RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (527) < ... 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2014,12:48   

Gordon E. Mullings walks into a bar, and says "Ouch", because it turns out that he can't recognize de sign even when it hits him in de face.

Gary Gaulin wakes up, changes a lightbulb, crosses the road with a chicken*, walks into a bar, and finally realizes that the last decade has been a bad joke.

(*poultry in motion)

Jesus walks down main street and turns into a bar, and everyone yells, "It's a miracle!".

  
KevinB



Posts: 525
Joined: April 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2014,13:49   

Quote (N.Wells @ Aug. 21 2014,12:48)
Gary Gaulin wakes up, changes a lightbulb, crosses the road with a chicken*, walks into a bar, and finally realizes that the last decade has been a bad joke.

But was that joke the one that begins

Quote
"Gary Gaulin, Gordon E Mullings, and Vincent Torley walk into a bar..."


?

  
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2014,16:39   

Quote (JohnW @ Aug. 21 2014,11:58)
Quote (Soapy Sam @ Aug. 21 2014,09:29)
Quote (Driver @ Aug. 21 2014,16:33)
First up, Dr Moose's

Appeal to the failure of Windows 8 to improve itself.



       
Quote

"if you have information that is copied with variation and selection then you must get (as Dan Dennett p50 puts it) 'Design out of chaos without the aid of mind'."

This, I see, as the first tenet of neo-Darwinism. If this statement is true, then neo-Darwinism is very credible. If this statement is false, then neo-Darwinism is, well, wrong.

As a software developer, I would love to see software that results from a world where this statement is true. We have information. Every time a piece of data is loaded off of a hard drive, and into active memory, we have duplication. All too often we have computers making copy errors — much more so 30 years ago than today. We even have selection, it is called "operators cursing computers". Yet with these three principles plugged together, the only improvement we have seen is that the intelligent designers have worked really hard to reduce copy errors.



Stick that in your analogy pipe and smoke it, evolutionists!

Fucking software developers. (Hang on, I'm a software developer!). Tierra? Avida? Eureka? What in hell are they then, if not successfully replicated with random errors? I hope he's not really entitled to use 'Dr' - it would be twattish in the extreme to include it in a webbyname if so.

I hope he's really a moose.

A Møøse once bit my sister...

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
Tony M Nyphot



Posts: 491
Joined: June 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2014,16:52   

Quote (Texas Teach @ Aug. 21 2014,15:39)
Quote (JohnW @ Aug. 21 2014,11:58)
 
Quote (Soapy Sam @ Aug. 21 2014,09:29)
 
Quote (Driver @ Aug. 21 2014,16:33)
First up, Dr Moose's

Appeal to the failure of Windows 8 to improve itself.



         
Quote

"if you have information that is copied with variation and selection then you must get (as Dan Dennett p50 puts it) 'Design out of chaos without the aid of mind'."

This, I see, as the first tenet of neo-Darwinism. If this statement is true, then neo-Darwinism is very credible. If this statement is false, then neo-Darwinism is, well, wrong.

As a software developer, I would love to see software that results from a world where this statement is true. We have information. Every time a piece of data is loaded off of a hard drive, and into active memory, we have duplication. All too often we have computers making copy errors — much more so 30 years ago than today. We even have selection, it is called "operators cursing computers". Yet with these three principles plugged together, the only improvement we have seen is that the intelligent designers have worked really hard to reduce copy errors.



Stick that in your analogy pipe and smoke it, evolutionists!

Fucking software developers. (Hang on, I'm a software developer!). Tierra? Avida? Eureka? What in hell are they then, if not successfully replicated with random errors? I hope he's not really entitled to use 'Dr' - it would be twattish in the extreme to include it in a webbyname if so.

I hope he's really a moose.

A Møøse once bit my sister...

I've heard those can be pretty nasti...

--------------
"I, OTOH, am an underachiever...I either pee my pants or faint dead away..." FTK

"You could always wrap fresh fish in the paper you publish it on, though, and sell that." - Field Man on how to find value in Gary Gaulin's real-science "theory"

  
Timothy McDougald



Posts: 1036
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2014,21:14   

Quote (Tony M Nyphot @ Aug. 21 2014,16:52)
Quote (Texas Teach @ Aug. 21 2014,15:39)
 
Quote (JohnW @ Aug. 21 2014,11:58)
 
Quote (Soapy Sam @ Aug. 21 2014,09:29)
   
Quote (Driver @ Aug. 21 2014,16:33)
First up, Dr Moose's

Appeal to the failure of Windows 8 to improve itself.



           
Quote

"if you have information that is copied with variation and selection then you must get (as Dan Dennett p50 puts it) 'Design out of chaos without the aid of mind'."

This, I see, as the first tenet of neo-Darwinism. If this statement is true, then neo-Darwinism is very credible. If this statement is false, then neo-Darwinism is, well, wrong.

As a software developer, I would love to see software that results from a world where this statement is true. We have information. Every time a piece of data is loaded off of a hard drive, and into active memory, we have duplication. All too often we have computers making copy errors — much more so 30 years ago than today. We even have selection, it is called "operators cursing computers". Yet with these three principles plugged together, the only improvement we have seen is that the intelligent designers have worked really hard to reduce copy errors.



Stick that in your analogy pipe and smoke it, evolutionists!

Fucking software developers. (Hang on, I'm a software developer!). Tierra? Avida? Eureka? What in hell are they then, if not successfully replicated with random errors? I hope he's not really entitled to use 'Dr' - it would be twattish in the extreme to include it in a webbyname if so.

I hope he's really a moose.

A Møøse once bit my sister...

I've heard those can be pretty nasti...

Who trained the moose?

--------------
Church burning ebola boy

FTK: I Didn't answer your questions because it beats the hell out of me.

PaV: I suppose for me to be pried away from what I do to focus long and hard on that particular problem would take, quite honestly, hundreds of thousands of dollars to begin to pique my interest.

   
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2014,22:45   

Quote (Tony M Nyphot @ Aug. 21 2014,16:52)
Quote (Texas Teach @ Aug. 21 2014,15:39)
 
Quote (JohnW @ Aug. 21 2014,11:58)
 
Quote (Soapy Sam @ Aug. 21 2014,09:29)
   
Quote (Driver @ Aug. 21 2014,16:33)
First up, Dr Moose's

Appeal to the failure of Windows 8 to improve itself.



           
Quote

"if you have information that is copied with variation and selection then you must get (as Dan Dennett p50 puts it) 'Design out of chaos without the aid of mind'."

This, I see, as the first tenet of neo-Darwinism. If this statement is true, then neo-Darwinism is very credible. If this statement is false, then neo-Darwinism is, well, wrong.

As a software developer, I would love to see software that results from a world where this statement is true. We have information. Every time a piece of data is loaded off of a hard drive, and into active memory, we have duplication. All too often we have computers making copy errors — much more so 30 years ago than today. We even have selection, it is called "operators cursing computers". Yet with these three principles plugged together, the only improvement we have seen is that the intelligent designers have worked really hard to reduce copy errors.



Stick that in your analogy pipe and smoke it, evolutionists!

Fucking software developers. (Hang on, I'm a software developer!). Tierra? Avida? Eureka? What in hell are they then, if not successfully replicated with random errors? I hope he's not really entitled to use 'Dr' - it would be twattish in the extreme to include it in a webbyname if so.

I hope he's really a moose.

A Møøse once bit my sister...

I've heard those can be pretty nasti...

I think I saw that movie...

Five-legged moose... that's some mutation...

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
Tony M Nyphot



Posts: 491
Joined: June 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2014,01:38   

Quote (afarensis @ Aug. 21 2014,20:14)
 
Quote (Tony M Nyphot @ Aug. 21 2014,16:52)
 
Quote (Texas Teach @ Aug. 21 2014,15:39)
   
Quote (JohnW @ Aug. 21 2014,11:58)
     
Quote (Soapy Sam @ Aug. 21 2014,09:29)
     
Quote (Driver @ Aug. 21 2014,16:33)
First up, Dr Moose's

Appeal to the failure of Windows 8 to improve itself.



             
Quote

"if you have information that is copied with variation and selection then you must get (as Dan Dennett p50 puts it) 'Design out of chaos without the aid of mind'."

This, I see, as the first tenet of neo-Darwinism. If this statement is true, then neo-Darwinism is very credible. If this statement is false, then neo-Darwinism is, well, wrong.

As a software developer, I would love to see software that results from a world where this statement is true. We have information. Every time a piece of data is loaded off of a hard drive, and into active memory, we have duplication. All too often we have computers making copy errors — much more so 30 years ago than today. We even have selection, it is called "operators cursing computers". Yet with these three principles plugged together, the only improvement we have seen is that the intelligent designers have worked really hard to reduce copy errors.



Stick that in your analogy pipe and smoke it, evolutionists!

Fucking software developers. (Hang on, I'm a software developer!). Tierra? Avida? Eureka? What in hell are they then, if not successfully replicated with random errors? I hope he's not really entitled to use 'Dr' - it would be twattish in the extreme to include it in a webbyname if so.

I hope he's really a moose.

A Møøse once bit my sister...

I've heard those can be pretty nasti...

Who trained the møøse?

Not sure, but I think those responsible have been sacked.

--------------
"I, OTOH, am an underachiever...I either pee my pants or faint dead away..." FTK

"You could always wrap fresh fish in the paper you publish it on, though, and sell that." - Field Man on how to find value in Gary Gaulin's real-science "theory"

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2014,12:54   

Did the moose pull a rabbit out of his hat?

  
Tony M Nyphot



Posts: 491
Joined: June 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2014,00:22   

Cross-posted from the GaGa thread:

 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Aug. 22 2014,22:02)
http://humanevents.com/2014.......0755688

I notice that Robert Marks II showed up in the comments to say:

       
Quote
2. In the comments about my column in Human Events, addressing the contents of the book would be more fruitful than name calling, throwing zingers or repeating tired old anti-ID clichés. Such shallow exchanges are typically done by those lacking the intellectual capacity to engage in intelligent debate.


Speaking of "addressing the contents of the book would be more fruitful than name calling, throwing zingers or repeating tired old anti-[Evolution] clichés" and that "shallow exchanges are typically done by those lacking the intellectual capacity to engage in intelligent debate."...I sorely wish someone would welcome the return of Galapagos Finch by linking to ERV's post below:

How not to blog anonymously: Robert Marks

(I don't have any of the prerequisite commenting profiles, but I may have to create one just for this. I feel Oleg's discovery should be noted.)

--------------
"I, OTOH, am an underachiever...I either pee my pants or faint dead away..." FTK

"You could always wrap fresh fish in the paper you publish it on, though, and sell that." - Field Man on how to find value in Gary Gaulin's real-science "theory"

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2014,11:08   

Quote (Tony M Nyphot @ Aug. 23 2014,08:22)
Cross-posted from the GaGa thread:

   
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Aug. 22 2014,22:02)
http://humanevents.com/2014.......0755688

I notice that Robert Marks II showed up in the comments to say:

         
Quote
2. In the comments about my column in Human Events, addressing the contents of the book would be more fruitful than name calling, throwing zingers or repeating tired old anti-ID clichés. Such shallow exchanges are typically done by those lacking the intellectual capacity to engage in intelligent debate.


Speaking of "addressing the contents of the book would be more fruitful than name calling, throwing zingers or repeating tired old anti-[Evolution] clichés" and that "shallow exchanges are typically done by those lacking the intellectual capacity to engage in intelligent debate."...I sorely wish someone would welcome the return of Galapagos Finch by linking to ERV's post below:

How not to blog anonymously: Robert Marks

(I don't have any of the prerequisite commenting profiles, but I may have to create one just for this. I feel Oleg's discovery should be noted.)



Yes dressing his book with the much desired sycophant's gilded baubles would be better than having GIGO spam up his threads.  Geez that eliminates the entire ID cognoscenti except for his fellow panhandlers... excuse me Authors...GIGO is in good company the ID ego knows no shame.

eta-spellz

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2014,16:08   

In the comments to that Human Events article, somebody named Geoffrobinson is a little unclear on the concept:
 
Quote
And if ID isn't science, then Darwinism can't be science. Because ID would be how you would falsify Darwinism. They stand and fall as science together.

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 23 2014,17:38   

wasn't Geoffrobinson on UD like forever ago?

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 24 2014,14:08   

Quote
Riveting 14 minute documentary on Darwinism as one of the root causes of WWI

August 24, 2014 Posted by News

These not accusations, by the way, they are historical facts, amply sourced with quotations from the period.


linky

   
Seversky



Posts: 442
Joined: June 2010

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 24 2014,14:36   

Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 24 2014,14:08)
Quote
Riveting 14 minute documentary on Darwinism as one of the root causes of WWI

August 24, 2014 Posted by News

These not accusations, by the way, they are historical facts, amply sourced with quotations from the period.


linky

Blatant anti-evolution propaganda based on Weikart's anti-Darwinian apologetics.  Nothing new to be seen here.  Move along!

  
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 24 2014,16:47   

With apologies, I'd like to repost this from a response to Gaulin over in the Gaulin thread, where he admired the video about Weikert's nonsense:
[quote]Largely bullshit.  Weikert's stuff is highly controversial and not well regarded, outside the world of anti-evolution christian fundamentalists, who spend a huge amount of effort trying to drag religion out of its culpability for its contributions to Hitler and shift the blame to Darwin:
Priests saluting Hitler: http://www.nobeliefs.com/images.....ute.jpg
Carving of church decoration showing a Nazi stormtrooper standing next to Jesus: http://www.nobeliefs.com/memento....MC2.jpg
Carving of Hitler on a baptismal font: http://www.nobeliefs.com/memento....MC5.jpg
Et cetera: http://www.nobeliefs.com/memento....oes.htm

Guess who banned some evolutionary books? - Hitler.  The 1935 edition of the Die Bücherei listed banned books including "Writings of a philosophical and social nature whose content deals with the false scientific enlightenment of primitive Darwinism and Monism".

Guess who said, "Where do we acquire the right to believe that man has not always been what he is now? The study of nature teaches us that, in the animal kingdom just as much as in the vegetable kingdom, variations have occurred. They've occurred within the species, but none of these variations has an importance comparable with that which separates man from the monkey — assuming that this transformation really took place."  (Hitler, again.)

Hitler created a pathological nation.  He pulled together all manner of stuff with varying degrees of distortion in order to justify his actions.  He exploited some social Darwinist phrasings (for which we can blame Herbert Spencer far more than Darwin) for his purposes, just as he used (and perverted) a lot of religious stuff.  In fact, he relied on distortions of standard religion far more than Darwinism.  The Germans marched to war with "Gott mit uns" on their belt.  Hitler intended to present himself as a new messiah who would save the world from Jews: "I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord..""

About Weikert's work:
 
Quote
Robert J. Richards:  'it can only be a tendentious and dogmatically driven assessment that would condemn Darwin for the crimes of the Nazis'." Does Science Education Need the History of Science. Isis. 2008, 99: 322–330.


 
Quote
[from Wikipedia] His third book, From Darwin to Hitler, has been widely criticized by the academic community and promoted by creationists. His fourth is a sequel, Hitler's Ethic, arguing that Adolf Hitler's "ideology revolved around evolutionary ethics -- the idea that whatever promoted evolutionary progress is good and whatever hinders it is bad."[13][14] According to Weikart, "This evolutionary ethic shaped nearly every major feature of Nazi policy: eugenics (measures to improve human heredity, including compulsory sterilization), euthanasia, racism, population expansion, offensive warfare and racial extermination."[15] Thomas Pegelow Kaplan, a historian at Davidson College, reviewed the book for Central European History noting Weikart "pushes his interpretations too far" because Weikart "does not sufficiently integrate the complex motivational factors" behind ideology, with Kaplan concluding Hitler's Ethic "offers little in terms of a new, fully convincing understanding of the Nazi dictator's thought."[16] Gerwin Strobl, a historian at University of Cardiff, reviewed Hitler's Ethic in European History Quarterly, writing the introduction "reads like a mixture of a television voiceover and the worst kind of undergraduate essay" and described the book has two notable weaknesses: "how ‘Hitler’s ethics’ were disseminated within the party" and its "emphasis on intellectual developments inside Germany," which ignores "that Hitler had set out to copy what he regarded as the Anglo-American example."[17] Eric Kurlander, in German Studies Review, wrote: "Though energetically drawn, this new iteration of the "intentionalist" argument invites skepticism in some respects, especially in its attempt to explain World War II and the Holocaust."[18] Additionally, Larry Arnhart, a professor of Political Science at Northern Illinois University wrote "As Weikart indicates, Hitler was a crude genetic determinist who believed that not only physical traits but even morality and culture were inherited genetically along racial lines, so that moral and cultural evolution depended on genetic evolution. But Weikart doesn't indicate to his readers that Darwin denied this."[19]

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 24 2014,17:26   

Quote (N.Wells @ Aug. 24 2014,17:47)
About Weikert's work:
   
Quote
Robert J. Richards:  'it can only be a tendentious and dogmatically driven assessment that would condemn Darwin for the crimes of the Nazis'." Does Science Education Need the History of Science. Isis. 2008, 99: 322–330.

So you admit your information comes from a barbaric murderous islamic jihadist movement currently waging war in Iraq and Syria?

Checkmate, N. Wells, you science-stopper.

   
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 24 2014,17:50   

POTW?

Can't get away with anything in this forum.

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 24 2014,18:03   

HAHAHAHAHAHA:

Quote

4
Acartia_bogartAugust 24, 2014 at 3:17 pm

Historian Paul Johnson: “On one side were ranged Protestant Germany, Catholic Austria, Orthodox Bulgaria and Moslem Turkey. On the other were Protestant Britain, Catholic France and Italy, and othodox Russia.”

Sounds more like a religious civil war than a Darwin inspired genocide. But even if this war was caused by Darwin’s theory, how does it prove evolution wrong? Or creationism correct. And how do you explain all of the genocides prior to Darwn?

Nations have always used false justifications to engage in war. Doesn’t anyone remember WMD in Iraq?


Quote

6
humbledAugust 24, 2014 at 3:35 pm

A_b, your comment serves to show you have not understood the documentary, and that your understanding of the history, events and contributing factors at play then and now are lacking.


Yeah AB you stupid person. Europe had never even heard of anti-semitism before evil ol Chucky D. came to town!

linky

Edited by stevestory on Aug. 24 2014,19:04

   
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 24 2014,21:45   

This is good. vjtorley gives us an "Update on Feser’s response to my post". He waffles on for a few paragraphs and eventually writes:
 
Quote
Astonishingly, after harping on my scientific criticisms of his argument (which were of relatively minor significance), Feser then went on to say that he would not be reading the rest of my post, in which I exposed the logical flaws in his argument:

 
Quote
   Well, don’t worry Vince, I won’t be accusing you of misrepresenting me in whatever it is you have to say in the remainder of this latest post of yours. I haven’t bothered to read it.

vjt writes only two more shortish paragraphs to say that he is stunned, stunned, I tell you.
UD link

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 26 2014,02:43   

Quote (Ptaylor @ Aug. 24 2014,21:45)
This is good. vjtorley gives us an "Update on Feser’s response to my post". He waffles on for a few paragraphs and eventually writes:
   
Quote
Astonishingly, after harping on my scientific criticisms of his argument (which were of relatively minor significance), Feser then went on to say that he would not be reading the rest of my post, in which I exposed the logical flaws in his argument:

   
Quote
   Well, don’t worry Vince, I won’t be accusing you of misrepresenting me in whatever it is you have to say in the remainder of this latest post of yours. I haven’t bothered to read it.

vjt writes only two more shortish paragraphs to say that he is stunned, stunned, I tell you.
UD link

And Box responds...
Quote
The only cure for vanity is laughter, and the only fault that is laughable is vanity.
Henri Bergson


--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
sparc



Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 26 2014,05:59   

Quote (Bob O'H @ Aug. 26 2014,02:43)
 
Quote (Ptaylor @ Aug. 24 2014,21:45)
This is good. vjtorley gives us an "Update on Feser’s response to my post". He waffles on for a few paragraphs and eventually writes:
     
Quote
Astonishingly, after harping on my scientific criticisms of his argument (which were of relatively minor significance), Feser then went on to say that he would not be reading the rest of my post, in which I exposed the logical flaws in his argument:

     
Quote
   Well, don’t worry Vince, I won’t be accusing you of misrepresenting me in whatever it is you have to say in the remainder of this latest post of yours. I haven’t bothered to read it.

vjt writes only two more shortish paragraphs to say that he is stunned, stunned, I tell you.
UD link

And Box responds...
 
Quote
The only cure for vanity is laughter, and the only fault that is laughable is vanity.
Henri Bergson

Aren't you "The censorial anti-ID activist is…Bob O'Hara?" :)

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 26 2014,06:23   

Quote (sparc @ Aug. 26 2014,05:59)
Quote (Bob O'H @ Aug. 26 2014,02:43)
 
Quote (Ptaylor @ Aug. 24 2014,21:45)
This is good. vjtorley gives us an "Update on Feser’s response to my post". He waffles on for a few paragraphs and eventually writes:
       
Quote
Astonishingly, after harping on my scientific criticisms of his argument (which were of relatively minor significance), Feser then went on to say that he would not be reading the rest of my post, in which I exposed the logical flaws in his argument:

       
Quote
   Well, don’t worry Vince, I won’t be accusing you of misrepresenting me in whatever it is you have to say in the remainder of this latest post of yours. I haven’t bothered to read it.

vjt writes only two more shortish paragraphs to say that he is stunned, stunned, I tell you.
UD link

And Box responds...
   
Quote
The only cure for vanity is laughter, and the only fault that is laughable is vanity.
Henri Bergson

Aren't you "The censorial anti-ID activist is…Bob O'Hara?" :)

SHUT UP! SHUT UP! SHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUP!

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
Timothy McDougald



Posts: 1036
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 26 2014,08:49   

Quote (Bob O'H @ Aug. 26 2014,06:23)
Quote (sparc @ Aug. 26 2014,05:59)
Quote (Bob O'H @ Aug. 26 2014,02:43)
   
Quote (Ptaylor @ Aug. 24 2014,21:45)
This is good. vjtorley gives us an "Update on Feser’s response to my post". He waffles on for a few paragraphs and eventually writes:
       
Quote
Astonishingly, after harping on my scientific criticisms of his argument (which were of relatively minor significance), Feser then went on to say that he would not be reading the rest of my post, in which I exposed the logical flaws in his argument:

       
Quote
   Well, don’t worry Vince, I won’t be accusing you of misrepresenting me in whatever it is you have to say in the remainder of this latest post of yours. I haven’t bothered to read it.

vjt writes only two more shortish paragraphs to say that he is stunned, stunned, I tell you.
UD link

And Box responds...
   
Quote
The only cure for vanity is laughter, and the only fault that is laughable is vanity.
Henri Bergson

Aren't you "The censorial anti-ID activist is…Bob O'Hara?" :)

SHUT UP! SHUT UP! SHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUP!

Sounds like old news to me. Bob O'H outed himself quite some time ago. :D

--------------
Church burning ebola boy

FTK: I Didn't answer your questions because it beats the hell out of me.

PaV: I suppose for me to be pried away from what I do to focus long and hard on that particular problem would take, quite honestly, hundreds of thousands of dollars to begin to pique my interest.

   
KevinB



Posts: 525
Joined: April 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 26 2014,10:25   

Quote (Bob O'H @ Aug. 26 2014,06:23)
Quote (sparc @ Aug. 26 2014,05:59)
Quote (Bob O'H @ Aug. 26 2014,02:43)
   
Quote (Ptaylor @ Aug. 24 2014,21:45)
This is good. vjtorley gives us an "Update on Feser’s response to my post". He waffles on for a few paragraphs and eventually writes:
       
Quote
Astonishingly, after harping on my scientific criticisms of his argument (which were of relatively minor significance), Feser then went on to say that he would not be reading the rest of my post, in which I exposed the logical flaws in his argument:

       
Quote
   Well, don’t worry Vince, I won’t be accusing you of misrepresenting me in whatever it is you have to say in the remainder of this latest post of yours. I haven’t bothered to read it.

vjt writes only two more shortish paragraphs to say that he is stunned, stunned, I tell you.
UD link

And Box responds...
   
Quote
The only cure for vanity is laughter, and the only fault that is laughable is vanity.
Henri Bergson

Aren't you "The censorial anti-ID activist is…Bob O'Hara?" :)

SHUT UP! SHUT UP! SHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUP!

Based on youtr avatar, I was expecting the "Infamy" quote.

  
Driver



Posts: 649
Joined: June 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 26 2014,14:20   

Quote (KevinB @ Aug. 26 2014,15:25)
Quote (Bob O'H @ Aug. 26 2014,06:23)
 
Quote (sparc @ Aug. 26 2014,05:59)
 
Quote (Bob O'H @ Aug. 26 2014,02:43)
     
Quote (Ptaylor @ Aug. 24 2014,21:45)
This is good. vjtorley gives us an "Update on Feser’s response to my post". He waffles on for a few paragraphs and eventually writes:
         
Quote
Astonishingly, after harping on my scientific criticisms of his argument (which were of relatively minor significance), Feser then went on to say that he would not be reading the rest of my post, in which I exposed the logical flaws in his argument:

         
Quote
   Well, don’t worry Vince, I won’t be accusing you of misrepresenting me in whatever it is you have to say in the remainder of this latest post of yours. I haven’t bothered to read it.

vjt writes only two more shortish paragraphs to say that he is stunned, stunned, I tell you.
UD link

And Box responds...
     
Quote
The only cure for vanity is laughter, and the only fault that is laughable is vanity.
Henri Bergson

Aren't you "The censorial anti-ID activist is…Bob O'Hara?" :)

SHUT UP! SHUT UP! SHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUP!

Based on youtr avatar, I was expecting the "Infamy" quote.

Born and raised just around the corner from me. I am not referring to Caesar:



--------------
Why would I concern myself with evidence, when IMO "evidence" is only the mind arranging thought and matter to support what one already wishes to believe? - William J Murray

[A]t this time a forum like this one is nothing less than a national security risk. - Gary Gaulin

  
KevinB



Posts: 525
Joined: April 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 27 2014,05:08   

Quote (Driver @ Aug. 26 2014,14:20)
Quote (KevinB @ Aug. 26 2014,15:25)
 
Quote (Bob O'H @ Aug. 26 2014,06:23)
   
Quote (sparc @ Aug. 26 2014,05:59)
   
Quote (Bob O'H @ Aug. 26 2014,02:43)
       
Quote (Ptaylor @ Aug. 24 2014,21:45)
This is good. vjtorley gives us an "Update on Feser’s response to my post". He waffles on for a few paragraphs and eventually writes:
           
Quote
Astonishingly, after harping on my scientific criticisms of his argument (which were of relatively minor significance), Feser then went on to say that he would not be reading the rest of my post, in which I exposed the logical flaws in his argument:

           
Quote
   Well, don’t worry Vince, I won’t be accusing you of misrepresenting me in whatever it is you have to say in the remainder of this latest post of yours. I haven’t bothered to read it.

vjt writes only two more shortish paragraphs to say that he is stunned, stunned, I tell you.
UD link

And Box responds...
       
Quote
The only cure for vanity is laughter, and the only fault that is laughable is vanity.
Henri Bergson

Aren't you "The censorial anti-ID activist is…Bob O'Hara?" :)

SHUT UP! SHUT UP! SHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUP!

Based on youtr avatar, I was expecting the "Infamy" quote.

Born and raised just around the corner from me. I am not referring to Caesar:


Ha! I've just passed this Blue Plaque on the way to work.



This one's nearby as well.



There wasn't room to add "(depending on who they were sleeping with at the time)".

  
rossum



Posts: 289
Joined: Dec. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 27 2014,05:33   

Quote (KevinB @ Aug. 27 2014,05:08)
Ha! I've just passed this Blue Plaque on the way to work.


This one is near me:



Not entirely official (read it carefully), but a lot more fun, allegedly.

--------------
The ultimate truth is that there is no ultimate truth.

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 27 2014,12:44   

Second best!  That's pretty good.  Borat's sister was only the #4 prostitute in all of Kazakhstan.

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 29 2014,13:06   

Quote
Live Stream Faith, Science & Culture: Does God Still Matter tonight, with Steve Meyer
August 28, 2014 Posted by News under Atheism, Culture, Darwinism, Intelligent Design, News


linky

   
Woodbine



Posts: 1218
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 29 2014,15:45   

Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 29 2014,19:06)
Quote
Live Stream Faith, Science & Culture: Does God Still Matter tonight, with Steve Meyer
August 28, 2014 Posted by News under Atheism, Culture, Darwinism, Intelligent Design, News


linky

Which should immediately call to mind Denyse's epic fail-post from 2006....

Why I know Darwin doesn't really matter...

And then proceeded to double down in a new article...

Why I know Darwin doesn't matter: Part 2

:D

  
  15792 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (527) < ... 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]