Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Cornelius Hunter Thread

Pages: (16) < ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] >

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 1268 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 26 2012,11:26    Quote (Freddie @ Nov. 26 2012,10:47)   Quote There is more evidence to support reincarnation and the fact that pyramids are antennas, then your position has. And I understand that bothers you. Evidence.  I do not think that word means what ... etc.  If I had more characters for my sig entry I would snag that one too :-( Reincarnation must be true.  JoeTard came back as a giant horse's ass. -------------- JoeG: And by eating the cake you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.

Kattarina98 Posts: 1188 Joined: Sep. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: Nov. 26 2012,12:28    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Nov. 26 2012,09:56) Quote (Kattarina98 @ Nov. 24 2012,02:46) 20 bucks for the NCSE say that Joe feels far too cosy as an esteemed commenter at UD to migrate back; KF's positive feedback can't be emulated by Hunter who rarely bothers to comment once he has made the OP. You lost that one already.  JoeTard is already back spouting his usual anti-science one liners. I give him a week before his next obscenity-spewing meltdown and Corny has to disable comments again. Oh well ... Merry Christmas, NCSE. :-)) -------------- Barry Arrington is a bitch.

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 1268 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2012,22:29    Cornelius Hunter has now surpassed every other Creationist and IDiot in the biggest, most despicable dickhead department. Today on his blog he posted a piece comparing the madman's killing of those innocent children in Connecticut to "all evolutionists" being just as bad by supporting abortion. I've see some pretty repulsive acts by Creationists - comparing the 2011 mass murders in Norway to "natural selection" for example, but exploiting these poor slain first graders is just too much. Cornelius Hunter you worthless piece of dog shit, I hope you get the most painfully slow bone cancer imaginable and live in fucking terrible pain for the next three decades. -------------- JoeG: And by eating the cake you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.

Quack Posts: 1338 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Dec. 16 2012,01:10    Quote comparing the 2011 mass murders in Norway to "natural selection" for example, Chalk up one decade for us to. -------------- My new avatar is so lovely. Me. you are hand waving faster than a one armed NY cabby with crabs. k.e.. No, I said nothing about mathematics. Anyone can support anything with mathematics. Ray Martinez

Glen Davidson Posts: 565 Joined: May 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 11 2013,12:46    The evil Darwinists are perpetrating the Warfare Thesis with respect to science and religion:     Quote Ever since its foundation was laid in the nineteenth century, the Warfare Thesis has found increasing application. It can be recognized by its two basic components: an attack on science and an attack on scientists. Uh-huh, this from the author of this book:     Quote Darwin's Proof: The Triumph of Religion over Science OMG, it's the warfare thesis.  Corny must be a Darwinist. Sure, you might say that Corny's using two different ideas of "religion" there.  And I'd say, precisely, he lies about science being religion and thereby  plays the warfare thesis to the hilt, even saying that said "religion" won ('illegitimately'--with bollocks to back up that claim), then the very real attacks on science that this mutt perpetrates are supposedly false "warfare" because the warfare thesis is "flawed."  There's some truth to the flaw idea, but, especially in the US, it's just a bit flawed yet a very real and unending fact, even though (flaw) not all religious denominations agree with dumbshits like Hunter. But I suppose it's just a religion to want consistency and a cessation of hypocrisy.  It's fair to say that such a "religion" is science, though, not at all the disgusting religious melange of prejudice and stupidity that drives Hunter. Glen Davidson -------------- http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

Glen Davidson Posts: 565 Joined: May 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 17 2013,18:08    Quote Person X: “supernatural explanations always mean the end of inquiry” Person Y: “So the appearance of species through time, as seen in fossils, is far from random. …  No theory of special creation, or any theory other than evolution, can explain these patterns.” [emphasis in original] The answer is that Person X and Person Y are the same person. In this case the person is Jerry Coyne but it could be any one of the leading evolutionists because they commonly make these kinds of self-revealing pronouncements. The first statement delegitimizes supernatural explanations and the second statement is a supernatural explanation. So, um, what was the whine about "materialists" ruling out supernatural explanations? Seems that they don't at all.  Or Corny's too stupid and/or dishonest to care even about maintaining any internal consistency in ID lies. -------------- http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

Doc Bill Posts: 975 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 17 2013,20:05    Corny is one of the few creationists I think is mentally ill.  Some are just obnoxious, like FL, and some are so very strange that they may have severe mental problems.  Corny falls into that category.  It's a religious delusion that's beyond banter.

Glen Davidson Posts: 565 Joined: May 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2013,10:14    I have no idea what warps Corny, but he is sort of the etymological idiot.  Which seques into a couple of idiots exchanging amazement over the fact that we actually infer a cause adequate to the effects we discover:       Quote Peter WadeckFebruary 17, 2013 at 4:36 PM I think I finally understand these evolutionists. They actually believe what they say. When they say there is mountains of evidence for evolution they think that this is true. For example, if two species have similar morphologies they think this is proof of evolution. It took me a long time to realize this because it seems too strange to be true. Similar morphologies, like similar strands of dna do not prove anything. They only show a similarity. Evolution attempts to explain the change from one species to another. Similar morphologies say nothing about how one species could change into another. It is no evidence for evolution at all. It is a mistake in logic that would fail a first year philosophy student. This is incredible. And yet these biology professors consistently make this mistake. So when an evolutionist says there is mountains of evidence for evolution, in fact there is none. Words escape me to describe this unbelievable error throughout this field of knowledge. I can't bring myself to call it science. Reply Replies    Cornelius HunterFebruary 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM    Peter:    I think I finally understand these evolutionists. They actually believe what they say.    Yes, it takes a long time to finally get it. Amazingly simple once you see it, but it usually takes a long time. Like those incredible optical illusions: http://kathrynvercillo.hubpages.com/hub........lusions It's just amazing, Darwinists know what to expect from evolution, find it in life, and then just assume that life evolved.   Why can't they just follow the evidence where it leads? A dead body with bullets from Fred's gun is just a dead body with bullets from Fred's gun in it.  Why would you suppose that means anything important?   And it all might be an illusion anyhow.  Aliens work in mysterious ways, you know (well, substitute words where necessary). My God, next you'll see people supposing that Greek and German evolved from a common ancestor.  That all humans are related, simply because of their similarities.  Well, they're not all the same, you atheistic bozos. Determining cause from effect is absolutely beyond science.  Or, at least beyond ID science, which just happens to be the latest and greatest, so the only one that matters. Glen Davidson -------------- http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

Henry J Posts: 3773 Joined: Mar. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2013,10:19    If words escape that guy, why does he have so many of them?

Soapy Sam Posts: 378 Joined: Jan. 2012 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2013,13:38    Quote if two species have similar morphologies they think this is proof of evolution. It took me a long time to realize this because it seems too strange to be true. Similar morphologies, like similar strands of dna do not prove anything. That's right, and similar patterns in 'silent' substitution don't prove anything. And hierarchic commonality of longer stretches of DNA inversion and insertion and deletion  doesn't prove anything. And commonality of transpositional insert positions don't prove anything. And relationships between karyotypes don't prove anything. And the fact that trees are recovered from objective phylogenetic analysis doesn't prove anything. And the concordance of many independent lines of evidence doesn't prove anything. Fucking Darwinists. They're just determined to see relationship where none exists. -------------- Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad. The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

Henry J Posts: 3773 Joined: Mar. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2013,13:48    Well of course two species taken by themselves don't prove a general principle. It's several overall patterns among a huge number of species that are the reason the theory gets accepted by people who've studied the subject matter.

Zachriel Posts: 2572 Joined: Sep. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2013,16:05    Missed this one, but Cornelius Hunter kindly reposted it. The Evolution of Circular RNA: A Marshall McLuhan Moment http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2013....ll.html -------------- The struggle against ignorance is to the end of time. But it is said that if you die in tard, you will be reborn in Tardhalla.

Peter Henderson Posts: 285 Joined: Aug. 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 12 2013,05:10    Somehow, there's one giant conspiracy by scientists to hide the truth: http://darwins-god.blogspot.co.uk/2013....-0.html Quote One of evolution’s trade secrets is its prefiltering of data to make it look good, but now evolutionists are resorting to postfiltering of the data as well.

Pages: (16) < ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard