RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (10) < 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 >   
  Topic: Top Tard Quotes, Surely you save them too....< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 03 2008,07:46   

more of the same ol same ol.  note the goalpost shift from 'that's impossible' to 'we don't know how to profit from this yet but we are working on it but in the meantime let us tell the plebes it is wrong'.


Tardalus

Quote
Recently the British House of Commons passed an animal-human hybrid law that will take the British people (and eventually all of us) into a future genetic dystopia. The scientists have been given permission to create any kind of hybrid, including those created from cloning, animal eggs and human sperm.


Sorry Kerby, the brits are human-animal hybrids already.  i heard some of them have three chambered hearts.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 02 2008,21:37   

Tardation

Quote
"It is an established fact that modern species of coelacanth are in a separate genus": Oh? Because you say so? Yet you didn't explain how this can be determined without interfertility tests. No, this "established fact" is by decree, not scientific tests of interfertility.
Philip J. Rayment 11:22, 1 July 2008 (EDT)


now that is dumb.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 03 2008,11:20   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ July 02 2008,19:37)
Tardation

Quote
"It is an established fact that modern species of coelacanth are in a separate genus": Oh? Because you say so? Yet you didn't explain how this can be determined without interfertility tests. No, this "established fact" is by decree, not scientific tests of interfertility.
Philip J. Rayment 11:22, 1 July 2008 (EDT)


now that is dumb.

Could this be the birth of a new creationist "argument"?

"Scientists say Tyrannosaurus and Triceratops* are different species.  But they don't explain how this can be determined without interfertility tests.  No, this "established fact" is by decree, not scientific tests of interfertility."


* Insert any two organisms here, as long as at least one is extinct: sheep and hadrosaurs, geckos and Irish elk, ducks and trilobites...


A few years ago, before I took up tardology, I would have thought this argument would be too stupid even for creationists.  I know better now.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 03 2008,11:56   

john i think you got it.  

fossil species are articles of faith.

next thing you know they'll suggest fossils were planted by SATAN.

wait...  never mind.

ps i can't fault creationists for holding essentialist views of what a 'species' is, particularly since so many of my biologist colleagues hold these views, even if unintentionally. it is hard to rid oneself of sloppy typological thinking.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
keiths



Posts: 2195
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 04 2008,09:20   

Good stuff:
Quote
Intelligent Design reveals the wisdom of God

July 04, 2008 - 12:00 a.m.

The subject of Intelligent Design has been in the news lately, and it’s amazing how much resistance there is to it. There is hope, however, for quite a number of scientists are now admitting that evolution is hard to swallow and they do see the hand of an Intelligent Designer at work in the universe. Slowly but surely, the tide is turning toward Intelligent Design.

Some of the resistance comes from scientists who prefer to keep science in the realm of test and observation. I cannot fault them for that because that’s what science is all about. But for a scientist to close his mind to the obvious and refuse to believe in God on professional grounds is extreme short sightedness.

One of the early capitulations came with Robert Jastrow, an astrophysicist and founder of NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies.

In 1978 he wrote a book titled “God and the Astronomers” One of his topics concerned the human eye: “The eye is a marvelous instrument, resembling a telescope of the highest quality, with a lens, an adjustable focus, a variable diaphragm for controlling the amount of light, and optical corrections for spherical and chromatic aberration. The eye appears to have been designed; no designer of telescopes could have done better. How could this marvelous instrument have evolved by chance, through a succession of random events?”

Darwin himself acknowledged this as a problem. He wrote: “To suppose that the eye . . . could have been formed by (evolution), seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.”

There is much more ... the human body, the brain, DNA, the construction of the ear, the awesome distribution of the blood through the body.

Sex is too complex for its origin to be explained by evolution. Males and females would have to evolve independently and the first evolved person would not have had a mate. Body organs and organ systems would have been useless until all parts were in place.

How to account for the symmetry of the body? Two eyes, ears, hands, feet; even the nose is divided into two channels.

How would the bird fly with a wing only on one side? Consider the balance mechanism in the ear, what evolutionary force could have dreamed that up?

Evolutionists are classic rebels. The theory of evolution is merely a religion that serves to discredit the Intelligent Designer Himself.

The recent movie, “Expelled,” is a good example of the resistance some scientists have to the idea of God. Intelligent Design is part of our cultural war. Someone has said words to the effect that if there is no God, moral issues are up to the individual, so, by denying God they feel they can do as they please.

To be alert to all the intricacies of our world and its ecology is to be constantly amazed at the wonder of it all. Our Creator has planned the minutest detail.

So, start thinking about Intelligent Design, it will set you on a rewarding adventure of discovery.

Raymond Smith is president of the Strong Families of Victoria.


--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number. -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

  
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 04 2008,09:35   

If I hadn't read it I wouldn't have believed it was in print.

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
Assassinator



Posts: 479
Joined: Nov. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 04 2008,11:29   

Maybe these quotes aren't the most tardish, but they sure are the most ingenious pro-ID argument and anti-evolution argument I've seen in a while. I'll try to translate them.
The pro-ID one:
Quote
All modulair cybernetic systems we know are the result from rational and intelligent design. (ofcourse that's not true by definition, because we don't know if that's the case with life, wich is apperantly also a modulair cybernetic system) The reason we prefer modulair designs, is because we want expandability, re-use, and control for bigger designs.

Anti-evolution:
Quote
We don't know any (unintelligent) mechanism wich causes something with a structure like (with wich he means modulair cybernetic systems, ofcourse) that to arise out of it's own (in an unknown number of steps). There even are good arguments that such a mechanism is impossible: For example, there is no reason why a goal-less and unintelligent process should result in a modulair system. A modulair system always is less efficient then a non-modulair system. All examples of "design" by evolutionaire algorithms (I think he's trying to compare apples with pears here, because how well do those evolutionaire algorithms (he doesn't even name one) simulate the whole of the evolutionaire theory ánd reality.) show that there is a preference for non-modulair design.

The bolding is from me.

  
American Saddlebred



Posts: 111
Joined: May 2005

(Permalink) Posted: July 04 2008,16:28   


   
Assassinator



Posts: 479
Joined: Nov. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 04 2008,18:48   

Yes indeed ;) He actually sounds suprised that no one ever suggests that we are just really high-tech technology. Latest from him just came in, he quoted an article stating this:
Quote
Natural selection could select the ?ttest already-
programmed phenotypes. Evolution works through
differential survival and reproduction of the superior
members of each species. Phenotypes are the ?nished
products of nucleic acid (genetic) algorithms. Natural
selection could not have programmed nucleic acid
algorithms at the covalently-bound primary structure
(sequence) level. The environment does not select
nucleotide or codonic sequences. The environment
favors only the ?ttest phenotypes. It knows nothing of
genotypic programming directly. Nature has no ability
to optimize a conceptual cybernetic system at the
decision node (covalently-bound sequence) level. Nature
cannot organize conceptual, holistic operating systems
and instructions from ‘‘necessary’’ (Monod, 1972) mass/
energy relationships. Freedom of selection is necessary at
each decision node. Gene regulation and coordination are
programmed algorithmically. No known hypothetical
mechanism has even been suggested for the generation of
nucleic acid algorithms.

And he's suprised that's not common knowledge. Like no one knows that natural selection only selects on the phenotype...yea that's true hidden knowledge, they're all hiding it from us! No idea what his point with the algorithm is though, I can't stand that math-language...I háte math.

Anyway, what I want to say with quoting this, is that you guys would lóve to discuss with this bloke. I bet that he would be one of the few ID-supporters that would actually engage in a meaningfull discussion. Ok, I bet it would end in nothing anyway, that happend to me as well, but at least he would say something meaningfull. To bad he hates the attitude on places like that, or else I would've tried to get him over here ;)

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 09 2008,15:44   

just because this is good shit to hear someone say with a straight face.

Quote
From what I believe and read it was Original Sin that caused and is causing God's creation to break down.  Micro Evolution is fully supported by ID and indeed it is supported and predicted by it.  The loss of Information is why we get these sub-optimal appearing designs.

God's creation was perfect, our sin destroyed that perfection.

Or again that is what I Postulate.

......


Quote
Actually there were no disease causing bacteria.  Yes, there was bacteria, but it was the fall that caused some of them to degenerate and give us what we see today.

Again, there was no death before the fall.  Our sins to God are the cause of all the pain and suffering we see today.




ALL SCIENCE SO FAR

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 15 2008,12:05   

"Evidence liberals have to deny in order to say god does not exist" or some shit like that.  Hilarious


tardage

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 24 2008,19:57   

from an  Opinionated Teen(I am wondering if he is a Poe).

Quote
Okay, Erasmus. If the earth were being rapidly flooded by tons of water, what would die and be buried by mud first? Hmmm…..what about lizards and amphibians? Yes. Not terribly intelligent, they would be overcome rather quickly in the earlier layers of mud-soon-to-be-strata. Followed probably by……say……dinosaurs? Dinosaurs weren’t too bright either, I imagine. Mammals are smarter, but they would be buried soon after. Now humans are pretty smart. They would figure out that clothes drag them down into the water. Then they would swim and swim…..but soon drown. After all, it rained for forty days. Of course, not everybody would be able to swim. For example, the Neanderthal man, who is just a regular old man with arthritis.


odds are he is not.  this is run of the mill tard from that vein.  low sulfur, no overburden.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 25 2008,10:37   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ July 24 2008,17:57)
from an  Opinionated Teen(I am wondering if he is a Poe).

Quote
Okay, Erasmus. If the earth were being rapidly flooded by tons of water, what would die and be buried by mud first? Hmmm…..what about lizards and amphibians? Yes. Not terribly intelligent, they would be overcome rather quickly in the earlier layers of mud-soon-to-be-strata. Followed probably by……say……dinosaurs? Dinosaurs weren’t too bright either, I imagine. Mammals are smarter, but they would be buried soon after. Now humans are pretty smart. They would figure out that clothes drag them down into the water. Then they would swim and swim…..but soon drown. After all, it rained for forty days. Of course, not everybody would be able to swim. For example, the Neanderthal man, who is just a regular old man with arthritis.


odds are he is not.  this is run of the mill tard from that vein.  low sulfur, no overburden.

Did you ask him how the flowering plants were able to outswim the ichthyosaurs yet?

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 25 2008,10:57   

i think outswimming is not as important, to him, as how smart they are.  or i think if they have arthritis.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 25 2008,12:13   

Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,July 25 2008,08:57)
i think outswimming is not as important, to him, as how smart they are.  or i think if they have arthritis.

So did you ask him how the flowering plants were able to outsmart the ichthyosaurs yet?

Or how the creationists were able to outsmart the flowering plants?

Seriously, this is another illustration of how popular treatments of evolution lead to confusion.  The great-chain-of-being approach (Age Of Invertebrates -> Age Of Fish -> ... -> Age Of Mammals -> Age Of Man) leads people to think that, say, Jurassic strata contain nothing but dinosaurs, and there are only fish in Devonian rocks.  There's a nice bed of Miocene molluscs a few miles away from where I'm sitting.  Presumably, they were smart clams.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 25 2008,16:03   

john i do not engage this fool.  merely incidental mockery and oblique derision.

there are enough thick seams of tard to mine over there to just poke around for nuggets.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 25 2008,20:50   

Quote
William Dembski: Could we please dispense with any patronizing nonsense about Darwin being less than the messiah of a materialistic religion that pretends to find its justification in science. If Darwin was not the alpha and omega of evolution, then he was either a knave or a fool or a madman. Darwin did not leave us any other options. He did not intend to.

Patronizing nonsense, messiah, materialistic religion, alpha and omega, knave.

Wow.

{Hat tip to Bilbo at Telic Thoughts}

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 28 2008,08:20   

wow somebody should tell Billy Billy to dispense with the nonsense whereby he paraphrases CS Lewis very poorly, perhaps in the style of Dennis O'Leary, buy my book.  Zach I wonder just what in the hell goes on in his head, it seems clear to me that his beef has nothing to do with science (I know we all knew that already).

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
utidjian



Posts: 185
Joined: Oct. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 29 2008,09:03   

Oh the Dark Matter TARD! (not on UD).

Perhaps angels push the galaxies around?

-DU-

--------------
Being laughed at doesn't mean you're progressing along some line. It probably just means you're saying some stupid shit -stevestory

  
utidjian



Posts: 185
Joined: Oct. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 29 2008,09:13   

Ooops forgot to add some quotes:

Quote
I think that scientist are just too smart to believe in God, so they seek their answers elsewhere. They say that there is no evidence for God, but what that means is that they cannot dig up a piece of Him and study it under a microscope.


and

Quote
They have already found the evidence for God, and yet they call that evidence, dark matter. If you don’t know the idea of dark matter, there is this uniform force, that is keeping the stars of our galaxy together, exerting a constant and uniform gravity field. This goes against the laws of physics.


and

Quote
It is God who stops the galaxies from flying apart. So this is clear evidence of God’s existence. The sad thing is, that scientist cannot accept this, because of their prejudice against Him, and therefore make up these bizarre theories about something that cannot really exist, but is clearly there.


-DU-

--------------
Being laughed at doesn't mean you're progressing along some line. It probably just means you're saying some stupid shit -stevestory

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 29 2008,09:50   

that is primo tardery.  proof that you can polish a turd!

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 30 2008,00:47   

hold up hold up hold up

this fool you got to watch

on second thought it is painful tard to endure.  unless you like getting preached at.  

but this shit keeps winding up in my inbox.  too much trolling creobot boards i reckon.  beware, this is some heady shit.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Assassinator



Posts: 479
Joined: Nov. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 30 2008,05:47   

Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,July 30 2008,00:47)
hold up hold up hold up

this fool you got to watch

on second thought it is painful tard to endure.  unless you like getting preached at.  

but this shit keeps winding up in my inbox.  too much trolling creobot boards i reckon.  beware, this is some heady shit.

Heady shit? All I see is the typical crea-argumentation, nothing special, just the same ol' boring crap. What is fun by the way, is that he's calling himself "Dr." really proud in that video, but his degree (English) has 0 to do with his bla-bla in the video.
The creo's are really feeling like stuck records, I'm getting bored of them. Let's hope they shed the skin called ID soon, and something new and fun emerges from underneath it.

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 30 2008,09:21   

not heady as in 'brainy', but can you feel the vapors.  pungent aromatic squishy tard.

i admire his rhetorical style but it's all he's got.  i posted this because it is the kind of stupid tard that gets passed around in the creo circles.  god dammit it still shows up in my inbox.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Assassinator



Posts: 479
Joined: Nov. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 30 2008,10:36   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ July 30 2008,09:21)
not heady as in 'brainy', but can you feel the vapors.  pungent aromatic squishy tard.

i admire his rhetorical style but it's all he's got.  i posted this because it is the kind of stupid tard that gets passed around in the creo circles.  god dammit it still shows up in my inbox.

Well yes I'm amazed at there stamina, how after só long they can still keep pumping out this crap. Kudo's for that. But even the smell of this isn't so tardilishious anymore, for me at least. I'm like "Is this all you got?", ready for fresh heaps of tard instead of this dried up ol' turd.

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 30 2008,11:26   

don't you still like to watch Muhammad Ali fights?  I do.  I like to play 200 year old fiddle tunes.  No surprises, just an honest admiration of the delivery.  

Of course it would be exciting indeed to see some new material.  Its unlikely.  In the meantime, the church rolls on (and the women have paint on their face).

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Turncoat



Posts: 129
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 30 2008,11:31   

Quote (Assassinator @ July 30 2008,05:47)
The creo's are really feeling like stuck records, I'm getting bored of them. Let's hope they shed the skin called ID soon, and something new and fun emerges from underneath it.


  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: July 30 2008,11:55   

Ooh!  It's even got eyespots.

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 30 2008,11:57   

Quidam - I demand a TARDzilla. pronto.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 30 2008,12:19   

Quote (Richardthughes @ July 30 2008,11:57)
Quidam - I demand a TARDzilla. pronto.

Rich - Give him some direction!

Whose face should be morphed onto godzilla's?

Behe, DaveScott, Demsbki?

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
  297 replies since June 28 2007,14:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (10) < 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]