Joined: Oct. 2009
|Quote (forastero @ Oct. 23 2011,03:40)|
|Again more so called pseudoempericism and to say that no kinds of radiometric contamination are alterations occurred in billions or even thousands of years is as ridiculous as saying dinosaur soft tissue can last millions of years.|
And your first and only link is a bit broad wouldnít you say? Thus, I just went to the first book and whata ya know. http://books.google.com/books?i....f=false
It wasnt just Cambrian explosions, but Ordovician explosions, Silurian explosion, Devonian explosions, carboniferous explosions, Triassic explosion, Jurassic explosion, Cretaceous explosion, Paleocene explosion, Eocene explosion, Oligocene †explosion, Miocene explosion, †Pleistocene explosions.
..and no good evidence for intermediates so your priests came up with super sun god powered punctuated equilibrium
You are making claims, then you need to support them. Please provide evidence for you assertion that any of the fundamental forces in our universe have changed over time. The mere fact that you are using a computer shows that this is wrong.
Further, astronomers can see backwards in time and observe that the fundamental forces of our universe are the same 13 billion years ago as the are now.
You can just ignore the evidence, but it just makes you look like a dummy. Sorry, but that's the way it is.
Now, as to the book... here's what it says in regards to an explosion:
The term 'Big Bang' implies some sort of explosion, which is a not wholly inappropriate analogy, except that the Big Bang was not an explosion in space, but an explosion of space.
So, what exploded? It couldn't have been a thermonuclear explosion as you think since matter didn't exist at the time of the Big Bang. It couldn't have been matter/anti-matter, etc.
Do you see that word 'analogy'? A not wholly appropriate analogy.
You are making an argument about AN ANALOGY. This is just another strawman argument and has absolutely nothing to do with reality.
Tell you what, I know that you won't, but why don't you tell me what the Cambrian explosion is. In your own words, describe what exploded and when and how. Go ahead, describe in detail.
Then you bring up an entirely new argument (typical of creationists) without satisfactorily completing any of the prior arguments. Intermediates?
There are thousands of peer-reviewed articles showing intermediates. Heck, you are an intermediate between your parents and your children. Duh.
Now, let's see what do we need from you:
describe the Cambrian explosion
define symmetry breaking (as relates to the begining of the universe)
describe the endocrine notion of phenotype selection
define phenotype (include the other common -type and define that as well)
explain why you insist that evolution requires something that no scientist requires (fruit flies to dogs)
show that mutation always results in the loss of genetic information (show the math and define information while you are at it)
evidence that the four fundamental forces of our universe change over time
And now you want to talk about intermediates?
Gish Gallop on!
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.