RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (527) < ... 116 117 118 119 120 [121] 122 123 124 125 126 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
khan



Posts: 1554
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,15:54   

Quote (stevestory @ May 20 2015,13:50)
Quote (midwifetoad @ May 20 2015,12:50)
Quote
jerry May 20, 2015 at 7:43 am
 
Quote
What’s the connection to the US election cycle?


The left’s only chance of winning is to obscure the bad results of their past policies and to somehow get out the black vote in elections. If the blacks did not vote in the US, the Democrats would win almost no elections, In 2016 there will not be a black man running for president so it is somehow necessary to find ways to get them to vote.

That is one of the reasons why inner city explosions of rioting are exploited and in some places encouraged. I expect to see much more of it in the next 18 months.


http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwini....laptrap

reminds me of the national review guy who said 'obama's policies aren't really as popular as polls suggest, because black people Overwhelmingly support them, skewing the results'

I recall Reagan saying that unemployment numbers were misleading because they included women.

--------------
"It's as if all those words, in their hurry to escape from the loony, have fallen over each other, forming scrambled heaps of meaninglessness." -damitall

That's so fucking stupid it merits a wing in the museum of stupid. -midwifetoad

Frequency is just the plural of wavelength...
-JoeG

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,16:19   

Quote
If the blacks did not vote in the US, the Democrats would win almost no elections


If Michael Jordan's Bulls hadn't played in the 90's, portland and seattle would have won like ALL the titles.

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,16:42   

Quote
228
Larry MoranMay 19, 2015 at 7:10 pm
Mung says,

You have your minimalist definition of evolution and expect us to respect it [and rightly so]. Likewise, we have our minimalist definition of intelligent design and would just like to see it respected in turn.

Vincent Torley posted something resembling a minimalist definition of ID in his post ….

A succinct case for Intelligent Design

I responded to that succinct case at …

The best case for Intelligent Design Creationism

I pointed out that Torley’s “succinct case” was simply “four separate scientific critiques demonstrating the inadequacy of the neo-Darwinian mechanism.” That’s not really a case for ID, is it?

In this post (top) Torley retreats and claims that I should have read other parts of Meyer’s book in order to understand the real “succinct case” for ID.

It’s all very confusing. Perhaps you could give me your version of a minimalist definition of intelligent design? Please make sure that the other ID proponents in this thread agree with you.


Larry's clearly enjoying himself

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,16:48   

Quote
255
Larry MoranMay 20, 2015 at 7:42 am
computerist #253 says,

What evolutionists (like Larry) are saying, is that
evolution works regardless, because mutations
will pile up, and eventually become useful (aka: have a selective/fitness advantage).


I have patiently explained in this thread what I actually meant. I have explained it in greater detail on my blog and provided numerous references. In addition, there are six or seven very good introductory evolutionary biology textbooks that explain it very well.

I spite of all this, you post a ridiculous summary of what you think I said without doing any of the homework one would expect of some intelligent person attempting to understand a difficult concept for the first time.

I have a favorite word for people like you, can you guess what it is?




more fun than UD's been in forever

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,16:51   

HOLYSHIT computerist is functionally retarded. Look at this reply:

Quote
257
computeristMay 20, 2015 at 8:06 am
Quote
I have patiently explained in this thread what I actually meant. I have explained it in greater detail on my blog and provided numerous references. In addition, there are six or seven very good introductory evolutionary biology textbooks that explain it very well.


Six or seven intros? Is evolution so simple that one textbook is not enough?
Quote

I spite of all this, you post a ridiculous summary of what you think I said without doing any of the homework one would expect of some intelligent person attempting to understand a difficult concept for the first time.

I’m just trying to help, Larry. As someone who designs and builds complex functional systems for a living, I thought I would help out a fellow evolutionist.

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,16:55   

Like computerist, I Also used to be "someone who designs and builds complex functional systems for a living", although my parents probably would have described me as "a 9 year old playing with Legos".

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,17:03   

Quote
264
Larry MoranMay 20, 2015 at 9:14 am
soundburger at #251 says,

For example, if a student came up to a professor in such a course, saying that he liked a certain writer, and it was revealed that the writer used juvenile put downs (such as IDiot), and numerous charges of stupidity, etc, toward those he disagreed with, what would a GOOD Critical Thinking prof do?


I’ll tell you what I do. Maybe that will help.

I would point out that there’s a difference between critical thinking and rhetorical devices. In order to survive in the real world you have to learn about both. Critical thinking involves making sure you understand sound logic and the facts.

How you deliver that information effectively in a modern society often involves additional skills.

We use Jonathan Wells’ book Icons of Evolution as an example. We learn that his put down of evolutionary biologists by charging them with stupidity is a very effective strategy for his audience. We learn that the creationists, in general, are very good at this sort of thing and it works.

I show them that if you want to really engage in a debate then it’s pretty ineffective to just rely on evidence and critical thinking. No politician will ever do this. Sometimes you have to be provocative and annoying in order to attract attention and get your message out. That’s how the real world works.

For example, many evolutionary biologist have written about random genetic drift, Neutral Theory, etc. etc. but they have been ignored. As soon as I start calling ID proponents IDiots I get an entire thread with my name on it and I get a chance to actually educate some of them.



   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,17:07   

and speaking of burnt

Quote
293
Larry MoranMay 20, 2015 at 2:29 pm
kairosfocus at #275 sys,

Specifically, all you have succeeded in doing is convincing me that I would not want to entrust any person I cared about to your tutelage; which means essentially anyone. Abusive namecalling, willful distortion of people and ideas, schoolyard bully level taunting and the like tell me you are an enabler of the fever swamp extremists who take it to the next level, stalking.

Further, you have convinced me that you are not capable of teaching sound, straight thinking, but would be very likely to resort to indoctrination, intimidation and outright bullying to push an ideological agenda.

Worse, for cause as seen above, you have come across repeatedly as speaking in disregard to truth and fairness, in evident hope that what you say or suggest will be taken as substantially true.


I have never been as mean, disrespectful, and despicable as kaisosfocus.

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,17:54   

Quote (stevestory @ May 20 2015,17:03)
Quote
264
Larry MoranMay 20, 2015 at 9:14 am
soundburger at #251 says,

For example, if a student came up to a professor in such a course, saying that he liked a certain writer, and it was revealed that the writer used juvenile put downs (such as IDiot), and numerous charges of stupidity, etc, toward those he disagreed with, what would a GOOD Critical Thinking prof do?


I’ll tell you what I do. Maybe that will help.

I would point out that there’s a difference between critical thinking and rhetorical devices. In order to survive in the real world you have to learn about both. Critical thinking involves making sure you understand sound logic and the facts.

How you deliver that information effectively in a modern society often involves additional skills.

We use Jonathan Wells’ book Icons of Evolution as an example. We learn that his put down of evolutionary biologists by charging them with stupidity is a very effective strategy for his audience. We learn that the creationists, in general, are very good at this sort of thing and it works.

I show them that if you want to really engage in a debate then it’s pretty ineffective to just rely on evidence and critical thinking. No politician will ever do this. Sometimes you have to be provocative and annoying in order to attract attention and get your message out. That’s how the real world works.

For example, many evolutionary biologist have written about random genetic drift, Neutral Theory, etc. etc. but they have been ignored. As soon as I start calling ID proponents IDiots I get an entire thread with my name on it and I get a chance to actually educate some of them.



Until Barry Arrogant thinks that Larry is winning. Then it is to the penalty box for Larry.

But until then, I am enjoying the hell out of this.

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,18:22   

Have to agree this is the most entertaining UD has been for some time.  The IDiots are always crowing about how no real scientists will debate them.  Then when a real one shows up and calls their bluff they don't know whether to shit or wind their watch.  :D  :D  :D

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,19:13   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ May 21 2015,01:54)
Quote (stevestory @ May 20 2015,17:03)
 
Quote
264
Larry MoranMay 20, 2015 at 9:14 am
soundburger at #251 says,

For example, if a student came up to a professor in such a course, saying that he liked a certain writer, and it was revealed that the writer used juvenile put downs (such as IDiot), and numerous charges of stupidity, etc, toward those he disagreed with, what would a GOOD Critical Thinking prof do?


I’ll tell you what I do. Maybe that will help.

I would point out that there’s a difference between critical thinking and rhetorical devices. In order to survive in the real world you have to learn about both. Critical thinking involves making sure you understand sound logic and the facts.

How you deliver that information effectively in a modern society often involves additional skills.

We use Jonathan Wells’ book Icons of Evolution as an example. We learn that his put down of evolutionary biologists by charging them with stupidity is a very effective strategy for his audience. We learn that the creationists, in general, are very good at this sort of thing and it works.

I show them that if you want to really engage in a debate then it’s pretty ineffective to just rely on evidence and critical thinking. No politician will ever do this. Sometimes you have to be provocative and annoying in order to attract attention and get your message out. That’s how the real world works.

For example, many evolutionary biologist have written about random genetic drift, Neutral Theory, etc. etc. but they have been ignored. As soon as I start calling ID proponents IDiots I get an entire thread with my name on it and I get a chance to actually educate some of them.



Until Barry Arrogant thinks that Larry is winning. Then it is to the penalty box for Larry.

But until then, I am enjoying the hell out of this.

Is winning and education the same?

Clearly not for IDiots otherwise  they wouldn't  be  idiots. To them winning is remaining  ignorant. Every fiber of their gut tells them so.Barry will have to use his 'logic' which because of his beliefs are completely counter to real world logic. Failing that he can always fall back on Demski's tried and true bans.  Boring and Pathetic Level of Detail  ™.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,19:34   

Quote (stevestory @ May 20 2015,17:07)
and speaking of burnt

 
Quote
293
Larry MoranMay 20, 2015 at 2:29 pm
kairosfocus at #275 sys,

Specifically, all you have succeeded in doing is convincing me that I would not want to entrust any person I cared about to your tutelage; which means essentially anyone. Abusive namecalling, willful distortion of people and ideas, schoolyard bully level taunting and the like tell me you are an enabler of the fever swamp extremists who take it to the next level, stalking.

Further, you have convinced me that you are not capable of teaching sound, straight thinking, but would be very likely to resort to indoctrination, intimidation and outright bullying to push an ideological agenda.

Worse, for cause as seen above, you have come across repeatedly as speaking in disregard to truth and fairness, in evident hope that what you say or suggest will be taken as substantially true.


I have never been as mean, disrespectful, and despicable as kaisosfocus.

Says the guy who hits his kids with "Mr. leathers"

Edited by Richardthughes on May 21 2015,23:43

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,19:59   

Quote (JohnW @ May 20 2015,12:32)
All science so far!

That whole thread is... interesting, even by UD's exalted standards.
Quote
Progressive-ism has always been the philosophy that smart people know better. And what do we get as a result of this, riots which the smart people will blame on anything but themselves.

It is these people who constantly bring up evolution in questions with Republican political candidates.

"Where were you during the Darwin riots of '15, Grandma?"

"It's people like yew wot cause unrest." -- Cleese.

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,21:09   

Andre's contribution on the Larry Moran thread is a delight too. Andre calls LM a snake oil peddler and challenges him on his views on Behe and Lenski. LM calls him on it and challenges Andre to a debate on Sandwalk giving him guest author status.
Andre's reaction?:
   
Quote
Prof Moran

Last night as I read your posts I had a thought….. Is Keith S and Larry Moran the same person? Your ignorance and arrogance is just about on par, but when you invited me over to Sandwalk to come and debate you I knew you are cut from the same cloth, please don’t take this personal but visiting your site is second to being the worst after TSZ, diogenes, your favorite lapdog makes me sick to my stomach, you can tell the world I won’t come and debate on your site, that much is true, I tried before and your best effort ever was….You don’t understand evolution…

So crow on your victory, but you ain’t getting me ever to visit your awful blog full of foul tempered ignoramuses.

So that's two sites now that Andre will not sully his eyes by visiting - TSZ and Sandwalk. He's starting to look, urmm selective as to where he gets information on the argument regarding design. Anyone over there want to suggest he visit WEIT? ATBC?
UD link

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,21:17   

Quote (Ptaylor @ May 20 2015,21:09)
Andre's contribution on the Larry Moran thread is a delight too. Andre calls LM a snake oil peddler and challenges him on his views on Behe and Lenski. LM calls him on it and challenges Andre to a debate on Sandwalk giving him guest author status.
Andre's reaction?:
     
Quote
Prof Moran

Last night as I read your posts I had a thought….. Is Keith S and Larry Moran the same person? Your ignorance and arrogance is just about on par, but when you invited me over to Sandwalk to come and debate you I knew you are cut from the same cloth, please don’t take this personal but visiting your site is second to being the worst after TSZ, diogenes, your favorite lapdog makes me sick to my stomach, you can tell the world I won’t come and debate on your site, that much is true, I tried before and your best effort ever was….You don’t understand evolution…

So crow on your victory, but you ain’t getting me ever to visit your awful blog full of foul tempered ignoramuses.

So that's two sites now that Andre will not sully his eyes by visiting - TSZ and Sandwalk. He's starting to look, urmm selective as to where he gets information on the argument regarding design. Anyone over there want to suggest he visit WEIT? ATBC?
UD link

It continues to amaze me how people tell professors of evolutionary biology that they don't know anything about evolution.

Talk about living in a fantasy.

That reminds me. UD reminds me a little of Fantasy Island.

[Mr.] Roarke had a strong moral code, but he was always merciful. He usually tried to teach his guests important life lessons through the medium of their fantasies, frequently in a manner that exposes the errors of their ways, and on occasions when the island hosted terminally ill guests he would allow them to live out one last wish. Roarke's fantasies were not without peril, but the greatest danger usually came from the guests themselves. In some cases people were killed due to their own negligence, aggression or arrogance.

from Wikipedia

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
timothya



Posts: 280
Joined: April 2013

(Permalink) Posted: May 20 2015,22:25   

Shroud of Turin!

--------------
"In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal loaves of bread." Anatole France

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 21 2015,03:22   

Quote (stevestory @ May 20 2015,17:03)
Quote
264
Larry MoranMay 20, 2015 at 9:14 am
soundburger at #251 says,

For example, if a student came up to a professor in such a course, saying that he liked a certain writer, and it was revealed that the writer used juvenile put downs (such as IDiot), and numerous charges of stupidity, etc, toward those he disagreed with, what would a GOOD Critical Thinking prof do?


I’ll tell you what I do. Maybe that will help.

I would point out that there’s a difference between critical thinking and rhetorical devices. In order to survive in the real world you have to learn about both. Critical thinking involves making sure you understand sound logic and the facts.

How you deliver that information effectively in a modern society often involves additional skills.

We use Jonathan Wells’ book Icons of Evolution as an example. We learn that his put down of evolutionary biologists by charging them with stupidity is a very effective strategy for his audience. We learn that the creationists, in general, are very good at this sort of thing and it works.

I show them that if you want to really engage in a debate then it’s pretty ineffective to just rely on evidence and critical thinking. No politician will ever do this. Sometimes you have to be provocative and annoying in order to attract attention and get your message out. That’s how the real world works.

For example, many evolutionary biologist have written about random genetic drift, Neutral Theory, etc. etc. but they have been ignored. As soon as I start calling ID proponents IDiots I get an entire thread with my name on it and I get a chance to actually educate some of them.



That is just beautiful.

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
Freddie



Posts: 371
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 21 2015,12:34   

Silver Asiatic plays the killer ID argument card to Larry Moran:
 
Quote
Also, you claim to have no evidence of ‘gods’ but on the same basis, you have no direct observations of humans descending from chimplike ancestors. You make an inference based on fossil and genetic similarities. You even posit ancestors that are invisible (at least for now).

We have no evidence of non-humans giving birth to humans. But you’re so convinced that it did happen, you call it a fact.


--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 21 2015,12:55   

Quote (Freddie @ May 21 2015,12:34)
Silver Asiatic plays the killer ID argument card to Larry Moran:
   
Quote
Also, you claim to have no evidence of ‘gods’ but on the same basis, you have no direct observations of humans descending from chimplike ancestors. You make an inference based on fossil and genetic similarities. You even posit ancestors that are invisible (at least for now).

We have no evidence of non-humans giving birth to humans. But you’re so convinced that it did happen, you call it a fact.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

Wait. Is he serious?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 21 2015,15:34   

Larry vs. KF:
Quote
This is not “get a life,” which is itself, further tripping warning flags on defiant resistance to correction. KF

Get a life. Or stop your defiant resistance to my corrections.


--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
paragwinn



Posts: 539
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: May 21 2015,17:12   

KevNick Calls Out Dr. Moran:  
Quote
Larry,

I’m challenging you to provide all the scientific evidence for ALL the reasons WHY you became so convinced that life arose by chance. . . .

[snip]

Larry, if you don’t answer this challenge, I will make you pay for it… and I mean it…

KevNick will meet him in the high school parking lot at 3pm.

--------------
All women build up a resistance [to male condescension]. Apparently, ID did not predict that. -Kristine 4-19-11
F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc. The whole thing is F/N ridiculous -Seversky on KF footnote fetish 8-20-11
Sigh. Really Bill? - Barry Arrington

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2015,00:19   

Quote (paragwinn @ May 21 2015,17:12)
KevNick Calls Out Dr. Moran:        
Quote
Larry,

I’m challenging you to provide all the scientific evidence for ALL the reasons WHY you became so convinced that life arose by chance. . . .

[snip]

Larry, if you don’t answer this challenge, I will make you pay for it… and I mean it…

KevNick will meet him in the high school parking lot at 3pm.

After Cross, soundburger and Kairosfocus jump on him, KevNick clarifies himself.    
Quote
I meant that if Larry doesn’t respond to the challenge, I will “make him pay” for his arrogance, name calling and lack of respect of others’ views by exposing it (his lack of evidence for the origins of life) on the internet, blogs and such.

Trifle with KevNick and he'll tell the Internet on you.

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2015,20:46   

Quote
2
Jim SmithMay 24, 2015 at 5:57 am
The empirical evidence shows animals go to the afterlife.


Dafuq?

linky

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2015,20:46   

Quote
6
MungMay 24, 2015 at 9:53 am
hi vjt.

Would you say that a meta-meta-concept is qualitatively different from a meta-concept, and that a meta-meta-meta-concept is qualitatively different from a meta-meta-concept?

To be honest, I think you have built your case on a premise about concepts that you haven’t even begun to argue for.



(same link as above)

   
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2015,22:01   

Would a meta-meta-meta-meta-concept be a metaphor? (i.e., meta-4)

  
paragwinn



Posts: 539
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2015,23:35   

Quote (Henry J @ May 24 2015,20:01)
Would a meta-meta-meta-meta-concept be a metaphor? (i.e., meta-4)

Have you ever metaphor you didn't like?

--------------
All women build up a resistance [to male condescension]. Apparently, ID did not predict that. -Kristine 4-19-11
F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc. The whole thing is F/N ridiculous -Seversky on KF footnote fetish 8-20-11
Sigh. Really Bill? - Barry Arrington

  
sparc



Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 24 2015,23:51   

Quote (paragwinn @ May 24 2015,23:35)
Quote (Henry J @ May 24 2015,20:01)
Would a meta-meta-meta-meta-concept be a metaphor? (i.e., meta-4)

Have you ever metaphor you didn't like?

well, as long as it isn't served with spam

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: May 25 2015,10:06   

Quote (CeilingCat @ May 24 2015,00:19)
Quote (paragwinn @ May 21 2015,17:12)
KevNick Calls Out Dr. Moran:          
Quote
Larry,

I’m challenging you to provide all the scientific evidence for ALL the reasons WHY you became so convinced that life arose by chance. . . .

[snip]

Larry, if you don’t answer this challenge, I will make you pay for it… and I mean it…

KevNick will meet him in the high school parking lot at 3pm.

After Cross, soundburger and Kairosfocus jump on him, KevNick clarifies himself.      
Quote
I meant that if Larry doesn’t respond to the challenge, I will “make him pay” for his arrogance, name calling and lack of respect of others’ views by exposing it (his lack of evidence for the origins of life) on the internet, blogs and such.

Trifle with KevNick and he'll tell the Internet on you.

PLease notice that after KevNick's clarification that he did not intend physical violence, only cyber-stalking, that Gordon (Karoisfocus) Mullings did not chastise him. I guess it is OK to cyber-stalk evilutionists, but not creationists.

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 659
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: May 25 2015,13:57   

Kevnick is Quest/John Witton. Sticks out a mile.

--------------
SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G

BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 25 2015,14:05   

Quote
Home » Intelligent Design, Religion » Is God Really Good?
Is God Really Good?
May 21, 2015 Posted by Granville Sewell under Intelligent Design, Religion


I'm confused...Intelligent Design has something to do with this "god" character??????

linky

   
  15792 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (527) < ... 116 117 118 119 120 [121] 122 123 124 125 126 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]