RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (622) < ... 532 533 534 535 536 [537] 538 539 540 541 542 ... >   
  Topic: A Separate Thread for Gary Gaulin, As big as the poop that does not look< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2016,09:17   

Or I should have said:

So carry on, with your science work.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2016,09:20   

A new page has begun! I'll just repost the whole message:

Quote (Jim_Wynne @ Feb. 08 2016,18:47)
Gary, you're in the habit of saying, as you did here at UD, that your "theory" is "doing well" in many places.  The reaction to the "theory" on the web, which is demonstrable, generally falls into two categories: It's ridiculed and derided, or it's ignored.  Which of those do you consider "doing well"?

Doing well looks like this:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/christi....-597144

And Kathy emailed back to say that she has faith that Science does & will lead us to God. So carry on with your science work.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2016,09:32   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 10 2016,10:20)
A new page has begun! I'll just repost the whole message:

 
Quote (Jim_Wynne @ Feb. 08 2016,18:47)
Gary, you're in the habit of saying, as you did here at UD, that your "theory" is "doing well" in many places.  The reaction to the "theory" on the web, which is demonstrable, generally falls into two categories: It's ridiculed and derided, or it's ignored.  Which of those do you consider "doing well"?

Doing well looks like this:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/christi....-597144

And Kathy emailed back to say that she has faith that Science does & will lead us to God. So carry on with your science work.

Oh, Kathy said it.  That's certainly definitive, there's no need for the rest of us to worry about anything now that you have Kathy's imprimatur.

Good lord, you're pathetic.  No idea what 'intelligence' means, no idea what 'emergent' means, no idea how to bridge the (alleged) gap between chemical systems of subsystems of subsystems ... of molecules to 'intelligence', whatever that turns out to be.

  
Jim_Wynne



Posts: 1208
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2016,09:58   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 10 2016,09:14)
Quote (Jim_Wynne @ Feb. 08 2016,18:47)
Gary, you're in the habit of saying, as you did here at UD, that your "theory" is "doing well" in many places.  The reaction to the "theory" on the web, which is demonstrable, generally falls into two categories: It's ridiculed and derided, or it's ignored.  Which of those do you consider "doing well"?

Doing well looks like this:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/christi....-597144

And Kathy emailed back to say that she has faith that Science does & will lead us to God. So carry with the science work.

An email from Kathy Martin, whose thirty seconds of fame ended over ten years ago.    I stand corrected!

--------------
Evolution is not about laws but about randomness on happanchance.--Robert Byers, at PT

  
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2016,13:22   

From Gary at UD:
Quote
So at least I’m able to be taken seriously by scientists, though it proves that the Discovery Institute is scientifically dysfunctional.

Thanks to me, the “theory of intelligent design” is now doing fine. But the DI is now in big trouble that I’m glad I’m not stuck in.


That's just another assertion without proof of these mysterious scientists who take your not-a-theory seriously.  

No doubt they are all busy examining all the baby crocodiles who scurried into their mothers' mouths for safety, just downstream of all the salmon protecting their nests full of young.

  
Woodbine



Posts: 1218
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2016,15:54   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 10 2016,15:20)
A new page has begun! I'll just repost the whole message:

       
Quote (Jim_Wynne @ Feb. 08 2016,18:47)
Gary, you're in the habit of saying, as you did here at UD, that your "theory" is "doing well" in many places.  The reaction to the "theory" on the web, which is demonstrable, generally falls into two categories: It's ridiculed and derided, or it's ignored.  Which of those do you consider "doing well"?

Doing well looks like this:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/christi....-597144

And Kathy emailed back to say that she has faith that Science does & will lead us to God. So carry on with your science work.

So in Gary's mind his theory 'doing well' is evidenced by the following....

At AtBC (where he is ridiculed) he posts a link to a comment made at UD (where he is dismissed) that further links to a 10yr old forum post (where he is ignored). He concludes with bragging about receiving an email from Kathy Martin who has nothing substantive to say other than "Yay Jesus!"

Brilliant, Gary.

All those people who think you're mental must be eating their words right now.

  
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 10 2016,16:33   

Quote (Woodbine @ Feb. 10 2016,15:54)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 10 2016,15:20)
A new page has begun! I'll just repost the whole message:

         
Quote (Jim_Wynne @ Feb. 08 2016,18:47)
Gary, you're in the habit of saying, as you did here at UD, that your "theory" is "doing well" in many places.  The reaction to the "theory" on the web, which is demonstrable, generally falls into two categories: It's ridiculed and derided, or it's ignored.  Which of those do you consider "doing well"?

Doing well looks like this:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/christi....-597144

And Kathy emailed back to say that she has faith that Science does & will lead us to God. So carry on with your science work.

So in Gary's mind his theory 'doing well' is evidenced by the following....

At AtBC (where he is ridiculed) he posts a link to a comment made at UD (where he is dismissed) that further links to a 10yr old forum post (where he is ignored). He concludes with bragging about receiving an email from Kathy Martin who has nothing substantive to say other than "Yay Jesus!"

Brilliant, Gary.

All those people who think you're mental must be eating their words right now.

So, Gary, out of curiosity, how awful would things need to be for you to admit to "doing badly"?

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 12 2016,06:57   

My wife says I should go to the hospital ER for the agonizing mouth and gum swelling that's literally killing me right now. But I have to get to work, and I am supposed to die broke while the guys with no science make the money therefore even if I drop dead today I'm still doing very scientifically well.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
Woodbine



Posts: 1218
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 12 2016,10:43   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 12 2016,12:57)
My wife says I should go to the hospital ER for the agonizing mouth and gum swelling that's literally killing me right now. But I have to get to work, and I am supposed to die broke while the guys with no science make the money therefore even if I drop dead today I'm still doing very scientifically well.

Gaulin Logic...

I must die in ignomy therefore I am doing very scientifically well.

???

Gary somehow manages to strain even the non-sequitur to breaking point.

  
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 12 2016,10:58   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 12 2016,06:57)
My wife says I should go to the hospital ER for the agonizing mouth and gum swelling that's literally killing me right now. But I have to get to work, and I am supposed to die broke while the guys with no science make the money therefore even if I drop dead today I'm still doing very scientifically well.

How did that work out for John Davison?

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 12 2016,15:54   

Quote (Glen Davidson @ Feb. 12 2016,10:58)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 12 2016,06:57)
My wife says I should go to the hospital ER for the agonizing mouth and gum swelling that's literally killing me right now. But I have to get to work, and I am supposed to die broke while the guys with no science make the money therefore even if I drop dead today I'm still doing very scientifically well.

How did that work out for John Davison?

Glen Davidson

He loved it so.

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 12 2016,17:14   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 12 2016,06:57)
My wife says I should go to the hospital ER for the agonizing mouth and gum swelling that's literally killing me right now. But I have to get to work, and I am supposed to die broke while the guys with no science make the money therefore even if I drop dead today I'm still doing very scientifically well.

I hope you get better, but you have provided an unintentionally revealing answer to my question.  You and your ideas are doing terribly, but you still insist it is going well.

You have yet to give anyone any reason to carry your ideas any further.  If you go silent on your stuff, it will disappear entirely from the radar, because you haven't provided useful operational definitions; valid regular definitions of key terms; valid potential tests of your theory*; documented evidence supporting your claims; explanations in readable English; anything published in visible, high impact, peer-reviewed scientific literature; and so on and so forth.

*Note how physicists just managed to verify a well-grounded prediction put forward by Einstein when he published his theory.

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 14 2016,11:49   

For Sunday:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/christi....-597445

And there has been relief from the pain. I found out that emergency dental and other things are now covered under the state health insurance plan. Appointment is in the works with who I left off with before not being able to afford it all.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 14 2016,12:15   

And two earlier ones here:
www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/larry-moran-needs-to-do-some-more-reading/#comment-597379

UD is now reporting:
www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/bbc-bacteria-see-like-tiny-eyeballs

Here we go again..
www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGNiXGX2nLU

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
Jim_Wynne



Posts: 1208
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 14 2016,12:58   

Glad to see the "theory" is still being ignored doing well.

--------------
Evolution is not about laws but about randomness on happanchance.--Robert Byers, at PT

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 14 2016,13:59   

I could not help myself:  
http://www.uncommondescent.com/evoluti....-597462

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 14 2016,14:21   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 14 2016,11:49)
For Sunday:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/christi....-597445

And there has been relief from the pain. I found out that emergency dental and other things are now covered under the state health insurance plan. Appointment is in the works with who I left off with before not being able to afford it all.

Gary finally gives up the lie that this isn't about religion.

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 14 2016,14:31   

Quote (Texas Teach @ Feb. 14 2016,14:21)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 14 2016,11:49)
For Sunday:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/christi....-597445

And there has been relief from the pain. I found out that emergency dental and other things are now covered under the state health insurance plan. Appointment is in the works with who I left off with before not being able to afford it all.

Gary finally gives up the lie that this isn't about religion.

Kathy rules the religious side of the ID theory. I just keep the science part coming!

AC/DC - Who Made Who
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v....Nw1MtzI

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 14 2016,14:41   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 14 2016,14:31)
Quote (Texas Teach @ Feb. 14 2016,14:21)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 14 2016,11:49)
For Sunday:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/christi....-597445

And there has been relief from the pain. I found out that emergency dental and other things are now covered under the state health insurance plan. Appointment is in the works with who I left off with before not being able to afford it all.

Gary finally gives up the lie that this isn't about religion.

Kathy rules the religious side of the ID theory. I just keep the science part coming!

AC/DC - Who Made Who
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v....Nw1MtzI

Gary's just covering the fiction.

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 14 2016,14:46   

Quote (Glen Davidson @ Feb. 14 2016,14:41)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 14 2016,14:31)
Quote (Texas Teach @ Feb. 14 2016,14:21)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 14 2016,11:49)
For Sunday:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/christi....-597445

And there has been relief from the pain. I found out that emergency dental and other things are now covered under the state health insurance plan. Appointment is in the works with who I left off with before not being able to afford it all.

Gary finally gives up the lie that this isn't about religion.

Kathy rules the religious side of the ID theory. I just keep the science part coming!

AC/DC - Who Made Who
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v....Nw1MtzI

Gary's just covering the fiction.

Glen Davidson

In this forum it's more like selling the drama.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 14 2016,15:53   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 14 2016,14:31)
Quote (Texas Teach @ Feb. 14 2016,14:21)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 14 2016,11:49)
For Sunday:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/christi....-597445

And there has been relief from the pain. I found out that emergency dental and other things are now covered under the state health insurance plan. Appointment is in the works with who I left off with before not being able to afford it all.

Gary finally gives up the lie that this isn't about religion.

Kathy rules the religious side of the ID theory. I just keep the science part coming!

Sure, that's why you said:

Quote
From my experience “Science does & will lead us to God” is even true for Atheists who discover or explain something that helps us get there.


Feel free to spin some bullshit about how "being lead to God" isn't religious, but no one is buying it.  Maybe it will convince the cdesignproponentsists.

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
ChemiCat



Posts: 532
Joined: Nov. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 16 2016,10:13   

Quote
Kathy rules the religious side of the ID theory. I just keep the science part coming!


It's all about the science!

Feel free to provide some then as you haven't so far, Gaulin.

All you have done is try to force your version of your god into science and done that as poorly as your assertions about intelligence (whatever you suppose that to be). You have no science just a mess of buzz-words plagiarised at random from various scientists and put through a mind that spews them out in randomised English without meaning.

I'm sorry to hear that your health troubles have come back but perhaps you should stop posting rubbish and concentrate on improving the life of yourself and your family.

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 16 2016,23:19   

Two here, second one new:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/evoluti....-597496

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
ChemiCat



Posts: 532
Joined: Nov. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 17 2016,03:50   

Quote
Two here, second one new:


I refuse to go to that god-soaked den of liars, Gaulin. I don't want to increase their ill-gotten revenue.

That you do is very indicative your own mindset. You are just another godbot pretender who has been rejected wherever you have posted your rubbish.

As you didn't read my last sentence i my last post here it is again;

I'm sorry to hear that your health troubles have come back but perhaps you should stop posting rubbish and concentrate on improving the life of yourself and your family.

  
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 17 2016,03:59   

Quote
You can be sure that ID theory we are having science fun of a lifetime with right now is what US academia takes seriously.


All the evidence available suggests that no academician anywhere takes your stuff seriously.

For that to happen, you first need to remove false "facts" and contradictory assertions, and provide valid definitions, usable operational definitions, documented supporting evidence, affirmative tests or at least valid predictions and testable hypotheses, comprehensible English, and valid reasoning.

Any progress on baby crocodilians scurrying into their mothers' mouths yet?

  
ChemiCat



Posts: 532
Joined: Nov. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 17 2016,08:13   

Quote
You can be sure that ID theory we are having science fun of a lifetime with right now is what US academia takes seriously.


Dumbski, jumped ship,
Luskin. jumped ship,
Behe, shunted into a non-position,
Meyer, a liar for christ,
Lisle, ditto and totally nuts,
etc. etc.

Yes, ID is doing sooooo well!

No serious scientist anywhere is discussing ID/creationism except when they want a good laugh.

What is it, 50 years since ID stalled on the starting line? In that time ID/creationism has produced nothing, zilch, nada. Your "contribution" to "ID science" just makes it worse if that is possible. As N.Wells has eloquently pointed out again, your "theory" is not a scientific theory nor is it English.

Give up, Gaulin, and look after your family and yourself properly.

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 17 2016,22:02   

Evidence indicates that the most loyal adherents to Naturalism are to be found in the ID movement:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-597803

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 17 2016,22:49   

Quote (N.Wells @ Feb. 17 2016,03:59)
All the evidence available suggests that no academician anywhere takes your stuff seriously.

Then what's the problem with academiciana?

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
ChemiCat



Posts: 532
Joined: Nov. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2016,03:52   

Quote
Then what's the problem with academiciana?


They are not the problem, it's your pseudoscience that's the problem.

  
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2016,11:48   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 17 2016,22:49)
 
Quote (N.Wells @ Feb. 17 2016,03:59)
All the evidence available suggests that no academician anywhere takes your stuff seriously.

Then what's the problem with academiciana?

You mean, other than not existing in the English language?

(Or are your trying to claim that your stuff actually makes more sense if translated into, or perhaps out of, Romanian?)

The problems begin and end with you.

Edited to add: any documentation of baby crocodilians scurrying into their mothers' mouths yet?

Again, you need to remove false "facts" and contradictory assertions, and you need to provide valid definitions, usable operational definitions, valid reasoning, documented supporting evidence, and affirmative tests or at least valid predictions and testable hypotheses.  Comprehensible English is also desirable.

  
  18634 replies since Oct. 31 2012,02:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (622) < ... 532 533 534 535 536 [537] 538 539 540 541 542 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]