The whole truth
Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012
|
In this thread at UD http://tinyurl.com/kv7pd7j....kv7pd7j gordo mullings tries to sound sciency and intelligent by barfing up this mess:
87
kairosfocus October 7, 2014 at 1:54 am
IDS: Yes, it is by our knowledge of English across the centuries that we recognise complex, specific functionality in the string from Hamlet. On that strength, we THEN address, can such be credibly accessed by a blind chance and necessity search/sample of the population of possibilities? The answer on search window to scope of config space and necessary isolation of such islands of function is obvious. No. This illustrates the power of the design inference on detection of FSCO/I and to tax that with, oh you are not producing a universal decoder algorithm is first irrelevant. Second, as a glance at theory of computation will assure us that such a universal algorithm is utterly implausible, it is in effect saying unless you do the near or actual impossible as well, I will not listen to what you are doing successfully. Please rethink. KF
--------------------------------------
Well then, let's see what gordo accomplished by spewing that:
He confirmed that "the string from Hamlet" is recognizable to people who have knowledge of English across the centuries. In other words, so-called "complex, specific functionality" in something is recognizable to humans who already thoroughly know the history of something that was invented and produced by humans. Duh.
He claimed that "the string from Hamlet" can't "be credibly accessed by a blind chance and necessity search/sample of the population of possibilities", which no one asserted that it could, and gordo obviously believes that because Shakespeare designed and created "the string from Hamlet", it somehow proves that yhwh-isho-holy-ghost designed and created EVERYTHING.
gordo admitted that there's no "universal decoder algorithm" to detect FSCO/I (just plain old CSI to most IDiots) and that such an algorithm is "utterly implausible" and "near or actual impossible as well", even though he often posts a bunch of mathy-sciency looking equations as though they're THE universal decoder algorithm to reliably detect FSCO/I.
I'm sure that gordo doesn't realize it but he destroyed the ID 'inference' or 'theory' in his statements quoted above. IDiots claim that intelligent design (including FSCO/I or CSI) in nature can be reliably detected and measured, using their sciency methods (LOL), without knowing anything about the origin and history of whatever it is that is being examined. IDiots claim that they have and use mathy-sciency universal decoder algorithms to detect and measure intelligent design, including FSCO/I or CSI (the 500 bit thing, etc.).
gordo has inadvertently admitted in his statements quoted above that 'ID' is unreliable, non-scientific bullshit.
ETA: Replaced the UD url with one that works, I hope.
Edited by The whole truth on Oct. 17 2014,09:20
--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34
But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27
|
