RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < ... 91 92 93 94 95 [96] 97 98 99 100 101 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
The whole truth



Posts: 973
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,06:53   

Quote (CeilingCat @ Feb. 13 2012,02:34)
the whole truth  
Quote
It appears that he does have an MSc, but from what I've found he hasn't done anything since then but spew his insanity on the internet.

According to Wikipedia, Montserrat got clobbered by hurricane Hugo in 1989.  140 MPH winds damaged 90% of the structures on the island and killed the tourist trade.

In 1995, the Soufriere Hills volcano, which had been dormant for centuries, erupted.  It covered the capitol, Plymouth, in more than 12 metres (39 ft) of mud, destroyed its airport and docking facilities, and rendered the southern half of the island uninhabitable.  Half the population left the island.

Today, the population is 5,879 (down from 13,000) and there are virtually no jobs.  The island is supported by the British government to the tune of 25 million pounds per year or about 4,200 pounds per inhabitant, about $6500 USD.

I imagine Gordon manages to snag some part of that.

I agree that mullings manages to snag some part of that, especially since his wife and her family are from Montserrat and that likely makes her eligible for some money, which he can take advantage of.

I've seen a variety of population numbers, from before and after the eruption, and somewhere between 4500 and 6000 for the current population is close enough I suppose. It's certainly not a place where a world renowned scientist/physicist like gordo (LOL) could keep his vast contributions to science and society (LOL LOL) hidden from the outside world.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Soapy Sam



Posts: 495
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,06:56   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Feb. 13 2012,06:30)
The "no longer with us" search: http://www.google.co.uk/search?....h+us%22

 
Quote
Due to his refusing to recognize that snowflake patterns derived from looking at
snowflakes is self-referential DharmaBum is no longer with us

Sheesh those guys are tough!

--------------
Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad.

The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

  
k.e..



Posts: 2841
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,07:11   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Feb. 13 2012,14:30)
The "no longer with us" search: http://www.google.co.uk/search?....h+us%22

Post of the Day?

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
BillB



Posts: 354
Joined: Aug. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,07:12   

Quote (The whole truth @ Feb. 13 2012,12:27)
With the new paper on Peppered Moths in mind, check this out:

arrington the arrogant IDiot

And notice that the ban hammer comes out in comment number 13.

From what I can tell, when UD re-vamped their site everyone who was registered with it but had been banned was un-banned (except of course anyone who had the account deleted). Don't know if this was deliberate or just an accident.

  
The whole truth



Posts: 973
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,07:12   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Feb. 13 2012,04:30)
The "no longer with us" search: http://www.google.co.uk/search?....h+us%22

And yet that lying scumbag barry arrington claims to be an advocate for 'free speech' and 'transparency'.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
REC



Posts: 556
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,08:18   

Quote
He is not, as StephenB points out, fit for rational dialogue, and you will not see him on this site again.

Another update: At another site Eigenstate says he responded here, which is an outrageous lie. At that same site he up an idiot’s answer to the question which is not worth responding to. Suffice it to say it was neither “yes” nor “no.”


"Suffice it to say it was neither “yes” nor “no.”? That's the whole point!

Unfit for rational dialog, and idiot.....from the man that never, never tolerates insults.

Link

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3551
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,08:31   

Has Barry Arrington stopped having sex with his mother? Yes or no.

No excuses for not responding, and no wishy-washy answers.

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,08:40   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Feb. 13 2012,08:31)
Has Barry Arrington stopped having sex with his mother? Yes or no.

No excuses for not responding, and no wishy-washy answers.

No, she has not. She told me last night!

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
BillB



Posts: 354
Joined: Aug. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,09:26   

MaxEntropies comments have now been deleted, has MaxE been banned as well?

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10080
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,09:34   

1. ID is real science, not religion!
2a. But we're all fundies.
2b. We just do science differently, by telling you what other science can't do, therefore ID
3. Because of this, we don't need labs.
4. We're 100% for free enquiry. End censorship! We even did a film on it.
5. We don't like peer review, though
6. And we don't like science blogs
7. But we have our own blog!
8. We get to pick the subjects (lots of Jesus)
9. And if you don't agree with us, you get banned.
10. And if you don't say what we want you get banned, before you've not said it.

All science so far!

Did I miss anything?

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,09:44   

it's hilarious to see those morons yammering about jupiter and cats and photons and crying about lack of fit of logical laws to nature therefore nature must be wrong

What the fuck does any of that have to do with any evidence for their creationist theories?  LMAO

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,09:53   

Quote (BillB @ Feb. 13 2012,09:26)
MaxEntropies comments have now been deleted, has MaxE been banned as well?

Barry is still replying to max:
Quote
Not true Max, as KF points out below.


http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-420225

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10080
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,10:09   

Barry:

"This sentence is not true’"

Is that sentence true or false?

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
khan



Posts: 1479
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,10:10   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 13 2012,10:34)
1. ID is real science, not religion!
2a. But we're all fundies.
2b. We just do science differently, by telling you what other science can't do, therefore ID
3. Because of this, we don't need labs.
4. We're 100% for free enquiry. End censorship! We even did a film on it.
5. We don't like peer review, though
6. And we don't like science blogs
7. But we have our own blog!
8. We get to pick the subjects (lots of Jesus)
9. And if you don't agree with us, you get banned.
10. And if you don't say what we want you get banned, before you've not said it.

All science so far!

Did I miss anything?

Orwell or Kafka?

--------------
"It's as if all those words, in their hurry to escape from the loony, have fallen over each other, forming scrambled heaps of meaninglessness." -damitall

That's so fucking stupid it merits a wing in the museum of stupid. -midwifetoad

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3268
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,10:12   

Quote (khan @ Feb. 13 2012,10:10)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 13 2012,10:34)
1. ID is real science, not religion!
2a. But we're all fundies.
2b. We just do science differently, by telling you what other science can't do, therefore ID
3. Because of this, we don't need labs.
4. We're 100% for free enquiry. End censorship! We even did a film on it.
5. We don't like peer review, though
6. And we don't like science blogs
7. But we have our own blog!
8. We get to pick the subjects (lots of Jesus)
9. And if you don't agree with us, you get banned.
10. And if you don't say what we want you get banned, before you've not said it.

All science so far!

Did I miss anything?

Orwell or Kafka?

I think Barry looks more like Alfred Hitchcock.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,10:35   

comment volume currently seems down 60-80%, at a guess, on UD. I'll put up a live chart of it shortly, time permitting, so we can watch it tank over the coming days.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
utidjian



Posts: 185
Joined: Oct. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,12:03   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Feb. 13 2012,10:35)
comment volume currently seems down 60-80%, at a guess, on UD. I'll put up a live chart of it shortly, time permitting, so we can watch it tank over the coming days.

Ban-o-metric Science! I like it. It is hysterical, but the IDiots will call it "historical science" and therefore based on presuppositions (or something.)

--------------
Being laughed at doesn't mean you're progressing along some line. It probably just means you're saying some stupid shit -stevestory

  
The whole truth



Posts: 973
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,12:09   

Let's enjoy some statements by barry 'dickhead' arrington:

Here he demonstrates his vast knowledge of nature and Herpetology:

"Snakes and newts are kinda the same sort of critter. No comma needed."

moron

Here he forgets that his imagined designer/god is "over the horizon", WAY over the horizon:

Dr. Barr, you say that the other parts of universe are “over the horizon.” If I understand your metaphor, one of the implications of your assertion is that we cannot, even in principle, test empirically the hypothesis that there are other universes (or parts of our universe if you prefer) that are “over the horizon.” How then could this hypothesis be falsified? And if it cannot, in principle, be falsified, is the statement “there are other universes over the horizon” not more properly classified as a metaphysical statement?

tard

Here he reveals his real thoughts:

"“God keep us from . . .” Except for me and you of course, because we really are right all the time. Well, I am anyway."

jackass

Here he lies his ass off:

"JDN, if you have the floor you can whatever you want about religion. I do not have a right to be shielded from viewpoints with which I disagree or even offend me deeply. Neither do you.

bullshit

And here he finally says something true (only he left out the word 'dick'):

Arcane irrelevantia (my neologism for the day) are leaking out of my head into the blogosphere.

dickhead leakage

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Tracy P. Hamilton



Posts: 1237
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,12:41   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Feb. 13 2012,10:35)
comment volume currently seems down 60-80%, at a guess, on UD. I'll put up a live chart of it shortly, time permitting, so we can watch it tank over the coming days.

Puts a new meaning on Darwinists unable to answer arguments, eh?

--------------
"Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV

"The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen

"We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

  
The whole truth



Posts: 973
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,12:57   

gordon elliott mullings, god-like practitioner of impeccable morals, integrity, courtesy, compassion, humility, honesty, and all around nice guy says:

"PS: Since we are plainly dealing with those who will gleefully snip words out of context and maliciously twist them to try to deride, denigrate and dismiss –as we saw so plainly across the week and weekend past, let me explain. Do, be patient; we are dealing with willful, hostility driven twisters at sites like AtBC and Anti Evo, not fair minded and civil participants in dialogue."

two faced liar

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
keiths



Posts: 2040
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,12:59   

Quote (The whole truth @ Feb. 13 2012,10:09)
Let's enjoy some statements by barry 'dickhead' arrington:

Here he demonstrates his vast knowledge of nature and Herpetology:

"Snakes and newts are kinda the same sort of critter. No comma needed."

moron

TWT,

That was just Barry poking a stick at Newt Gingrich.  Barry says plenty of ridiculous things for us to criticize; no need to misrepresent one of his more sensible statements.

--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number.  -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don’t belong there and thoughts into my mind that don’t belong there. -- KF

  
The whole truth



Posts: 973
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,14:07   

Quote (keiths @ Feb. 13 2012,10:59)
Quote (The whole truth @ Feb. 13 2012,10:09)
Let's enjoy some statements by barry 'dickhead' arrington:

Here he demonstrates his vast knowledge of nature and Herpetology:

"Snakes and newts are kinda the same sort of critter. No comma needed."

moron

TWT,

That was just Barry poking a stick at Newt Gingrich.  Barry says plenty of ridiculous things for us to criticize; no need to misrepresent one of his more sensible statements.

It wasn't deliberate misrepresentation.

Note to self:

Don't try to read a dozen pages at the same time, especially when in need of sleep.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Schroedinger's Dog



Posts: 1691
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,14:08   

Quote (keiths @ Feb. 13 2012,19:59)
Quote (The whole truth @ Feb. 13 2012,10:09)
Let's enjoy some statements by barry 'dickhead' arrington:

Here he demonstrates his vast knowledge of nature and Herpetology:

"Snakes and newts are kinda the same sort of critter. No comma needed."

moron

TWT,

That was just Barry poking a stick at Newt Gingrich.  Barry says plenty of ridiculous things for us to criticize; no need to misrepresent one of his more sensible statements.

Why the fuck do you hate snakes so much...?

--------------
"Hail is made out of water? Are you really that stupid?" Joe G

"I have a better suggestion, Kris. How about a game of hide and go fuck yourself instead." Louis

"The reason people use a crucifix against vampires is that vampires are allergic to bullshit" Richard Pryor

   
keiths



Posts: 2040
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,14:45   

Quote (Schroedinger's Dog @ Feb. 13 2012,12:08)
Quote (keiths @ Feb. 13 2012,19:59)
Quote (The whole truth @ Feb. 13 2012,10:09)
Let's enjoy some statements by barry 'dickhead' arrington:

Here he demonstrates his vast knowledge of nature and Herpetology:

"Snakes and newts are kinda the same sort of critter. No comma needed."

moron

TWT,

That was just Barry poking a stick at Newt Gingrich.  Barry says plenty of ridiculous things for us to criticize; no need to misrepresent one of his more sensible statements.

Why the fuck do you hate snakes so much...?

Good point.  I hereby apologize to any snakes who were offended by my comment, and for the record, I support the newt lobby in their efforts to change the name of their species.

--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number.  -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don’t belong there and thoughts into my mind that don’t belong there. -- KF

  
Henry J



Posts: 4014
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,15:14   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 13 2012,09:09)
Barry:

"This sentence is not true’"

Is that sentence true or false?

Or how about the set of all sets that don't contain themselves as members?

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10080
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,15:47   

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....s-or-no

Quote
..Another update: At another site Eigenstate says he responded here, which is an outrageous lie. At that same site he up an idiot’s answer to the question which is not worth responding to. Suffice it to say it was neither “yes” nor “no.”



I don't believe you, Barry. And why wont you name the other site or link to it?

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Patrick



Posts: 549
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,15:50   

Quote (BillB @ Feb. 13 2012,05:12)
Someone challenges KF to stand up and be counted:    
Quote
KF,
   
Quote
I would be interested to see such, if it exists.

I agree and I am glad to see that eigenstates response was cross posted at Elizabeth Liddles site here. It certainly seems odd that his reply didn’t get through here although I see that several people have attempted to post links from this thread to eigenstates reply for you and others to see. Unfortunately is seems those comments have also disappeared.

We could be uncharitable to eigenstate and conclude that he didn’t actually post his reply here, but simply claimed to have, then claimed to have been banned in order to smear the moderators of this blog. But as you charitably pointed out it could also be a simple error on his part, or an error in the site – I would imagine that given Mr Arringtons statement above that eigenstate would be given the right to post the first comment, some system would have been put in place for this thread to place all comments in moderation until eigenstates appeared in the que, and could be published. Perhaps this system was to blame.

On the other hand we have the problem of commentators linking to eigenstates reply being banned, and the comments vanishing. We might infer from this that Mr Arrington is being less than honest, perhaps even that he simply decided to pretend that eigenstate never posted a reply in order to smear eigenstate. It would be truly sad if this were the case and I hope that distinguished contributors like yourself would be brave enough to stand up to this type of behaviour – although I understand that it would probably get you banned as well (assuming that the inference about Mr Arrington was correct of course).

With that in mind I will try an experiment – posted below is eigenstates reply, which he claimed to have posted here already. If this post of mine disappears, and I am banned, we have more reason to infer that Mr Arrington is, for whatever reason, playing games rather than pursuing honest debate. In which case I would encourage you to try the experiment yourself, post eigenstates reply here, and see if it (and perhaps you) remain on this site!

....
...


Eigenstates reply was included, and a link to it on Elizabeths site.

Barry is probably asleep right now, hopefully that will mean the comment persists long enough for KF and others to have good look.

That didn't last long.

Barry "big lie" Arrington not only demonstrates his complete disdain for free speech and truth by eliminating posts that document his gutless behavior, he then has the nerve to add this edit:
Quote
Another update: At another site Eigenstate says he responded here, which is an outrageous lie.

Barry, you are a proven liar and intellectual coward.  C'mon, threaten me for speaking the truth.

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,15:58   

countdown to barry being found blue faced ball gagged in a wet suit astride toilet plunger hung deep

that much stress needs the kinda release that a good old fashioned altar call just can't offer

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10080
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,16:02   

Bonus:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-common

Quote
...BTW, as much as I pick on her, I really like Dr. Liddle. I may have mistaken her stubborn insistence on sticking to her guns (in the face of what I perceive as overwhelming and irrefutable arguments to the contrary) as intellectual dishonesty, and if I did I apologize. Dr. Liddle, I hope you continue to post here. As frustrating as you can be, this would be a boring site if we did not have someone from the other side to joust with. And it is fun to joust with you.



Yes, it will be a boring site, Blowhard Barry.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Woodbine



Posts: 755
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,16:06   

Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Feb. 13 2012,21:58)
countdown to barry being found blue faced ball gagged in a wet suit astride toilet plunger hung deep

Makes me wonder what the UD posse would use for 'safe words'.

JoeTard : "Your position!"

Gildo : "Transparent!"

Batsh^t77 : "Semi OT!"

Kairosfocus : "Onlookers, I am experiencing physical and psychological difficulties. Kindly reconnect the oxygen and remove the catheter from my manhood. END!"

....etc.

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < ... 91 92 93 94 95 [96] 97 98 99 100 101 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]