Joined: Jan. 2006
|Quote (VMartin @ Aug. 02 2007,00:48)|
No. Criticism is valid. But only if it leads to alternative hypotheses that can be tested, and then to testing of those hypotheses. That is known as "constructive criticism". What you are doing is known as "bitching".
Sorry, but your arguments remind me exactly of those used by communists. They also accepted ctriticism but only if it was constructive . Unbelievable. They used to say "Criticism yes, but only constructive one". You have to add your own solution of the problem, otherwise you was a saboteur. Consequently criticism was almost impossible.
It is interesting that "sciences" like marxism or (neo)darwinism require from their critics to be constructive.
Do you think it is normal procedure also in the area of real sciences like physics, math? Do not criticise discrepancies in the Maxwell electromagnetic theory! Yet physicists made computations (before 1900) and came to conclusions that this theory is unable to explain some phenomena.
It was Max Planck who gave explanation of them. According you physiscists before Planck were "bitching".
Nice try. First you call us National Socialists, now you call us Communists. You are not very bright, are you? And now you're trying to compare yourelf to Max Planck??
Look, moron. You waste our time with your whining about "Darwinism are evil! You are all communist! You are all atheist! All swans are white, Darwinism can not explain!"
You have not attempted to explain ANYTHING. You have not offered ANY HYPOTHESES. You produce NOTHING.
You don't think 'Darwinism' can explain the color of moths and swans? What is YOUR explanation? Do you even HAVE one?
Do you have ANYTHING other than bitching and calling people Nazis and Communists, you pathetic worm?
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus