NoName
Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013
|
Quote (GaryGaulin @ June 30 2015,20:19) | Quote (Texas Teach @ June 30 2015,18:46) | Quote (GaryGaulin @ June 30 2015,18:15) | Quote (Woodbine @ June 30 2015,17:54) | Gary, as a real-scientist you are obliged to back up your claims.
But you know this because you are an honourable man and would never lie about your scientific achievements.
With this in mind can you please post your explanation for 'how one intelligence level causes another'.
Or retract your claim.
Many thanks. |
Your future robot overlords are doing splendidly! This one even shares my mood, in regards to you: |
Why are you so afraid, Gary? Just give a page number. Bwok bwok bwok bwok bwok... |
If I did that then this thread would become many pages longer, in part from all the complaining afterward about your not wanting to see pages of information and illustrations for how intelligence and intelligent cause works.
Either way, I'm damned. |
You're damned regardless. It's self-inflicted and you're the only one who can begin to fix it. A therapist would help, but you're the one who has to do the work.
What's incredibly funny about this whine of yours is not so much the confusion over what is being requested of you. The really funny bit is how you have, up to now, proclaimed that your "theory" literally is the explanation for how one intelligence level causes another, how intelligence works across the 4 levels of your absurdist diagram, and all things pertaining to 'intelligence'. This thread is hundreds of pages long in no small part because of your constant posting of 'the diagram' and your links to the ever-changing "theory" of which you are so proud. But now you run away from that and insist it would somehow be pointless.
Well, you got one thing right, by accident. It would indeed be pointless. Not because it would increase the size of this thread, but because we've all 'been there, done that', and have rejected your "theory" due to its obvious lack of merit. Are you starting to get a glimmer of a trace of a foreshadowing of a premonition of an insight that we might be correct? One can only hope.
|