RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < ... 527 528 529 530 531 [532] 533 534 535 536 537 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Stephen Elliott



Posts: 1776
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,13:19   

Quote (Dr.GH @ June 19 2007,13:14)
But WAD isn't a pathetic, envious wanker.  
Quote
How many honorary doctorates does Judge Jones have now?
WAD

...


Is he?

My Bolding (Well some of it.)

LOL! Say what you mean and get off the fence. ;)

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,13:44   

Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ June 19 2007,10:45)
Quote
How many honorary doctorates does Judge Jones have now?
WAD

...Ron Numbers informs me that over 100 professional societies have weighed in officially against ID. (Again, I’d like to see this confirmed.) Don’t expect people with a finger in the wind to help ID....

But if they've got a thumb...

No, nevermind.

Why in the hell does Dembski persist in linking to posts that make him look so bad?  First he links to the "New non-religious support for ID" - and the guy is nothing but another total nutcase. (Sorry Kristine I know you have high hopes for the Theorey of Pleasurium...)  

Then he links to this honor for Judge Jones, who helped to hand Dembski and ID their hat, lunch, & ass at Dover...

So, let's help Dr. Dr. Bill and play Amateur Psychoanalysis.  If Bill will forward his HMO info to us here, we can bill them for the time, so it will be a win-win all around.  We make money, and help Dr. Dr. Dembski get de-programmed.  I hope my brief outline will help:

The Top Ten Problems With Dr. Dr. Dembksi

10.  Martyr Complex - He wants to suffer.  Lets continue to help him!
9.  Messianic Complex - see above... Damn, where did I put those 6" nails?
8.  He's a Fruitcake, Looney Tunes, and a bunch of other medical terms.
7.  Has Leprosy (see his latest post)
6.  Suffers from Irritable Bowel Syndrom (see post-dover fart sequence)
5.  Bad case of unrequited love for either DaveScot or Denyse... (I say go for DaveScot Bill, I think he is less likely to suffer from rabies.  And fleas.)
4.  He is nothing but a skanky attention whore- ignore him!
3.  His idiocy is a perfectly understandable reaction by one who was ruthlessly and repeatedly "wedgied" when in grade school.  By the girls.  The younger girls.
2.  He hasn't been able to concentrate ever since Paris Hilton got sent up the river.
1.Nothing anyone can do - He was Designed That Way!

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
Stephen Elliott



Posts: 1776
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,13:50   

Quote (J-Dog @ June 19 2007,13:44)
Why in the hell does Dembski persist in linking to posts that make him look so bad?...  

Desperation?

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,13:57   

He dosen't have anything better to link to.

   
Stephen Elliott



Posts: 1776
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,14:04   

Quote (Richardthughes @ June 19 2007,13:19)
ID informatics uncompressible information expert Giltard makes an observation:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-125339


     
Quote
2

GilDodgen

06/19/2007

12:21 pm
And just think, Jones’ honorary-degree-worthy decision only required three keystrokes:

Ctrl-A (select all)
Ctrl-C (copy)
Ctrl-V (paste)


Except that's SIX Keystrokes you innumerate twunt.

http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/K/keystroke.html

Good luck finding God in flagella ("Bac. Flag." - see they do so much research they need to abbreviate it to speed things up), You odious, sycophantic tard.


Edit: I did dun a editation for to make reading betterer

In reply to that.

 
Quote
3

geoffrobinson

06/19/2007

12:28 pm
The funny thing is we caught his use of other sources using the principles of design detection.


Weird considering that our side caught Dembski as the author of the Judge Jones fart post. Of course both instances identified the designer and motive. Something that seems to be lost on those ID muppets.

Now a question to ID, why do we have an imune system? How is that "Intelligent" Design? Would it not be easier/more inteligent for God the designer to just not bother to design stuff we need to be imune from?

  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,14:10   

Quote (Stephen Elliott @ June 19 2007,13:50)
 
Quote (J-Dog @ June 19 2007,13:44)
Why in the hell does Dembski persist in linking to posts that make him look so bad?...  

Desperation?

My guess is that he links to these things as a feel-good gesture to keep morale high among the base, hoping/assuming that the troops either won't click on them or won't read them too closely. That is, he links to these things saying "See! Good news! Trust me!", and trusting that his none-too bright followers will just take his word for it. Experience has shown that he's not underestimating his fans in this regard. But often it seems like Bill doesn't examine the articles he links to all that closely himself.

Something tells me that for every credulous Christianist who looks at Bill's site and says to himself "Golly! I want to support this man, because he's a good Christian!" there are about twenty others who take a good long look and say "ID can't do better than THIS? Shit, these guys are a bunch of losers!"

Quote

Now a question to ID, why do we have an imune system? How is that "Intelligent" Design? Would it not be easier/more inteligent for God the designer to just not bother to design stuff we need to be imune from?


Yeah, esp. since one of the most crucial parts of their 'theory' is that the Disembodied Telic Entity personally designed e-coli to be more efficient.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,14:13   

the designers motives isn't part of ID, apparently. Nor is who the designer might be, or how they designed things. Any question of any merit is taboo. It must *look* sciency, but it can't have any real science content..

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Stephen Elliott



Posts: 1776
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,14:19   

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ June 19 2007,14:10)
...
Something tells me that for every credulous Christianist who looks at Bill's site and says to himself "Golly! I want to support this man, because he's a good Christian!" there are about twenty others who take a good long look and say "ID can't do better than THIS? Shit, these guys are a bunch of losers!"...

I have some experience of that. You make a good point. ID has managed to make me consider my philosophy on life several times.

Upon entering this debate I considered myself to be a Christian  (and ID suporter). It was ID that made me doubt. Such rampant dishonesty made me question my beliefs far more than evolution ever did.

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,15:10   

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ June 19 2007,15:10)
Something tells me that for every credulous Christianist who looks at Bill's site and says to himself "Golly! I want to support this man, because he's a good Christian!" there are about twenty others who take a good long look and say "ID can't do better than THIS? Shit, these guys are a bunch of losers!"

I wonder what the percentage of this is. People familiar with science from the inside can see that ID is BS in about 2 seconds. I wonder how it looks from the outside. How many people are fooled.

   
carlsonjok



Posts: 3326
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,15:15   

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ June 19 2007,14:10)
But often it seems like Bill doesn't examine the articles he links to all that closely himself.

One would hope that, for a minute, he would stop looking for a message from the Designer in DNA and look for it in the seemingly unbroken stream of backfires that he is experiencing.

--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,15:48   

Geoffrobinson:
Quote
The funny thing is we caught his use of other sources using the principles of design detection.

No, the funny thing is, you didn't. You didn't use any "filter" - you eyeballed it. And you got that wrong, too.

Borne pontificates:
Quote
In a world where assassin/terrorist Yasser Arafat can get the Nobel peace prize and ’scientists’ now go to the courts to establish their pet theories as truth, nothing - no matter how inane, is surprising any more.

And, sadly, that has lowered the meaning & value of a Nobel prize and Phd’s etc. in the eyes of millions.

Already they're spinning their lack of Nobel prizes in the future. The fact that they're not going to be winning any prizes is "proof," now. Everything is "proof" that evolution is "crumbling."

I guess that's why the sports fans are grumbling!

Dembski:
Quote
Don’t expect people with a finger in the wind to help ID.

And why does anyone need to "help ID?" Help it do what? Find its ID card?

For that matter, why doesn't God step in to help ID? He appears to be capable. ;)

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
C.J.O'Brien



Posts: 395
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,16:15   

God to Kristine:

Maybe you didn't get the memo. I help those who help themselves.
I'd like to give Bill a hand, really, but his latest prayers have been drowned out by farty noises.

--------------
The is the beauty of being me- anything that any man does I can understand.
--Joe G

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,16:20   

Quote
How many honorary doctorates does Judge Jones have now? - WAD

Don't know for sure, but I bet it's more than the number of peer-reviewed ID papers.  ;)

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
SpaghettiSawUs



Posts: 77
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,17:12   

Quote (stevestory @ June 19 2007,21:10)
 
Quote (Arden Chatfield @ June 19 2007,15:10)
Something tells me that for every credulous Christianist who looks at Bill's site and says to himself "Golly! I want to support this man, because he's a good Christian!" there are about twenty others who take a good long look and say "ID can't do better than THIS? Shit, these guys are a bunch of losers!"

I wonder what the percentage of this is. People familiar with science from the inside can see that ID is BS in about 2 seconds. I wonder how it looks from the outside. How many people are fooled.

From the outside, with a mind primed to believe the bible, it looks as follows:

1) The Theory of Evolution is not that well supported, even eminent scientists say so: here's some quotes about that and there's some references to show you how we are honest and not making this up (if you're primed, you won't check many if any references).

2) Design explains it better: here's some "facts", see how it fits. Does blind random chance fit those facts? No it doesn't.

3)What you want some really good sciencey stuff? Ok, buy these books.

4)Wow. It all sure does fit. And I can't believe how much I've learned.

5)I'm so right.

6)You evil satan inspired scientists are destroying the world with your "theory": turning it against GOD ALMIGHTY! Down with evilutionist atheistic science!

6a)Erm... except the good stuff (like medicine and flying and really cool things like them thar internets).

7)Everyone is lying when they say evolution is true. When they point out a quotemine, they're lying and twisting the truth: the section says the exact words that were quoted. Did he say it though? There it is in black and white! When they point to evidence, its a lie. Dressed up in scientific garbage is a set of darwinian assumptions of old earths, just their preconceptions. If only they knew The Truth. I do.

How many fall for it?
I would guess that the percentages are higher for those brought up to believe in the Jesus God, especially those in the US Bible Belt (all of whom would by now be at least well aware of ID, if not adherents to some degree of persuasion).

I think that for those predisposed for belief (however one could define that) the percentages adopting it are high. Going with the stats on YEC belief in the US we get a vague 50%ish. But say that only 10% of that is firm, or what about 20%? Where did they come from? Where are they likely to be?

My point is that ID preys well on the existing christian meme (in its many variations), but is pretty useless as a first-line conversion tool, which I think is simply because ID advocates are so f**king frightening to anyone not used to filtering out creepiness in creepy people!! (e.g. most evangelical church goers)

Cheers
Spags

--------------
On June 23, 2007, 01:06 PM AFDave wrote: "How can we dismiss their theories without first reading their work?"

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,17:50   

Quote (carlsonjok @ June 19 2007,11:43)
Further WmAD:
   
Quote
George Bush may make supporting noises for ID when confronted on the matter by the press, but when push comes to shove he defers to his science adviser John Marburger, who takes his marching orders from the NCSE.

Yes, Willie, it's true ---- even the Republicrat Party leadership thinks IDers are nuts and won't lift a finger to help them.

They are, of course, quite willing to continue to take your money and your votes, though.  (snicker)


Gee, it only took Willie SEVEN YEARS to realize that the Republicrats were playing the IDers for a bunch of chumps and using them like a ten-dollar whore.  (giggle)

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
PennyBright



Posts: 78
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,20:15   

Quote (stevestory @ June 19 2007,15:10)
   
Quote (Arden Chatfield @ June 19 2007,15:10)
Something tells me that for every credulous Christianist who looks at Bill's site and says to himself "Golly! I want to support this man, because he's a good Christian!" there are about twenty others who take a good long look and say "ID can't do better than THIS? Shit, these guys are a bunch of losers!"

I wonder what the percentage of this is. People familiar with science from the inside can see that ID is BS in about 2 seconds. I wonder how it looks from the outside. How many people are fooled.

From the outside, I'm afraid it looks fairly convincing.   I have no background in the sciences, and am largely self educated - an education thus focused on my interests and quite deficient  in all other respects,  such as biology, chemistry, mathematics, and so forth.

It quite un-nerves me at times to look at sources like UD and Behe's writings,  and to realize that I cannot tell if this is valid science or not.  It certainly sounds valid - the authoritative tone I recall from school science texts mixed with doses of jargon, diagrams and maths which I don't really understand.

 In short, it sounds like what I recall the  'real science' I  was taught in school being like.   I can only imagine how many people - already biased in favour of a creationist solution by their faiths - are perfectly willing to accept such sources as 'real science'  from precisely such memories.  And I am quite certain that writers on ID are perfectly aware of how to write to this effect.

In all honesty,  when I first came to this debate (through the EvC chatroom on MSN, years ago)  the only real reason I advocated for evolution rather then creationism is that my grandfather once went on at voluble length to me about how bad creation-science was.   I trusted and respected my grandfather,  and what dilettantish interest I have in the sciences is due directly to his influence.

I think probably there are many other intelligent yet poorly educated people out there who have come down on the side of creationism in its various forms for precisely that reason -- that a person whom they hold to be trustworthy and respectable told them it was the right thing.   And who - like myself -- largely limit themselves to communities and studies that support their pre-existing beliefs because they see no need to try to really understand that nonsense they know is wrong.

If you would care to take a moment to turn down the irony meters....

I often look at the helpless sincerity of people such as FtK,   and find my self thinking "There but for the grace of God, go I."

--------------
Conversation should be pleasant without scurrility, witty without affectation, free without indecency, learned without conceitedness, novel without falsehood. - Shakespeare (reputedly)

  
Richard Simons



Posts: 425
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,20:50   

I was told, by a Hutterite, that Jonathan Witt's writings were convincing because they were so well documented. I suggested that if he checked he would find that the documentation was not as thorough as it appeared.

--------------
All sweeping statements are wrong.

  
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,21:33   

Jehu        
Quote
Seriously, the more I read objections to The Edge of Evolution the more I am struck by what a devastating blow it has struck to the heart of the materialist establishment.

Well, thank Goodness that's over with. I suppose the scientific community materialist establishment can be put on relief and retrained for useful work.

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,22:14   

Quote (Zachriel @ June 19 2007,21:33)
[URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/evolutionary-biologists-allstar-atheists-apparently-or-very-occasionally-teddy-bears-for-j

esus#comment-125366]Jehu[/URL]          
Quote
Seriously, the more I read objections to The Edge of Evolution the more I am struck by what a devastating blow it has struck to the heart of the materialist establishment.

Well, thank Goodness that's over with. I suppose the scientific community materialist establishment can be put on relief and retrained for useful work.

Jehu can smell fear.  :O

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
Ichthyic



Posts: 3325
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,22:43   

Quote (Arden Chatfield @ June 19 2007,22:14)
Quote (Zachriel @ June 19 2007,21:33)
[URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/evolutionary-biologists-allstar-atheists-apparently-or-very-occasionally-teddy-bears-for-j



esus#comment-125366]Jehu[/URL]            
Quote
Seriously, the more I read objections to The Edge of Evolution the more I am struck by what a devastating blow it has struck to the heart of the materialist establishment.

Well, thank Goodness that's over with. I suppose the scientific community materialist establishment can be put on relief and retrained for useful work.

Jehu can smell fear.  :O

or his own projection, puddling around his ankles.

--------------
"And the sea will grant each man new hope..."

-CC

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,23:48   

Mikey Tutu:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-125343

Quote
Dr. Dembski,
Are you deliberately seeking to undermine any role you might play as a recognized ID authority in any future litigation? I am struck that this and other recent posts will supply ample reason for even an ID-friendly court to dismiss your testimony as biased and irrational. Certainly you’re not conceding defeat to anti-ID forces. How will the movement prevail next time if your authority is undermined by snarky sniping?

Michael Tuite


Billy D:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-125380

Quote
Michael Tuite: I have no aspirations to be in another trial, and if I am barred from one on account of posts such as this, so be it. I regard posts such as this in a broader light than you do, seeing them as mirrors by which the culture may examine itself. Where is the honor in Jones’s honorary doctorate?


Waterloo is off, fellas. Sorry.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Ichthyic



Posts: 3325
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 19 2007,23:52   

Quote
I regard posts such as this in a broader light than you do,


delusions of godhood, based on little more than fartjokes.

yup, he's lost it.

--------------
"And the sea will grant each man new hope..."

-CC

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 20 2007,00:32   

Quote (Zachriel @ June 19 2007,21:33)
[URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/evolutionary-biologists-allstar-atheists-apparently-or-very-occasionally-teddy-bears-for-j

esus#comment-125366]Jehu[/URL]          
Quote
Seriously, the more I read objections to The Edge of Evolution the more I am struck by what a devastating blow it has struck to the heart of the materialist establishment.

Well, thank Goodness that's over with. I suppose the scientific community materialist establishment can be put on relief and retrained for useful work.

Just as long as they keep on paying us.

Bob

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
djmullen



Posts: 327
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 20 2007,01:53   

WAD: "Where is the honor in Jones’s honorary doctorate?"

Translation: Where's MY honorary degree?

  
Ichthyic



Posts: 3325
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 20 2007,02:44   

phhht.

based on his thesis work, his degrees WERE mostly honorary.

I did more rigorous stuff as an undergrad.

--------------
"And the sea will grant each man new hope..."

-CC

  
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 20 2007,07:19   

DaveScot  
Quote
How much information is needed to construct a human?

A commenter in another thread prompted this. I didn’t approve the comment because it was so impoverished but thought the discussion warranted a thread of its own.

The comment didn't deserve to be approved, but the discussion deserved its own thread so that I, DaveScot, could paraphrase the argument and strike it down.

DaveScot  
Quote
I suspect far more of the cell structure, often called epigenetic information, is required for the complete specification.

I predict this because scientists have already identified and named epigenetics. Argumentum ad Scientific Americanus.

DaveScot  
Quote
That makes trillions more atoms potentially usable for information storage and it’s all heritable as each daughter cell is more or less a faithful copy of its parent cell.

The human egg is important to reproduction! Trillions of atoms are involved! Another amazing prediction from the theory of Intelligent Design!

{DaveScot felt well-enough to argue a point, but suppressed the original comment and presumably any response. Sorry. I had wanted to edit out the sarcasm, but there was nothing left.}

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 20 2007,09:19   

A Mighty Wind, a broader light.
Quote
Michael Tuite: I have no aspirations to be in another trial, and if I am barred from one on account of posts such as this, so be it. I regard posts such as this in a broader light than you do, seeing them as mirrors by which the culture may examine itself.

*Looks into mirror, fixes her hair* Thanks, Bill. Don't wait up for me, the culture will be out late, having a life.
Quote
Where is the honor in Jones’s honorary doctorate?

Who put de "honor" in your honor, Your Honor?
Bill should really ask you, but he just doesn't wanner. That reminds me of a song.

Who put the bomp
In the bomp bah bomp bah bomp?
Who put the ram
In the rama lama ding dong?
Who put the bop
In the bop shoo bop shoo bop?
Who put the dip
In the dip da dip da dip?
Who was that man?
I'd like to shake his hand
He made my baby
Fall in love with me

When my baby heard
Bomp bah bah bomp
Bah bomp bah bomp bah bomp bomp
Every word went right into her heart
And when she heard them singin
Rama lama lama lama
Rama ding dong
She said we'd never have to part
So......... :)

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 20 2007,09:47   

Quote (Kristine @ June 20 2007,09:19)
A Mighty Wind, a broader light.  
Quote
Michael Tuite: I have no aspirations to be in another trial, and if I am barred from one on account of posts such as this, so be it. I regard posts such as this in a broader light than you do, seeing them as mirrors by which the culture may examine itself.

*Looks into mirror, fixes her hair* Thanks, Bill. Don't wait up for me, the culture will be out late, having a life.
 
Quote
Where is the honor in Jones’s honorary doctorate?

Who put de "honor" in your honor, Your Honor?
Bill should really ask you, but he just doesn't wanner. That reminds me of a song.

Who put the bomp
In the bomp bah bomp bah bomp?
Who put the ram
In the rama lama ding dong?
Who put the bop
In the bop shoo bop shoo bop?
Who put the dip
In the dip da dip da dip?
Who was that man?
I'd like to shake his hand
He made my baby
Fall in love with me

When my baby heard
Bomp bah bah bomp
Bah bomp bah bomp bah bomp bomp
Every word went right into her heart
And when she heard them singin
Rama lama lama lama
Rama ding dong
She said we'd never have to part
So......... :)

Yes, Mr. Bill,

What kind of information is transmitted by

Boom Shaka-laka?

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 20 2007,10:08   

The scold doesn’t hear you, J-Dog. He’s too busy trying to ape ;) Diogenes, looking for an honest man but walking around with a mirror instead of a lamp, and mistaking the lights of others that are reflected on its surface to his own cleverness and superiority.

Naturally he broods about not being rewarded for his great contribution to humanity, for which he has so much secret contempt.

Poor little man. :)

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
carlsonjok



Posts: 3326
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 20 2007,10:28   

Quote (Kristine @ June 20 2007,10:08)
Naturally he broods about not being rewarded for his great contribution to humanity, for which he has so much secret contempt.

Naturally.  But, as a believer in a personal God Disembodied Telic Entity who moves in mysterious scientifical ways, you would think that he would see in his embarassing series of missteps groundbreaking ideas being viewed skeptically by the scientific community, a lesson in humility opportunity to further develop his ideas.  Alas, no moments of insight return to the lab here.  Better to petulantly stamp his feet stand by his considerable body of work.  Because, his canon is a dead-end irreducibly complex.

--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < ... 527 528 529 530 531 [532] 533 534 535 536 537 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]