Joined: June 2004
|Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 11 2010,08:31)|
|Quote (slpage @ Mar. 02 2010,14:24)|
|Quote (carlsonjok @ Feb. 25 2010,20:14)|
|Quote (OgreMkV @ Feb. 25 2010,20:06)|
|Tell me, Joe. Have you ever done a calculation? |
He sure has! Behold!
So, an aardvark only 202 characters?
Didn't Berlinski count 50,000 character differences between cows and whales?
Dr Page proves he is an imbecile.
The definition of an aarvark only has that many characters.
Are you that stupid that you can't even understand what I post?
Do you realize that 13 year olds understand what you cannot?
I see that you - being a scientist and all, what with your degree in electronics engineering - can only respond in that oh so Christian (or is it still Muslim?) spirit.
You see, Berlinski claimed to have gotten to 50,000 characters that seperate whales from camels. You got a mere 202 characters that 'define' an aardvark.
If there are more than 50,000 differences between a whale and a cow, surley there are many more than define each species.
So, this must mean that whales have at the very least nearly 250 times as many characters as aardvarks.
Does that sound right?
Which one of you is correct?