Antievolution.org - Antievolution.org Discussion Board -Topic::Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread

Posted: Aug. 19 2007,14:10

Oh and you have, in so many very, very disturbing ways!

I saw some leg, someone's behind and a red dress. I thought "Oho! Booty alert", I clicked, I cried, I plucked my own eyes out and jabbed myself in the weeping sockets repeatedly with a kebab skewer.

I'm ok now though. I've had several showers with bleach and conc. HCl. I no longer feel like a dirty, dirty boy. I have no skin, but I understand it grows back. No big deal.

;)

Louis

--------------
Bye.

Richardthughes

Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

Posted: Aug. 19 2007,19:38

S L O W E S T reader in the world?

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

Posted: Aug. 19 2007,19:50

Quote

dgw

08/19/2007

3:43 pm

Tard Alert!

Does Behe?s work rise to the level of a fundamental law of biology?defining the genetic limitations of RM +NS? The lack of fundamental biological laws (compared with physical laws in electromagnetics, gravitation, quantum mechanics, and relativity) is a serious shortcoming of the current model. And, one that ID has opportunity to contribute to significantly.

http://www.egothemag.com/archi.....cal_la.htm

there's some real delusion over there.

Arden Chatfield

Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

Posted: Aug. 19 2007,20:06

Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 19 2007,19:38)

[URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/canadian-writer-gets-positive-review-of-edge-of-evolution-published-in-philadelphia-inquir

er/#comment-133101]S ? L ? O ? ?W ? E ? S ? T ? ? reader in the world?[/URL]

"All science so far!"

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

Posted: Aug. 19 2007,21:29

http://post-darwinist.blogspot.com/2007....er.html

Denyse says:

Quote

Can you believe it? Darwinism is obviously in ruins, and they would actually make a statement like THAT?

For a journalist, Denyse is a terrible writer. Really substandard.

someotherguy

Posts: 398
Joined: Aug. 2006

Posted: Aug. 19 2007,22:14

Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 19 2007,21:29)

http://post-darwinist.blogspot.com/2007....er.html

Denyse says:

Quote

Can you believe it? Darwinism is obviously in ruins, and they would actually make a statement like THAT?

For a journalist, Denyse is a terrible writer. Really substandard.

Luckily, what she lacks in written communication skills, she easily makes up for with her clever ideas and amazing mental acuity.

Oh wait. . .

--------------
Evolander in training

Arden Chatfield

Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

Posted: Aug. 19 2007,22:43

Quote (someotherguy @ Aug. 19 2007,22:14)

Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 19 2007,21:29)

http://post-darwinist.blogspot.com/2007....er.html

Denyse says:

Quote

Can you believe it? Darwinism is obviously in ruins, and they would actually make a statement like THAT?

For a journalist, Denyse is a terrible writer. Really substandard.

Luckily, what she lacks in written communication skills, she easily makes up for with her clever ideas and amazing mental acuity.

Oh wait. . .

Is it perhaps an indicator of Denyse's journalistic prowess that the best gigs she can get are unpaid blogs?

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

Posted: Aug. 19 2007,22:49

tribune7 is a tard

Quote

the payload is the author?s open question as to whether Michael Ruse even READ the book.
I see the dam starting to break.

Would that be the dam which is holding back our Waterloo?

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

Posted: Aug. 19 2007,22:54

Any day now folks! I hope you're all prepared!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

Posted: Aug. 19 2007,22:58

Only our rigid and dogmatic adherence to the Church of Darwin prevents us from noticing that the evolution journals are floundering, while the ID journal has become a juggernaut, publishing breakthrough after breakthrough.

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

Posted: Aug. 19 2007,23:08

Since Judge Jones's ruling in December of 2005, that one evolution journal has published 4,932 pages, and the premiere ID journal has published, um, zero pages. You'd have to be downright biased to think there was something wrong with Revolutionary ID Science.

Arden Chatfield

Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

Posted: Aug. 19 2007,23:18

Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 19 2007,22:58)

Only our rigid and dogmatic adherence to the Church of Darwin prevents us from noticing that the evolution journals are floundering, while the ID journal has become a juggernaut, publishing breakthrough after breakthrough.

HAH! I see that journal Evolution hasn't managed to put out an issue since August 2007!!

Oh. Never mind.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

Bob O'H

Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,00:07

Yeah, you Americans are lagging behind when it comes to evolution. Our European Journal of Evolutionary Biology managed to stagger on to September 2007.

And we don't have to hide in some God forsaken place like New Zealand when we want to meet each other. No, we go to Sweden instead.

Bob

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

Posts: 1948
Joined: Mar. 2006

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,00:49

Quote (Bob O'H @ Aug. 20 2007,08:07)

Yeah, you Americans are lagging behind when it comes to evolution. ?Our European Journal of Evolutionary Biology managed to stagger on to September 2007.

And we don't have to hide in some God forsaken place like New Zealand when we want to meet each other. ?No, we go to Sweden instead.

Bob

Ha! God forsaken? It could have been France.

Why did god make the French? Because, after making such a beautiful country he had to balance things out.

Notice the list of comercial sponsors for that conference.
When did ID have Roche as a sponsor?

--------------
The conservative has but little to fear from the man whose reason is the servant of his passions, but let him beware of him in whom reason has become the greatest and most terrible of the passions.These are the wreckers of outworn empires and civilisations, doubters, disintegrators, deicides.Haldane

Ptaylor

Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,01:15

Quote (Bob O'H @ Aug. 20 2007,00:07)

Yeah, you Americans are lagging behind when it comes to evolution. Our European Journal of Evolutionary Biology managed to stagger on to September 2007.

And we don't have to hide in some God forsaken place like New Zealand when we want to meet each other. No, we go to Sweden instead.

Bob

Well, if God has forsaken New Zealand, I guess that's one more good reason for living here. ;)

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

keiths

Posts: 2195
Joined: Jan. 2006

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,04:53

Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 19 2007,21:29)

For a journalist, Denyse is a terrible writer. Really substandard.

Has anyone else noticed what Denyse considers to be cool journalistic lingo, like calling herself a "scijo" and referring to paragraphs as "graffs"?

Quote

Ann Coulter takes a shot at Darwinism in the last graff of this column:

--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number. -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

djmullen

Posts: 327
Joined: Jan. 2006

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,04:59

Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 19 2007,21:29)

http://post-darwinist.blogspot.com/2007....er.html

Denyse says:

?

Quote

Can you believe it? Darwinism is obviously in ruins, and they would actually make a statement like THAT?

For a journalist, Denyse is a terrible writer. Really substandard.

For a journalist, Denyse seems to publish mostly in religious magazines, an occasional trade journal and one co-write with a Canadian Dr. Egnor.

steve_h

Posts: 544
Joined: Jan. 2006

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,06:50

Quote (keiths @ Aug. 20 2007,11:53)

Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 19 2007,21:29)

For a journalist, Denyse is a terrible writer. Really substandard.

Has anyone else noticed what Denyse considers to be cool journalistic lingo, like calling herself a "scijo" and referring to paragraphs as "graffs"?

Most of what she writes is just a load of old lox.

oldmanintheskydidntdoit

Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,07:26

Remember this day. Step 1 of the proof of Intelligent design!

Fresh Tard

Finally, a testable ID prediction :p

EDIT: I have to wonder if "darwinism" has already been disproved in concept why they are so excited about this?

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger�s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

Erasmus, FCD

Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,07:43

DT tarded

Quote

What new things did falciparum build with all that opportunity given to rm+ns to add functional information? Nothing. Exactly what ID predicts

All Science So Far!!!!

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell.�Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

oldmanintheskydidntdoit

Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,07:48

I know it's obvious, but DS is right on the money this time.

ID predicts nothing.

I think we can all agree on that!

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger�s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

Bebbo

Posts: 161
Joined: Dec. 2002

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,08:30

Quote (keiths @ Aug. 20 2007,04:53)

Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 19 2007,21:29)

For a journalist, Denyse is a terrible writer. Really substandard.

Has anyone else noticed what Denyse considers to be cool journalistic lingo, like calling herself a "scijo" and referring to paragraphs as "graffs"?
?

Quote

Ann Coulter takes a shot at Darwinism in the last graff of this column:

That's what happens when you're just a mindless hack, like Ann Coulter but without the wit.

Richardthughes

Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,08:50

Quote (keiths @ Aug. 20 2007,04:53)

Has anyone else noticed what Denyse considers to be cool journalistic lingo, like calling herself a "scijo" and referring to paragraphs as "graffs"?
?

She "Riffs on things", as does Davetard.

It must be a bad guitar-center-been-playing-4-months stairway to heaven Riff.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

Richardthughes

Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,09:03

Oh Davetard!

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....entists

Quote

Intelligent Design Research: Proof of concept in 3-10 years say scientists
DaveScot
While they don?t call it intelligent design research? that?s in fact what it is. In the article a scientist is quoted saying once a container (cell wall) is synthesized and nucleotides are added in the right proportions then Darwinian evolution will take care of the rest. Yeah, right. Darwinian processes won?t do jack diddly squat. It?ll require intelligent design every step of the way. Mark my words. ID will be proven in concept and Darwinian evolution will (again) be disproven in concept.

That's right, DT. Abiogenesis disproves NDE. I suspect if this happens, it will have the same effect in the 'big tent' as one of Arden's "dead cat farts".

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

Posts: 1948
Joined: Mar. 2006

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,09:22

Quote

That's right, DT. Abiogenesis disproves NDE. I suspect if this happens, it will have the same effect in the 'big tent' as one of Arden's "dead cat farts".

Woah Neddy!

That's too much for D.T. to grok before his next bag of cheesy poofs.

Better to say "The Designer is a fat Texas IT pensioner with fungus in his bilges, who is so brilliant he disproves NDE each time he loads his gun or starts his chainsaw".

--------------
The conservative has but little to fear from the man whose reason is the servant of his passions, but let him beware of him in whom reason has become the greatest and most terrible of the passions.These are the wreckers of outworn empires and civilisations, doubters, disintegrators, deicides.Haldane

Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,09:25

Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 20 2007,10:03)

Quote

Intelligent Design Research: Proof of concept in 3-10 years say scientists
DaveScot
While they don?t call it intelligent design research? that?s in fact what it is.

IDers are like the Holly Hunter character in Raising Arizona. They can't have a baby of their own, so they wanna steal one from the hospital.

Posts: 1948
Joined: Mar. 2006

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,09:49

Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 20 2007,17:25)

Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 20 2007,10:03)

Quote

Intelligent Design Research: Proof of concept in 3-10 years say scientists
DaveScot
While they don?t call it intelligent design research? that?s in fact what it is.

IDers are like the Holly Hunter character in Raising Arizona. They can't have a baby of their own, so they wanna steal one from the hospital.

Yeah except they are going to steal it in 3-10 years...3-10 years from now.

It's a bit like the plumber who goes to a house to fix a tap and notices that the lady of the house is making eyes at him. He just can't get to the point and she finally says: "Do you like cold rice pudding?"
and he says: "Yes"
she says: "Well, come back tomorrow".

--------------
The conservative has but little to fear from the man whose reason is the servant of his passions, but let him beware of him in whom reason has become the greatest and most terrible of the passions.These are the wreckers of outworn empires and civilisations, doubters, disintegrators, deicides.Haldane

Hermagoras

Posts: 1260
Joined: June 2007

Posted: Aug. 20 2007,10:39

Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 20 2007,09:03)

Oh Davetard!

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....entists

Quote

Intelligent Design Research: Proof of concept in 3-10 years say scientists
DaveScot
While they don?t call it intelligent design research? that?s in fact what it is. In the article a scientist is quoted saying once a container (cell wall) is synthesized and nucleotides are added in the right proportions then Darwinian evolution will take care of the rest. Yeah, right. Darwinian processes won?t do jack diddly squat. It?ll require intelligent design every step of the way. Mark my words. ID will be proven in concept and Darwinian evolution will (again) be disproven in concept.

That's right, DT. Abiogenesis disproves NDE. I suspect if this happens, it will have the same effect in the 'big tent' as one of Arden's "dead cat farts".

DaveScot is really into the notion of proof of concept:

Quote

It?s a proof of concept for intelligent design. Imagine that someone in a lab somewhere were able to apply selective pressure to bacteria that caused them evolve a nucleus and become a prokaryote. What would that prove? It wouldn?t prove it happened that way but it would be a proof of concept - i.e. it proves it *could* have happened that way. In fact it would be the first proof of concept ever for macroevolution.

Intelligent design has been proven in concept by accomplishments in genetic engineering. NDE in its larger claims has no such proof - the only direct observations are all microevolutionary in nature.

This is why it?s so anti-science to exclude ID from hypothetical mechanisms underlying organic evolution - ID is a proven concept which is more than any competing hypothesis can claim. It?s not just a peer to NDE but a superior hypothesis based on experimental evidence.

--------------
"I am not currently proving that objective morality is true. I did that a long time ago and you missed it." -- StephenB

http://paralepsis.blogspot.com/....pot.com

Posts: 1948
Joined: Mar. 2006