RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (622) < ... 412 413 414 415 416 [417] 418 419 420 421 422 ... >   
  Topic: A Separate Thread for Gary Gaulin, As big as the poop that does not look< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Woodbine



Posts: 1218
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,02:19   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 15 2014,06:05)
I really only need what I already have, where it is right now. Including in this forum, where I can see Wesley is increasing the drama (or something) with an excellent quote mine, from a similar situation where another government agency was said to have been contacted to investigate me. At this point in time: in comparison to that incident this one that possibly got me reported to US Homeland Security is sadly comical. In my opinion they would also come to the conclusion that this forum would have better off to NOT call for ANY investigation at ALL of what's going on in this toilet of a forum where I reported as so ordered sir, or mam, whichever you are:

Forty pages of this gibberish, Gary.

Forty fucking pages.

And yet you still believe it's the Man holding you back.

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,06:53   

Quote (Woodbine @ Dec. 15 2014,02:19)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 15 2014,06:05)
I really only need what I already have, where it is right now. Including in this forum, where I can see Wesley is increasing the drama (or something) with an excellent quote mine, from a similar situation where another government agency was said to have been contacted to investigate me. At this point in time: in comparison to that incident this one that possibly got me reported to US Homeland Security is sadly comical. In my opinion they would also come to the conclusion that this forum would have better off to NOT call for ANY investigation at ALL of what's going on in this toilet of a forum where I reported as so ordered sir, or mam, whichever you are:

Forty pages of this gibberish, Gary.

Forty fucking pages.

And yet you still believe it's the Man holding you back.

Who is "the Man"?

In the US the phrase is used for a large government agency such as Homeland Security, which in this case is only stuck in the middle of your religious spat.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,07:03   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 15 2014,14:53)
Quote (Woodbine @ Dec. 15 2014,02:19)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 15 2014,06:05)
I really only need what I already have, where it is right now. Including in this forum, where I can see Wesley is increasing the drama (or something) with an excellent quote mine, from a similar situation where another government agency was said to have been contacted to investigate me. At this point in time: in comparison to that incident this one that possibly got me reported to US Homeland Security is sadly comical. In my opinion they would also come to the conclusion that this forum would have better off to NOT call for ANY investigation at ALL of what's going on in this toilet of a forum where I reported as so ordered sir, or mam, whichever you are:

Forty pages of this gibberish, Gary.

Forty fucking pages.

And yet you still believe it's the Man holding you back.

Who is "the Man"?

In the US the phrase is used for a large government agency such as Homeland Security, which in this case is only stuck in the middle of your religious spat.

Gary Gaulin the only person on earth who doesn't know who the man is.

Hey Gary tell us all again how drug dealers, rap music, guns and religious fundamentalism are better for the world than science.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,07:08   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 15 2014,01:05)
 
Quote (N.Wells @ Dec. 14 2014,21:37)
   
Quote
I must say though that I did not expect to wake up to such a reaction to my showing what using science to throw stones at other cultures and religions is contributing to.
I'll bet that you can't back up that interpretation.  As V.S. Naipaul noted in "Among the Believers", Islamic fundamentalists like the fruits of science well enough (medicines, electronics, etc.), although they don't much care for science and western technological (and thus military) superiority.  Nonetheless, science is fairly low on the list of things that they don't like about the west.


Or in other words you can point to others who you think did more damage than you did and they can point to someone else and so forth until the blame comes back to you, then starts all over again without anyone having to stop throwing inflaming insults.

Bat-crap crazy.
You cannot substantiate your claim that people here are "using science to throw stones at other cultures and religions."
I will point out, yet again, that the only one introducing religion into this discussion is you. Same as it has ever been.
You seem to want desperately for this to be about religion, about 'culture', yet your emissions have nothing to do with either.  Nor does the mockery you earn for your bat-crap crazy writing style, your arrogant stupidity, your ineducable ignorance, or your utterly incoherent notions.
 
Quote

   
Quote (N.Wells @ Dec. 14 2014,21:37)
   
Quote
The US Homeland Security people and military see that sort of thing all the time, which makes it somewhat comical to discuss reporting me for showing everyday reality in another part of the world. I assumed that all knew that the "tard" type insults being thrown around are certainly no help to the people who are in charge of cleaning up the bloody messes in parts of the world I doubt we (at least not in our lifetimes) will ever see an Atheist convention held at.


Nobody is tossing tard-type insults at those people.  We are tossing them at you, which is entirely different.


And you are tossing demeaning insults at Christian culture, which in turn helps marginalize the culture being eradicated by what has become genocide. So you are saying you are not doing the actual killing, just helping to demonize those who are being killed off.

Again, as Wikipedia would say "citation needed."
There are Christians posting on this site.  Some of them have been as appalled at your vitriolic refusal to engage with facts and evidence as those on this board who profess no religion or who oppose it utterly.
You keep assuming your opponents are those out of your fantasies rather than grappling with the realities.
Standard issue behavior from you, one more facet of your distraction/deflection maneuvers.  You'll go to any lengths to avoid having to engage with concrete criticisms of your effluent.
 
Quote

   
Quote (N.Wells @ Dec. 14 2014,21:37)
Also, slightly tongue in cheek, your statement about atheist conferences depends in part on whether India's 172 million muslims count as part of the "Islamic Crescent" or not:        
Quote
Today's Paper » NATIONAL » ANDHRA PRADESH
January 3, 2007
World Atheist Conference from Jan 5
VIJAYAWADA: The three-day Sixth World Atheist Conference will begin here at Siddhartha auditorium at 11.30 p.m. from January 5 under the auspices of Atheist Centre, which was set up by freedom fighter and rationalist late Gora.


India? That's about as daring as holding the convention where NoName is hunkered down, in Canada.

Wrong again, butt-breath.  I am not in Canada.
Your research skills are fully as well developed as your linguistic skills.
Quote

You are needed at the Iraq/Syrian border, to help pass out pamphlets somewhere along the roads inviting everyone to join the great religion bashing event that will teach them all they need to know about what science is for. When will we see something like that?

   
Quote (N.Wells @ Dec. 14 2014,21:37)
   
Quote
But before I start giving everyone at UD new IDeas (like book one with fancy invitation webpage showing the before picture of a now bombed out hotel that's free to go to but after realizing where they are they will pay everything they have just to get back alive) I better get back to work, again. I do though feel better now that all here are now able to share in what has helped put a damper on my holiday spirit.
There seems to be remarkably little interest at UD in your supposedly new and improved ID ideas, in fact just about the same as the amount of interest those guys express in Edgar Postrado's newer and even more improved version of ID, which according to your stated standards supersedes your own effluent and makes it obsolete.  Since you have not yet explained why anyone should pay attention to your older, less well publicized, obsolete version of ID as opposed to Edgar's newer and broader version, would you care to do so now?


I really only need what I already have, where it is right now. Including in this forum, where I can see Wesley is increasing the drama (or something) with an excellent quote mine, from a similar situation where another government agency was said to have been contacted to investigate me. At this point in time: in comparison to that incident this one that possibly got me reported to US Homeland Security is sadly comical. In my opinion they would also come to the conclusion that this forum would have better off to NOT call for ANY investigation at ALL of what's going on in this toilet of a forum where I reported as so ordered sir, or mam, whichever you are:

You only need what you have right now?  A steaming pile of incoherent verbiage posted on the net, zero supporters or adherents of any sort, and a miserable piece of crap software, utterly pointless in every respect, that is considered to be 'quality coding' by as many as 4 people?

How nice for you that your needs are few and easily met.
How delusional of you to think anyone cares.
How bat-crap crazy of you to think you are correct, let alone successful or triumphant in any regard.
The only triumph you have achieved is the destruction of a  human life, your own.

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,09:21   

Quote (NoName @ Dec. 15 2014,08:08)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 15 2014,01:05)
 
Quote (N.Wells @ Dec. 14 2014,21:37)
     
Quote
I must say though that I did not expect to wake up to such a reaction to my showing what using science to throw stones at other cultures and religions is contributing to.
I'll bet that you can't back up that interpretation.  As V.S. Naipaul noted in "Among the Believers", Islamic fundamentalists like the fruits of science well enough (medicines, electronics, etc.), although they don't much care for science and western technological (and thus military) superiority.  Nonetheless, science is fairly low on the list of things that they don't like about the west.


Or in other words you can point to others who you think did more damage than you did and they can point to someone else and so forth until the blame comes back to you, then starts all over again without anyone having to stop throwing inflaming insults.

Bat-crap crazy.
You cannot substantiate your claim that people here are "using science to throw stones at other cultures and religions."
I will point out, yet again, that the only one introducing religion into this discussion is you. Same as it has ever been.
You seem to want desperately for this to be about religion, about 'culture', yet your emissions have nothing to do with either.  Nor does the mockery you earn for your bat-crap crazy writing style, your arrogant stupidity, your ineducable ignorance, or your utterly incoherent notions.
 
Quote

     
Quote (N.Wells @ Dec. 14 2014,21:37)
     
Quote
The US Homeland Security people and military see that sort of thing all the time, which makes it somewhat comical to discuss reporting me for showing everyday reality in another part of the world. I assumed that all knew that the "tard" type insults being thrown around are certainly no help to the people who are in charge of cleaning up the bloody messes in parts of the world I doubt we (at least not in our lifetimes) will ever see an Atheist convention held at.


Nobody is tossing tard-type insults at those people.  We are tossing them at you, which is entirely different.


And you are tossing demeaning insults at Christian culture, which in turn helps marginalize the culture being eradicated by what has become genocide. So you are saying you are not doing the actual killing, just helping to demonize those who are being killed off.

Again, as Wikipedia would say "citation needed."
There are Christians posting on this site.  Some of them have been as appalled at your vitriolic refusal to engage with facts and evidence as those on this board who profess no religion or who oppose it utterly.
You keep assuming your opponents are those out of your fantasies rather than grappling with the realities.
Standard issue behavior from you, one more facet of your distraction/deflection maneuvers.  You'll go to any lengths to avoid having to engage with concrete criticisms of your effluent.
 
Quote

     
Quote (N.Wells @ Dec. 14 2014,21:37)
Also, slightly tongue in cheek, your statement about atheist conferences depends in part on whether India's 172 million muslims count as part of the "Islamic Crescent" or not:          
Quote
Today's Paper » NATIONAL » ANDHRA PRADESH
January 3, 2007
World Atheist Conference from Jan 5
VIJAYAWADA: The three-day Sixth World Atheist Conference will begin here at Siddhartha auditorium at 11.30 p.m. from January 5 under the auspices of Atheist Centre, which was set up by freedom fighter and rationalist late Gora.


India? That's about as daring as holding the convention where NoName is hunkered down, in Canada.

Wrong again, butt-breath.  I am not in Canada.
Your research skills are fully as well developed as your linguistic skills.

and legal skills, and Real-Science skills...gary's like a polymath, except the opposite.  :p

   
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,09:36   

Quote (stevestory @ Dec. 15 2014,10:21)
 
Quote (NoName @ Dec. 15 2014,08:08)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 15 2014,01:05)
   ...
India? That's about as daring as holding the convention where NoName is hunkered down, in Canada.

Wrong again, butt-breath.  I am not in Canada.
Your research skills are fully as well developed as your linguistic skills.

and legal skills, and Real-Science skills...gary's like a polymath, except the opposite.  :p

Yup.  His intelligence and cognitive skills are the exact inverse of a Klein flask.

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,16:52   

Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 15 2014,07:03)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 15 2014,14:53)
Quote (Woodbine @ Dec. 15 2014,02:19)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 15 2014,06:05)
I really only need what I already have, where it is right now. Including in this forum, where I can see Wesley is increasing the drama (or something) with an excellent quote mine, from a similar situation where another government agency was said to have been contacted to investigate me. At this point in time: in comparison to that incident this one that possibly got me reported to US Homeland Security is sadly comical. In my opinion they would also come to the conclusion that this forum would have better off to NOT call for ANY investigation at ALL of what's going on in this toilet of a forum where I reported as so ordered sir, or mam, whichever you are:

Forty pages of this gibberish, Gary.

Forty fucking pages.

And yet you still believe it's the Man holding you back.

Who is "the Man"?

In the US the phrase is used for a large government agency such as Homeland Security, which in this case is only stuck in the middle of your religious spat.

Gary Gaulin the only person on earth who doesn't know who the man is.

Hey Gary tell us all again how drug dealers, rap music, guns and religious fundamentalism are better for the world than science.

Show me where I ever said that.

I know you can't, but I need to show that you are just another defamatory liar.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,17:27   

Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Dec. 14 2014,19:42)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,22:14)
 
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,22:07)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:57)
   
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,20:50)
   
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:14)
     
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,20:02)
     
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 13 2014,00:01)
             
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,04:10)
               
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 12 2014,15:02)
Damn I missed a Friday meltdown ...must be something in the water over at UD.

Which meltdown in which thread(s) at UD are you referring to?

Only Gary's meltdown here.... sorry for the confusion. Might take him a little while over at UD before they give him enough rope. Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?

I think he was hoping to get a whole bunch of tard credits by drawing Wes into some sort of legal wrangle. All part of his plan of theft over toil.

Oh drat, I was hoping to see a huge meltdown at UD. Oh wait, UD is always a huge meltdown. :)

"Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?"

I doubt it, but I wish they could. It would be entertaining to see the responses from the other UD IDiots, and I would especially like to see Gary and gordo mullings 'debate' their versions of ID theory tard.

Scientific authority (if such a thing even exists) better take action against this sort of shit before the general public is forced to take legal action against funding sources and science administrators who have been enabling these bullies.

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "You guys quit laughing when two random guys on the Internet argue over which one is going to overturn science."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "Um, why?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Because the general public might sue you."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "For laughing at morons argue on the Internet?  Are you high?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Nevermind, carry on."

What is your real name and what school do you supposedly teach at?

If you expect me to tell you my name, you really are insane.  Fanatics like you and your friends at UD are why I don't use my real name online.  If you don't like it, please feel free to fuck right off.

I expected you to blame your victims, instead of being honest.

More projection from Gary 'I consulted with Casey Luskin on how to set up a lawsuit from online discussions' Gaulin.

Gary might understand the difference between single and double quotes in the abovem but I wouldn't bet on it.

Please explain the difference between single and double quotes in the abovem.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,18:10   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 15 2014,18:27)
 
Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Dec. 14 2014,19:42)
...
More projection from Gary 'I consulted with Casey Luskin on how to set up a lawsuit from online discussions' Gaulin.

Gary might understand the difference between single and double quotes in the abovem but I wouldn't bet on it.

Please explain the difference between single and double quotes in the abovem.

It's OK Gary, we knew you wouldn't know.
It's hardly surprising given your appalling writing ability.
And your equally appalling reading ability.

  
jeffox



Posts: 671
Joined: Oct. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,18:19   

Quote
Gary's incoherence amplifier goes to 11.


I think Goo Goo's been to a few too many head-banging conventions for his (or anybody else's) good.  

Gadzooks, whatta hoot!  :)  :)  :)

  
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,18:43   

Quote
 
Quote
I'll bet that you can't back up that interpretation.  .....  

Or in other words you can point to others who you think did more damage than you did and they can point to someone else and so forth until the blame comes back to you, then starts all over again without anyone having to stop throwing inflaming insults.

So, you can't.

Also, you still haven't come up with a solution to the problem that Edgar has made your ideas obsolete according to your own standards, or are you going to try to change the topic again?

  
Wesley R. Elsberry



Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,20:20   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 15 2014,17:27)
Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Dec. 14 2014,19:42)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,22:14)
 
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,22:07)
   
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:57)
   
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,20:50)
     
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:14)
     
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,20:02)
       
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 13 2014,00:01)
             
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,04:10)
               
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 12 2014,15:02)
Damn I missed a Friday meltdown ...must be something in the water over at UD.

Which meltdown in which thread(s) at UD are you referring to?

Only Gary's meltdown here.... sorry for the confusion. Might take him a little while over at UD before they give him enough rope. Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?

I think he was hoping to get a whole bunch of tard credits by drawing Wes into some sort of legal wrangle. All part of his plan of theft over toil.

Oh drat, I was hoping to see a huge meltdown at UD. Oh wait, UD is always a huge meltdown. :)

"Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?"

I doubt it, but I wish they could. It would be entertaining to see the responses from the other UD IDiots, and I would especially like to see Gary and gordo mullings 'debate' their versions of ID theory tard.

Scientific authority (if such a thing even exists) better take action against this sort of shit before the general public is forced to take legal action against funding sources and science administrators who have been enabling these bullies.

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "You guys quit laughing when two random guys on the Internet argue over which one is going to overturn science."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "Um, why?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Because the general public might sue you."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "For laughing at morons argue on the Internet?  Are you high?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Nevermind, carry on."

What is your real name and what school do you supposedly teach at?

If you expect me to tell you my name, you really are insane.  Fanatics like you and your friends at UD are why I don't use my real name online.  If you don't like it, please feel free to fuck right off.

I expected you to blame your victims, instead of being honest.

More projection from Gary 'I consulted with Casey Luskin on how to set up a lawsuit from online discussions' Gaulin.

Gary might understand the difference between single and double quotes in the abovem but I wouldn't bet on it.

Please explain the difference between single and double quotes in the abovem.

Gary can take it up as a research project if he doesn't already know.

Or we can negotiate a tutoring fee if he insists on a lesson. My going rate is $50/hour. I might apply a denseness surcharge, though.

--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

    
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2014,23:36   

Holy crap.

I just picked up Martin Gardner's Science, Good Bad and Bogus at a book sale. Chapter I, "Hermit Science" has our GinGout written all over it.  Not only are his ideas nonsense, his attitude isn't even original.

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,00:18   

Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Dec. 15 2014,20:20)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 15 2014,17:27)
Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Dec. 14 2014,19:42)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,22:14)
   
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,22:07)
   
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:57)
     
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,20:50)
     
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:14)
       
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,20:02)
       
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 13 2014,00:01)
               
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,04:10)
                 
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 12 2014,15:02)
Damn I missed a Friday meltdown ...must be something in the water over at UD.

Which meltdown in which thread(s) at UD are you referring to?

Only Gary's meltdown here.... sorry for the confusion. Might take him a little while over at UD before they give him enough rope. Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?

I think he was hoping to get a whole bunch of tard credits by drawing Wes into some sort of legal wrangle. All part of his plan of theft over toil.

Oh drat, I was hoping to see a huge meltdown at UD. Oh wait, UD is always a huge meltdown. :)

"Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?"

I doubt it, but I wish they could. It would be entertaining to see the responses from the other UD IDiots, and I would especially like to see Gary and gordo mullings 'debate' their versions of ID theory tard.

Scientific authority (if such a thing even exists) better take action against this sort of shit before the general public is forced to take legal action against funding sources and science administrators who have been enabling these bullies.

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "You guys quit laughing when two random guys on the Internet argue over which one is going to overturn science."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "Um, why?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Because the general public might sue you."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "For laughing at morons argue on the Internet?  Are you high?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Nevermind, carry on."

What is your real name and what school do you supposedly teach at?

If you expect me to tell you my name, you really are insane.  Fanatics like you and your friends at UD are why I don't use my real name online.  If you don't like it, please feel free to fuck right off.

I expected you to blame your victims, instead of being honest.

More projection from Gary 'I consulted with Casey Luskin on how to set up a lawsuit from online discussions' Gaulin.

Gary might understand the difference between single and double quotes in the abovem but I wouldn't bet on it.

Please explain the difference between single and double quotes in the abovem.

Gary can take it up as a research project if he doesn't already know.

Or we can negotiate a tutoring fee if he insists on a lesson. My going rate is $50/hour. I might apply a denseness surcharge, though.

I need you to explain what you just did to me.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,01:10   

Yesterday morning Planet Source Code went offline:
Quote
Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server error '80040e14'

The transaction log for database 'PlanetSourceCode' is full. To find out why space in the log cannot be reused, see the log_reuse_wait_desc column in sys.databases

/CrossWeb/stats/code_count.asp, line 142


I'm hoping they will soon be back online. But until then Google still works:
http://intelligencegenerator.blogspot.com/....pot.com

More:
https://www.blogger.com/profile....8439900

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
didymos



Posts: 1828
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,01:20   

Gary, you know damn well that no one here cares about Planet Source Code.  Why do you post about it?

--------------
I wouldn't be bothered reading about the selfish gene because it has never been identified. -- Denyse O'Leary, professional moron
Again "how much". I don't think that's a good way to be quantitative.-- gpuccio

  
Wesley R. Elsberry



Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,01:44   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 16 2014,00:18)
Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Dec. 15 2014,20:20)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 15 2014,17:27)
 
Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Dec. 14 2014,19:42)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,22:14)
   
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,22:07)
     
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:57)
     
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,20:50)
       
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:14)
       
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,20:02)
         
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 13 2014,00:01)
               
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,04:10)
                 
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 12 2014,15:02)
Damn I missed a Friday meltdown ...must be something in the water over at UD.

Which meltdown in which thread(s) at UD are you referring to?

Only Gary's meltdown here.... sorry for the confusion. Might take him a little while over at UD before they give him enough rope. Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?

I think he was hoping to get a whole bunch of tard credits by drawing Wes into some sort of legal wrangle. All part of his plan of theft over toil.

Oh drat, I was hoping to see a huge meltdown at UD. Oh wait, UD is always a huge meltdown. :)

"Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?"

I doubt it, but I wish they could. It would be entertaining to see the responses from the other UD IDiots, and I would especially like to see Gary and gordo mullings 'debate' their versions of ID theory tard.

Scientific authority (if such a thing even exists) better take action against this sort of shit before the general public is forced to take legal action against funding sources and science administrators who have been enabling these bullies.

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "You guys quit laughing when two random guys on the Internet argue over which one is going to overturn science."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "Um, why?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Because the general public might sue you."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "For laughing at morons argue on the Internet?  Are you high?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Nevermind, carry on."

What is your real name and what school do you supposedly teach at?

If you expect me to tell you my name, you really are insane.  Fanatics like you and your friends at UD are why I don't use my real name online.  If you don't like it, please feel free to fuck right off.

I expected you to blame your victims, instead of being honest.

More projection from Gary 'I consulted with Casey Luskin on how to set up a lawsuit from online discussions' Gaulin.

Gary might understand the difference between single and double quotes in the abovem but I wouldn't bet on it.

Please explain the difference between single and double quotes in the abovem.

Gary can take it up as a research project if he doesn't already know.

Or we can negotiate a tutoring fee if he insists on a lesson. My going rate is $50/hour. I might apply a denseness surcharge, though.

I need you to explain what you just did to me.

I put cultural literacy tutoring on a fee schedule.

--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

    
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,01:54   

Quote (fnxtr @ Dec. 15 2014,23:36)
Holy crap.

I just picked up Martin Gardner's Science, Good Bad and Bogus at a book sale. Chapter I, "Hermit Science" has our GinGout written all over it.  Not only are his ideas nonsense, his attitude isn't even original.

Some believe I'm actually a devil who gets around way too well in science:

http://www.biology-online.org/biology....p146133

Making it appear that I am a hermit is a tactic used by some who want all in science to be controlled by rather discriminatory big-science "publish or perish" groupthink that (even where a paper is published) dismisses all who do not work at an impressive sounding scientific institution, which must be listed after their name or something is wrong and they will be ignored anyway.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,01:58   

Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Dec. 16 2014,01:44)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 16 2014,00:18)
Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Dec. 15 2014,20:20)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 15 2014,17:27)
 
Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Dec. 14 2014,19:42)
   
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,22:14)
     
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,22:07)
     
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:57)
       
Quote (Texas Teach @ Dec. 13 2014,20:50)
       
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,20:14)
         
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,20:02)
         
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 13 2014,00:01)
                 
Quote (The whole truth @ Dec. 13 2014,04:10)
                   
Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 12 2014,15:02)
Damn I missed a Friday meltdown ...must be something in the water over at UD.

Which meltdown in which thread(s) at UD are you referring to?

Only Gary's meltdown here.... sorry for the confusion. Might take him a little while over at UD before they give him enough rope. Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?

I think he was hoping to get a whole bunch of tard credits by drawing Wes into some sort of legal wrangle. All part of his plan of theft over toil.

Oh drat, I was hoping to see a huge meltdown at UD. Oh wait, UD is always a huge meltdown. :)

"Do you think they could be persuaded to give him his own threads?"

I doubt it, but I wish they could. It would be entertaining to see the responses from the other UD IDiots, and I would especially like to see Gary and gordo mullings 'debate' their versions of ID theory tard.

Scientific authority (if such a thing even exists) better take action against this sort of shit before the general public is forced to take legal action against funding sources and science administrators who have been enabling these bullies.

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "You guys quit laughing when two random guys on the Internet argue over which one is going to overturn science."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "Um, why?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Because the general public might sue you."

Scientifically Literate People on the Internet: "For laughing at morons argue on the Internet?  Are you high?"

Gary's Imaginary Scientific Authority: "Nevermind, carry on."

What is your real name and what school do you supposedly teach at?

If you expect me to tell you my name, you really are insane.  Fanatics like you and your friends at UD are why I don't use my real name online.  If you don't like it, please feel free to fuck right off.

I expected you to blame your victims, instead of being honest.

More projection from Gary 'I consulted with Casey Luskin on how to set up a lawsuit from online discussions' Gaulin.

Gary might understand the difference between single and double quotes in the abovem but I wouldn't bet on it.

Please explain the difference between single and double quotes in the abovem.

Gary can take it up as a research project if he doesn't already know.

Or we can negotiate a tutoring fee if he insists on a lesson. My going rate is $50/hour. I might apply a denseness surcharge, though.

I need you to explain what you just did to me.

I put cultural literacy tutoring on a fee schedule.

You are using single quotes for "putting words into my mouth" correct?

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,03:13   

Quote (didymos @ Dec. 16 2014,01:20)
Gary, you know damn well that no one here cares about Planet Source Code.  Why do you post about it?

With PSC temporarily out of action it's easier to make it appear that I actually am a hermit. As though something is wrong with me when the real problem is the usual academic snobbery from those with vested interests in unfairly discrediting their competition by unfairly discrediting the places where they have published over the years.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,04:25   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 16 2014,11:13)
Quote (didymos @ Dec. 16 2014,01:20)
Gary, you know damn well that no one here cares about Planet Source Code.  Why do you post about it?

With PSC temporarily out of action it's easier to make it appear that I actually am a hermit. As though something is wrong with me when the real problem is the usual academic snobbery from those with vested interests in unfairly discrediting their competition by unfairly discrediting the places where they have published over the years.

Haha, so you're not denying you're a hermit?

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,06:04   

Quote (k.e.. @ Dec. 16 2014,04:25)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 16 2014,11:13)
Quote (didymos @ Dec. 16 2014,01:20)
Gary, you know damn well that no one here cares about Planet Source Code.  Why do you post about it?

With PSC temporarily out of action it's easier to make it appear that I actually am a hermit. As though something is wrong with me when the real problem is the usual academic snobbery from those with vested interests in unfairly discrediting their competition by unfairly discrediting the places where they have published over the years.

Haha, so you're not denying you're a hermit?

I'm no hermit, World Wide Web wise. Only in the sense that someone who has to spend much of their free time in cyberspace does not have to leave home to get there and with no car we don't get out much.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,06:44   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 16 2014,01:54)
   
Quote (fnxtr @ Dec. 15 2014,23:36)
Holy crap.

I just picked up Martin Gardner's Science, Good Bad and Bogus at a book sale. Chapter I, "Hermit Science" has our GinGout written all over it.  Not only are his ideas nonsense, his attitude isn't even original.

Some believe I'm actually a devil who gets around way too well in science:

http://www.biology-online.org/biology....p146133

Making it appear that I am a hermit is a tactic used by some who want all in science to be controlled by rather discriminatory big-science "publish or perish" groupthink that (even where a paper is published) dismisses all who do not work at an impressive sounding scientific institution, which must be listed after their name or something is wrong and they will be ignored anyway.

No one believes you're a devil.   No one thinks much of your science.  Talking to yourself in your own private jargon as on Biology Online does indeed make you look like a mad hermit.  Although there are no doubt some snobs in science, I personally don't know anyone in or around science who cares about whether scientific advances come from amateurs, hermits, or major universities.  What scientists care about is science done properly: correct use of terminology or clearly stated redefinitions, valid operational definitions, supporting evidence, legitimate treatment of prior work (whether corroborating it or refuting it), careful and honest work (whether observational, experimental, or theoretical), testing of hypotheses  (using logically valid predictions), and so forth, all areas where you fail completely.  Hence, no one finds any value in the rubbish you are presenting here.  Your rejection has nothing to do with your background, and everything to do with the worthlessness of your work.

Overthrowing previous paradigms is wonderful.  That's the stuff that gets everyone interested and wins people top jobs and honors, but it has to be scientifically valid, or at least testable.  Your stuff fails that criterion.

Redo your stuff from the first step on, or stick with stuff like your finch beak program, or find something else to do that you can be competent at, but the current version of your "intelligence" stuff isn't ever going to win approval, because it is rubbish.

And how come you are still pushing your stuff, when by your standards Edgar's ideas have made your stuff obsolete?  Have you found something invalid in Edgar's ideas?

  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,07:10   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 16 2014,04:13)
Quote (didymos @ Dec. 16 2014,01:20)
Gary, you know damn well that no one here cares about Planet Source Code.  Why do you post about it?

With PSC temporarily out of action it's easier to make it appear that I actually am a hermit. As though something is wrong with me when the real problem is the usual academic snobbery from those with vested interests in unfairly discrediting their competition by unfairly discrediting the places where they have published over the years.

The problem is not so much that you are a hermit or that there is "something wrong with you."
This is not about persons, this is about ideas.

Your ideas, to raise them far above their station, are gibberish.  At best they are counter-factual or banal and neither interesting nor controversial.  At worst they are incoherent, illogical, illiterate, ill-informed, ill-formed, and badly expressed.

While we might derive various insights into you as a person from the characteristics of your work [contra the dogma of the real ID camp], we don't much care about you, nor should we be expected to.
Science is not about 'great persons', it is about 'great ideas'.  That you fail in both arenas is merely an amusing accident.

What we care about is your "theory" -- which is utter and complete garbage, with no value whatsoever.  Where it manages clarity and coherency for a few words or phrases, it is demonstrably wrong.  Where it maintains your usual standard of nonsensical jibber-jabber, it fails to rise to the level of error.  It is a vast nothing.

Insofar as we engage with you, it is for purposes of clarifying your "theory".  Several hundred pages have been spent on this site alone, and the internet only knows how many hundred of pages across other sites, trying to get you to clarify what you mean, what evidence you have, what specific phenomena you are attempting to address, what it means when we present examples that ought to fall within the scope of your "theory" yet remain inexplicable in terms of said "theory", etc.

Insofar as you fail to engage with the scientific discourse offered you, our only recourse is mockery, derision, abuse, and all the other slings and arrows an outrageous fortune reserves for those who suffer, as you do, fulminating delusions of adequacy.

You would be better served by spending the time you spend on the internet with a mental health specialist instead.

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,07:11   

Quote (N.Wells @ Dec. 16 2014,06:44)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 16 2014,01:54)
   
Quote (fnxtr @ Dec. 15 2014,23:36)
Holy crap.

I just picked up Martin Gardner's Science, Good Bad and Bogus at a book sale. Chapter I, "Hermit Science" has our GinGout written all over it.  Not only are his ideas nonsense, his attitude isn't even original.

Some believe I'm actually a devil who gets around way too well in science:

http://www.biology-online.org/biology....p146133

Making it appear that I am a hermit is a tactic used by some who want all in science to be controlled by rather discriminatory big-science "publish or perish" groupthink that (even where a paper is published) dismisses all who do not work at an impressive sounding scientific institution, which must be listed after their name or something is wrong and they will be ignored anyway.

No one believes you're a devil.   No one thinks much of your science.  Talking to yourself in your own private jargon as on Biology Online does indeed make you look like a mad hermit.  Although there are no doubt some snobs in science, I personally don't know anyone in or around science who cares about whether scientific advances come from amateurs, hermits, or major universities.  What scientists care about is science done properly: correct use of terminology or clearly stated redefinitions, valid operational definitions, supporting evidence, legitimate treatment of prior work (whether corroborating it or refuting it), careful and honest work (whether observational, experimental, or theoretical), testing of hypotheses  (using logically valid predictions), and so forth, all areas where you fail completely.  Hence, no one finds any value in the rubbish you are presenting here.  Your rejection has nothing to do with your background, and everything to do with the worthlessness of your work.

Overthrowing previous paradigms is wonderful.  That's the stuff that gets everyone interested and wins people top jobs and honors, but it has to be scientifically valid, or at least testable.  Your stuff fails that criterion.

Redo your stuff from the first step on, or stick with stuff like your finch beak program, or find something else to do that you can be competent at, but the current version of your "intelligence" stuff isn't ever going to win approval, because it is rubbish.

And how come you are still pushing your stuff, when by your standards Edgar's ideas have made your stuff obsolete?

It already received approval that most matters to someone like me, most from the how-to community. I can't complain about approval, the problem is the academic snobbery that makes it seem like I should be embarrassed for that and other things like taking the award for the Intelligence Design Lab seriously and being proud of that.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,07:21   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 16 2014,08:11)
... I can't complain about approval...

Really?  You do so all the time.
Constantly.  It's become the background whine in this thread, all too often brought to the foreground.  Always by you.

  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,07:22   

Look, Gary, maybe this will help.
A logical proof that you are not nobody.
Nobody's perfect.
You are not perfect.
Therefore, you are not nobody.

As an extra bonus, it's evidence based.

  
Wesley R. Elsberry



Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,08:03   

Nobody needs to invent words for Gary.

Quote

And before I came to this forum Casey gave me free legal advice in regard to what is legally over the line enough to easily win a case for that can come at me from places like this.


--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

    
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,08:15   

Quote
I can't complain about approval,

And yet that's a constant refrain from you.
Quote
the problem is the academic snobbery that makes it seem like I should be embarrassed for that and other things like taking the award for the Intelligence Design Lab seriously and being proud of that.
 It's not academic snobbery to note that your "approval" came from a trivially small number of people who approved of complicated looking graphics by saying things like [paraphrased] 'looked great, will read it when I have time", and who clearly did not engage with the claims that you made beyond the program itself.  Those of us who have actually looked at your ideas in detail (and actually know something about biology) find them to be ridiculous and worthless on their own merits.

  
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2014,08:42   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 13 2014,22:45)
Quote (N.Wells @ Dec. 13 2014,22:28)
Quote
I only began to show what kind of trouble is in store for those who have been knowingly or unknowingly helping to mislead the general public in regards to scientific issues that the taxpayers are paying to have resolved, not start a civil war over.

That would be you.  Whether you are knowing or unknowing about the way you are trying to mislead people with your rubbish has been a matter of debate, but you are adding nothing to the public's discussion about evolution except confusion through lies and misrepresentation.

Explain how "intelligence" and "intelligent cause" works, creep!!!!!!!!!!!

As an example of some genuine science that is much better than your rubbish:
http://www.medicaldaily.com/how-mol....dvanced

  
  18634 replies since Oct. 31 2012,02:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (622) < ... 412 413 414 415 416 [417] 418 419 420 421 422 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]