RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 28 2011,10:17   

Quote
Now, whatever Petrushka may go on saying, that subset is a very tiny subset of all possible functions. Therefore, natural selection is obviously much less powerful than intelligent selection. Intelligent selection can select any defined function, while natural selection can select only a reproductive advantage. It’s as simple as that.


I forget where it is that he dismisses neutral and nearly neutral variation.

But he completely misses Petrushka's point, which is that  directed evolution is a targeted search and natural selection is not. Natural selection operates in many dimensions.

Anyway, I want to cry.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
Tracy P. Hamilton



Posts: 1239
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 28 2011,16:13   

DeNews being an IDiot:
Quote
Peer review is, in the end, a victim of self-inflicted injury. And Karl Giberson is the last man alive, according to his own testimony, who really, truly believes in it.


Somebody obviously has a severe cognitive deficit, to say that about a person who writes:
Quote
In our new book, "The Anointed: Evangelical Truth in a Secular Age," historian Randall Stephens and I look at the widespread and disturbing inability of American evangelicals to distinguish between real knowledge claims, rooted in serious research and endorsed by credible knowledge communities, and pseudo-claims made by unqualified groups and leaders that offer "faith-friendly" alternatives. Across the board we find evangelical Christians attracted to indefensible views in many areas: American history (the Founding Fathers intended America to be a Christian nation), sexual orientation (you can "pray away the gay"), climate change (not happening), evolution (never happened), cosmology (Big Bang is a big joke) and even biblical studies (the bible tells us what is about to happen in the Middle East).


And how does science as a whole create a real knowledge base?  The peer-reviewed literature.  All scientists know this, and believe it, because it works.  By the way, UD hits on four of these pseudo-claims, if you count the Bible Code debacle of Dembski for an example of the latter.

--------------
"Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV

"The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen

"We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

  
dheddle



Posts: 545
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 28 2011,17:57   

Off topic. Tenure track faculty positions available, at least one in Mathematical Biology.

Read about 'em here.

(I have moved from the physics department to chair, temporarily, the Mathematics department.)

Equivalent statements:

1) We are an EoE.

2) Preference without prejudice will be given to anyone who can calculate the specified complexity of any living organism.

--------------
Mysticism is a rational enterprise. Religion is not. The mystic has recognized something about the nature of consciousness prior to thought, and this recognition is susceptible to rational discussion. The mystic has reason for what he believes, and these reasons are empirical. --Sam Harris

   
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 28 2011,18:06   

Quote (dheddle @ Sep. 28 2011,17:57)
Off topic. Tenure track faculty positions available, at least one in Mathematical Biology.

Read about 'em here.

(I have moved from the physics department to chair, temporarily, the Mathematics department.)

Equivalent statements:

1) We are an EoE.

2) Preference without prejudice will be given to anyone who can calculate the specified complexity of any living organism.

heddle:  

re: @#2.  You have quite the little mean streak there Dr. Heddle... I like it! :)

Congratulations on the move.  I hope it all adds up for you.

ps:  You got out of Physics just in time !  Everything they know is wrong, right?

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
paragwinn



Posts: 539
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 28 2011,18:15   

Quote (dheddle @ Sep. 28 2011,15:57)
Off topic. Tenure track faculty positions available, at least one in Mathematical Biology.

Read about 'em here.

(I have moved from the physics department to chair, temporarily, the Mathematics department.)

Equivalent statements:

1) We are an EoE.

2) Preference without prejudice will be given to anyone who can calculate the specified complexity of any living organism.

Who was it at UD who said that they would perform the task stated in #2 if given thousands or tens of thousands of dollars? This could be the incentive they're looking for!

--------------
All women build up a resistance [to male condescension]. Apparently, ID did not predict that. -Kristine 4-19-11
F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc. The whole thing is F/N ridiculous -Seversky on KF footnote fetish 8-20-11
Sigh. Really Bill? - Barry Arrington

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 29 2011,00:34   

Gil appears to be pricked by comments on his predictability:
 
Quote
My purpose is to provide encouragement to fellow victims of materialistic philosophy — which is ubiquitous and pervasive in public education and all the popular media — and to demonstrate that legitimate science points in the direction of design and therefore purpose and meaning in life.

I promise to never again reference my abandonment of militant atheism, since that seems to be out of bounds. I’ll just address the science.
<more of the usual Gil-speak - "transparently illogical", "mathematically absurd", etc>

Link
So there goes argument E from the Dodgenator3000. It'll be interesting to see if he can keep his word.

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 29 2011,04:44   

Quote (Zachriel @ Sep. 28 2011,17:55)
 
Quote
DrRec: Functional information DOES increase in nature (de novo genes, novel activities).

 
Quote
Gpuccio: Sure. The problem is: how does it increase? Design certainly can increase functional information, for example by designing and implementing a de novo gene. Can the darwinian algorithm do the same? The simple answer is: no, if the new information is complex and not deconstructable into simple naturally selectable steps.

If ...

 
Quote
Gpuccio: Directed evolution, if I understand what you mean, is a form of design.

Directed evolution can address the issue of selectable steps.

 
Quote
Gpuccio: The fundamental limitation is that only one subset of functions is “naturally selectable”: those that confer a reproductive advantage. Now, whatever Petrushka may go on saying, that subset is a very tiny subset of all possible functions.

This seems to be the crux of gpuccio's position. In fact, as anyone with passing familiarity with biology can see, there are many ways to be reproductively competitive, from sunflowers to sunfish.

INDEED, HOMO!

HOW DO YOU GET FROM SUNFLOWERS TO SUNFISH? (with or out fingers)

......EASY STRIKE OUT FLOWERS AN' PUT FISION.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 29 2011,04:56   

Quote (Ptaylor @ Sep. 29 2011,08:34)
Gil appears to be pricked by comments on his predictability:
   
Quote
My purpose is to provide encouragement to fellow victims of materialistic philosophy — which is ubiquitous and pervasive in public education and all the popular media — and to demonstrate that legitimate science points in the direction of design and therefore purpose and meaning in life.

I promise to never again reference my abandonment of militant atheism, since that seems to be out of bounds. I’ll just address the science.
<more of the usual Gil-speak - "transparently illogical", "mathematically absurd", etc>

Link
So there goes argument E from the Dodgenator3000. It'll be interesting to see if he can keep his word.

Is Gil one of the original 12 or 10 or maybe 7 lost  tribes spawned by Abraham?

IF YOU PRICK US, DO WE NOT BLEED? HOMOS.

If so, he needs to get up close and personal with his Rabbi.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 29 2011,06:18   

Quote (Ptaylor @ Sep. 29 2011,01:34)
Gil appears to be pricked by comments on his predictability:
 
Quote
My purpose is to provide encouragement to fellow victims of materialistic philosophy — which is ubiquitous and pervasive in public education and all the popular media....

Link

Gil should expect a call from the Department of Redundancy Department.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 29 2011,06:20   

Blue_Savannah states her values:  
Quote
It always amuses me the way actors, comedians, cartoonists, etc pride themselves on their alleged intelligence by mocking those who dissent against an unsupported theory. When I want to learn about scientific theories and evidence for/against them I look to UNcommon Descent, not pop culture.


That's after giving the correct URL for a Doonesbury cartoon after DeNews posted what turned out to be a link to Gmail.  Doonesbury - Gmail - when you've mastered ID think, there's no difference.

  
Schroedinger's Dog



Posts: 1692
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 29 2011,07:50   

Quote (CeilingCat @ Sep. 29 2011,12:20)
Blue_Savannah [URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/this-doonesbury-cartoon-tells-you-all-you-need-to-know-about-the-design-vs-darwinism-contr

oversies/comment-page-1/#comment-401117]states her values:[/URL]  
Quote
It always amuses me the way actors, comedians, cartoonists, etc pride themselves on their alleged intelligence by mocking those who dissent against an unsupported theory. When I want to learn about scientific theories and evidence for/against them I look to UNcommon Descent, not pop culture.


That's after giving the correct URL for a Doonesbury cartoon after DeNews posted what turned out to be a link to Gmail.  Doonesbury - Gmail - when you've mastered ID think, there's no difference.

One word: Oh Boy!*









*Intended

--------------
"Hail is made out of water? Are you really that stupid?" Joe G

"I have a better suggestion, Kris. How about a game of hide and go fuck yourself instead." Louis

"The reason people use a crucifix against vampires is that vampires are allergic to bullshit" Richard Pryor

   
Tracy P. Hamilton



Posts: 1239
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 29 2011,13:53   

Poor, expelled Gonzalez:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastr....e-zones

I expect extensive discussion at UD any time now.

--------------
"Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV

"The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen

"We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

  
damitall



Posts: 331
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 29 2011,15:20   

Do we take note of the KF "Lewontin" quote-mine count any more, or just accept its inexorable upward trajectory?

http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwini....-401119

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 29 2011,15:47   

Quote (paragwinn @ Sep. 29 2011,11:15)
   
Quote (dheddle @ Sep. 28 2011,15:57)

...

2) Preference without prejudice will be given to anyone who can calculate the specified complexity of any living organism.

Who was it at UD who said that they would perform the task stated in #2 if given thousands or tens of thousands of dollars? This could be the incentive they're looking for!

That would of course be Pa-"go away little girl"-V, as originally pointed out by oldman here.

 
Quote
What she wants from us is the “chance hypothesis” for these programs. If she is willing to pay me large sums of money, I might consider showing her how its done. However, considering the time, effort and thought required, I am not willing to give it to her for free.


Current link.

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
keiths



Posts: 2195
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 29 2011,16:01   

Progress of a sort -- Denyse is no longer looking for a single "selfish gene":
Quote
The whole of human history can be explained by the competition of the never-identified “selfish genes.” As every Sunday features editor knows.

Well, where are they, Darwinists?

I wonder if Denyse saw the Iron Curtain before it fell.  And really, who makes curtains out of iron?  Stupid communists.

--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number. -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 29 2011,16:06   

Quote (Tracy P. Hamilton @ Sep. 28 2011,16:13)
DeNews being an IDiot:
Quote
Peer review is, in the end, a victim of self-inflicted injury. And Karl Giberson is the last man alive, according to his own testimony, who really, truly believes in it.


Somebody obviously has a severe cognitive deficit, to say that about a person who writes:
Quote
In our new book, "The Anointed: Evangelical Truth in a Secular Age," historian Randall Stephens and I look at the widespread and disturbing inability of American evangelicals to distinguish between real knowledge claims, rooted in serious research and endorsed by credible knowledge communities, and pseudo-claims made by unqualified groups and leaders that offer "faith-friendly" alternatives. Across the board we find evangelical Christians attracted to indefensible views in many areas: American history (the Founding Fathers intended America to be a Christian nation), sexual orientation (you can "pray away the gay"), climate change (not happening), evolution (never happened), cosmology (Big Bang is a big joke) and even biblical studies (the bible tells us what is about to happen in the Middle East).


And how does science as a whole create a real knowledge base?  The peer-reviewed literature.  All scientists know this, and believe it, because it works.  By the way, UD hits on four of these pseudo-claims, if you count the Bible Code debacle of Dembski for an example of the latter.

All creationism is is an attempt to control, and thus "predict," the future, and thus scare people into doing what creationists want, and living the way that they think we should live. Peer review is decentralized, nonauthoritarian, so naturally it gets dissed.

Creationism adapts not so much to new scientific knowledge as to their own new ideas of how the worldly are "corrupt." I remember a time when conservatives insisted that Jesus kept his hair short (Rev. Cecil Maxey) and paid his taxes. Sshh! Don't tell the T-publicans!

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 29 2011,21:43   

Quote (damitall @ Sep. 29 2011,16:20)
Do we take note of the KF "Lewontin" quote-mine count any more, or just accept its inexorable upward trajectory?

[URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/this-doonesbury-cartoon-tells-you-all-you-need-to-know-about-the-design-vs-darwinism-contr

oversies/comment-page-1/#comment-401119]http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwini....-401119[/URL]

Lewontin!

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 30 2011,00:46   

I took the liberty of making a working Tinyurl of damitall's link

ETA: Tested!

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
paragwinn



Posts: 539
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 30 2011,01:06   

Saul Alinsky!

--------------
All women build up a resistance [to male condescension]. Apparently, ID did not predict that. -Kristine 4-19-11
F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc. The whole thing is F/N ridiculous -Seversky on KF footnote fetish 8-20-11
Sigh. Really Bill? - Barry Arrington

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 30 2011,06:19   

Quote (paragwinn @ Sep. 30 2011,02:06)
Saul Alinsky!

With a Lewontin! on the side.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
sparc



Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 30 2011,06:20   

Will Gordon E. Mullings finally turn gay?
Kairosfocus:
Quote
BREAKING: Major longitudinal (across-time) study showing spiritually motivated changes in sexual orientation


--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 30 2011,06:34   

Quote (sparc @ Sep. 30 2011,07:20)
Will Gordon E. Mullings finally turn gay?
Kairosfocus:
 
Quote
BREAKING: Major longitudinal (across-time) study showing spiritually motivated changes in sexual orientation

Much more fun is a sexually motivated change in spirituality.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
Patrick



Posts: 666
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 30 2011,07:19   

dmullenix speaks truth at UD:
Quote
As far as I can tell, ID’s sole self-appoint task is to make futile attacks on on their straw-man misunderstandings of evolutionary theory and, on this blog at least, on science generally.

(The whole post is worth reading.)

I sense a ban and comment elimination pending.

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 30 2011,07:31   

Quote (sparc @ Sep. 30 2011,07:20)
Will Gordon E. Mullings finally turn gay?
Kairosfocus:
 
Quote
BREAKING: Major longitudinal (across-time) study showing spiritually motivated changes in sexual orientation

whatever it is he is trying to do it with, i am sure that it's a disappointment for everyone but gordon mullings.  nothing could kill a big throbber quicker than listening to that glory hole troll open his goober smoocher and start flapping those face curtains about a big pile of jackshit

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 30 2011,07:43   

:p  Hee hee here
Quote
4 ThoughtSpark
September 24, 2011 at 5:16 am

Isn’t it about time you said something new in there posts of yours, Gil? I’m partial to intelligent design, but it does you no favours repeating the same old “I used to be an atheist, you know!”, time after time. One would almost be lead to think you are proud of your atheist history.

Ouch! That must have stung!

Don't be backslider, Gil! (Yeah, as if.)

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Patrick



Posts: 666
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 30 2011,08:42   

Despite the always stiff competition at UD, I believe the Cluelessly Projecting Hypocrite of the Week award should go to Eugene S:
Quote
I think to say: “we don’t know” or even “we can’t know” is more honest than to lie with smoke in mirrors instead of evidence.

Yes, Eugene, that would indeed be more honest.  I look forward to you applying that standard to Upright BiPed, gpuccio, Dembski, kairosfocus, and, of course, your good self.

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 30 2011,08:58   

Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Sep. 30 2011,12:34)
Quote (sparc @ Sep. 30 2011,07:20)
Will Gordon E. Mullings finally turn gay?
Kairosfocus:
 
Quote
BREAKING: Major longitudinal (across-time) study showing spiritually motivated changes in sexual orientation

Much more fun is a sexually motivated change in spirituality.

Ahhhh the Tortured Monk routine, I remember it well.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Tracy P. Hamilton



Posts: 1239
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 30 2011,09:52   

Major league philosophy coming up from vjtorley:
Quote
Hi junkdnaforlife,

“Plainly, you cannot invoke the laws of physics to explain the laws of physics.”

I loved that line. That says it all. Thanks.


Physicists are puzzled as to why derivations suddenly become invalid.

--------------
"Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV

"The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen

"We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

  
REC



Posts: 638
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 30 2011,10:04   

Quote (sparc @ Sep. 30 2011,06:20)
Will Gordon E. Mullings finally turn gay?
Kairosfocus:
 
Quote
BREAKING: Major longitudinal (across-time) study showing spiritually motivated changes in sexual orientation

The "research" group that published that paper is from Pat Robertson U, with this on their webpage:

"tend to be student-oriented, focusing on engaging students through the subject matter and its application to their professional identity and ways in which God may be at work in their lives. I also try to call students to be good stewards of the many resources they have been given, to teach them to be advocates for those who are marginalized, and to see what they do in the context of God's redemptive plan.

I have published two integration textbooks, such as Family Therapies: A Comprehensive Christian Appraisal and Modern Psychopathologies: A Comprehensive Christian Appraisal. I have also previously published several books on homosexuality and sexual identity: Homosexuality and the Christian: A Guide for Pastors, Parents and Friends, Homosexuality: The Use of Scientific Research in the Church's Moral Debate, Sexual Identity: A Guide to Living in the Time Between the Times, Ex-Gays? A Longitudinal Study of Religiously Mediated Change in Sexual Orientation, and Sexual Identity Synthesis: Attributions, Meaning-Making and the Search for Congruence."

http://www.regent.edu/acad....use.htm

  
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 30 2011,10:45   

Quote (Patrick @ Sep. 30 2011,08:42)
Despite the always stiff competition at UD, I believe the Cluelessly Projecting Hypocrite of the Week award should go to Eugene S:
       
Quote
I think to say: “we don’t know” or even “we can’t know” is more honest than to lie with smoke in mirrors instead of evidence.

Yes, Eugene, that would indeed be more honest.  I look forward to you applying that standard to Upright BiPed, gpuccio, Dembski, kairosfocus, and, of course, your good self.

Might this case of "I-don't-know-honesty" be appropriate here:

From a transcript made at the DDD3 conference in 2002 (Source ARN):
       
Quote
Question from the audience: I’d be interested in hearing you tell us a little bit about what your theory of intelligent design is, as opposed to what evolution isn’t.

Behe replies: Well, that’s a great question, and I know folks on the other side who are sceptical of intelligent design often get frustrated, but I try to be as conservative as I can and I don’t go out beyond what the data can support because I think overreaching is the bane of theories of design. You say that flagellum looks designed so everything is designed, or that everything that looks complex was designed, or something like that.

I think the short answer to your question is, for all of those things, I don’t know.

There not enough data. For the elephant, we have primelephus, the ancestral elephant of the Asian and African elephant, and mammoth. Well, could that happened by random mutation and natural selection? My instinctive answer is sure - it sure looks like it. It doesn’t look like any big deal.

The more careful answer, the actual answer, is I don’t know - cause I don’t know what’s involved in making one versus the other. I don’t know what molecular changes are necessary to make the small anatomical differences in those different species.

Suppose one believed that those things could have happened by natural selection, but maybe the origination of mammals needed some extra information - how would that have happened - how would the designer have done that? Would it have been, say, information embedded into nature at the big bang, or whenever nature started, or might it have been manipulations along the way, or some sort of input along the way?

The short answer is “I don’t know.”


But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]