RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < ... 216 217 218 219 220 [221] 222 223 224 225 226 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
CeilingCat



Posts: 1651
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2012,18:46   

Quote (k.e.. @ Sep. 21 2012,09:32)
 

Welcome onlookers, can't help with the trout tickling but good luck with poking church lady.

Or just Rent a Carp.

--------------
Like every other academic field, philosophy of religion has its share of hacks and mediocrities.   Edward Feser

‘Anything is a “real possibility” in the mind of one seeking to deny the obvious.’ – William J Murray

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2012,20:14   

Quote
for a while I tried to see if the 4-D space-time of General Relativity was sufficient to explain centrality we witness for the earth in the universe


TIME CUBE YOU CANNOT COMPREHEND FOUR SIMULTANEOUS DAYS IN ONE TIME

Quote
Children will be blessed for
Killing Of Educated Adults
Who Ignore 4 Simultaneous
Days Same Earth Rotation.
Practicing  Evil  ONEness -
Upon Earth Of  Quadrants.
Evil Adult Crime VS Youth.
 Supports Lie Of Integration.
 1 Educated Are Most Dumb.
 Not 1 Human Except Dead 1.
 Man Is Paired,  2 Half 4 Self.
 1 of God Is Only 1/4 Of God.                        
  Bible A Lie & Word Is Lies.
  Navel Connects 4 Corner 4s.
 God Is Born Of A Mother –
  She Left Belly B. Signature.
Every Priest Has Ma Sign
 But Lies To Honor Queers.
Belly B. Proves 4 Corners.

Your dirty lying teachers
use only the midnight to
midnight 1 day (ignoring
3 other days) Time to not
foul (already wrong) bible
  time. Lie that corrupts earth
you educated stupid fools.

GoBelly-Button  Logic Works.


--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5375
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2012,20:45   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ Sep. 21 2012,21:14)
Quote
for a while I tried to see if the 4-D space-time of General Relativity was sufficient to explain centrality we witness for the earth in the universe


TIME CUBE YOU CANNOT COMPREHEND FOUR SIMULTANEOUS DAYS IN ONE TIME

They really are on the same intellectual level, aren't they? Nutjobs.

--------------
Lou FCD is still in school, so we should only count him as a baby biologist. -carlsonjok -deprecated
I think I might love you. Don't tell Deadman -Wolfhound

Work-friendly photography
NSFW photography

   
midwifetoad



Posts: 3550
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2012,20:46   

BA77 works hard at, but he never quite measures up to the Time Cube. Perhaps if he married AFDave and they had three parent children...

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
dvunkannon



Posts: 1377
Joined: June 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2012,20:52   

Quote (keiths @ Sep. 21 2012,03:52)
No points for guessing who wrote this magnum opus tardissimus:

Centrality of Each Observer In The Universe and Christ’s Credible Reconciliation Of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics

You almost had me thinking that this was going to be a UD thread started by BA^77. That event would truly mark the nadir of UD. OK, giving JoeyGeeGee thread starting privileges would be equally nadiferous...

--------------
I’m referring to evolution, not changes in allele frequencies. - Cornelius Hunter
I’m not an evolutionist, I’m a change in allele frequentist! - Nakashima

  
k.e..



Posts: 2838
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2012,22:43   

Quote (dvunkannon @ Sep. 22 2012,04:52)
Quote (keiths @ Sep. 21 2012,03:52)
No points for guessing who wrote this magnum opus tardissimus:

Centrality of Each Observer In The Universe and Christ’s Credible Reconciliation Of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics

You almost had me thinking that this was going to be a UD thread started by BA^77. That event would truly mark the nadir of UD. OK, giving JoeyGeeGee thread starting privileges would be equally nadiferous...

Wot .......KF doesn't qualify as a nadir?

Are we becoming that immune to KF's crowings from the dunghill?





--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 21 2012,22:54   

Quote
I find it extremely interesting, and strange, that quantum mechanics tells us that instantaneous quantum wave collapse to its ‘uncertain’ 3-D state is centered on each individual conscious observer in the universe, whereas, 4-D space-time cosmology (General Relativity) tells us each 3-D point in the universe is central to the expansion of the universe. These findings of modern science are pretty much exactly what we would expect to see if this universe were indeed created, and sustained, from a higher dimension by a omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, eternal Being who knows everything that is happening everywhere in the universe at the same time. These findings certainly seem to go to the very heart of the age old question asked of many parents by their children, “How can God hear everybody’s prayers at the same time?”,,, i.e. Why should the expansion of the universe, or the quantum wave collapse of the entire universe, even care that you or I, or anyone else, should exist? Only Theism offers a rational explanation as to why you or I, or anyone else, should have such undeserved significance in such a vast universe:

Psalm 33:13-15
The LORD looks from heaven; He sees all the sons of men. From the place of His dwelling He looks on all the inhabitants of the earth; He fashions their hearts individually; He considers all their works.





fuck, batshit you got me,,,  see ya in church sunday morning!

Edited by Erasmus, FCD on Sep. 21 2012,23:55

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5375
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2012,05:43   

It's getting a little slow around here. We need a new meltdown.

--------------
Lou FCD is still in school, so we should only count him as a baby biologist. -carlsonjok -deprecated
I think I might love you. Don't tell Deadman -Wolfhound

Work-friendly photography
NSFW photography

   
k.e..



Posts: 2838
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2012,08:37   

Quote (Lou FCD @ Sep. 22 2012,13:43)
It's getting a little slow around here. We need a new meltdown.

Regime change?

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
onlooker



Posts: 17
Joined: Sep. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2012,10:14   

Quote (Lou FCD @ Sep. 22 2012,05:43)
It's getting a little slow around here. We need a new meltdown.

I'm working on it:


  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5375
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2012,10:54   

Quote (onlooker @ Sep. 22 2012,11:14)
Quote (Lou FCD @ Sep. 22 2012,05:43)
It's getting a little slow around here. We need a new meltdown.

I'm [URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/design-inference/it-seems-that-tsz-objector-to-design-af-insists-on-the-long-since-corrected-canard-that-de

sign-is-a-default-inference/#comment-434129]working on it[/URL]:


Further down, same thread.



lol.

--------------
Lou FCD is still in school, so we should only count him as a baby biologist. -carlsonjok -deprecated
I think I might love you. Don't tell Deadman -Wolfhound

Work-friendly photography
NSFW photography

   
Amadan



Posts: 1240
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2012,11:35   

The title to this post on Boing Boing is simply too good to be true.

--------------
"People are always looking for natural selection to generate random mutations" - Densye  4-4-2011
JoeG BTW dumbass- some variations help ensure reproductive fitness so they cannot be random wrt it.

   
Learned Hand



Posts: 83
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2012,16:29   

Quote (onlooker @ Sep. 22 2012,10:14)
Quote (Lou FCD @ Sep. 22 2012,05:43)
It's getting a little slow around here. We need a new meltdown.

I'm [URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/design-inference/it-seems-that-tsz-objector-to-design-af-insists-on-the-long-since-corrected-canard-that-de


sign-is-a-default-inference/#comment-434129]working on it[/URL]:


Your comment has been censored on grounds that it accused the censor of censorship.

  
Patrick



Posts: 549
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2012,17:47   

Quote (Learned Hand @ Sep. 22 2012,17:29)
Quote (onlooker @ Sep. 22 2012,10:14)
 
Quote (Lou FCD @ Sep. 22 2012,05:43)
It's getting a little slow around here. We need a new meltdown.

I'm [URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/design-inference/it-seems-that-tsz-objector-to-design-af-insists-on-the-long-since-corrected-canard-that-de

sign-is-a-default-inference/#comment-434129]working on it[/URL]:


Your comment has been censored on grounds that it accused the censor of censorship.

You made me look.  Thank you.  I wouldn't want to have missed this:
Quote
O makes a false accusation of censorship — probably being amplified all across the slander laced fever swamps as we speak — when O knows full well he was asked to apologise and cease from derail attempts or leave. He chose to leave then tried to return and suggest that he could — with an unresolved matter of uncivil behaviour on his part on the table — hold a separate conversation ignoring the thread owner. Sorry, it does not work that way. Comment removed for cause. KF

"I'm removing what Onlooker posted because he accused me of censorship.  In the process I'll slander him while complaining about slander on other sites."

How does his head not explode from the weapons grade hypocrisy?

ETA:  Bolding in the original.  Like multiple exclamation points, a sure sign of a disturbed mind.

Edited by Patrick on Sep. 22 2012,18:48

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2012,17:51   

Quote (Patrick @ Sep. 22 2012,17:47)
 
Quote
O makes a false accusation of censorship — probably being amplified all across the slander laced fever swamps as we speak — when O knows full well he was asked to apologise and cease from derail attempts or leave.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ry_of_O

 
Quote
Story of O (French: Histoire d'O, IPA: [istwa? do]) is an erotic novel published in 1954 about love, dominance and submission by French author Anne Desclos under the pen name Pauline Réage.


--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Patrick



Posts: 549
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2012,18:31   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Sep. 22 2012,18:51)
Quote (Patrick @ Sep. 22 2012,17:47)
 
Quote
O makes a false accusation of censorship — probably being amplified all across the slander laced fever swamps as we speak — when O knows full well he was asked to apologise and cease from derail attempts or leave.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ry_of_O

 
Quote
Story of O (French: Histoire d'O, IPA: [istwa? do]) is an erotic novel published in 1954 about love, dominance and submission by French author Anne Desclos under the pen name Pauline Réage.

Ah, kairosfocus must be oiling Mr. Leathers in anticipation of his next meeting with Onlooker.  One can just imagine the look on his face as he rubs his hand up and down the slick shaft, over and over and over . . . .

  
The whole truth



Posts: 972
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2012,19:46   

Quote (Patrick @ Sep. 22 2012,15:47)
Quote (Learned Hand @ Sep. 22 2012,17:29)
 
Quote (onlooker @ Sep. 22 2012,10:14)
   
Quote (Lou FCD @ Sep. 22 2012,05:43)
It's getting a little slow around here. We need a new meltdown.

I'm [URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/design-inference/it-seems-that-tsz-objector-to-design-af-insists-on-the-long-since-corrected-canard-that-de



sign-is-a-default-inference/#comment-434129]working on it[/URL]:


Your comment has been censored on grounds that it accused the censor of censorship.

You made me look.  Thank you.  I wouldn't want to have missed this:
 
Quote
O makes a false accusation of censorship — probably being amplified all across the slander laced fever swamps as we speak — when O knows full well he was asked to apologise and cease from derail attempts or leave. He chose to leave then tried to return and suggest that he could — with an unresolved matter of uncivil behaviour on his part on the table — hold a separate conversation ignoring the thread owner. Sorry, it does not work that way. Comment removed for cause. KF

"I'm removing what Onlooker posted because he accused me of censorship.  In the process I'll slander him while complaining about slander on other sites."

How does his head not explode from the weapons grade hypocrisy?

ETA:  Bolding in the original.  Like multiple exclamation points, a sure sign of a disturbed mind.

What?!?!?!!!!!!

Just kidding.

"Comment removed for cause."

Yeah, 'cause gordo can get away with being a cowardly, censoring, uncivil, slandering, authoritarian monster in the UD sanctuary.

"asked to apologise"

No, gordo, you demanded that onlooker apologize.  

"How does his head not explode from the weapons grade hypocrisy?"

An extremely thick skull must have something to do with it.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
REC



Posts: 552
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2012,22:50   

Mung slips the blinders on:

Quote
454 Mung

If you ask me, people like onlooker, Elizabeth Liddle, CLAVDIVS and Jerad, and yes even MathGrrl, have been treated remarkable well here at UD.

So why do so many people of similar mind feel they need to post at TSZ rather than here?


Yes....why post somewhere they can?  Why don't they  post at the site they are banned from or censored at......

Speaking of which, was Sal 86ed over there?

  
k.e..



Posts: 2838
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2012,23:25   

Quote (REC @ Sep. 23 2012,06:50)
Mung slips the blinders on:

Quote
454 Mung

If you ask me, people like onlooker, Elizabeth Liddle, CLAVDIVS and Jerad, and yes even MathGrrl, have been treated remarkable well here at UD.

So why do so many people of similar mind feel they need to post at TSZ rather than here?


Yes....why post somewhere they can?  Why don't they  post at the site they are banned from or censored at......

Speaking of which, was Sal 86ed over there?

God they're pathetic.

He unselfconsciously lists the only sane people to visit UD.

Yes Mung, Why?

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
The whole truth



Posts: 972
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 23 2012,01:20   

Quote (REC @ Sep. 22 2012,20:50)
Mung slips the blinders on:

Quote
454 Mung

If you ask me, people like onlooker, Elizabeth Liddle, CLAVDIVS and Jerad, and yes even MathGrrl, have been treated remarkable well here at UD.

So why do so many people of similar mind feel they need to post at TSZ rather than here?


Yes....why post somewhere they can?  Why don't they  post at the site they are banned from or censored at......

Speaking of which, was Sal 86ed over there?

The IDiots never cease to amaze me with their mental impairments.

mung has dung for a brain.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Zachriel



Posts: 2594
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 23 2012,09:48   

Quote
kairosfocus: UD PRO-DARWINISM ESSAY CHALLENGE: Compose your summary case for darwinism (or any preferred variant that has at least some significant support in the professional literature, such as punctuated equlibria etc) in a fashion that is accessible to the non-technical reader — based on empirical evidence that warrants the inference to body plan level macroevolution — in up to say 6,000 words {a chapter in a serious paper is often about that long}. Outgoing links are welcome so long as they do not become the main point. That is, there must be a coherent essay, with

Quote
(i)an intro,
(ii) a thesis,
(iii) a structure of exposition,
(iv) presentation of empirical warrant that meets the inference to best current empirically grounded explanation test for scientific reconstructions of the remote past,
(v) a discussion and from that
(vi) a warranted conclusion.

Your primary objective should be to show in this way, per IBCE, why there is no need to infer to design from the root of the Darwinian tree of life on up (BTW, it will help to find a way to resolve the various divergent trees), on grounds that the Darwinist explanation, as extended to include OOL, is adequate to explain origin and diversification of the tree of life. A second objective of like level is to show how your thesis is further supported by such evidence as suffices to warrant the onward claim that is is credibly the true or approximately true explanation of origin and body-plan level diversification of life; on blind watchmaker style chance variation plus differential reproductive success, starting with some plausible pre-life circumstance. It would be helpful if in that essay you would outline why alternatives such as design, are inferior on the evidence we face. {as an initial spark for thinking, contrast my own survey of origins science here on (note the onward resources page), the definition of design theory in the UD resources tab top of this and every UD page, the Weak Argument correctives in the same tab, the general resources that pop up on clicking the tab itself, and the discussion of design theory in the NWE article here. You may also want to refer to the site of the IDEA Center, and the Discovery Institute CSC site as well as Mike Gene's Telic Thoughts. Notice IDEA's essay on the case for design here.}

Could start with Darwin's Origin of Species. It's dated, but still a powerful argument. What Darwin considered an abstract is still too long at 190,000 words (6th edition).

Edited by Zachriel on Sep. 23 2012,09:49

--------------
There is only one Tard. The Tard is One.

   
OgreMkV



Posts: 3265
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 23 2012,09:56   

Quote (Zachriel @ Sep. 23 2012,09:48)
Quote
[URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/design-inference/it-seems-that-tsz-objector-to-design-af-insists-on-the-long-since-corrected-canard-that-de

sign-is-a-default-inference/#comment-434245]kairosfocus[/URL]: UD PRO-DARWINISM ESSAY CHALLENGE: Compose your summary case for darwinism (or any preferred variant that has at least some significant support in the professional literature, such as punctuated equlibria etc) in a fashion that is accessible to the non-technical reader — based on empirical evidence that warrants the inference to body plan level macroevolution — in up to say 6,000 words {a chapter in a serious paper is often about that long}. Outgoing links are welcome so long as they do not become the main point. That is, there must be a coherent essay, with

Quote
(i)an intro,
(ii) a thesis,
(iii) a structure of exposition,
(iv) presentation of empirical warrant that meets the inference to best current empirically grounded explanation test for scientific reconstructions of the remote past,
(v) a discussion and from that
(vi) a warranted conclusion.

Your primary objective should be to show in this way, per IBCE, why there is no need to infer to design from the root of the Darwinian tree of life on up (BTW, it will help to find a way to resolve the various divergent trees), on grounds that the Darwinist explanation, as extended to include OOL, is adequate to explain origin and diversification of the tree of life. A second objective of like level is to show how your thesis is further supported by such evidence as suffices to warrant the onward claim that is is credibly the true or approximately true explanation of origin and body-plan level diversification of life; on blind watchmaker style chance variation plus differential reproductive success, starting with some plausible pre-life circumstance. It would be helpful if in that essay you would outline why alternatives such as design, are inferior on the evidence we face. {as an initial spark for thinking, contrast my own survey of origins science here on (note the onward resources page), the definition of design theory in the UD resources tab top of this and every UD page, the Weak Argument correctives in the same tab, the general resources that pop up on clicking the tab itself, and the discussion of design theory in the NWE article here. You may also want to refer to the site of the IDEA Center, and the Discovery Institute CSC site as well as Mike Gene's Telic Thoughts. Notice IDEA's essay on the case for design here.}

Could start with Darwin's Origin of Species. It's dated, but still a powerful argument. What Darwin considered an abstract is still too long at 190,000 words (6th edition).

I could list about a hundred books that fit that bill.  Your INner FIsh being one of the better ones.

Seriously, that's one of the problems with creationists.  They are asking for evidence for things that have been support so well that  no one worries about them anymore.  Civil engineers don't have to derive F=m*a in every paper they write or design they create.  Astronomers don't have to derive the gravitational constant in every paper they write.  Those things are settled.

Just like evolution.  No one argues about evolution.  Now there is some discussion over various parts of evolution, but even if one side "wins", that doesn't fundamentally change the mechanics, processes, or facts of evolution.

Sigh... do they have libraries in Montserrat?  Does Gordon know how to read... he knows how to write.  Or maybe that's just a case of a few monkeys in a few weeks (instead of infinite monkeys in infinite time).

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
olegt



Posts: 1378
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 23 2012,09:57   

Why bother? Creationists are trolls who crave attention. Don't feed the trolls.

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
Zachriel



Posts: 2594
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 23 2012,10:13   

Meanwhile, bornagain77 teaches Joe about relativity.

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-434174

--------------
There is only one Tard. The Tard is One.

   
onlooker



Posts: 17
Joined: Sep. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 23 2012,11:11   

Quote (Learned Hand @ Sep. 22 2012,16:29)
Quote (onlooker @ Sep. 22 2012,10:14)
 
Quote (Lou FCD @ Sep. 22 2012,05:43)
It's getting a little slow around here. We need a new meltdown.

I'm working on it:


Your comment has been censored on grounds that it accused the censor of censorship.

I'm shocked -- that kairosfocus took so long.

  
onlooker



Posts: 17
Joined: Sep. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 23 2012,11:12   

Quote (Patrick @ Sep. 22 2012,18:31)
Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Sep. 22 2012,18:51)
Quote (Patrick @ Sep. 22 2012,17:47)
   
Quote
O makes a false accusation of censorship — probably being amplified all across the slander laced fever swamps as we speak — when O knows full well he was asked to apologise and cease from derail attempts or leave.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......ry_of_O

   
Quote
Story of O (French: Histoire d'O, IPA: [istwa? do]) is an erotic novel published in 1954 about love, dominance and submission by French author Anne Desclos under the pen name Pauline Réage.

Ah, kairosfocus must be oiling Mr. Leathers in anticipation of his next meeting with Onlooker.  One can just imagine the look on his face as he rubs his hand up and down the slick shaft, over and over and over . . . .

I really, really didn't need that image while sipping my morning coffee.

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 23 2012,11:13   

Quote (Zachriel @ Sep. 23 2012,10:13)
Meanwhile, bornagain77 teaches Joe about relativity.

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-434174


Quote
bornagain- yes I am remembering about relativistic mass Thanks again- much appreciated.

Is that right Joe, you are "remembering" are you?

What's it like to be humiliated in public Joe? By Batshitinsane of all people?

But then again, you humiliate yourself every day in RL anyway don't ya just by being Joe!

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 23 2012,11:15   

Quote (onlooker @ Sep. 23 2012,11:12)
I really, really didn't need that image while sipping my morning coffee.

Wait till he covers it in the oil of ad-hominem and sets it ablaze!

Edited by oldmanintheskydidntdoit on Sep. 23 2012,11:15

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
JohnW



Posts: 2200
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 23 2012,11:22   

Quote (Zachriel @ Sep. 23 2012,08:13)
Meanwhile, bornagain77 teaches Joe about relativity.

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-434174

In related news, my cat is teaching next door's golden retriever about Post-Impressionism.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it.
- Robert Byers

  
keiths



Posts: 2040
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 23 2012,12:13   

Lots of UDers have trouble writing comprehensibly (hi, Upright!), but StephenB is still working on reading comprehensibly:
Quote
I would have already asked you for more information and hurried to the library to read more comprehensibly on the subject.


--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number.  -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don’t belong there and thoughts into my mind that don’t belong there. -- KF

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < ... 216 217 218 219 220 [221] 222 223 224 225 226 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]