dvunkannon
Posts: 1377
Joined: June 2008
|
Some classic Scooter there...
Scooter Falls On His Turd For Dembski
The evidence from Missouri...
| Quote | Copying the blog posts here so everyone can see
I hope someone keeps track of the 11 parents and their children. Everyone in Dover knows damn well that no children were forced to listen to the 60 second announcement regarding evolution and intelligent design. So what you have is 11 parents whose religious hostility extended to such a trivial matter they were willing to make the tiny school district pay a million dollars.
I won't be at all surprised if the children of these parents are so badly ostracized and abused by other students that they're forced to find another school and the parents will be snubbed and insulted and their cars keyed and their coworkers and supervisors making their lives miserable that they'll all end up moving away.
I hope that's all tracked so that the next group of parents that gets their panties in a bunch and volunteers to the be the designated shitheads know what it's going to cost them." [34] (already referenced in the article). JoshuaZ 02:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
|
Scooter thinks quoting his own words is libelous of himself!!1!
| Quote | | The interpretation of what I wrote is libelous. |
Then backpedals furiously...
| Quote | | The last edit was better but it still implied I intended to publish the names to encourage others to cause harm. My only intent there was so that the names could be googled to see if anything untoward had indeed happened which I presume would have received some press. I corrected it to better state what my intent was. I also pointed out that I never actually published any names. It was empty rhetoric. Lastly, I updated to reflect the fact that I had put back as a moderator on uncommon descent after a hiatus of 6 weeks. |
What is this "empty rhetoric" you speak of? Ain't you a Marine? This isn't empty rhetoric, just a garden variety FAILED SCOOTER PREDICTION.
The bannination hammer falls on the cheezy poofed fingers of Scooter...
| Quote | | Per this I recommend that we block an IP Dave is using on sight and revert his edits until he withdraws his legal threats per WP:LEGAL. JoshuaZ 04:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC) |
Scooter decides a guerilla campaign is the only way to continue "helping" his fearless leader.
| Quote | | Not to engage in ad hominems or well poisoning but the anon who brought the matter up is DaveScot. In fact, the matter was sourced to the primary comments until he got Larry to take them down and then attempted to remove the statement saying the sources didn't have it. He also initially tried to "clarify" what he meant with those comments so his attempt to say on the BLP board that maybe the comments weren't his is insulting to our intelligence. The bottom line is that no matter how unhappy Dave is with his comments and no matter how many times he makes libel accusations the comment is reliably sourced. JoshuaZ 01:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
...and proceeds to talk about himself in the third person...
| Quote | | DaveScot's comment did not appear on Dembski's blog and there's not a shred of evidence that Dembski either knew about it or agreed with it. |
... to no avail. Scooter's nose is rubbed in his own tard.
| Quote | | DaveScot is a two-bit player on the ID scene and not nearly as important as he'd like to be or think he is. The argument would have to go something like "its relevant because the article is about Dembski and what happens at his blog is a major part of it" It might seem more reasonable to include it if we had a separate article on Uncommon Descent. On the other hand, we clearly don't have enough material to have a separate article on Uncommon Descent, so any such material would be reasonable to have here. I haven't made up my mind on this matter at all. (Given that the content is sourced and such I'm also tempted to keep it in simply in reaction to DaveScot's behavior since he first made libel claims then got Larry to take down the original posts and then tried to blank and vandalize this article, then made some more libel noises, and now is trying to claim that maybe the posts aren't his even though he had earlier tried to argue that he had meant something different. Indeed, Dave seems to be going out of his way to take the info out and if anything just to establish that Wikipedia won't back down from threats and manipulation we should consider keeping it if we think the sourcing is good. JoshuaZ 18:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
Instant replay
| Quote | | DaveScot is a two-bit player on the ID scene and not nearly as important as he'd like to be or think he is. |
Slow motion
| Quote | | D a v e S c o t i s a t w o - b i t p l a y e r o n t h e I D s c e n e |
That's gotta leave a mark. A cheezy poof shaped mark, but a mark, nonetheless. Perhaps we should blame JoshuaZ for Scooter's reckless abandon with the bannination stick and loudspeaker in the ceiling since the day he was banninated from Wikipedia. Or maybe we should just blame Scooter hisself. We report, you decide.
--------------
I’m referring to evolution, not changes in allele frequencies. - Cornelius Hunter
I’m not an evolutionist, I’m a change in allele frequentist! - Nakashima
|
