RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < ... 206 207 208 209 210 [211] 212 213 214 215 216 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 03 2012,12:35   

Quote (Lou FCD @ Sep. 03 2012,10:16)
Quote (Alan Fox @ Sep. 02 2012,19:34)
Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 02 2012,13:09)
 
Quote (keiths @ Sep. 02 2012,16:45)
   
Quote (paragwinn @ Sep. 02 2012,14:30)
but if evolution is continually falling while always missing the ground, isnt that technically 'flying'?

Technically, that's 'orbiting'.

I prefer riding the curl.

In the tube?

In the pipe, five by five.

Evolution is narley! !!!!111111!!!!

We win the internet.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 659
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 03 2012,15:04   

Quote (keiths @ Sep. 03 2012,02:09)

   
Quote (Joe @ August 27 2012, 8:15 pm)
And KF that line you thought was vulgar was from a very funny Monty Python movie- I definitely need to tone it down but you need to lighten up, just a little

Joe: All that did is to further reduce Monty Python in my already low estimation. The language reference to flatulence is vulgar, and should not be used. KF


Psssst! Joe! Ask him what he thought of Life of Brian!

--------------
SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G

BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

  
paragwinn



Posts: 539
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 03 2012,15:45   

Quote (Soapy Sam @ Sep. 03 2012,13:04)
 
Quote (keiths @ Sep. 03 2012,02:09)

     
Quote (Joe @ August 27 2012, 8:15 pm)
And KF that line you thought was vulgar was from a very funny Monty Python movie- I definitely need to tone it down but you need to lighten up, just a little

Joe: All that did is to further reduce Monty Python in my already low estimation. The language reference to flatulence is vulgar, and should not be used. KF


Psssst! Joe! Ask him what he thought of Life of Brian!

Or better yet, The Meaning of Life. Does KF agree that every sperm is sacred?

--------------
All women build up a resistance [to male condescension]. Apparently, ID did not predict that. -Kristine 4-19-11
F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc. The whole thing is F/N ridiculous -Seversky on KF footnote fetish 8-20-11
Sigh. Really Bill? - Barry Arrington

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 03 2012,15:48   

Quote (Soapy Sam @ Sep. 03 2012,13:04)
Quote (keiths @ Sep. 03 2012,02:09)

   
Quote (Joe @ August 27 2012, 8:15 pm)
And KF that line you thought was vulgar was from a very funny Monty Python movie- I definitely need to tone it down but you need to lighten up, just a little

Joe: All that did is to further reduce Monty Python in my already low estimation. The language reference to flatulence is vulgar, and should not be used. KF


Psssst! Joe! Ask him what he thought of Life of Brian!

And Blazing Saddles.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 03 2012,17:12   

Quote (The whole truth @ Sep. 03 2012,15:48)
Quote (Soapy Sam @ Sep. 03 2012,13:04)
Quote (keiths @ Sep. 03 2012,02:09)

     
Quote (Joe @ August 27 2012, 8:15 pm)
And KF that line you thought was vulgar was from a very funny Monty Python movie- I definitely need to tone it down but you need to lighten up, just a little

Joe: All that did is to further reduce Monty Python in my already low estimation. The language reference to flatulence is vulgar, and should not be used. KF


Psssst! Joe! Ask him what he thought of Life of Brian!

And Blazing Saddles.

And definitely ask him about Dr. Dr. Dembski's original "Judge Jones School of Law"
http://www.uncommondescent.com/educati....-of-law

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 03 2012,17:21   

Quote (keiths @ Sep. 03 2012,02:09)
Joe says 'fart' and KF blows a gasket:
 
Quote (Joe @ August 27 2012, 11:46 am)
velikovskys-

In the words of Monty Python-

“I [vulgar reference deleted-- KF] in your general direction”

Have a nice day

Joe, you probably have an inch of leeway left if so much. Kindly watch tone and manners. KF

And:
 
Quote (Joe @ August 27 2012, 8:15 pm)
And KF that line you thought was vulgar was from a very funny Monty Python movie- I definitely need to tone it down but you need to lighten up, just a little

Joe: All that did is to further reduce Monty Python in my already low estimation. The language reference to flatulence is vulgar, and should not be used. KF

What a useless, insufferable, hypocritical, sanctimonious priss KF is.

Apologies if someone already commented on this little episode.  I can't be arsed to go back and find out.

P.S.  Hey KF -- I said 'arsed'!

It's a good thing KF isn't an American.  He'd never be able to handle "Fart Proudly" by Ben Franklin.

  
NormOlsen



Posts: 104
Joined: Nov. 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 03 2012,18:12   

Sal says:
 
Quote
humans are like those detestable cockroaches which we give no thought to exterminating.


See, I learned my quoting skills from Sal!

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 03 2012,18:14   

Quote (N.Wells @ Sep. 03 2012,15:12)
 
Quote (The whole truth @ Sep. 03 2012,15:48)
 
Quote (Soapy Sam @ Sep. 03 2012,13:04)
   
Quote (keiths @ Sep. 03 2012,02:09)

       
Quote (Joe @ August 27 2012, 8:15 pm)
And KF that line you thought was vulgar was from a very funny Monty Python movie- I definitely need to tone it down but you need to lighten up, just a little

Joe: All that did is to further reduce Monty Python in my already low estimation. The language reference to flatulence is vulgar, and should not be used. KF


Psssst! Joe! Ask him what he thought of Life of Brian!

And Blazing Saddles.

And definitely ask him about Dr. Dr. Dembski's original "Judge Jones School of Law"
http://www.uncommondescent.com/educati....-of-law

For those who don't want to go to UD, here are dembski's statements (in full) from that thread:

"The Rembrandt of flash animation and I are working to enhance “The Judge Jones School of Law.” As a first step we have made the animation less offensive to more refined sensibilities. All the overt flatulence has therefore been removed. Go to www.overwhelmingevidence.com for the less objectional version of this animation (we are keeping the original, however, so that when the history of evolution’s demise is written, all versions of this animation will be available to historians)."

And:

"Calm yourselves everybody. An enhanced flatulent version is being worked on at this very moment. I will make it available. I do want to say this for the record, however. Many people regard the flatulent version as unsophisticated and even infantile. I want to suggest that in this postmodern age the flatulence in this animation actually serves as a sophisticated rhetorical device that mirrors the subtext of flatulence that runs throughout Judge Jones’s decision."

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
keiths



Posts: 2195
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 03 2012,18:30   

Quote (CeilingCat @ Sep. 03 2012,15:21)
Quote (keiths @ Sep. 03 2012,02:09)
Joe says 'fart' and KF blows a gasket:
Quote (Joe @ August 27 2012, 11:46 am)
velikovskys-

In the words of Monty Python-

“I [vulgar reference deleted-- KF] in your general direction”

Have a nice day

Joe, you probably have an inch of leeway left if so much. Kindly watch tone and manners. KF

And:
Quote (Joe @ August 27 2012, 8:15 pm)
And KF that line you thought was vulgar was from a very funny Monty Python movie- I definitely need to tone it down but you need to lighten up, just a little

Joe: All that did is to further reduce Monty Python in my already low estimation. The language reference to flatulence is vulgar, and should not be used. KF

What a useless, insufferable, hypocritical, sanctimonious priss KF is.

Apologies if someone already commented on this little episode.  I can't be arsed to go back and find out.

P.S.  Hey KF -- I said 'arsed'!

It's a good thing KF isn't an American.  He'd never be able to handle "Fart Proudly" by Ben Franklin.


It's a shame KF and Mr. Leathers weren't available to 'correct' Martin Luther. Luther habitually wrote about farts (for example, this response to a papal declaration):
Quote
I was frightened and thought I was dreaming, it was such a thunder clap, such a great, horrid fart did the papal ass let go here! He certainly pressed with great might to let out such a thunderous fart - it is a wonder that it did not tear his hole and belly apart!


Edited by keiths on Sep. 03 2012,16:40

--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number. -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,03:07   

KF's behaviour is typical for those who have minds smaller then the holes they are concerned with.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Amadan



Posts: 1337
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,05:19   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Sep. 04 2012,09:07)
KF's behaviour is typical for those who have minds smaller then the holes they are concerned with.

Leave Orifice alone!

--------------
"People are always looking for natural selection to generate random mutations" - Densye  4-4-2011
JoeG BTW dumbass- some variations help ensure reproductive fitness so they cannot be random wrt it.

   
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,09:43   

All of which will make most excellent grist for the next Dover mill.

After a while all you can do is point and laugh.

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,09:52   

Quote (fnxtr @ Sep. 04 2012,10:43)
All of which will make most excellent grist for the next Dover mill.

After a while all you can do is point and laugh.

hell yes!  Cue Lenny Flank!

AGAIN



--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,09:57   

Don't forget to vote for your favorite tard

OF ALL TIME

PM you magnificent biotches!

So far I can report that many of us have similar tastes.  Diversity please!

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
REC



Posts: 638
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,14:25   

Bored now....

Where's the increasingly shrill, self-defeating and erratic loudspeaker?

Where are Byers' cleanly shorn asian garden of Eden dry-hair Eskimos fresh off the ark and Adam asexually reproducing from his 'rib' that was taken later?

Come on UD, you're seriously under-entertaining lately....

I need me some meltdown!!!

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,14:36   

well, i'm still laughing at "ballchinian cupcake"

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Freddie



Posts: 371
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,14:42   

Quote (REC @ Sep. 04 2012,14:25)
Bored now....

Where's the increasingly shrill, self-defeating and erratic loudspeaker?

Where are Byers' cleanly shorn asian garden of Eden dry-hair Eskimos fresh off the ark and Adam asexually reproducing from his 'rib' that was taken later?

Come on UD, you're seriously under-entertaining lately....

I need me some meltdown!!!

Well, to be fair, Byers did cough this one up yesterday.

Robert Byers:
     
Quote
Maybe Einstein is malicious?
And on these issues useless. stick to gravity stuff Al.

nature is not in its original form.
originally nature had eternal life and mechanisms to do it.
only a great and weird FALL changed nature into a thing of death.
The bible says this.
Any analysis of nature must include a option its not what God planned.
Christianity is about bringing remedy.
God was executed.
This is not showing a healthy universe.

Not quite as entertaining as the explanation for a post Fall Adam's beard, but worth reading through a couple of times just to appreciate the flow ... it works best for me by reading in the same tone as Michael Palin's 'prophet' character in Life of Brian.

We could take turns at deconstructing it for want of something better to do?

--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,14:51   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ Sep. 04 2012,09:57)
Don't forget to vote for your favorite tard

OF ALL TIME

PM you magnificent biotches!

So far I can report that many of us have similar tastes.  Diversity please!

When do we get results?

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,16:05   

well i said ten days but i forgot when i said that.  i reckon if they are still coming i will wait til they quit trickling.  i can tell you one thing, some of you are true students of the t.a.r.d.  

but no one has nominated chuckdz yet.  and that little sombitch is one of my favorites but i am not voting i am just saying

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,16:24   

Hey gordo, since you read this site I thought that you'd be interested in some of the things that joey g has said regarding christianity, "God", the bible, etc. Feel free to ask your pal joey if he denies saying these things:


"Umm I don't follow the Bible you ignorant faggot.
I don't even own one."



"I wouldn't run to any "God" hypothesis and I would fight to the death anyone who attempted to make ID into a religious argument."



"BTW I am not a christian and could care less if the designer/ creator is the God of the Bible."



"I have distanced myself from Biblical literalists."



"I am a Muslim and many of my Catholic friends (and wife) are also Creationists."



"It never appears in the Bible because it was censored out. That is the whole point- the Bible is not an include-all- meaning it is selective as to what was included.

I do not hold the Bible as any kind of authority basically because I know and understand that humans had a hand in it."



(Frances asked) "Joe, may I ask who or what you think the Intelligent Designer to be?"

(joey answered) "Yes, you may ask. No I don’t know but I do hope it ain’t the God of the Bible."



Obviously joey doesn't think very highly of "God", christianity, or the bible, even though he trots them out sometimes in a vain attempt to support his bald assertions. Apparently he thinks that anyone who owns or follows a bible is an "ignorant faggot". You own and follow a bible, don't you gordo? Since you likely own and follow several bibles, doesn't that make you an "ignorant faggot" several times over in joey's opinion?

You should report joey to the deputy commissioner of police and the attorney general in fucking Montserrat, and to Scotland Yard, Interpol, the FBI, the CIA, and other agencies, for his threat to kill anyone who makes ID into a religious argument. That's a "mafioso style threat" (or maybe more accurately an 'islamist terrorist style threat' since joey is a muslim) aimed at you and all the other IDiot creationists, including joey himself. You REALLY make ID into a religious argument on your websites and on UD and on other sites that you have posted on, and of course all the other IDiot creationists (including joey) make ID into a religious argument (because that's what it is).

Maybe you'll get lucky and islamist muslim joey will fight himself to the death before he gets around to fighting you or any other IDiots to the death for making ID into a religious argument, or maybe in one of the fights to the death with other IDiots joey will be the one who gets killed before he gets around to killing you. But, YOU could be the first one on his "fight to the death" list!

Your wife and kids, who surely see ID as religious, are being 'held hostage' by joey's deadly threat and are in great danger, so you better get them some bodyguards right away. joey may be on his way to Montserrat right now or may be there already!

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,16:58   

It's clowns all the way down.

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,17:07   

R0bb lists all the questions Joe has left unanswered while Joe pretends he can "do math" too.
 
Quote
That depends. Do you plan on answering the following questions that I’ve asked?

#31 “Have you read the examples and proofs in Dembski’s work?”

#43 “As I pointed out in #31, endogenous probability is defined as |T|/|?|, not |T|/(number of choices). Do you agree that this is how it’s defined?”

#43 “You might be of the opinion that ? is supposed to be defined such that |?| = number of choices, and therefore endogenous probability = |T|/|?| = |T|/(number of choices). Is that your position?”

#43 “If that is your position, do you believe that Dembski and Marks always define ? such that |?| = number of choices?”

#43 “If that is not your position, why do you think that the endogenous probability is |T|/(number of choices)?”

#43 “Consider the concept of “Brillouin active information” … Why would Dembski and Marks define a measure that’s always zero?”

#44 “Pardon my thick skull, but are you referring to my random walk example? If so, what aspect of the random walk are you describing as a roll of the die? Or are you talking about the die example in my second post at TSZ?”

#44 “No, it means that if we always exclude zero-probability outcomes from ?, then in some cases active information will decrease when a search improves. Do you agree?”

#44 “As for including numbers 7 – infinity (by which I assume you mean all integers greater than 6, none of which is actually infinity), is there any reason not to do so, other than inconvenience?”

#45 “Can you provide definitions for your terms ‘muddled’ and ‘properly defined’?
A distribution is muddled iff _.
A distribution is properly defined iff _.”

#57 “Where exactly did I mangle what Dembski said?”

#57 “Consider some of their other examples of active information, like Marks’ example of finding a good recipe for boiling an egg. … Do you think Marks would agree that the active info is zero?”

#57 “Also consider Dembski’s oft-used example of a treasure map. Them map eliminates all outcomes except for one. Does the map have zero active information?”

#68 “In #53 you said that my examples were mathematically valid. Have you changed your mind?”

#69 “And BTW, how does Dembski’s example apply to the real world?”

#69 “How do his three CoI theorems apply to the real world?”

#69 “If any of Dembski’s examples or theorems don’t apply to the real world, is he being uncivil by bringing them up?”

And a question that I’ve asked three times: “If the LCI fails in mathematically valid cases, is it a true law?”

And the most important questions, from #58:
“1. Are you interested in doing the work it takes for us to understand each other?”
“2. Are you interested in having a civil discussion, free of taunts?”

Wonder how Joe will shrug that off...
Link.
No doubt nobody will comment on Joe's inability to answer questions he should find simple answer given his "critiques", but KF will simply repeat once more as he has already once in that thread said:
 
Quote
F/N: this is evidently yet another case of a red herring distractor led off to a strawman side issue. Notice, just how little of the above actually addresses the main point. KF

Yeah, Gordo, we've all seen how keen you are to address the main point...

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,17:26   

depends if the point is the tip of a prick

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,17:56   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ Sep. 04 2012,15:26)
depends if the point is the tip of a prick

His version of address to the haggis, I guess.

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
eigenstate



Posts: 78
Joined: Nov. 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,18:21   

Meanwhile, KF over at UD:

Quote
I have a national sci edu crisis to deal with, so I have to be selective.


Gonna have to cut the tard down to just 10,000 words or so today, on account of the National Science Crisis That Is Threatening Monserrat's Very Existence and By Extension, Really the Remains of the British Empire, and all.

OnEdit:Linky

Edited by eigenstate on Sep. 04 2012,18:22

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,19:12   

Quote (eigenstate @ Sep. 04 2012,18:21)
Meanwhile, KF [URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/science/for-record-questions-on-the-logical-and-scientific-status-of-design-theory-for-objectors-a

nd-supporters/#comment-432272]over at UD[/URL]:

 
Quote
I have a national sci edu crisis to deal with, so I have to be selective.


Gonna have to cut the tard down to just 10,000 words or so today, on account of the National Science Crisis That Is Threatening Monserrat's Very Existence and By Extension, Really the Remains of the British Empire, and all.

OnEdit:Linky

I was going to say... a protectorate of the Brits that has just over 5,000 people and one TARD isn't what I would call (not anyone else) a nation.

I had more field testers (high school seniors) for my last round of work than Montserrat has people.  My work will be used by (as of 2009) 800,000 people per year.  When I have an item that 5,000 people screw-up on, it's not even statistically significant.

The contract I'm working on is valued more than the entire GDP of his "nation".  And my companies office buildings world wide total more area than his entire "nation".

His crisis is not noticed by anyone of any actual importance.  

Paraphrase "What is unnoticed by the Great Dane is looked upon with dread by the toy poodle."

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,20:26   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Sep. 04 2012,17:12)
Quote (eigenstate @ Sep. 04 2012,18:21)
Meanwhile, KF [URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/science/for-record-questions-on-the-logical-and-scientific-status-of-design-theory-for-objectors-a


nd-supporters/#comment-432272]over at UD[/URL]:

 
Quote
I have a national sci edu crisis to deal with, so I have to be selective.


Gonna have to cut the tard down to just 10,000 words or so today, on account of the National Science Crisis That Is Threatening Monserrat's Very Existence and By Extension, Really the Remains of the British Empire, and all.

OnEdit:Linky

I was going to say... a protectorate of the Brits that has just over 5,000 people and one TARD isn't what I would call (not anyone else) a nation.

I had more field testers (high school seniors) for my last round of work than Montserrat has people.  My work will be used by (as of 2009) 800,000 people per year.  When I have an item that 5,000 people screw-up on, it's not even statistically significant.

The contract I'm working on is valued more than the entire GDP of his "nation".  And my companies office buildings world wide total more area than his entire "nation".

His crisis is not noticed by anyone of any actual importance.  

Paraphrase "What is unnoticed by the Great Dane is looked upon with dread by the toy poodle."

And of those 5,000 or so people, how many are actually taking science classes in an actual school? Most of the people on Montserrat are elderly and some people are doing "basketry", IF they're doing anything at all. The people of the UK are subsidizing the moochers of Montserrat to the tune of millions of pounds.

And speaking of the total population, no one seems to be able to figure out exactly what the number is. I saw 4,250 on a site the other day and 4,500 to 6,000 on another site, and about 5,000 on another site. Math, and counting people, must not be important there.

And hey sparc, THAT'S why I say "fucking Montserrat". gordo talks as though Montserrat is some hugely important nation and as though the government there (such as the deputy commissioner of police and the attorney general's office) are endowed with enormous, world encompassing power. And he's always allegedly dealing with a national crisis! What a fucking JOKE!

Hey gordo, how much money do you get in your welfare check from the people of the UK for just sitting on your pompous ass in a moldy basement while spewing your insane shit on the internet? You don't have a job so you must be mooching off of the UK taxpayers. Did you move to Montserrat from Jamaica so that you could take advantage of the welfare there and because you couldn't get or keep a job in Jamaica?

And hey gordo, what's next, a national basketry crisis?

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Patrick



Posts: 666
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,20:41   

Now, now, no need to be sizeist.  I lived in Luxembourg for several years and thoroughly enjoyed the experience.  Frankly, I don't think any country should have more people than that.

Of course, even Lux is 80 times the population of Montserrat.

  
keiths



Posts: 2195
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,21:14   

Quote (eigenstate @ Sep. 04 2012,16:21)
Meanwhile, KF over at UD:
Quote
I have a national sci edu crisis to deal with, so I have to be selective.

The school cafeteria ran out of jello. They're sending KF out to get more.

Edited by keiths on Sep. 04 2012,19:16

--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number. -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 04 2012,21:22   

Quote (eigenstate @ Sep. 05 2012,11:21)
Meanwhile, KF over at UD:

   
Quote
I have a national sci edu crisis to deal with, so I have to be selective.

They want to bring science into the curriculum.

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < ... 206 207 208 209 210 [211] 212 213 214 215 216 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]