Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > MrIntelligentDesign

Pages: (42) < ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 ... >

dazz Posts: 247 Joined: Mar. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,05:02    Quote (sparc @ Oct. 13 2015,08:17) Quote (dazz @ Oct. 12 2015,15:06) Quote (rpenner @ Oct. 12 2015,21:54) This is why we need the “Science Police” on the Internet.  :) Tard boys, tard boys, watcha gonna do, watcha gonna do when they come 4 U Tard boys always shine LOL

dazz Posts: 247 Joined: Mar. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,05:09    I see a missed opportunity here... PRINCIPLE ASS That would have been a great title for his books

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,06:31    Quote (sparc @ Oct. 13 2015,09:17) Quote (dazz @ Oct. 12 2015,15:06) Quote (rpenner @ Oct. 12 2015,21:54) This is why we need the “Science Police” on the Internet.  :) Tard boys, tard boys, watcha gonna do, watcha gonna do when they come 4 U Tard boys always shine Tard boys are always shining turds. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Lethean Posts: 292 Joined: Jan. 2014 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,07:09    I like the choice of font. All I can see is a dude giving his "d" one of those christian side hugs. Can't unsee it. -------------- "So I'm a pretty unusual guy and it's not stupidity that has gotten me where I am. It's brilliance." "My brain is one of the very few independent thinking brains that you've ever met. And that's a thing of wonder to you and since you don't understand it you criticize it." ~Dave Hawkins~

dazz Posts: 247 Joined: Mar. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,07:45    Quote (Lethean @ Oct. 13 2015,14:09) I like the choice of font. All I can see is a dude giving his "d" one of those christian side hugs. Can't unsee it. LMFAO!

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,07:47    Hey Edgar, this is why you fail.  Well, one of the countless reasons.  A genuine scientist, on science and how it works: “Science is unique.  The idea is to try to give all the information to help others judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgement in one particular direction or another.”  Richard Feynman

dazz Posts: 247 Joined: Mar. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,07:51    Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,14:47) Hey Edgar, this is why you fail.  Well, one of the countless reasons.  A genuine scientist, on science and how it works: “Science is unique.  The idea is to try to give all the information to help others judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgement in one particular direction or another.”  Richard Feynman Prediction: that's going to go well over his head and he's going to respond with the same "I've already given all the information on how to categorize eggs, I mean X!!"

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,08:14    Quote (dazz @ Oct. 13 2015,08:51) Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,14:47) Hey Edgar, this is why you fail.  Well, one of the countless reasons.  A genuine scientist, on science and how it works: “Science is unique.  The idea is to try to give all the information to help others judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgement in one particular direction or another.”  Richard Feynman Prediction: that's going to go well over his head and he's going to respond with the same "I've already given all the information on how to categorize eggs, I mean X!!" Or he'll just ignore it. Or recycle his previous response.  'Other scientists had their ideas replace previous ideas, so you have to replace my ideas or they win.' Is that the single most common trope of pseudo-science loons?  It certainly appears to be, at least around these parts.

Wesley R. Elsberry Posts: 4991 Joined: May 2002 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,08:19    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 12 2015,07:27)   Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 12 2015,03:29)     Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 10 2015,00:43)       Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 09 2015,21:22) WHS Jr. appears to have a thing for apologetics and intelligent design creationism, judging from his other reviews. There's nothing to indicate that WHS Jr. brings any scientific acumen to the table. I've already told you that I don't care anybody, OK? I will only care if you bring one experiment showing that I am wrong. Thus, I will surely care. Thus, I have the best science and you have religion only. Irrelevancy (I didn't say Edgar cared about WHS Jr.), irrelevancy (one can be shown wrong in many other ways than by experiment), arguing from facts not in evidence ("best science"?), and ignorance (Edgar, like many others responding to me, has no clue what my stances are). Edgar can "agree" with WHS Jr. all he likes, but the fact remains that endorsement by WHS Jr. appears to have little merit based upon WHS Jr.'s other review history. Edgar need not care about that; I and others are doing fine making our own assessments of the rigor of any and all positive notices of Edgar's work; it isn't something that requires Edgar's validation. As I said that I don't care whoever they are. I only care if one person has commented with experiment in his hand, then, I will be very attentive to that person. Edgar Postrado, on Amazon, Posted on Jun 3, 2015 2:39:38 PM:   Quote Thank you for your comments. I agree with you. WHS Jr. didn't present any experiment, and yet Edgar cared enough to post the above comment. While a foolish consistency may be a hobgoblin to small minds, getting even to small mind status would require the minimal level of organization that is marked by some consistency. -------------- "You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

dazz Posts: 247 Joined: Mar. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,08:25    Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,15:14) Quote (dazz @ Oct. 13 2015,08:51) Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,14:47) Hey Edgar, this is why you fail.  Well, one of the countless reasons.  A genuine scientist, on science and how it works: “Science is unique.  The idea is to try to give all the information to help others judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgement in one particular direction or another.”  Richard Feynman Prediction: that's going to go well over his head and he's going to respond with the same "I've already given all the information on how to categorize eggs, I mean X!!" Or he'll just ignore it. Or recycle his previous response.  'Other scientists had their ideas replace previous ideas, so you have to replace my ideas or they win.' Is that the single most common trope of pseudo-science loons?  It certainly appears to be, at least around these parts. Yeah, they see themselves as such extraordinary geniuses, that they are one of a kind, not realizing that many loons preceded them, following the same exact patterns, the same Galileo comparisons... And all their amazing innovative "discoveries" are almost invariably rehashes of the cosmological argument, Paley's watchmaker and other ancient and stupid arguments from ignorance / god-of-the-gaps. And of course, they are convinced that nobody will notice that they're simply out to prove god. Dumbfucks

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,08:28    "They laughed at Fulton!" "They laughed at Edison!" But 'they' also laughed at Bozo the Clown.  And Edgar Postrado, and Gary Gaulin, and TimeCube Guy, and Michael Behe, and Sal Cordova, and Joe G, and the rest of the Idiots.

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,09:12    Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,08:28) "They laughed at Fulton!" "They laughed at Edison!" But 'they' also laughed at Bozo the Clown.  And Edgar Postrado, and Gary Gaulin, and TimeCube Guy, and Michael Behe, and Sal Cordova, and Joe G, and the rest of the Idiots. But I have always the last victory laugh since I discovered the real intelligence. If someone in this 7 billions people on earth would like to discover the real intelligence, they will end agreeing with me! That is the reason why I published my science books fast and quick so that when that "discoverer" will claim that he/she discovered the real intelligence, I will show to him/her the date of my publication and my YouTube videos. I've already discovered it! I HAVE SCIENCE and I'M RIGHT! THAT IS FOR SURE!

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,09:14    Quote (dazz @ Oct. 13 2015,08:25) Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,15:14) Quote (dazz @ Oct. 13 2015,08:51)   Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,14:47) Hey Edgar, this is why you fail.  Well, one of the countless reasons.  A genuine scientist, on science and how it works: “Science is unique.  The idea is to try to give all the information to help others judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgement in one particular direction or another.”  Richard Feynman Prediction: that's going to go well over his head and he's going to respond with the same "I've already given all the information on how to categorize eggs, I mean X!!" Or he'll just ignore it. Or recycle his previous response.  'Other scientists had their ideas replace previous ideas, so you have to replace my ideas or they win.' Is that the single most common trope of pseudo-science loons?  It certainly appears to be, at least around these parts. Yeah, they see themselves as such extraordinary geniuses, that they are one of a kind, not realizing that many loons preceded them, following the same exact patterns, the same Galileo comparisons... And all their amazing innovative "discoveries" are almost invariably rehashes of the cosmological argument, Paley's watchmaker and other ancient and stupid arguments from ignorance / god-of-the-gaps. And of course, they are convinced that nobody will notice that they're simply out to prove god. Dumbfucks You had never read my science books that is why you still don't know the differences of them all between my new discoveries and them...

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,09:17    Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,07:47) Hey Edgar, this is why you fail.  Well, one of the countless reasons.  A genuine scientist, on science and how it works: “Science is unique.  The idea is to try to give all the information to help others judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgement in one particular direction or another.”  Richard Feynman Yes, he was right. The reason why he said that because he received taxes, grants and funds from anywhere. All books for ToE had already been prepaid by taxes, thus, they must be free! I am a freelance scientist and I have the best science. They have the best monetary supports, but they have the worst science.

MrIntelligentDesign Posts: 405 Joined: Sep. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,09:18    Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 13 2015,08:19) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 12 2015,07:27)     Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 12 2015,03:29)     Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 10 2015,00:43)       Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 09 2015,21:22) WHS Jr. appears to have a thing for apologetics and intelligent design creationism, judging from his other reviews. There's nothing to indicate that WHS Jr. brings any scientific acumen to the table. I've already told you that I don't care anybody, OK? I will only care if you bring one experiment showing that I am wrong. Thus, I will surely care. Thus, I have the best science and you have religion only. Irrelevancy (I didn't say Edgar cared about WHS Jr.), irrelevancy (one can be shown wrong in many other ways than by experiment), arguing from facts not in evidence ("best science"?), and ignorance (Edgar, like many others responding to me, has no clue what my stances are). Edgar can "agree" with WHS Jr. all he likes, but the fact remains that endorsement by WHS Jr. appears to have little merit based upon WHS Jr.'s other review history. Edgar need not care about that; I and others are doing fine making our own assessments of the rigor of any and all positive notices of Edgar's work; it isn't something that requires Edgar's validation. As I said that I don't care whoever they are. I only care if one person has commented with experiment in his hand, then, I will be very attentive to that person. Edgar Postrado, on Amazon, Posted on Jun 3, 2015 2:39:38 PM:     Quote Thank you for your comments. I agree with you. WHS Jr. didn't present any experiment, and yet Edgar cared enough to post the above comment. While a foolish consistency may be a hobgoblin to small minds, getting even to small mind status would require the minimal level of organization that is marked by some consistency. Those who will agree with me will surely be safe.

sparc Posts: 2088 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,09:19    Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,08:28) "They laughed at Fulton!" "They laughed at Edison!" But 'they' also laughed at Bozo the Clown.  And Edgar Postrado, and Gary Gaulin, and TimeCube Guy, and Michael Behe, and Sal Cordova, and Joe G, and the rest of the Idiots. Who would even laugh at MrIntelligentDesign? Edited by sparc on Oct. 13 2015,09:20 -------------- "[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God." - William Dembski -

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,09:25    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 13 2015,10:12) Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,08:28) "They laughed at Fulton!" "They laughed at Edison!" But 'they' also laughed at Bozo the Clown.  And Edgar Postrado, and Gary Gaulin, and TimeCube Guy, and Michael Behe, and Sal Cordova, and Joe G, and the rest of the Idiots. But I have always the last victory laugh since I discovered the real intelligence. If someone in this 7 billions people on earth would like to discover the real intelligence, they will end agreeing with me! That is the reason why I published my science books fast and quick so that when that "discoverer" will claim that he/she discovered the real intelligence, I will show to him/her the date of my publication and my YouTube videos. I've already discovered it! I HAVE SCIENCE and I'M RIGHT! THAT IS FOR SURE! Doesn't matter how loud you shout. What matters is the evidence. Nothing you do is correct -- not in methods, not in interpretation, not in results. "Real intelligence" as you use the phrase is an abuse of both terms.  Your definition fails on every account. Those "discovering" 'real intelligence' is on a par with 'discovering' the Bandersnatch -- minus the creative value. You have no science and you are not right. If you disagree, show otherwise. Shouting is of no use, and is bad behavior as well. As I asked before, what are you, six?

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,09:27    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 13 2015,10:14) Quote (dazz @ Oct. 13 2015,08:25) Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,15:14)   Quote (dazz @ Oct. 13 2015,08:51)   Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,14:47) Hey Edgar, this is why you fail.  Well, one of the countless reasons.  A genuine scientist, on science and how it works: “Science is unique.  The idea is to try to give all the information to help others judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgement in one particular direction or another.”  Richard Feynman Prediction: that's going to go well over his head and he's going to respond with the same "I've already given all the information on how to categorize eggs, I mean X!!" Or he'll just ignore it. Or recycle his previous response.  'Other scientists had their ideas replace previous ideas, so you have to replace my ideas or they win.' Is that the single most common trope of pseudo-science loons?  It certainly appears to be, at least around these parts. Yeah, they see themselves as such extraordinary geniuses, that they are one of a kind, not realizing that many loons preceded them, following the same exact patterns, the same Galileo comparisons... And all their amazing innovative "discoveries" are almost invariably rehashes of the cosmological argument, Paley's watchmaker and other ancient and stupid arguments from ignorance / god-of-the-gaps. And of course, they are convinced that nobody will notice that they're simply out to prove god. Dumbfucks You had never read my science books that is why you still don't know the differences of them all between my new discoveries and them... Nothing you have posted here provides any motivation whatsoever to read your self-published books. No one buys them, no one takes them seriously, and that's being generous. We've already shown here that what appears to be your foundational distinction, between 'intellen' and 'naturen' is confused, incoherent, and relies on an argument from ignorance. You have no new discoveries, except in the trivial sense that you have combined words in new ways.  But everyone does that all the time, almost always with more meaning, more sense, and more utility than your word salad.

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,09:31    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 13 2015,10:17) Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,07:47) Hey Edgar, this is why you fail.  Well, one of the countless reasons.  A genuine scientist, on science and how it works: “Science is unique.  The idea is to try to give all the information to help others judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgement in one particular direction or another.”  Richard Feynman Yes, he was right. The reason why he said that because he received taxes, grants and funds from anywhere. All books for ToE had already been prepaid by taxes, thus, they must be free! I am a freelance scientist and I have the best science. They have the best monetary supports, but they have the worst science. You are seriously arguing that he was 'right' because he received financial support? If so, then clearly you are wrong because you do not. It is simply false, and offensively so, to assert that 'all books for ToE' are paid for by taxes.  You are equally wrong to assert that whatever part may have been paid for by taxes should be free. You are as wrong about economics and publishing as you are about science. With just a titch of bitterness added. You get far more support than you deserve. You have less science than you have money.   What have you produced that benefits the world? Nothing, that's what. You've got nothing but promises. And when challenged on the promises, you admit that it all boils down to making you rich and famous.  That's all that the acceptance of your ideas would mean to the world -- you said so in this thread. But that is of no value to anyone but you. Science does considerably better than that. You pathetic little lunatic.

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,09:33    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 13 2015,10:18) Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 13 2015,08:19) Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 12 2015,07:27)     Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 12 2015,03:29)       Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 10 2015,00:43)         Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 09 2015,21:22) WHS Jr. appears to have a thing for apologetics and intelligent design creationism, judging from his other reviews. There's nothing to indicate that WHS Jr. brings any scientific acumen to the table. I've already told you that I don't care anybody, OK? I will only care if you bring one experiment showing that I am wrong. Thus, I will surely care. Thus, I have the best science and you have religion only. Irrelevancy (I didn't say Edgar cared about WHS Jr.), irrelevancy (one can be shown wrong in many other ways than by experiment), arguing from facts not in evidence ("best science"?), and ignorance (Edgar, like many others responding to me, has no clue what my stances are). Edgar can "agree" with WHS Jr. all he likes, but the fact remains that endorsement by WHS Jr. appears to have little merit based upon WHS Jr.'s other review history. Edgar need not care about that; I and others are doing fine making our own assessments of the rigor of any and all positive notices of Edgar's work; it isn't something that requires Edgar's validation. As I said that I don't care whoever they are. I only care if one person has commented with experiment in his hand, then, I will be very attentive to that person. Edgar Postrado, on Amazon, Posted on Jun 3, 2015 2:39:38 PM:     Quote Thank you for your comments. I agree with you. WHS Jr. didn't present any experiment, and yet Edgar cared enough to post the above comment. While a foolish consistency may be a hobgoblin to small minds, getting even to small mind status would require the minimal level of organization that is marked by some consistency. Those who will agree with me will surely be safe. Jesus complex much? Sheesh, just what will any poor fool who winds up accepting your nonsense be safe from?  Sanity?  Rationality? You don't even understand the point of Wesley's post. Your response is ludicrous.   And just to note, you have convinced no one of the truth of your notions.

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,09:34    Quote (sparc @ Oct. 13 2015,10:19) Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,08:28) "They laughed at Fulton!" "They laughed at Edison!" But 'they' also laughed at Bozo the Clown.  And Edgar Postrado, and Gary Gaulin, and TimeCube Guy, and Michael Behe, and Sal Cordova, and Joe G, and the rest of the Idiots. Who would even laugh at MrIntelligentDesign? Everyone?s Or at least that subset who have the misfortune to encounter his silly little notions.

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,09:43    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 13 2015,10:17) Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,07:47) Hey Edgar, this is why you fail.  Well, one of the countless reasons.  A genuine scientist, on science and how it works: “Science is unique.  The idea is to try to give all the information to help others judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgement in one particular direction or another.”  Richard Feynman Yes, he was right. The reason why he said that because he received taxes, grants and funds from anywhere. All books for ToE had already been prepaid by taxes, thus, they must be free! I am a freelance scientist and I have the best science. They have the best monetary supports, but they have the worst science. It's pretty funny to see you saying "yes, he was right" when he is describing a process infinitely far removed from what you do. You cannot even provide sufficient detail and control information for your little trials (not experiments) to allow them to be replicated. You cannot provide operational definitions for any of your terms. You craft every 'discussion' in which you engage in such a way as to direct the desired judgement.  That you fail in this is inarguable.  That you do it is equally clear. You do not present all the information. What you present rarely rises to the level of information.  This is because most of it never rises to the level of data.

QED Posts: 41 Joined: July 2008 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,10:15    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 13 2015,09:12) Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,08:28) "They laughed at Fulton!" "They laughed at Edison!" But 'they' also laughed at Bozo the Clown.  And Edgar Postrado, and Gary Gaulin, and TimeCube Guy, and Michael Behe, and Sal Cordova, and Joe G, and the rest of the Idiots. But I have always the last victory laugh since I discovered the real intelligence. If someone in this 7 billions people on earth would like to discover the real intelligence, they will end agreeing with me! That is the reason why I published my science books fast and quick so that when that "discoverer" will claim that he/she discovered the real intelligence, I will show to him/her the date of my publication and my YouTube videos. I've already discovered it! I HAVE SCIENCE and I'M RIGHT! THAT IS FOR SURE! OK - time to confess. You're really Ben Carson, aren't you?

dazz Posts: 247 Joined: Mar. 2015 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,10:41    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 12 2015,22:56) [quote=dazz,Oct. 12 2015,15:52][quote=MrIntelligentDesign,Oct. 12 2015,22:45] Quote (dazz @ Oct. 12 2015,10:40) Did you use the egg-tissue experiment in your book as evidence to support your intelen/naturen categorization? Yes or no? Yes. Then why don't you publish that retraction? If that experiment is evidence for your intelen/naturen categorization based on the number of solutions to a problem, then your experiment should produce consistent results for ANY problem and ANY solution(s) If I try with a more intelligent solution (some soft material), I found that I could solve the problem without needing more than one paper tissue. I also found that, using paper tissues, I could reproduce your results and one single paper tissue was enough if what I wanted (the problem) was to break the egg. I fact, I managed to break the egg with NO tissues, rags or any extra elements! So I experimentally tested your theory and found problems with 0, 1 and more than 1 solutions. This clearly falsifies your theory because it shows that the number of solutions, defined and applied exactly as per your own instructions in your book, is independent of the "intelligence" involved in the experiment. Therefore, you must retract your work and apologize A.S.A.P.

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,11:15    Edgar has neither the intelligence nor the integrity to recognize the truth of what you say and the actions that properly follow from that truth. As we'll see shortly, I have no doubt.

sparc Posts: 2088 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,13:17    MrIntelligentDesign is within Big Think's google+ circles who describe themselves in the following way: Quote Tagline Get smarter faster Introduction A knowledge forum featuring the ideas, lessons, stories and advice from leading exerts around the world. Excerts ... like MrIntelligentDesign. -------------- "[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God." - William Dembski -

NoName Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,13:20    "Experts" From 'Ex' as in Extreme and 'spurts' as in 'drips under pressure'. Yup, Edgar qualifies.  Extreme drip under pressure. Gary belongs there too.

ChemiCat Posts: 532 Joined: Nov. 2013 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,14:57    Quote So I experimentally tested your theory[...] dazz, but did you imagine a 68g egg? if not your experiment is invalid. COS I SEZ SO!!!!!

JohnW Posts: 3217 Joined: Aug. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,15:58    Fuck, this guy's boring. At least Gary's funny, with his intelligent molecules, four-legged hippocampus-equipped insects, and McGonagallesque writing style.  Potato just screams I'M RIGHT BECAUSE I SAID SO over and over again. -------------- Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

Texas Teach Posts: 2084 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Oct. 13 2015,16:08    Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 13 2015,09:17) Quote (NoName @ Oct. 13 2015,07:47) Hey Edgar, this is why you fail.  Well, one of the countless reasons.  A genuine scientist, on science and how it works: “Science is unique.  The idea is to try to give all the information to help others judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgement in one particular direction or another.”  Richard Feynman Yes, he was right. The reason why he said that because he received taxes, grants and funds from anywhere. All books for ToE had already been prepaid by taxes, thus, they must be free! I am a freelance scientist and I have the best science. They have the best monetary supports, but they have the worst science. Dawkins will be surprised to find out his books had to be free.  As will Coyne. And Shubin.  And... -------------- "Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr "I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

Pages: (42) < ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard