raguel
Posts: 107
Joined: Feb. 2008
|
OT: I've experienced the mixed emotions that come with being moderated by a creationist, even though one's response was well within the reported policy.
Apparently that QD vs Luskin really stung, so user CreationistsWON created a hit piece that only an attack gerbil could love:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8xJa6RSJ04&feature=related
It's pretty tedious, so I'll forgive you (lolz) if you don't make it to the last clip featuring the Q v L vid. If you do, you'll notice something missing, You might think, as I did (posting as NiallCosgrach, don't tell anyone  ) that this was intentionally edited out. Not so!!
| Quote | It's not edited my friend, the middle part is missing because it wouldn't fit the range of 11 min, i explained that in the response clip. Lusking sayd he? didn't do it, and didn't answer the question if someone from their side did it, he only sayd things about misinformation.
But i know why you're willing to believe yourself, this clip does show you truth, and it hurts you |
After I stopped giggling, I checked out his "response clip", where he even admitted to "removing" the bits (in order to fit within 11 min max). So I made two responses:
1. What's the difference between "editing" and "removing"
2. If his video shows truth, why does he claim (in the video) that Luskin tried to answer the questions, but admits in his reply to me that he didn't answer the question (in fact, he didn't answer any questions at all).
I wish I had used screenshots for what happened next. About a day went by without my responses showing up, but others were. Eventually they did show up, and I was going to thank him for this. When I had time to reply, they were gone again. 
So, I'm feeling a bit upset about being censored, but I find his silence particularly delicious, given his "the truth hurts" crack. 
|
