RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (919) < ... 271 272 273 274 275 [276] 277 278 279 280 281 ... >   
  Topic: Joe G.'s Tardgasm, How long can it last?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 11 2014,20:16   

Quote (Zachriel @ Dec. 11 2014,15:10)
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 11 2014,09:59)
I'll try to explain why I used "not joey"

We took it as a compliment.

:)

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 12 2014,07:33   

After blocking my comments (again) on his unintelligent blabbering blog, joey slobbered:

"OK so the impish TWiT shows up here, spews its usual bullshit and refuses to support it. Not only that it still refuses to link to the alleged theory of evolution which it has claimed to have found.

Total and complete cowardice from a proven pathological liar. At least we understand its need for anonymity."

Hey joey, the only comments you posted of mine are QUESTIONS. Why do I need to support QUESTIONS? The complete cowardice, pathological lying, bullshit, and lack of support are all on your side.

By the way, joey, are you on your way to Portland yet?

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 12 2014,21:09   

joey barked: "No one has ever observed nature, operating freely produce specified complexity- Never happened."

Hey joey, you often use the phrase "nature, operating freely". Will you describe exactly what you mean by that and exactly how you determine the difference(s) between "nature, operating freely" and nature not operating freely, or are you going to avoid supporting your claims as usual?

I see what you did there by saying specified complexity instead of one of the IDiot terms (CSI, dFSCI, FIASCO). What about the I in those IDiot terms, joey? Isn't the I the most important letter in regard to your IDiot claims? And what about the other letters you left out? Will you explain why anyone should have to show that they have observed or can observe "nature operating freely" (whatever that is) producing something (so-called CSI, dFSCI, FIASCO) that you IDiots can't and won't define coherently and consistently, can't and won't calculate/measure, and can't verify the existence of? CSI, dFSCI, and FIASCO are IDiot terms, joey, and it's up to you IDiots to support your claims.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 13 2014,23:05   

12
Joe December 13, 2014 at 3:08 pm

(Zachriel): "No. Birds are theropods. See Brusatte et al., Gradual Assembly of Avian Body Plan Culminated in Rapid Rates of Evolution across the Dinosaur-Bird Transition, Current Biology 2014."

(joey): "Umm, no one knows what makes a bird a bird let alone how genetic changes can produce one from theropods."

Hey joey, you've said that ID is not anti-evolution, not anti-common descent, and not anti-universal common descent, yet you constantly attack virtually anything and everything that pertains to evolution. It's abundantly clear that you don't accept any sort of evolution at all and that you believe that your imaginary god allah poofs everything into existence.

Tell me, joey, what makes a bird a bird, and where did birds come from? And when and how? Show your work. And since you insist that only peer reviewed, published work in a science journal counts, make sure that your work is peer reviewed and published in a science journal. That won't be a problem for you, will it, joey? LMAO!

Oh, and I'm sure that you don't realize it, because you're so anxious to be a jerk that you always bark without thinking, but when you often bark things like this: "Umm, no one knows what makes a bird a bird let alone how genetic changes can produce one from theropods.", you're including yourself and all of your 'fellow traveler ilk' IDiot-creationists. If, as you say, "no one knows", you IDiot-creationists don't know. Thanks for destroying your and your fellow IDiots' claims about so-called 'intelligent design'.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 14 2014,03:12   

What's more, Joey doesn't even know how to see whether a creature is a bird or not. Are there any non-bird animals (birds are animals, that much has been established beyond resonable doubt, I presume?) that have skeletons/bones that are not significantly deviant wrt bird skeletons/bones?

Is it possible that Joey might learn something from what I snipped from a book (ISBN 0-14-029481-3):
               
Quote
The limbs of all vertebrates with a more recent evolutionary origin than the fishes are built on the same sort of plan, the pentadactyl limb, but with modifications. Horses, for example, have only one, enormously elongated, toe, instead of the usual five. And chickens, like other birds, have a very reduced fibula, the smaller bone alongside the shin bone, as you will know if you have ever paid attention to eating a drumstick. Along with the reduced fibula the chicken also has many of its ankle bones missing, though this wouldn't be so obvious to the casual chicken-leg eater. It turns out that, by a variety of surgical manipulations on the chicken foetus in the egg, one can persuade a developing chick to grow a much sturdier fibula and also develop some of the normally missing ankle bones. Chicken DNA contains the information to build the 'normal' limb; so why doesn't it? Probably as a result of a very slight change in a regulator gene. The mutants never grow an ankle without a fibula, but once the fibula contacts the ankle region the bones there develop. The interpretation of this is that the presence of the fibula somehow induces the ankle bones to form, and that at some stage in its past the structural genes for the chicken's leg came under the influence of a new regulator that controlled them in a different way. The effect was to reduce the growth of the fibula, which in turn modified the ankle. The structural genes themselves are still there, as the experimental birds show, and what happened in evolution was that they got switched off.

There is some difference between the practicing of real science and what smart-asses like Joey are doing; he probably would have a problem sorting out ratshit from a sack of cinnamon.

Edited by Quack on Dec. 14 2014,03:13

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 14 2014,08:22   

Quote (Quack @ Dec. 14 2014,11:12)
What's more, Joey doesn't even know how to see whether a creature is a bird or not. Are there any non-bird animals (birds are animals, that much has been established beyond resonable doubt, I presume?) that have skeletons/bones that are not significantly deviant wrt bird skeletons/bones?

Is it possible that Joey might learn something from what I snipped from a book (ISBN 0-14-029481-3):
                 
Quote
The limbs of all vertebrates with a more recent evolutionary origin than the fishes are built on the same sort of plan, the pentadactyl limb, but with modifications. Horses, for example, have only one, enormously elongated, toe, instead of the usual five. And chickens, like other birds, have a very reduced fibula, the smaller bone alongside the shin bone, as you will know if you have ever paid attention to eating a drumstick. Along with the reduced fibula the chicken also has many of its ankle bones missing, though this wouldn't be so obvious to the casual chicken-leg eater. It turns out that, by a variety of surgical manipulations on the chicken foetus in the egg, one can persuade a developing chick to grow a much sturdier fibula and also develop some of the normally missing ankle bones. Chicken DNA contains the information to build the 'normal' limb; so why doesn't it? Probably as a result of a very slight change in a regulator gene. The mutants never grow an ankle without a fibula, but once the fibula contacts the ankle region the bones there develop. The interpretation of this is that the presence of the fibula somehow induces the ankle bones to form, and that at some stage in its past the structural genes for the chicken's leg came under the influence of a new regulator that controlled them in a different way. The effect was to reduce the growth of the fibula, which in turn modified the ankle. The structural genes themselves are still there, as the experimental birds show, and what happened in evolution was that they got switched off.

There is some difference between the practicing of real science and what smart-asses like Joey are doing; he probably would have a problem sorting out ratshit from a sack of cinnamon.

That's unfair, Joe MUST be able to taste the difference.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,07:46   

You got a point there. Fresh off the press today:
'Big Bang' of bird evolution mapped:
To think that Joey may be related to all of them...

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,08:17   

Quote (Quack @ Dec. 15 2014,07:46)
You got a point there. Fresh off the press today:
'Big Bang' of bird evolution mapped:
To think that Joey may be related to all of them...

Here's a link to the Avian Phylogenomics Project
http://avian.genomics.cn/en....en

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,09:45   

Quote (Zachriel @ Dec. 15 2014,08:17)
Quote (Quack @ Dec. 15 2014,07:46)
You got a point there. Fresh off the press today:
'Big Bang' of bird evolution mapped:
To think that Joey may be related to all of them...

Here's a link to the Avian Phylogenomics Project
http://avian.genomics.cn/en....e....n....en

Last week's Science was a special issue on bird genomics... including genetic history all the way back to archosaurs.

When Joey says "no one knows" what he means is "I don't know and am to lazy and stupid to find out."

Now, I'm inspired to read the 6 research papers and report on them...

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,16:56   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Dec. 15 2014,09:45)
Quote (Zachriel @ Dec. 15 2014,08:17)
Quote (Quack @ Dec. 15 2014,07:46)
You got a point there. Fresh off the press today:
'Big Bang' of bird evolution mapped:
To think that Joey may be related to all of them...

Here's a link to the Avian Phylogenomics Project
http://avian.genomics.cn/en....e....n....en

Last week's Science was a special issue on bird genomics... including genetic history all the way back to archosaurs.

When Joey says "no one knows" what he means is "I don't know and am to lazy and stupid to find out."

Now, I'm inspired to read the 6 research papers and report on them...

To add a bit, it's also "I don't know.  No one is smarter than me.  Therefore, no one knows."

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
KevinB



Posts: 525
Joined: April 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,17:00   

Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 14 2014,08:22)
That's unfair, Joe MUST be able to taste the difference.

The notoriously tasteless post over at TSZ militates against this assertion.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,14:26   

Chubbers@UD:

Quote
It isn’t a problem for anyone, keith. Only immature jerks try to make it a problem and here you are.

Christians know better than to question God. Grow up already.

How could God judge us if we didn’t have pain and suffering? What would be the impetus for learning if this was a perfect world?


But Joe, you're MUSLIM *wink*, remember?

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,19:49   

Hey joey, at UD rvb8 said: "OOL and Evolution are separate topics. The requirements of evolution are random mutations, followed by the the sifting process known as natural selection, and aided by sexual selection and perhaps gene transfer. The requirements of OOL, are chemicals and energy. What in the world is so difficult to grasp?"

To which you barked in response: "It is only if blind watchmaker-type processes produced living organisms would we say that they also produced its diversity. On the other hand if living organisms were intelligently designed then we would infer that the bulk of the evolution is also via intelligent design- as in organisms were intelligently designed to evolve and evolved by intelligent design (for example via Spetner’s “built-in responses to environmental cues).

Why is that so difficult to understand?"

So then, joey, based on that and other comments barked by you, are you saying that OOL and evolution are NOT separate topics?


ETA: By the way, joey, what do you mean by "the bulk of the evolution"? Explain how intelligent design only applies to the "bulk of the evolution", and how you, as an IDiot-creationist, scientifically determine the difference(s) between the "bulk" and the non-"bulk". Were/are only the "bulk" of "living organisms" intelligently designed? Which ones were/are not intelligently designed, and how do you know?

Edited by The whole truth on Dec. 16 2014,18:09

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,20:22   

Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 16 2014,19:49)
Hey joey, at UD rvb8 said: "OOL and Evolution are separate topics. The requirements of evolution are random mutations, followed by the the sifting process known as natural selection, and aided by sexual selection and perhaps gene transfer. The requirements of OOL, are chemicals and energy. What in the world is so difficult to grasp?"

To which you barked in response: "It is only if blind watchmaker-type processes produced living organisms would we say that they also produced its diversity. On the other hand if living organisms were intelligently designed then we would infer that the bulk of the evolution is also via intelligent design- as in organisms were intelligently designed to evolve and evolved by intelligent design (for example via Spetner’s “built-in responses to environmental cues).

Why is that so difficult to understand?"

So then, joey, based on that and other comments barked by you, are you saying that OOL and evolution are NOT separate topics?


ETA: By the way, joey, what do you mean by "the bulk of the evolution"? Explain how intelligent design only applies to the "bulk of the evolution", and how you, as an IDiot-creationist, scientifically determine the difference(s) between the "bulk" and the non-"bulk". Were/are only the "bulk" of "living organisms" intelligently designed? Which ones were/are not intelligently designed, and how do you know?

I wonder why Joe didn't jump on him and ask him for evidence of Blindwatchmaker evolution

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,20:53   

Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 16 2014,19:49)
Which ones were/are not intelligently designed, and how do you know?

Allow me to introduce you to the contributors of UD and their collected works.

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,21:01   

At UD Keith S said: "Tsunamis can travel far outside of the radius in which the earthquake can be felt."

And joey gallien, the basement dwelling, willfully ignorant, incorrigible brat who constantly fabricates bullshit responded:

"Evidence please. You are too well known for your fabrications to be trusted."

joey, your belligerent stupidity knows no bounds. When an earthquake occurs at or near one side of an ocean (say, at or near Japan) a tsunami caused by the quake can and sometimes does cross the ocean all the way to another side (to, say, California) even though NO ONE in California "felt" the earthquake. If you weren't such an IDIOT you would know that.


ETA: corrected typo

Edited by The whole truth on Dec. 16 2014,19:03

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,21:49   

Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 16 2014,18:53)
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 16 2014,19:49)
Which ones were/are not intelligently designed, and how do you know?

Allow me to introduce you to the contributors of UD and their collected works.

Yeah :)

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
socle



Posts: 322
Joined: July 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,22:01   

Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 16 2014,21:01)
At UD Keith S said: "Tsunamis can travel far outside of the radius in which the earthquake can be felt."

And joey gallien, the basement dwelling, willfully ignorant, incorrigible brat who constantly fabricates bullshit responded:

"Evidence please. You are too well known for your fabrications to be trusted."

joey, your belligerent stupidity knows no bounds. When an earthquake occurs at or near one side of an ocean (say, at or near Japan) a tsunami caused by the quake can and sometimes does cross the ocean all the way to another side (to, say, California) even though NO ONE in California "felt" the earthquake. If you weren't such an IDIOT you would know that.


ETA: corrected typo



First StephenB and now Joe.  Don't any of these people understand wtf a tsunami is??

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 17 2014,01:15   

Quote (socle @ Dec. 17 2014,06:01)
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 16 2014,21:01)
At UD Keith S said: "Tsunamis can travel far outside of the radius in which the earthquake can be felt."

And joey gallien, the basement dwelling, willfully ignorant, incorrigible brat who constantly fabricates bullshit responded:

"Evidence please. You are too well known for your fabrications to be trusted."

joey, your belligerent stupidity knows no bounds. When an earthquake occurs at or near one side of an ocean (say, at or near Japan) a tsunami caused by the quake can and sometimes does cross the ocean all the way to another side (to, say, California) even though NO ONE in California "felt" the earthquake. If you weren't such an IDIOT you would know that.


ETA: corrected typo



First StephenB and now Joe.  Don't any of these people understand wtf a tsunami is??

Since the wavelength is the same as the frequency the the reason you don't feel the earthquake in California is because the length exceeds the distance of the time it takes for the wave to complete a single cycle. Thus at one earthquake per annum the wavelength equals 365 days multiplied by one annum. which equals the frequency i.e. one over one annum or 5.284965330627431e -10 Hz.

This new science of Wave-Hertz is simple once you get your head around it.

Prevents earthquakes and cleans your teeth at the same time, comes with free steak knives! Available on all good fundie TV stations.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 17 2014,01:31   

Quote (socle @ Dec. 16 2014,20:01)
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 16 2014,21:01)
At UD Keith S said: "Tsunamis can travel far outside of the radius in which the earthquake can be felt."

And joey gallien, the basement dwelling, willfully ignorant, incorrigible brat who constantly fabricates bullshit responded:

"Evidence please. You are too well known for your fabrications to be trusted."

joey, your belligerent stupidity knows no bounds. When an earthquake occurs at or near one side of an ocean (say, at or near Japan) a tsunami caused by the quake can and sometimes does cross the ocean all the way to another side (to, say, California) even though NO ONE in California "felt" the earthquake. If you weren't such an IDIOT you would know that.


ETA: corrected typo



First StephenB and now Joe.  Don't any of these people understand wtf a tsunami is??

I don't think that they understand anything. Their feeble minds are extremely limited, and they're proud of that. Even the smartest amongst them are dolts. They're basically just badly programmed robots. The IDiots of the intelligent design agenda are the strongest evidence against intelligent design.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 17 2014,02:46   

Quote
They're basically just badly programmed robots.

Much like what I've been thinking - only in terms of faulty connections in the wiring of the brain but the effect would be aabout the same...

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 17 2014,07:15   

Quote (Quack @ Dec. 17 2014,10:46)
Quote
They're basically just badly programmed robots.

Much like what I've been thinking - only in terms of faulty connections in the wiring of the brain but the effect would be aabout the same...

Non Turing robots, ones that can't run science. More like mechanical turks driven by a committee of leaches.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 17 2014,07:34   

Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 17 2014,08:15)
Quote (Quack @ Dec. 17 2014,10:46)
 
Quote
They're basically just badly programmed robots.

Much like what I've been thinking - only in terms of faulty connections in the wiring of the brain but the effect would be aabout the same...

Non Turing robots, ones that can't run science. More like mechanical turks driven by a committee of leaches.

Nice image!  I'm stealing that expression!

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 17 2014,13:02   

Quote
Don't any of these people understand wtf a tsunami is??

It's a macrowave, in contrast to microwaves. And since there can be microevolution but not macroevolution, therefore...

  
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 17 2014,13:17   

Quote (NoName @ Dec. 17 2014,07:34)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 17 2014,08:15)
 
Quote (Quack @ Dec. 17 2014,10:46)
   
Quote
They're basically just badly programmed robots.

Much like what I've been thinking - only in terms of faulty connections in the wiring of the brain but the effect would be aabout the same...

Non Turing robots, ones that can't run science. More like mechanical turks driven by a committee of leaches.

Nice image!  I'm stealing that expression!

What would a world leached of leeches look like?

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 17 2014,13:58   

joey reveals more of his deranged mind

Comment number 519.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 17 2014,14:09   

Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 17 2014,11:58)
joey reveals more of his deranged mind

Comment number 519.

Joe:
Quote
We don’t live in a perfect world and I wouldn’t want to.

He's got a point.  A perfect world wouldn't have Joe in it.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 17 2014,17:35   

Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 18 2014,06:58)
joey reveals more of his deranged mind

Comment number 519.

A snippet from that comment:
   
Quote
Ask God.

I say all those children are now in Heaven

emphasis in original.
It seems that Joe saying "I say" is now a final arbiter in any argument Joe might have. No logic, no evidence, no reasoning need be considered, Joe just says it, that's that.

Hmm, where have I seen this before? Oh yes - Joe, congratulations on your asdescent into full blown Robert Byersland.

Edited by Ptaylor on Dec. 18 2014,10:37

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 17 2014,18:29   

Quote (Quack @ Dec. 17 2014,21:17)
   
Quote (NoName @ Dec. 17 2014,07:34)
       
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 17 2014,08:15)
       
Quote (Quack @ Dec. 17 2014,10:46)
         
Quote
They're basically just badly programmed robots.

Much like what I've been thinking - only in terms of faulty connections in the wiring of the brain but the effect would be aabout the same...

Non Turing robots, ones that can't run science. More like mechanical turks driven by a committee of leaches.

Nice image!  I'm stealing that expression!

What would a world leached of leeches look like?

Hahaha... you know I never considered the spelling of the things as I pulled one off my eyeball with a pair of pliers while holding a tiny shaving mirror with my other hand in the mountains of Papua New Guinea a few years ago. Trying to grab the tail of the leech as it flicked around was  a test of my determination over that of the leeche's. The image of my eyeball's skin tearing away from the ball stuck to the leeche's mouth is forever etched in my mind. None of the local guys who were normally never squeamish could bring themselves to do it, so it was a case of do it yourself bush surgery. The leech had been there for at least an hour after walking along a tropical jungle track with near on 100% humidity complelety drenched in my own perspiration and close in foliage hitting my face.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 17 2014,19:58   

Quote (Ptaylor @ Dec. 17 2014,15:35)
       
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 18 2014,06:58)
joey reveals more of his deranged mind

Comment number 519.

A snippet from that comment:
           
Quote
Ask God.

I say all those children are now in Heaven

emphasis in original.
It seems that Joe saying "I say" is now a final arbiter in any argument Joe might have. No logic, no evidence, no reasoning need be considered, Joe just says it, that's that.

Hmm, where have I seen this before? Oh yes - Joe, congratulations on your asdescent into full blown Robert Byersland.

"...Joe just says it, that's that."

Yep, just like his 'fellow traveler', 'ilk', and 'enabler' gordo mullings with his autocratic vomit: FOR RECORD. END. BYDAND! and "threads I own", "you have been corrected", "in the teeth of correction", "despite being corrected you have...", "must do better", etc., etc., etc.

One of the main traits of the ID-creation cultists is their authoritarian attitude.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
  27552 replies since Feb. 24 2010,12:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (919) < ... 271 272 273 274 275 [276] 277 278 279 280 281 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]