RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < ... 234 235 236 237 238 [239] 240 241 242 243 244 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
REC



Posts: 567
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2012,23:34   

I'd say he's been busy:

http://crosscutfractal.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://chromosometerritories.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://originoflifeaquarium.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://originofintelligentlifetheory.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://originofintelligentlife.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://hydrocarbonchains.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://sheetcut.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com http://selflearningbots.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com http://reversekrebscycle.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://intelligencegenerator.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://origin-of-life-experiments.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://selflearningvisionsystem.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://trace-fossils.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://gaulintracksite.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://orchardoflife.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://creator-hypothesis.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://alkanehydrocarbons.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://widontknow.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://theoryofid.blogspot.com/....pot....pot.com
http://lessonplanspage.com/Science....t68.htm
http://sites.google.com/site....ign.doc

Edited by REC on Oct. 30 2012,23:41

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 30 2012,23:44   

ah broadly published, i see



--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 3267
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,00:21   

Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 30 2012,21:45)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Oct. 30 2012,20:59)
 
Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 30 2012,20:40)
Gary, I saw this in a conversation you had online:

   
Quote

Control Of Krebs Cycle By Molecular Intelligence

In living things molecular intelligence is seen controlling what self-assembles from the powerful Krebs Cycle that has become the core metabolic cycle of cells. It is the power plant and factory where a dozen or so catalytic molecules (protein, mineral or other) are drawn to metabolic pathway assembly lines that makes a copy of the molecule it started with every time around the circle. It does this by adding a non-chiral (structurally identical) mirror image of the starting molecule then when the cycle is completed it breaks in half resulting in two identical copies.



At any stage through the assembly cycle a molecule of proper fit may be drawn by molecular forces into a nearby self-assembly interaction to where it fits. At least part of the Reverse Krebs Cycle is catalyzed by volcanic clay/dust/mineral in sunlight making it possible that the cycle was once common planetary chemistry.[11][12]

Where there is no molecular intelligence present the Krebs Cycle would not be able to produce cells and exist regardless of molecular intelligence being present or not to control it. A rudimentary intelligence may actually be challenged to keep up with its production rate but not necessarily be destroyed by periods of overproduction.

Intelligence to exploit this cycle could easily form in its local environment. Once active it would have little problem controlling this existing metabolism. We can here predict self-assembly of a precellular starter mechanism that produces a genome from scratch, instead of a genome first being required to produce this intelligence.


Elsewhere, you've said that you are revising your text constantly. Is this the latest stable text that you have about the citric acid cycle?

Due to the extreme amount of work putting this theory together (and its politics) I only have time and resources for what most matters to science.  Here's my latest project:  

http://www.biology-online.org/biology....p146133

That doesn't have anything to do with the citric acid cycle.

So let's put it another way: Is your statement that I quoted above about the citric acid cycle something that you feel is defensible? Or are you saying that it isn't, but you've been too busy to retract it?


There is some older material to elaborate on that here:

https://sites.google.com/site.......ull.doc

And I can add a paper under construction that might be helpful, for summing other things up:

https://sites.google.com/site.......fID.pdf


But I don’t see anything inherently wrong with what you quoted (other than not going into as much detail as is possible):

 
Quote
Citric acid cycle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......d_cycle

The citric acid cycle — also known as the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle), the Krebs cycle, or the Szent-Györgyi–Krebs cycle[1][2] — is a….


If you can show that it is wrong, then I would first have to blame it on Wikipedia, before agreeing that you are right. :D

From my experience though, they are used interchangeably, even though where I have to look for differences can say that the chemistry varies in a way that the forward/reverse TCA of origin of life papers is a more simple way of achieving the present day Citric Acid Cycle and Krebs.  They are otherwise the same to me.  But since what you are describing is more of a details thing that’s maybe more a mission for you to improve the wording of.  

Getting sidetracked on the Chromosome Illustrator project was the result of the paper also needing to better explain how “addressing” (as explained at Biology-Online) works, to make a molecular intelligence model relatively easy to program.  It’s one of the things that I do have to focus my attention on, because of it being needed by all experimenting with the computer model and theory.   But if you find a more precise way to word things then that will become the new priority and I will in minutes make the change so I can get back to work on what makes this theory unique, and scientifically valuable.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 3267
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,00:30   

Quote (fnxtr @ Oct. 30 2012,23:23)
Quote
requirement of this inherently controlling cognitive mechanism is a confidence level we consciously feel


Have you met timecube, Gary?

No, but String Theory works.  That's best explained in the .pdf version I'm working on:

https://sites.google.com/site....fID.pdf

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 1476
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,02:19   

Great.  Now "Laddy GaGa", the same shithead who's been posting this brain smegma at TalkRational for the last few months has discovered ATBC.  Just fucking wonderful.

--------------
JoeG: And by eating the cake you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.

  
keiths



Posts: 2041
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,02:36   

Gary,

I've created a separate thread for you to play in.

--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number.  -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

  
fusilier



Posts: 208
Joined: Feb. 2003

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,06:57   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Oct. 30 2012,20:03)
Any scientific questions?
 
Quote
This origin of intelligence theory explains the emergent origin of biological diversity and complexity of life on Earth (and detection of these features elsewhere in our Universe) as a product of intelligence, which here self-assembles from nonrandom behavior of matter into multiple self-similar levels of a four requirement cognitive system that over time learns (no select/selected/selection generalizations) and can take a guess (not take a mutation) and physically develops over a lifetime that for molecular intelligence lasts at least billions of years (hence the word evolve became redundant). The theory's unambiguous logical construct allowed for an operational definition for biological species that builds upon the standard accepted operational definition for chemical species, used in chemistry. This unified entire sciences such as Cognitive Theory, Cell Theory, Genetic Theory and Physics Theory including concepts from String Theory. And one requirement of this inherently controlling cognitive mechanism is a confidence level we consciously feel, which is vital to account for, for the theory to also be useful to artists, musicians, clergy and all interested in better knowing who and what we are, how we were created, and by process known as "chromosomal speciation" are related to a progenitor couple hereby colloquially named "Chromosomal Adam and Eve".

Theory Of Intelligent Design - Download

Free Intelligence Design Lab:


http://www.planetsourcecode.com/vb....n....ngWId=1

Intelligence Design Lab with compiled code for Windows

Hi Gary S. Gaulin:

Have you ever had the balls to contact Sandy Moss at U. Massachussetts?  He's retired, now.

Trevor Robinson died of old age, so I know you'll never take your crap to him, now.

Or will you now reveal all those University Biologists who agree with your  ... stuff.

Hey, why haven't you incorporated winfield's <id> stuff, with Proof of Design being that you can add layers of toilet paper and finally keep a dropped egg from breaking.

(Yeah, there's a history.)

--------------
fusilier
James 2:24

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3282
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,07:08   

Just curious, but is this diagram supposed to mean anything?

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 3267
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,07:20   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Oct. 31 2012,02:19)
Great.  Now "Laddy GaGa", the same shithead who's been posting this brain smegma at TalkRational for the last few months has discovered ATBC.  Just fucking wonderful.

As I can see Occam's Aftershave rules here too.  Have fun trying to stop us, you easily yanked wayward science-stopper troll you..

The Gary GaGa sequence and all else in science are doing fine right now with establishing base4 ACGT (here first four must be alphabetical order) and base5 ACGTN (with N the fifth base for an unknown) so at least get that right thank you.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,07:38   

I'd like to talk about
Quote
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.


But on your thread, not here.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3553
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,07:51   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Oct. 31 2012,07:08)
Just curious, but is this diagram supposed to mean anything?

Will it clean my floors?

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 3267
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,07:57   

Quote (fusilier @ Oct. 31 2012,06:57)
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Oct. 30 2012,20:03)
Any scientific questions?
   
Quote
This origin of intelligence theory explains the emergent origin of biological diversity and complexity of life on Earth (and detection of these features elsewhere in our Universe) as a product of intelligence, which here self-assembles from nonrandom behavior of matter into multiple self-similar levels of a four requirement cognitive system that over time learns (no select/selected/selection generalizations) and can take a guess (not take a mutation) and physically develops over a lifetime that for molecular intelligence lasts at least billions of years (hence the word evolve became redundant). The theory's unambiguous logical construct allowed for an operational definition for biological species that builds upon the standard accepted operational definition for chemical species, used in chemistry. This unified entire sciences such as Cognitive Theory, Cell Theory, Genetic Theory and Physics Theory including concepts from String Theory. And one requirement of this inherently controlling cognitive mechanism is a confidence level we consciously feel, which is vital to account for, for the theory to also be useful to artists, musicians, clergy and all interested in better knowing who and what we are, how we were created, and by process known as "chromosomal speciation" are related to a progenitor couple hereby colloquially named "Chromosomal Adam and Eve".

Theory Of Intelligent Design - Download

Free Intelligence Design Lab:


http://www.planetsourcecode.com/vb....n....ngWId=1

Intelligence Design Lab with compiled code for Windows

Hi Gary S. Gaulin:

Have you ever had the balls to contact Sandy Moss at U. Massachussetts?  He's retired, now.

Trevor Robinson died of old age, so I know you'll never take your crap to him, now.

Or will you now reveal all those University Biologists who agree with your  ... stuff.

Hey, why haven't you incorporated winfield's <id> stuff, with Proof of Design being that you can add layers of toilet paper and finally keep a dropped egg from breaking.

(Yeah, there's a history.)

You find the same (but at human level complexity) cognitive model here:

http://people.umass.edu/trehub....b

The theory makes sure to well credit Arnold Trehub and his book that has been my most valuable guide through the neuron level cognitive science.  I computer modeled memory circuits from it and to spite its age is still holding up well in science.  It's still an excellent (but unfortunately under-appreciated) resource that as you can see U-Mass is helping to make sure is there for you to read.  

Along with all else I can't ask for much better than that, from a local academia that honestly has better things to do than join a crusade against what Arnold Trehub found true too, that the model in the Theory of Intelligent Design is much modeled from.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 3267
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,08:06   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Oct. 31 2012,07:38)
I'd like to talk about
Quote
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.


But on your thread, not here.

I have something I'm already working to help get that started.  But first wanted to eliminate some of the quickly eliminated baggage that I thought best to leave behind in this one.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
GaryGaulin



Posts: 3267
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,08:34   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Oct. 31 2012,07:08)
Just curious, but is this diagram supposed to mean anything?

The circuit is what Arnold Trehub and David Heiserman described, that when combined together makes a simple yet awesome system.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,08:38   

Hey Gary this thread is not a place for you to shitpost.  You shitpost in The Gary Gaulin Thread.  Pretty please

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 3267
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,08:52   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ Oct. 31 2012,08:38)
Hey Gary this thread is not a place for you to shitpost.  You shitpost in The Gary Gaulin Thread.  Pretty please

What is wrong with  Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC in a topic about  Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC?

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,08:59   

Because you have your own fucking thread.  Are you stupid or just slow?

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Bob O'H



Posts: 1967
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,09:21   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Oct. 31 2012,08:52)
Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Oct. 31 2012,08:38)
Hey Gary this thread is not a place for you to shitpost.  You shitpost in The Gary Gaulin Thread.  Pretty please

What is wrong with  Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC in a topic about  Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC?

Because it has nothing to do with Uncommon Descent. Unless you want to go over there and explain your ideas to them.

--------------
ID theorists don’t postulate a designer for their arguments. - Crandaddy
There is no connection between a peppered moth, natural selection, and religion that I can see. - FtK

   
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,09:21   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Oct. 31 2012,08:52)
Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Oct. 31 2012,08:38)
Hey Gary this thread is not a place for you to shitpost.  You shitpost in The Gary Gaulin Thread.  Pretty please

What is wrong with  Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC in a topic about  Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC?

Ah, I guess you only read the sub-title of the thread then. Did you miss the  Uncommonly Dense Thread 4 bit then?

If selective misreading is the way you want to go then yes, you are on the right thread. Carry on.

But consider this. Have you fucking seen how long this thread is? Whatever you "clear up" will be yesterdays newspapers in hours.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 1476
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,10:37   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Oct. 31 2012,07:20)
 
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Oct. 31 2012,02:19)
Great.  Now "Laddy GaGa", the same shithead who's been posting this brain smegma at TalkRational for the last few months has discovered ATBC.  Just fucking wonderful.

As I can see Occam's Aftershave rules here too.  Have fun trying to stop us, you easily yanked wayward science-stopper troll you..

Us?  You and the turd in your pocket?  :D  :D  :D

--------------
JoeG: And by eating the cake you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.

  
k.e..



Posts: 2872
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,10:51   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ Oct. 31 2012,16:59)
Because you have your own fucking thread.  Are you stupid or just slow?

Is he really THAT bright?

You gotta laff tho' all the ID Creationism experts at UD won't be the least bit interested.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
Woodbine



Posts: 773
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,17:51   

Gary, if you visit Uncommon Descent and speak to Kairosfocus he may allow you to present your theory for discussion. All the finest minds in ID post there and they might enjoy helping to debug and refine your work.

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4361
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,18:35   

Quote (Woodbine @ Oct. 31 2012,17:51)
Gary, if you visit Uncommon Descent and speak to Kairosfocus he may allow you to present your theory for discussion. All the finest minds in ID post there and they might enjoy helping to debug and refine your work.

Smithers - Release the hounds!

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
QED



Posts: 24
Joined: July 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,19:22   

Channeling John Nash's darker hours to prove jesus - now I've seen it all...

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 1660
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,23:16   

"If you can show that it is wrong, then I would first have to blame it on Wikipedia, before agreeing that you are right."

SIG worthy!

--------------
Like every other academic field, philosophy of religion has its share of hacks and mediocrities.   Edward Feser

‘Anything is a “real possibility” in the mind of one seeking to deny the obvious.’ – William J Murray

  
Wesley R. Elsberry



Posts: 4470
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2012,23:45   

Quote (CeilingCat @ Oct. 31 2012,23:16)
"If you can show that it is wrong, then I would first have to blame it on Wikipedia, before agreeing that you are right."

SIG worthy!

I compared his work to the Wikipedia article and pointed out some points of difference.

--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

    
CeilingCat



Posts: 1660
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 01 2012,03:08   

Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 31 2012,23:45)
           
Quote (CeilingCat @ Oct. 31 2012,23:16)
"If you can show that it is wrong, then I would first have to blame it on Wikipedia, before agreeing that you are right."

SIG worthy!

I compared his work to the Wikipedia article and pointed out some points of difference.

Doesn't matter, it's an all purpose response.

Speaking of Denyse:            
Quote
Brought to You From the Seattle Analytic Philosophy Club, “Is Intelligent Design Science?”October 31, 2012 Posted by News under News  8 Comments  

For those of you who live in the Seattle area (which now includes me), the “Seattle Analytic Philosophy Club” are hosting an event on the 28th of November from 7pm till 9pm in Lake Hills Library (15590 Lake Hills Blvd, Bellevue, WA). Here’s the event description from the website:

Has Denyse fled Canada?  Is the Toronto Based Journalist™ now a damnyankee?  Has her Coffee!! habit become so all powerful and consuming that she's moved to The Source of All Things Caffeine™?  Does anybody care?  Link

I have a nephew who lives in Seattle.  I must warn him immediately.

On the bright side, if Denyse stays away from Toronto until the spring stunting season, then the EdgeWalk will finally be safe for decent people.

Edited by CeilingCat on Nov. 01 2012,03:09

--------------
Like every other academic field, philosophy of religion has its share of hacks and mediocrities.   Edward Feser

‘Anything is a “real possibility” in the mind of one seeking to deny the obvious.’ – William J Murray

  
damitall



Posts: 322
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 01 2012,03:15   

Quote (Woodbine @ Oct. 31 2012,17:51)
Gary, if you visit Uncommon Descent and speak to Kairosfocus he may allow you to present your theory for discussion. All the finest minds in ID post there and they might enjoy helping to debug and refine your work.

Gary "Giggles" Gaulin is convinced he is "doing science" - indeed, he is adamant that, once his "Theory" is more widely published, it will unseat mainstream science in all sorts of areas.
He might be welcome in KF's world - he is invariably polite, and virtually impervious to insult - and to being educated. Furthermore he is expert at the "wall-o'-text" approach, although much of it is written in Giggles's -er- idiosyncratic English, which is impenetrable to us benighted folk, who generally act as if words have commonly accepted meanings.
Sadly, he is doomed to be one of the "Most Misunderstood" folks of all time

  
k.e..



Posts: 2872
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 01 2012,05:41   

Quote (CeilingCat @ Nov. 01 2012,11:08)
 
Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 31 2012,23:45)
             
Quote (CeilingCat @ Oct. 31 2012,23:16)
"If you can show that it is wrong, then I would first have to blame it on Wikipedia, before agreeing that you are right."

SIG worthy!

I compared his work to the Wikipedia article and pointed out some points of difference.

Doesn't matter, it's an all purpose response.

Speaking of Denyse:              
Quote
Brought to You From the Seattle Analytic Philosophy Club, “Is Intelligent Design Science?”October 31, 2012 Posted by News under News  8 Comments  

For those of you who live in the Seattle area (which now includes me), the “Seattle Analytic Philosophy Club” are hosting an event on the 28th of November from 7pm till 9pm in Lake Hills Library (15590 Lake Hills Blvd, Bellevue, WA). Here’s the event description from the website:

Has Denyse fled Canada?  Is the Toronto Based Journalist™ now a damnyankee?  Has her Coffee!! habit become so all powerful and consuming that she's moved to The Source of All Things Caffeine™?  Does anybody care?  Link

I have a nephew who lives in Seattle.  I must warn him immediately.

On the bright side, if Denyse stays away from Toronto until the spring stunting season, then the EdgeWalk will finally be safe for decent people.

...the “Seattle Analytic Philosophy Club”


BOTH Analytics AND Philosophy??

I suppose that means they don't drink beer.

Sounds a bit iffy to me.

If the SAPC are having tea and cucumber sandwichs with ID spruikers instead of doing hard philosophy then they're wasting their time.

The MP boys analyzed Philosophy and found a fair amount of taking the piss.

 
Quote
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant
Who was very rarely stable.
Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar
Who could think you under the table.
David Hume could out-consume
Wilhelm Freidrich Hegel,
And Wittgenstein was a beery swine
Who was just as schloshed as Schlegel.

There's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach ya'
'Bout the raising of the wrist.
SOCRATES, HIMSELF, WAS PERMANENTLY PISSED...
John Stuart Mill, of his own free will,
On half a pint of shandy was particularly ill.
Plato, they say, could stick it away;
Half a crate of whiskey every day.
Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle,
Hobbes was fond of his dram,
And Rene Descartes was a drunken fart:
"I drink, therefore I am"
Yes, Socrates, himself, is particularly missed;
A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed!


--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
The whole truth



Posts: 979
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 01 2012,06:40   

Quote (CeilingCat @ Nov. 01 2012,01:08)
Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 31 2012,23:45)
           
Quote (CeilingCat @ Oct. 31 2012,23:16)
"If you can show that it is wrong, then I would first have to blame it on Wikipedia, before agreeing that you are right."

SIG worthy!

I compared his work to the Wikipedia article and pointed out some points of difference.

Doesn't matter, it's an all purpose response.

Speaking of Denyse:            
Quote
Brought to You From the Seattle Analytic Philosophy Club, “Is Intelligent Design Science?”October 31, 2012 Posted by News under News  8 Comments  

For those of you who live in the Seattle area (which now includes me), the “Seattle Analytic Philosophy Club” are hosting an event on the 28th of November from 7pm till 9pm in Lake Hills Library (15590 Lake Hills Blvd, Bellevue, WA). Here’s the event description from the website:

Has Denyse fled Canada?  Is the Toronto Based Journalist™ now a damnyankee?  Has her Coffee!! habit become so all powerful and consuming that she's moved to The Source of All Things Caffeine™?  Does anybody care?  Link

I have a nephew who lives in Seattle.  I must warn him immediately.

On the bright side, if Denyse stays away from Toronto until the spring stunting season, then the EdgeWalk will finally be safe for decent people.

The IDiotic discotute is in Seattle.

dense o'leary the IDiot now lives in Seattle.


Coincidence, or by design?

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < ... 234 235 236 237 238 [239] 240 241 242 243 244 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]