean this shirt?



All I can say is that is alot of look.



--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 28 2009,16:23   

Quote (J-Dog @ Jan. 28 2009,16:50)
* Gill just called - He thinks his Ruffled Shirt = Dembski's Sweater... He always feels so "Special"  when he wears it.

Nothing compares to WAD's finest sport jacket.



--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 28 2009,16:27   

But he can dream.



--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 28 2009,16:53   

With apologies to LA Story


   
Tracy P. Hamilton



Posts: 1239
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 28 2009,17:37   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Jan. 28 2009,15:49)
Quote
2) so I am Richard Dawkins worst nightmare

It's worth adding a link to the source of that, for full amusement value
       
Quote
I am Richard Dawkins’ worst nightmare — a former militant atheist and Darwinist, who finally realized that everything he believed about everything that mattered was wrong.

He goes on to say
     
Quote
I am curious. Where are the Safe Harbor organizations founded by fundamentalist atheist groups like those promoted by Richard Dawkins?

And then, possibly most amusing of all, in the comments he says
   
Quote
Denyse is working on my story. She is far more eloquent than I.

Beat that!

That does it!  Gil Dodgen must be playing UD like a Ben Stein-way!

--------------
"Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV

"The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen

"We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

  
olegt



Posts: 1405
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 28 2009,19:58   

UD resident Vogon writer Denyse calls an editorial in Financial Times "amazingly silly."  

Ironically, she can't format the post properly and ends up echoing the FT editors:
   
Quote
But Darwin is also worth defending because attacks on evolution symbolise a wider and more varied assault on policies based on evidence rather than prejudice. Some of this assault comes from the same religious forces as creationism – think, for example, of those ranged against embryonic stem cell research. Sheer ignorance plays a role too and so do the mass media.

UD folks are confused.  No comments.

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 28 2009,21:22   

Quote (olegt @ Jan. 28 2009,19:58)
UD resident Vogon writer Denyse [URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/financial-times-of-london-if-you-must-be-wrong-why-must-you-also-be-just-plain-stupid-and-





out-of-date/]calls[/URL] an editorial in Financial Times "amazingly silly."  

Ironically, she can't format the post properly and ends up echoing the FT editors:
       
Quote
But Darwin is also worth defending because attacks on evolution symbolise a wider and more varied assault on policies based on evidence rather than prejudice. Some of this assault comes from the same religious forces as creationism – think, for example, of those ranged against embryonic stem cell research. Sheer ignorance plays a role too and so do the mass media.

Hahaha - from Denyse's same post, at the link to the Newsweek article:
   
Quote
Some water fleas sport a spiny helmet [emphasis mine] that deters predators; others, with identical DNA sequences, have bare heads.

IDers love to conflate organic complexity with human design. So how about this for a spiny helmet:

ID leads you to killing people! :D

 
Quote (olegt @ Jan. 28 2009,19:58)
UD folks are confused.  No comments.

UD folks are confused no matter what they do. Even if they accidentally get something right, as Denyse does above. (Especially if they accidentally get something right.) :)

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Dr.GH



Posts: 2333
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 28 2009,22:06   

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ Jan. 28 2009,11:00)
Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 28 2009,10:27)
Quote (CeilingCat @ Jan. 28 2009,07:20)
gpuccio    
Quote
Second, I feel honored of being compared to Salvador Cordova.

That's it. I've got to bail. I can't take this concentration of tard right now. Back later.

In your weakened state, don't even THINK of clicking on this. :O

That site was the original creation of an Internet Infidels regular, Alan "Winace."

--------------
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."

L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 28 2009,22:56   

Quote (olegt @ Jan. 28 2009,20:58)
UD resident Vogon writer Denyse

She might not be a Vogon. She might actually be an Azagoth.

(Yes, I read those books WAY too many times in High School.)

   
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,00:34   

Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 28 2009,12:27)
 
Quote (CeilingCat @ Jan. 28 2009,07:20)
gpuccio    
Quote
Second, I feel honored of being compared to Salvador Cordova.

That's it. I've got to bail. I can't take this concentration of tard right now. Back later.

Even the grammer is bad.

  
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,11:37   

Quote
JayM: {MET} works because it is so limited.

Quote
jerry: There are no limits according to the MET.

Of course there are limits. Evolution tends to search explore only nearby areas of the landscape.

Quote
jerry: The future will show the way as new mappings of genomes and more understanding of the function of non coding elements will tell one how feathers are formed and bats have radar and why mammals do not lay eggs etc.

Bats have biosonar (echolocation), not radar. Some mammals do lay eggs.



Quote
Mark Frank: All this talk of islands of function in the sea of possible proteins (or DNA) made me think that it would be more appropriate to talk of evolution exploring the functional space rather than searching it.

An apt distinction.

Quote
JayM: His point, as I understand it, is that the “search strategy” provided by MET mechanisms explores only very small regions around the current, known viable, point. Since viable points in genome space are not uniformly distributed, this search doesn’t need to look at all possible sequences. It works because it is so limited.

gpuccio: Nonsense. No search needs to look at all possible sequences. In a random search, it is just a question of reasonable probabilities. And a search limited to the surroundings of what already exixts will never find anything distant.

In other words, if we take one step at a time, we'll never get anywhere.

Quote
djmullen: A few decades ago, a family in Milano, Italy was found to almost never have heart attacks. The cause of their good fortune was tracked down to a single point mutation in the DNA that codes for Apolipoprotein A-I. The new molecule, Apolipoprotein A-Imilano removes cholesteral and atherosclerotic plaque.

jerry: The MET says that evolution is stumbling but the question is how often is what is found useful, or really “how” useful. It finds useful things but can it find combinations that are novel complex and functional.

"How useful"? I don't know, but most people would think that resistance to heart attacks is rather useful.

Quote
gpuccio: Isn’t anybody else tired of reading “inconsistent and intellectually frustrating” posts from a couple of people? I am. And yes, this is a totally unsupported claim.

Possible early warning on bannination.

Quote
JayM: I am as well. The kind of unsupported, overbroad assertions made by some long time participants here do the ID cause no favors.

Ouch.

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,12:18   

Quote (CeilingCat @ Jan. 28 2009,22:34)
Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 28 2009,12:27)
 
Quote (CeilingCat @ Jan. 28 2009,07:20)
gpuccio      
Quote
Second, I feel honored of being compared to Salvador Cordova.

That's it. I've got to bail. I can't take this concentration of tard right now. Back later.

Even the grammer is bad.

And... wait for it... it's spelling.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,12:23   

Quote (Zachriel @ Jan. 29 2009,10:37)
Quote
... The kind of unsupported, overbroad assertions made by some long time participants ....

Ouch.

ID in a nutshell?

  
Laminar_



Posts: 14
Joined: Dec. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,12:33   

Quote

212
tribune7
01/29/2009
10:08 am
...
Mark, you have made the point that ID is falsifiable and hence legitimate science. Well done :-)


Cool.

My theory that chocolate bunnies are made by elves is also falsifiable so can I put it on the science curriculum?

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,12:40   

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ Jan. 29 2009,12:18)
 
Quote (CeilingCat @ Jan. 28 2009,22:34)
   
Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 28 2009,12:27)
     
Quote (CeilingCat @ Jan. 28 2009,07:20)
gpuccio          
Quote
Second, I feel honored of being compared to Salvador Cordova.

That's it. I've got to bail. I can't take this concentration of tard right now. Back later.

Even the grammer is bad.

And... wait for it... it's spelling.

Arden, ix-nay on the "ait-for-it"-way. *Shakes finger*

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,12:50   

Quote (Kristine @ Jan. 29 2009,10:40)
Quote (Arden Chatfield @ Jan. 29 2009,12:18)
   
Quote (CeilingCat @ Jan. 28 2009,22:34)
   
Quote (stevestory @ Jan. 28 2009,12:27)
       
Quote (CeilingCat @ Jan. 28 2009,07:20)
gpuccio          
Quote
Second, I feel honored of being compared to Salvador Cordova.

That's it. I've got to bail. I can't take this concentration of tard right now. Back later.

Even the grammer is bad.

And... wait for it... it's spelling.

Arden, ix-nay on the "ait-for-it"-way. *Shakes finger*

Uh oh. That's not how Richard Hughes got banned, is it?  :O

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
carlsonjok



Posts: 3326
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,13:00   

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ Jan. 29 2009,12:50)
Quote (Kristine @ Jan. 29 2009,10:40)
 
Quote (Arden Chatfield @ Jan. 29 2009,12:18)

And... wait for it... it's spelling.

Arden, ix-nay on the "ait-for-it"-way. *Shakes finger*

Uh oh. That's not how Richard Hughes got banned, is it?  :O

No.  

His sin was referring to p^igment and p^ungence.

--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,14:08   

Quote (carlsonjok @ Jan. 29 2009,19:00)
Quote (Arden Chatfield @ Jan. 29 2009,12:50)
 
Quote (Kristine @ Jan. 29 2009,10:40)
 
Quote (Arden Chatfield @ Jan. 29 2009,12:18)

And... wait for it... it's spelling.

Arden, ix-nay on the "ait-for-it"-way. *Shakes finger*

Uh oh. That's not how Richard Hughes got banned, is it?  :O

No.  

His sin was referring to p^igment and p^ungence.

Richard Hughes is not banned. He has just been Stalinesquely self-airbrushed from the picture by virtue of a purge on all things och^re and odifer^ous.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,14:10   

It's smellamentary?

  
carlsonjok



Posts: 3326
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,14:22   

Quote (Louis @ Jan. 29 2009,14:08)
Richard Hughes is not banned. He has just been Stalinesquely self-airbrushed from the picture by virtue of a purge on all things och^re and odifer^ous.

Louis

That is true. I wrote him via Facebook a few weeks back to tell him about a new member that he might like. I figured if anything would get him back here it would be AmandaHuginKiss.  But, surprisingly, his need to stand on principle is more important to him than AmandaHuginKiss. Thankfully, Louis, you have no such scruples.  

By the way, our new member has disappeared.  Did you kidnap AmandaHuginKiss, Louis?

--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,14:32   

I'm just about finished reading The Ancestor's Tale.  Last night, after reading the discussion here, I ran across Dawkins using "wait for it..." (In the chapter on the RNA world).  Truly this is is sign.  Of what I have no idea.

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,14:33   

Quote
Bayesian: Prof P., and all those that bring up Bayesian probability, you’re bluffing. Do the math, or shut up.

Quote
bornagain77: Do you want to argue that the Venter watermark was not intelligently designed? If so there is no point in trying to persuade you since you are unreasonable.

Quote
Prof_P.Olofsson: Bayesian and bornagain, Well then, as I have now been exposed as (a) bluffing and (b) unreasonable, I’d better stay away from the discussion to leave it to the honest and reasonable. Cheers

Quote
Bayesian: Do what you must, PO. At the very least, you could give us a link.

But if you can’t stand the heat, you may as well get out of the kitchen.

Here's your link.



Yeah, do the math, or shut up!

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,14:59   

Prof_P.Olofsson responds.
Quote
Prof_P.Olofsson: I can stand the heat of a rational and respectful discussion. Claiming that I am bluffing respresents neither. But OK then, let’s go personal: You are ugly and smell slightly of boiled potatoes!


--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
dheddle



Posts: 545
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,16:16   

Quote (Zachriel @ Jan. 29 2009,14:59)
Prof_P.Olofsson responds.
 
Quote
Prof_P.Olofsson: I can stand the heat of a rational and respectful discussion. Claiming that I am bluffing respresents neither. But OK then, let’s go personal: You are ugly and smell slightly of boiled potatoes!

I'm sure he didn't mean to say boiled potatoes. It should be elderberries. Everyone knows that.

--------------
Mysticism is a rational enterprise. Religion is not. The mystic has recognized something about the nature of consciousness prior to thought, and this recognition is susceptible to rational discussion. The mystic has reason for what he believes, and these reasons are empirical. --Sam Harris

   
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,16:18   

Quote (carlsonjok @ Jan. 29 2009,12:22)
By the way, our new member has disappeared.  Did you kidnap AmandaHuginKiss, Louis?

None of us can find AmandaHuginKiss. Maybe our standards are too high.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
Maya



Posts: 702
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 29 2009,16:59   

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ Jan. 29 2009,16:18)
Quote (carlsonjok @ Jan. 29 2009,12:22)
By the way, our new member has disappeared.  Did you kidnap AmandaHuginKiss, Louis?

None of us can find AmandaHuginKiss. Maybe our standards are too high.

I keep lowering mine, but your gender manages to keep ahead of me.

  
  14997 replies since July 17 2008,19:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (500) < ... 172 173 174 175 176 [177] 178 179 180 181 182 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]