Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Uncommonly Dense Thread 4

Pages: (356) < ... 150 151 152 153 154 [155] 156 157 158 159 160 ... >

oldmanintheskydidntdoit Posts: 4999 Joined: July 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,05:22    And regarding this: Quote Upright Biped laying the intellectual beat-down on Darwinists. Could you link me to the published paper where I can assess this "beatdown" as all I can find on that link is some poorly researched blog and somebody doing their best to avoid answering a certain sub-set of questions. -------------- I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies". FTK if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand Gordon Mullings

Schroedinger's Dog Posts: 1692 Joined: Jan. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,05:23    Well, it's alright, we all know nobody on the religious side has ever been deviant... Anyway, I have to read a few pages back to understand what all this is about... -------------- "Hail is made out of water? Are you really that stupid?" Joe G "I have a better suggestion, Kris. How about a game of hide and go fuck yourself instead." Louis "The reason people use a crucifix against vampires is that vampires are allergic to bullshit" Richard Pryor

JLT Posts: 740 Joined: Jan. 2008 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,06:17    Quote Personally, I disagree with his opinion. I believe U.D. should be devoted to any subject relevant to I.D. in any way, including exposing the appalling behavior of those who fight against I.D. Don't just expose their weak arguments and evidence; expose their weak moral fiber. Make it clear that I.D.'s battle isn't against science, but against a group of sleaze buckets who have corrupted science. That sounds like a winning strategy to me. Sounds like a desperate strategy to me, the final attempt after realizing that ID can't win on scientific grounds. But I'm all for you guys trying it out. As the Heartland Institute experienced after employing a similar strategy, it'll gain you lots of friends even among your allies....   Quote Two speakers have withdrawn from the [7th International Conference on Climate Change, promoted by Heartland Institute]. Donna Laframboise, who recently authored a book critiquing the work of the U.N. International Panel on Climate Change, withdrew from that conference. On her blog, nofrakkingconsensus.org, she said her reputation had been “harmed,” adding, “Suddenly, we were all publicly linked to an organization that thinks it’s OK to equate people concerned about climate change with psychopaths.” Lakely confirms that economist Ross McKitrick has now also withdrawn. In a letter sent to Heartland on Friday, he said, “You cannot simultaneously say that you want to promote a debate while equating the other side to terrorists and mass murderers.” source   Quote The ultra-conservative Heartland Institute admitted it was in financial crisis on Wednesday, with the flight of corporate donors making it difficult to pay staff or cover the costs of its annual conference aimed at debunking climate science. [...] Heartland also came in for bruising criticism from its own allies – a number of whom faulted Bast for failing to consult Heartland's colleagues or board members about the ads in advance. Among ultra-conservative activists, the billboard controversy has shaken confidence in Heartland's ability to serve as the hub of the climate contrarian network. source -------------- "Random mutations, if they are truly random, will affect, and potentially damage, any aspect of the organism, [...] Thus, a realistic [computer] simulation [of evolution] would allow the program, OS, and hardware to be affected in a random fashion." GilDodgen, Frilly shirt owner

Dr. Jammer Posts: 37 Joined: Feb. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,06:44    For those who were wondering about the health of Uncommon Descent... The Trollocaust  was in mid-February, right on the 02/12 marker, more or less. As we can see, the two months, post-bannings, resulted in far more unique visitors (the only traffic stat I can find), on average, than the several months prior to the banning. So, no, the absence of trolls hasn't hurt U.D.'s traffic. If anything, it may have improved it. While Elizabeth livened the place up a little bit, in my opinion, the rest of you clearly brought it down with your stupidity and horrible arguments. U.D. is better off without you smelly turds stinking the place up. Thank God Barry flushed you down the toilet.  :p -------------- Luskin destroys Talk Origins. | Dawkins runs scared. | Upright Biped scares off Moran

Kattarina98 Posts: 1267 Joined: Sep. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,06:51    Quote (Dr. Jammer @ June 14 2012,06:44) U.D. is better off without you smelly turds stinking the place up. Thank God Barry flushed you down the toilet.  :p Aaahhh, I love a scientific discussion between adults! This is so much more educated than Dembski's fart video re Judge Jones. -------------- Barry Arrington is a bitch.

oldmanintheskydidntdoit Posts: 4999 Joined: July 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,08:16    Quote (Dr. Jammer @ June 14 2012,06:44) For those who were wondering about the health of Uncommon Descent... Actually, shithead, as a registered charity accepting donations they'll have to reveal some information sooner or later about what they are spending the money on. Then we'll see how healthy ID is and what they are doing with  *your* money. No doubt ID research is top of the list. -------------- I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies". FTK if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand Gordon Mullings

Robin Posts: 1431 Joined: Sep. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,08:38    Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ June 12 2012,04:21) Quote It has indeed been argued that genetic programing makes some people homosexual and others heterosexual, and many have been led to accept it, never mind the subsequent back-tracking proponents of genetic theories have had to make. A read-through of just the introductory summary of the just linked, will suffice to show that instead: genes are the foundation for our ability to act in human ways, and form habits (including sexual ones), but there is little reason to believe that genetic programming determines sexual orientations and habits. For, as minded creatures, we are not merely plants growing as the seed and the soil and sun determine. Our genes make us sexual -- male and female, but do not determine our sexual habits. Perhaps you'd care to discuss this KF? For example, why would people make the choice to be gay knowing that it would cause them to be harassed in their community? It's as absurd as saying that you chose your race KF. No wonder you won't leave your ivory castle, you know you can't defend the indefensible. So what should we do with teh gay KF? Lock them up? Beat them until they change their mind? You are generating alot of hate KF, alot.... KF's argument boils down to insisting that genes code for the ability to eat, not for hunger and tastes for (and against) certain foods. A perfect illustration of really not understanding biology. -------------- we IDists rule in design for the flagellum and cilium largely because they do look designed.  Bilbo The only reason you reject Thor is because, like a cushion, you bear the imprint of the biggest arse that sat on you. Louis

The whole truth Posts: 1554 Joined: Jan. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,09:02    Hey jammer, why don't you just admit that you have weird hangups about sex and that you've never had sex with another person and that's why you call Matheson and Starbuck "degenerate"? What exactly is "degenerate" about Matheson (allegedly) having sex with another adult, and especially a female adult? Do you call yourself jammer because you regularly jam your head way up your imaginary god's ass and cordova's ass as your way of making love to them? I guess you haven't figured out that that sort of thing is sleazy, appalling, disgusting, and degenerate, and clearly exposes your weak moral fiber. Maybe some competent sex therapy would help you shed your bizarre sexual hangups and perversions. You said: "I believe U.D. should be devoted to any subject relevant to I.D. in any way, ..." Do you mean subjects pertaining to the theocratic dominionist fundagelical creationist religious beliefs that are the actual basis/motive for the promotion of the ID agenda by you and the rest of the IDiots? Don't worry, UD already pushes that crap more than enough and I seriously doubt that they are going to change their tune. -------------- Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

The whole truth Posts: 1554 Joined: Jan. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,09:09    Quote (Schroedinger's Dog @ June 14 2012,03:23) Well, it's alright, we all know nobody on the religious side has ever been deviant... Anyway, I have to read a few pages back to understand what all this is about... Yeah, those pure as driven snow godbots never do anything immoral. Also see this. -------------- Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

oldmanintheskydidntdoit Posts: 4999 Joined: July 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,09:11    Quote (Dr. Jammer @ June 14 2012,06:44) For those who were wondering about the health of Uncommon Descent... I see your graph and raise you this: Seems that ID is well past it's sell by date. That was fun. Let's have another! Hmm, seems old Charlie Darwin remains popular but poor Dr Dr Dembski does not even merit a single data point while the chart for "Intelligent Design" remains flatlined. Seems like the best days of ID are long long gone! So visits to UD remain static? That just *proves* the point that they are not winning any new converts or interest. You just blew off your own foot, idiot troll. -------------- I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies". FTK if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand Gordon Mullings

OgreMkV Posts: 3668 Joined: Oct. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,09:14    Quote (The whole truth @ June 14 2012,09:09) Quote (Schroedinger's Dog @ June 14 2012,03:23) Well, it's alright, we all know nobody on the religious side has ever been deviant... Anyway, I have to read a few pages back to understand what all this is about... Yeah, those pure as driven snow godbots never do anything immoral. Also see this. Because anything sanctioned by their god is automatically considered moral. Things like slavery, mass rape, genocide, torture, intolerance, lying, theft... all OK as long as God commands it OR you are doing it for God.  Right? -------------- Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims. http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

Kattarina98 Posts: 1267 Joined: Sep. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,09:56    Quote (Richardthughes @ June 13 2012,12:53) WOW: (ASSF)   Quote The Choice of (and for) Your Life June 13, 2012 Posted by Barry Arrington under Intelligent Design No Comments Suppose your enemy is trying to frame you for murder.  He does a good job of fabricating evidence, and you are arrested and charges are filed.  Of course you are not guilty, so you refuse all plea offers.  But being innocent does not guaranty you will win at trial, and your “no plea” position is very risky.  Indeed, the stakes could not be higher.  Under the law of your state the only allowable penalty for murder is life in prison without possibility of parole.  Your case goes to trial, and the DA’s entire case against you comes down to the testimony two witnesses.  Even though you are not guilty, it is clear to everyone that if either of these witnesses testifies against you, it is CERTAIN you will be convicted.   Suppose the DA is feeling magnanimous and says to you, “I don’t need both of these witnesses.  If either of them testifies against you, I will get a conviction, so I will call only one of them and what’s more, I will let you choose.”   Finally, suppose that all you know about the witnesses is that one of them is an orthodox Christian and one is an atheist and that your enemy has offered each of them ten million dollars to testify falsely against you. Two questions: 1.  Do you have enough information so that you would be other than indifferent about which witness to choose? 2.  If the answer to the first question is “yes,” which do you choose and why? What about if one was a Muslim and the other a Christian, Barry? The way Denyse and Barry keep attacking Jerad for his polite and humane reasoning (instead of just picking the Christian) is starting to remind me of the "LNC - Yes or No" spring cleaning. -------------- Barry Arrington is a bitch.

Richardthughes Posts: 11178 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,10:02    Quote (Kattarina98 @ June 14 2012,09:56) Quote (Richardthughes @ June 13 2012,12:53) WOW: (ASSF)     Quote The Choice of (and for) Your Life June 13, 2012 Posted by Barry Arrington under Intelligent Design No Comments Suppose your enemy is trying to frame you for murder.  He does a good job of fabricating evidence, and you are arrested and charges are filed.  Of course you are not guilty, so you refuse all plea offers.  But being innocent does not guaranty you will win at trial, and your “no plea” position is very risky.  Indeed, the stakes could not be higher.  Under the law of your state the only allowable penalty for murder is life in prison without possibility of parole.  Your case goes to trial, and the DA’s entire case against you comes down to the testimony two witnesses.  Even though you are not guilty, it is clear to everyone that if either of these witnesses testifies against you, it is CERTAIN you will be convicted.   Suppose the DA is feeling magnanimous and says to you, “I don’t need both of these witnesses.  If either of them testifies against you, I will get a conviction, so I will call only one of them and what’s more, I will let you choose.”   Finally, suppose that all you know about the witnesses is that one of them is an orthodox Christian and one is an atheist and that your enemy has offered each of them ten million dollars to testify falsely against you. Two questions: 1.  Do you have enough information so that you would be other than indifferent about which witness to choose? 2.  If the answer to the first question is “yes,” which do you choose and why? What about if one was a Muslim and the other a Christian, Barry? The way Denyse and Barry keep attacking Jerad for his polite and humane reasoning (instead of just picking the Christian) is starting to remind me of the "LNC - Yes or No" spring cleaning. I like how its filed under 'intelligent design'. Pure apologetics. -------------- "Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield "You magnificent bastard! " : Louis "ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard "I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932 "...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

The whole truth Posts: 1554 Joined: Jan. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,10:13    Quote (Dr. Jammer @ June 14 2012,04:44) For those who were wondering about the health of Uncommon Descent... The Trollocaust  was in mid-February, right on the 02/12 marker, more or less. As we can see, the two months, post-bannings, resulted in far more unique visitors (the only traffic stat I can find), on average, than the several months prior to the banning. So, no, the absence of trolls hasn't hurt U.D.'s traffic. If anything, it may have improved it. While Elizabeth livened the place up a little bit, in my opinion, the rest of you clearly brought it down with your stupidity and horrible arguments. U.D. is better off without you smelly turds stinking the place up. Thank God Barry flushed you down the toilet.  :p What you obviously don't want to believe is that most of that traffic is likely to be people who just want a good laugh. Do you actually think that UD and its gang of IDiots has any legitimate influence on science or anything else? UD is just a handful of delusional losers who erroneously and arrogantly think that they matter to the world. If you think that UD is so important, why don't you go out on the street and ask everyone who passes by if they have ever even heard of UD or any of the IDiots who dwell there? And maybe you can show what the IDiots at UD have ever accomplished in science? You know, things like legitimately published, peer reviewed scientific papers and how much they're cited, speaking about and presenting evidence of new scientific discoveries at science conferences, leadership or involvement in actual scientific research, authoring books about real science instead of books about pseudo-science that only appeal to a small number of delusional god zombies, involvement in science topic TV shows where they are the host, writer, or consultant, and any other important and relevant accomplishments. Go ahead, show all the evidence of just how important and influential all you IDiots at UD are to science and the lives of people around the world. Why not start with fatty arrington, kairosflacid (gordon e mullings), o'leary, joe g, vj torley, corny hunter, and uptight biped? I'll come back later and check out your list of all their scientific and world-influencing accomplishments. -------------- Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

The whole truth Posts: 1554 Joined: Jan. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,10:31    Quote (OgreMkV @ June 14 2012,07:14) Quote (The whole truth @ June 14 2012,09:09)   Quote (Schroedinger's Dog @ June 14 2012,03:23) Well, it's alright, we all know nobody on the religious side has ever been deviant... Anyway, I have to read a few pages back to understand what all this is about... Yeah, those pure as driven snow godbots never do anything immoral. Also see this. Because anything sanctioned by their god is automatically considered moral. Things like slavery, mass rape, genocide, torture, intolerance, lying, theft... all OK as long as God commands it OR you are doing it for God.  Right? -------------- Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

NormOlsen Posts: 104 Joined: Nov. 2011 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,11:08    Quote (The whole truth @ June 14 2012,10:31)   Quote (OgreMkV @ June 14 2012,07:14)     Quote (The whole truth @ June 14 2012,09:09)       Quote (Schroedinger's Dog @ June 14 2012,03:23) Well, it's alright, we all know nobody on the religious side has ever been deviant... Anyway, I have to read a few pages back to understand what all this is about... Yeah, those pure as driven snow godbots never do anything immoral. Also see this. Because anything sanctioned by their god is automatically considered moral. Things like slavery, mass rape, genocide, torture, intolerance, lying, theft... all OK as long as God commands it OR you are doing it for God.  Right? TWT, nice pic.  It brings me back to Barry's hypothetical:  If you were on trial for murder, which of these guys would you want as the witness? Better yet, which of these guys would you be willing to buy a used car from?

REC Posts: 638 Joined: Sep. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,11:14    Quote (Dr. Jammer @ June 14 2012,06:44) For those who were wondering about the health of Uncommon Descent... The Trollocaust  was in mid-February, right on the 02/12 marker, more or less. As we can see, the two months, post-bannings, resulted in far more unique visitors (the only traffic stat I can find), on average, than the several months prior to the banning. So, no, the absence of trolls hasn't hurt U.D.'s traffic. If anything, it may have improved it. While Elizabeth livened the place up a little bit, in my opinion, the rest of you clearly brought it down with your stupidity and horrible arguments. U.D. is better off without you smelly turds stinking the place up. Thank God Barry flushed you down the toilet.  :p Jammer deleted the bold warning in the chart that tells you the sample size for uncommondescent.com is so small that this is, at best, a rough estimate. Not to mention UD collects 500-750 views A DAY from the stolen "scoville scale" image that now appears as the second image in google image searches for "scoville scale," the first image for "scoville scale dangerous" and the third for "pepper dangerous." Try it. By these metrics, (500 views per day for hot peppers, 10,000 unique views per month) virtually ALL of UD's unique traffic could be coming from people looking for hot sauce! The rest is the same 100 idiots clicking repeatedly. We know who they are. If UD had a shred of dignity, it would 404 the stolen image thread. Lets see how the unique visits hold up then, Jammer. Why don't you post over there, suggesting this? It looks a bit silly to have one of the daily popular come from misdirected traffic, doesn't it? And as the uber-moral orthodox Christian who cannot steal or lie, Barry should feel compelled to do the right thing. Unique comments, productive threads, or lack of Barry's idiotic "Christians cannot lie" posts might be better considerations. Edited by REC on June 14 2012,11:20

Robin Posts: 1431 Joined: Sep. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,12:12    Quote (REC @ June 14 2012,11:14) Unique comments, productive threads, or lack of Barry's idiotic "Christians cannot lie" posts might be better considerations. Indeed. I don't think you could ask for better testimony on the subject... -------------- we IDists rule in design for the flagellum and cilium largely because they do look designed.  Bilbo The only reason you reject Thor is because, like a cushion, you bear the imprint of the biggest arse that sat on you. Louis

Febble Posts: 310 Joined: Jan. 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,14:58    They could pass for cousins.  Something about the eyebrows.

sparc Posts: 2088 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,14:59    Quote (Schroedinger's Dog @ June 14 2012,05:23) Well, it's alright, we all know nobody on the religious side has ever been deviant... Anyway, I have to read a few pages back to understand what all this is about... you may want to follow this link. -------------- "[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God." - William Dembski -

Kattarina98 Posts: 1267 Joined: Sep. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,15:17    Quote (Febble @ June 14 2012,14:58) They could pass for cousins.  Something about the eyebrows. And they both sport tacky ties - but WLC's tie takes the cake. -------------- Barry Arrington is a bitch.

sparc Posts: 2088 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,15:17    Quote (REC @ June 14 2012,11:14) Quote (Dr. Jammer @ June 14 2012,06:44) For those who were wondering about the health of Uncommon Descent... The Trollocaust  was in mid-February, right on the 02/12 marker, more or less. As we can see, the two months, post-bannings, resulted in far more unique visitors (the only traffic stat I can find), on average, than the several months prior to the banning. So, no, the absence of trolls hasn't hurt U.D.'s traffic. If anything, it may have improved it. While Elizabeth livened the place up a little bit, in my opinion, the rest of you clearly brought it down with your stupidity and horrible arguments. U.D. is better off without you smelly turds stinking the place up. Thank God Barry flushed you down the toilet.  :p Jammer deleted the bold warning in the chart that tells you the sample size for uncommondescent.com is so small that this is, at best, a rough estimate. Not to mention UD collects 500-750 views A DAY from the stolen "scoville scale" image that now appears as the second image in google image searches for "scoville scale," the first image for "scoville scale dangerous" and the third for "pepper dangerous." Try it. By these metrics, (500 views per day for hot peppers, 10,000 unique views per month) virtually ALL of UD's unique traffic could be coming from people looking for hot sauce! The rest is the same 100 idiots clicking repeatedly. We know who they are. If UD had a shred of dignity, it would 404 the stolen image thread. Lets see how the unique visits hold up then, Jammer. Why don't you post over there, suggesting this? It looks a bit silly to have one of the daily popular come from misdirected traffic, doesn't it? And as the uber-moral orthodox Christian who cannot steal or lie, Barry should feel compelled to do the right thing. Unique comments, productive threads, or lack of Barry's idiotic "Christians cannot lie" posts might be better considerations. If everybody clicks this link to UD's scoville page authored by the good doctor himself and reloads it at least 10 times we could lift the daily visits for today (currently 730) to about 1000 and make June 2012 a new record month for UD. -------------- "[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God." - William Dembski -

sparc Posts: 2088 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,15:29    BTW, since July 2007 the posts preceeding and following the scoville scale thread have been visited 50 and 69 times, respectively. 3 and 4 visits today can likely be attributed to the fact that they are neighbouring the record post. BTW, the fine German word Jammer translates to bitchiness -------------- "[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God." - William Dembski -

REC Posts: 638 Joined: Sep. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,15:37    This would be on my short list of UDs most embarrassing moments to click on: Flatulence removed from “The Judge Jones School of Law” by William Dembski Click

JLT Posts: 740 Joined: Jan. 2008 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,17:04    PaV Quote Another day; another bad day for Darwinism. The end is soon. -------------- "Random mutations, if they are truly random, will affect, and potentially damage, any aspect of the organism, [...] Thus, a realistic [computer] simulation [of evolution] would allow the program, OS, and hardware to be affected in a random fashion." GilDodgen, Frilly shirt owner

NormOlsen Posts: 104 Joined: Nov. 2011 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,17:14    Quote (JLT @ June 14 2012,17:04) PaV     Quote Another day; another bad day for Darwinism. The end is soon. From his draft copy: The end is nigh!! near! soon.

Tracy P. Hamilton Posts: 1239 Joined: May 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,17:51    Quote (sparc @ June 14 2012,15:29) BTW, since July 2007 the posts preceeding and following the scoville scale thread have been visited 50 and 69 times, respectively. 3 and 4 visits today can likely be attributed to the fact that they are neighbouring the record post. BTW, the fine German word Jammer translates to bitchiness I propose the phrase "dumber than a bag of jammers". -------------- "Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV "The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen "We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

Zachriel Posts: 2723 Joined: Sep. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,18:27    Quote (REC @ June 14 2012,11:14)  By these metrics, (500 views per day for hot peppers, 10,000 unique views per month) virtually ALL of UD's unique traffic could be coming from people looking for hot sauce! The rest is the same 100 idiots clicking repeatedly. We know who they are. Gulp. -------------- You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

Kattarina98 Posts: 1267 Joined: Sep. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,19:04    Quote (Zachriel @ June 14 2012,18:27) Quote (REC @ June 14 2012,11:14)  By these metrics, (500 views per day for hot peppers, 10,000 unique views per month) virtually ALL of UD's unique traffic could be coming from people looking for hot sauce! The rest is the same 100 idiots clicking repeatedly. We know who they are. Gulp. POTW -------------- Barry Arrington is a bitch.

eigenstate Posts: 78 Joined: Nov. 2011 (Permalink) Posted: June 14 2012,20:03    So I scanned here a bit wondering if this was covered, but didn't see anything. On the Matheson issue, I read this: http://www.mlive.com/news.......ro.html and while it appears the guy has a particularly acute lack of good judgment, a "multi-year sexual relationship" does NOT jibe with the kind of warning Sal is going on about. It may have been inappropriate in terms of the policies of a fundamentalist religious school, but am I right in understanding that Sal is committed to getting the word out that this Matheson... monster might be engaging in consensual sexual relationships with adult members of the opposite sex, and the public needs to be warned about this? This seems bizarre, even for Sal. Or was there some allegation/evidence of assault/rape/abuse on Matheson's part that I've missed?

Pages: (356) < ... 150 151 152 153 154 [155] 156 157 158 159 160 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard