Joined: Oct. 2009
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 05 2012,19:37)|
|Quote (olegt @ Nov. 05 2012,19:24)|
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 05 2012,18:36)|
|My new computer/software was able to save a pdf version of the theory!|
There should now be no excuses at all for not having studying it, before commenting.
You got it backwards, pal. I don't need an excuse for not studying your crap. I need motivation to study it. So far your incoherent babbling seems like a poor motivator.
If you are that uninterested in this area science then you should not have commented at all. Only made an ass out of yourself by pretending to know what you're talking about, when you didn't even read it. That's as pompous as it gets, and I'm not here to make excuses for you..
I read the first couple of pages. You are not even wrong on so many levels it's sad. You would have to study for years to reach the level of merely wrong.
|Several decades of following scientific evidence wherever it leads has led to this high school simple yet powerful cognitive emergence theory that...|
Apparently "several decades" means "I read wikipedia, but didn't understand it". You have obviously NOT read the actual science involved, since you don't understand even the most basic concept of "what is a theory".
|The phrase "natural selection" is a subjective generalization that is impossible to precisely quantify.|
Ummm... no. The Hardy-Weinberg principle and equations specifically show how random mating, without disturbing influences will result in an equilibrium of allele and genotype frequencies. By studying actual allele and genotype frequencies, we can know when a population is out of balance.
It the population is in equilibrium (for example, the sickle cell trait in African populations of humans) and a change occurs (say all the mosquitoes being wiped out), then we can actually show how the allele frequency changes over time due to that changed environment. Natural selection weeding out the less robust traits (with the caveat that humans can overcome selection at this level with medical science).
Heck, even a brief reading of the "natural selection" page on Wikipedia should be enough to show you that this statement is wrong.
|This theory instead requires specific terminology from cognitive science to be able to explain the tenacious self-learning mechanisms of intelligent living things which more specifically "learn" (not select/selected) and can take a "guess” (not mutate) and over time physically “develop” (not evolve).|
So, what you're saying here is that instead of evolution via mutation and natural selection, that every single organism on the planet CHOOSE to change in some way.
Yeah, I don't think we need to go farther. It really is a mess. It's poorly constructed. Usually a Table of Contents comes first, not on page 5 and in general, pages are numbered (usually in ascending order from the first page). You may be a computer programmer, but you absolutely suck at operating a computer. I don't know what software you are using (Word Perfect 3 maybe?), but they all have auto page numbering systems.
You might also want to remove the "Ads by Google" parts for the PDF of your website. Unless, you have stolen the picture in the ad, without permission or attribution. Does "Rock Star Layouts" know that you have published their work?
Another hint... when you create a graph. It is common to place a title on the graph, then label the axes so that your readers might have a clue as to what you are on about. Your "Cambrian Explosion" graph is meaningless gobbilty gook.
And you need a citation for your claim of exponential increase in diversity.
Here's another hint. Chemicals don't reproduce, so 'chemical species' isn't really a good comparison for 'biological species' and I've got to say, that's the strangest definition for biological species I've ever seen. Perhaps you should use an actual definition, without your weird additions.
Just reading this has caused me to go into a massive depression for the future of humanity. I will now go eat chocolate ice cream and watch Doctor Who and Amy Pond (Yowza!) until my faith in humanity has been restored and I'm not suicidal.
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.