Joined: Oct. 2012
|Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Nov. 04 2012,19:28)|
|Quote (stevestory @ Nov. 04 2012,19:40)|
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 04 2012,19:31)|
Your reading comprehension is weak. Neither I nor anyone else here requires any such thing. What we need from you is a model that includes a designer, and some details about how to distinguish designed crap from naturally occurring undesigned crap.
or, you know, provide a description of a mechanism which makes useful predictions.
so far, you have provided flowcharts, "i dun wunned an award therefore ID", culture war Dover, culture war Kansas, irrelevant horsepifflery and several thousand words of text which are functionally indistinguishable from randomly generated bafflegab.
don't get me wrong buddy, i love laughing my tits off at this sort of thing. it's just that if you are really serious about this bullshit* then you really suck at it
*yeah right i call Loki
Or in other non-words:
If this is not scientific enough for you then it's not my fault that through those who live for scientific discovery like this the theory is already all set to revolutionize science, while your fate is to laugh until you cry, then you die, then you die (of old age).
|The computer model also provides a precise, testable and scientifically useful operational definition for "intelligent cause" where each of the three emergent levels can be individually modeled, with a model predicted to be possible that generates an intelligent causation event, now goal of further research and challenge for all.|
Hopefully you were already taught the concept where ones with entirely religious or political motives just die-off with time, while through those who only cared about the science the theory forever remains undefeated...
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.