RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < ... 92 93 94 95 96 [97] 98 99 100 101 102 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,16:10   

Quote (Woodbine @ Feb. 13 2012,17:06)
Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Feb. 13 2012,21:58)
countdown to barry being found blue faced ball gagged in a wet suit astride toilet plunger hung deep

Makes me wonder what the UD posse would use for 'safe words'.

JoeTard : "Your position!"

Gildo : "Transparent!"

Batsh^t77 : "Semi OT!"

Kairosfocus : "Onlookers, I am experiencing physical and psychological difficulties. Kindly reconnect the oxygen and remove the catheter from my manhood. END!"

....etc.

"Oh Jesus"

the thing about these sick fucks is they don't even HAVE a safe word.  how twisted is THAT????///?/???/???



--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4243
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,16:10   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 13 2012,16:47)
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....s-or-no

 
Quote
..Another update: At another site Eigenstate says he responded here, which is an outrageous lie. At that same site he up an idiot’s answer to the question which is not worth responding to. Suffice it to say it was neither “yes” nor “no.”



I don't believe you, Barry. And why wont you name the other site or link to it?

OK, OK, for God's sake Barry, bring the Friday meltdown to a conclusion. It's Monday. This is getting more than a little scary.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
noncarborundum



Posts: 320
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,16:11   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 13 2012,16:02)
Bonus:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-common

 
Quote
...BTW, as much as I pick on her, I really like Dr. Liddle. I may have mistaken her stubborn insistence on sticking to her guns (in the face of what I perceive as overwhelming and irrefutable arguments to the contrary) as intellectual dishonesty, and if I did I apologize. Dr. Liddle, I hope you continue to post here. As frustrating as you can be, this would be a boring site if we did not have someone from the other side to joust with. And it is fun to joust with you.



Yes, it will be a boring site, Blowhard Barry.

I know they have overwhelming and irrefutable arguments because they mention them all the time, and why would they lie?  And I'm sure that if they would just post a link to the thread where those arguments can be found, we'd all fall into line forthwith.

--------------
"The . . . um . . . okay, I was genetically selected for blue eyes.  I know there are brown eyes, because I've observed them, but I can't do it.  Okay?  So . . . um . . . coz that's real genetic selection, not the nonsense Giberson and the others are talking about." - DO'L

  
REC



Posts: 572
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,16:15   

Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Feb. 13 2012,16:10)
 
Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 13 2012,16:47)
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....s-or-no

   
Quote
..Another update: At another site Eigenstate says he responded here, which is an outrageous lie. At that same site he up an idiot’s answer to the question which is not worth responding to. Suffice it to say it was neither “yes” nor “no.”



I don't believe you, Barry. And why wont you name the other site or link to it?

OK, OK, for God's sake Barry, bring the Friday meltdown to a conclusion. It's Monday. This is getting more than a little scary.

I like that the posting software melts down along with Barry. Unnumbered posts, posts with the same number, timestamps out of order, and non-nested replies. People referring to and quoting from comments that aren't there.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10179
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,16:17   

Not really their proudest day, is it?

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Woodbine



Posts: 784
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,16:28   

Quote (REC @ Feb. 13 2012,22:15)
I like that the posting software melts down along with Barry. Unnumbered posts, posts with the same number, timestamps out of order, and non-nested replies. People referring to and quoting from comments that aren't there.

Yeah, by coincidence the same thing happened a lot to Salvador Corwegotfuckedindova.

We are all too suspicious; these are clearly the necessary birth pangs of a revolution we're witnessing.

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,16:31   

Quote (Woodbine @ Feb. 13 2012,17:28)
Quote (REC @ Feb. 13 2012,22:15)
I like that the posting software melts down along with Barry. Unnumbered posts, posts with the same number, timestamps out of order, and non-nested replies. People referring to and quoting from comments that aren't there.

Yeah, by coincidence the same thing happened a lot to Salvador Corwegotfuckedindova.

We are all too suspicious; these are clearly the necessary birth pangs of a revolution we're witnessing.

PAIRADIME SHIFT!!!!1!!!

ALL SCIENCE SO FAR

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Freddie



Posts: 366
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,16:35   

Quote (REC @ Feb. 13 2012,16:15)
 
Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Feb. 13 2012,16:10)
     
Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 13 2012,16:47)
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....s-or-no

       
Quote
..Another update: At another site Eigenstate says he responded here, which is an outrageous lie. At that same site he up an idiot’s answer to the question which is not worth responding to. Suffice it to say it was neither “yes” nor “no.”



I don't believe you, Barry. And why wont you name the other site or link to it?

OK, OK, for God's sake Barry, bring the Friday meltdown to a conclusion. It's Monday. This is getting more than a little scary.

I like that the posting software melts down along with Barry. Unnumbered posts, posts with the same number, timestamps out of order, and non-nested replies. People referring to and quoting from comments that aren't there.

What shame there was no screenshot saved, given that Barry A has now committed himself irrevocably to the 'there was no post and he was not in moderation' line.  Unfortunate, but we learn from our mistakes.  

Of course, I am pre-supposing that no such screenshot exists ...

--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 886
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,16:41   

And the meltdown continues:
Ben h asks why comments appear to be disappearing.
Harry Barrington replies:  
Quote
I deleted it ben. if ES does not have the guts to post his idiocy here (and he did not), I will not let one of his surrogates do it for him.

Words fail.

--------------
“To surrender to ignorance and call it God has always been premature, and it remains premature today.” - Isaac Asimov

"Grow up, assface" - Joe G., grown up ID spokesperson, Sandwalk, April 2014

  
Woodbine



Posts: 784
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,16:48   

Ben....
Quote
It seems more likely that his reply got lost in the ether somewhere. Expecially, given the problems kairosfocus having posted.

....poor naive fool.

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,17:05   

Quote
Well, bornagain77, does not the absolute speed of light suggest that photons have their own reference- frame exogenous to space-time, presumably beyond the one event horizon of the Big Bang, even though they interact with space-time, and submit to it (in a spirit of subsidiarity favoured by Pope Benedict, nae doot), in that they can be at least partially absorbed by solid surfaces? So that, despite this absolute quality, their speed through space-and the distance they travel through it, can be measured according to the latter’s reference-frame. This seems to me to be the case, and to evoke thoughts of Christ’s Incarnation. Does it not seem that the quantum level of matter might actually already be beyond an immanent event horizon, so that we may shortly arrive at a limit, beyond which analytical reasoning will simply encounter absolute imponderables.




which one of you guys is Axel, again?  amazing that you survived the pogrom.  the trick is to BE the uniform, not just wear it

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 886
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,19:08   

Getting back to a regular DeNews story, Dense reports that one of her science news sources, a site named Creation-Evolution Headlines no less, cites a study that would imply that humans have descended from dogs, not monkeys as the darwinists try to tell us.
In the study dogs outperformed chimpanzees in a certain type of intelligence test. Specifically, dogs understood the concept of (human) pointing (to indicate the location of food) better than the chimps.
This of course doesn't completely destroy darwinism, but creates a huge problem for it. Why? Because dogs don't have fingers!
Dense:  
Quote
So dogs learned to detect a message using fingers, which they don’t have, but chimps, which have fingers, didn’t learn to detect the message? Jane Goodall, check YOUR messages.

I tell you, man, evilution's days are numbered.

--------------
“To surrender to ignorance and call it God has always been premature, and it remains premature today.” - Isaac Asimov

"Grow up, assface" - Joe G., grown up ID spokesperson, Sandwalk, April 2014

  
JohnW



Posts: 2248
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,19:16   

Quote (khan @ Feb. 13 2012,08:10)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 13 2012,10:34)
1. ID is real science, not religion!
2a. But we're all fundies.
2b. We just do science differently, by telling you what other science can't do, therefore ID
3. Because of this, we don't need labs.
4. We're 100% for free enquiry. End censorship! We even did a film on it.
5. We don't like peer review, though
6. And we don't like science blogs
7. But we have our own blog!
8. We get to pick the subjects (lots of Jesus)
9. And if you don't agree with us, you get banned.
10. And if you don't say what we want you get banned, before you've not said it.

All science so far!

Did I miss anything?

Orwell or Kafka?

Curly, Larry or Moe?

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it.
- Robert Byers

  
Woodbine



Posts: 784
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,19:23   

So humans descended from dogs, eh?

D'nyse ?

(a million points if you spot the ludicrously obscure reference)

  
noncarborundum



Posts: 320
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,20:04   

Quote (Woodbine @ Feb. 13 2012,19:23)
So humans descended from dogs, eh?

D'nyse ?

(a million points if you spot the ludicrously obscure reference)

Ballad of Lost C'Mell?

--------------
"The . . . um . . . okay, I was genetically selected for blue eyes.  I know there are brown eyes, because I've observed them, but I can't do it.  Okay?  So . . . um . . . coz that's real genetic selection, not the nonsense Giberson and the others are talking about." - DO'L

  
keiths



Posts: 2041
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,20:06   

Quote (Ptaylor @ Feb. 13 2012,17:08)
Getting back to a regular DeNews story, Dense reports that one of her science news sources, a site named Creation-Evolution Headlines no less, cites a study that would imply that humans have descended from dogs, not monkeys as the darwinists try to tell us.
In the study dogs outperformed chimpanzees in a certain type of intelligence test. Specifically, dogs understood the concept of (human) pointing (to indicate the location of food) better than the chimps.
This of course doesn't completely destroy darwinism, but creates a huge problem for it. Why? Because dogs don't have fingers!
Dense:
Quote
So dogs learned to detect a message using fingers, which they don’t have, but chimps, which have fingers, didn’t learn to detect the message? Jane Goodall, check YOUR messages.

I tell you, man, evilution's days are numbered.

Yes, while we've been absorbed with Barry's flameout, Denyse has been steadily cranking out the tard, never failing to meet her quota.

A couple of days ago, in a post entitled Male snakes show mystical Darwinian knowledge?, Denyse quotes a Science Daily article:
Quote
Large and older females, preferred by male snakes because they can produce more babies, also have a slightly different chemical signature in their pheromone. Young, small, females can still attract suitors, but not as readily.

Denyse actually thinks the author is talking about a conscious calculation on the part of the male snakes:
Quote
Male snakes clearly can’t tell a she from a he-on-estrogen, so what mystical Darwinian knowledge causes them to prefer a bigger female because she “can produce more babies”? They know? They care?

You think they've found that selfish gene yet, Denyse?

--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number.  -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

  
noncarborundum



Posts: 320
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,20:09   

Quote (keiths @ Feb. 13 2012,20:06)
Quote (Ptaylor @ Feb. 13 2012,17:08)
Getting back to a regular DeNews story, Dense reports that one of her science news sources, a site named Creation-Evolution Headlines no less, cites a study that would imply that humans have descended from dogs, not monkeys as the darwinists try to tell us.
In the study dogs outperformed chimpanzees in a certain type of intelligence test. Specifically, dogs understood the concept of (human) pointing (to indicate the location of food) better than the chimps.
This of course doesn't completely destroy darwinism, but creates a huge problem for it. Why? Because dogs don't have fingers!
Dense:  
Quote
So dogs learned to detect a message using fingers, which they don’t have, but chimps, which have fingers, didn’t learn to detect the message? Jane Goodall, check YOUR messages.

I tell you, man, evilution's days are numbered.

Yes, while we've been absorbed with Barry's flameout, Denyse has been steadily cranking out the tard, never failing to meet her quota.

A couple of days ago, in a post entitled Male snakes show mystical Darwinian knowledge?, Denyse quotes a Science Daily article:
 
Quote
Large and older females, preferred by male snakes because they can produce more babies, also have a slightly different chemical signature in their pheromone. Young, small, females can still attract suitors, but not as readily.

Denyse actually thinks the author is talking about a conscious calculation on the part of the male snakes:
 
Quote
Male snakes clearly can’t tell a she from a he-on-estrogen, so what mystical Darwinian knowledge causes them to prefer a bigger female because she “can produce more babies”? They know? They care?

You think they've found that selfish gene yet, Denyse?

Nah. She was genetically selected for tard.

--------------
"The . . . um . . . okay, I was genetically selected for blue eyes.  I know there are brown eyes, because I've observed them, but I can't do it.  Okay?  So . . . um . . . coz that's real genetic selection, not the nonsense Giberson and the others are talking about." - DO'L

  
Woodbine



Posts: 784
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,20:11   

Quote (noncarborundum @ Feb. 14 2012,02:04)
Quote (Woodbine @ Feb. 13 2012,19:23)
So humans descended from dogs, eh?

D'nyse ?

(a million points if you spot the ludicrously obscure reference)

Ballad of Lost C'Mell?

BASTARD!

:angry:

Your million points are being held in a vault on Montserrat.

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3311
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,20:12   

Quote (noncarborundum @ Feb. 13 2012,20:09)
Quote (keiths @ Feb. 13 2012,20:06)
 
Quote (Ptaylor @ Feb. 13 2012,17:08)
Getting back to a regular DeNews story, Dense reports that one of her science news sources, a site named Creation-Evolution Headlines no less, cites a study that would imply that humans have descended from dogs, not monkeys as the darwinists try to tell us.
In the study dogs outperformed chimpanzees in a certain type of intelligence test. Specifically, dogs understood the concept of (human) pointing (to indicate the location of food) better than the chimps.
This of course doesn't completely destroy darwinism, but creates a huge problem for it. Why? Because dogs don't have fingers!
Dense:  
Quote
So dogs learned to detect a message using fingers, which they don’t have, but chimps, which have fingers, didn’t learn to detect the message? Jane Goodall, check YOUR messages.

I tell you, man, evilution's days are numbered.

Yes, while we've been absorbed with Barry's flameout, Denyse has been steadily cranking out the tard, never failing to meet her quota.

A couple of days ago, in a post entitled Male snakes show mystical Darwinian knowledge?, Denyse quotes a Science Daily article:
 
Quote
Large and older females, preferred by male snakes because they can produce more babies, also have a slightly different chemical signature in their pheromone. Young, small, females can still attract suitors, but not as readily.

Denyse actually thinks the author is talking about a conscious calculation on the part of the male snakes:
 
Quote
Male snakes clearly can’t tell a she from a he-on-estrogen, so what mystical Darwinian knowledge causes them to prefer a bigger female because she “can produce more babies”? They know? They care?

You think they've found that selfish gene yet, Denyse?

Nah. She was genetically selected for tard.

Does she get paid by the word (or something resembling a word)?

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
noncarborundum



Posts: 320
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,20:14   

Quote (Woodbine @ Feb. 13 2012,20:11)
 
Quote (noncarborundum @ Feb. 14 2012,02:04)
   
Quote (Woodbine @ Feb. 13 2012,19:23)
So humans descended from dogs, eh?

D'nyse ?

(a million points if you spot the ludicrously obscure reference)

Ballad of Lost C'Mell?

BASTARD!

:angry:

Your million points are being held in a vault on Montserrat.

Surrounded by a flaming wall of strawmen soaked in oil of ad hominem, no doubt.

--------------
"The . . . um . . . okay, I was genetically selected for blue eyes.  I know there are brown eyes, because I've observed them, but I can't do it.  Okay?  So . . . um . . . coz that's real genetic selection, not the nonsense Giberson and the others are talking about." - DO'L

  
noncarborundum



Posts: 320
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,20:16   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Feb. 13 2012,20:12)
Quote (noncarborundum @ Feb. 13 2012,20:09)
 
Quote (keiths @ Feb. 13 2012,20:06)
   
Quote (Ptaylor @ Feb. 13 2012,17:08)
Getting back to a regular DeNews story, Dense reports that one of her science news sources, a site named Creation-Evolution Headlines no less, cites a study that would imply that humans have descended from dogs, not monkeys as the darwinists try to tell us.
In the study dogs outperformed chimpanzees in a certain type of intelligence test. Specifically, dogs understood the concept of (human) pointing (to indicate the location of food) better than the chimps.
This of course doesn't completely destroy darwinism, but creates a huge problem for it. Why? Because dogs don't have fingers!
Dense:    
Quote
So dogs learned to detect a message using fingers, which they don’t have, but chimps, which have fingers, didn’t learn to detect the message? Jane Goodall, check YOUR messages.

I tell you, man, evilution's days are numbered.

Yes, while we've been absorbed with Barry's flameout, Denyse has been steadily cranking out the tard, never failing to meet her quota.

A couple of days ago, in a post entitled Male snakes show mystical Darwinian knowledge?, Denyse quotes a Science Daily article:
   
Quote
Large and older females, preferred by male snakes because they can produce more babies, also have a slightly different chemical signature in their pheromone. Young, small, females can still attract suitors, but not as readily.

Denyse actually thinks the author is talking about a conscious calculation on the part of the male snakes:
   
Quote
Male snakes clearly can’t tell a she from a he-on-estrogen, so what mystical Darwinian knowledge causes them to prefer a bigger female because she “can produce more babies”? They know? They care?

You think they've found that selfish gene yet, Denyse?

Nah. She was genetically selected for tard.

Does she get paid by the word (or something resembling a word)?

She thinks so, but so far she hasn't figured out which word.

--------------
"The . . . um . . . okay, I was genetically selected for blue eyes.  I know there are brown eyes, because I've observed them, but I can't do it.  Okay?  So . . . um . . . coz that's real genetic selection, not the nonsense Giberson and the others are talking about." - DO'L

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4243
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,20:18   

KF:



You mean "where commenters go."

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,20:26   

gordon is 6, barry is 9

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Tracy P. Hamilton



Posts: 1238
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,20:49   

Quote (Woodbine @ Feb. 13 2012,16:06)
Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Feb. 13 2012,21:58)
countdown to barry being found blue faced ball gagged in a wet suit astride toilet plunger hung deep

Makes me wonder what the UD posse would use for 'safe words'.

JoeTard : "Your position!"

Gildo : "Transparent!"

Batsh^t77 : "Semi OT!"

Kairosfocus : "Onlookers, I am experiencing physical and psychological difficulties. Kindly reconnect the oxygen and remove the catheter from my manhood. END!"

....etc.

After that Kairosfocus said "I am about to PS myself!"

--------------
"Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV

"The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen

"We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

  
Hermagoras



Posts: 1260
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,22:41   

Hi all.  Haven't checked in here for a while, but I see the tard-mines are still rich with ore.

--------------
"I am not currently proving that objective morality is true. I did that a long time ago and you missed it." -- StephenB

http://paralepsis.blogspot.com/....pot.com

   
keiths



Posts: 2041
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,22:56   

Quote (Hermagoras @ Feb. 13 2012,20:41)
Hi all.  Haven't checked in here for a while, but I see the tard-mines are still rich with ore.

Hi, Herm!  I've concluded that tard is a renewable resource, praise be to the Designer!

--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number.  -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

  
fnxtr



Posts: 2136
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,23:06   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 13 2012,14:02)
Bonus:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-common

Quote
...BTW, as much as I pick on her, I really like Dr. Liddle. I may have mistaken her stubborn insistence on sticking to her guns (in the face of what I perceive as overwhelming and irrefutable arguments to the contrary) as intellectual dishonesty, and if I did I apologize. Dr. Liddle, I hope you continue to post here. As frustrating as you can be, this would be a boring site if we did not have someone from the other side to joust with. And it is fun to joust with you.



Yes, it will be a boring site, Blowhard Barry.

Dude, the brakes are on the handlebars.

Backpedalling doesn't work.

--------------
"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,23:09   

Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 14 2012,00:06)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 13 2012,14:02)
Bonus:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-common

 
Quote
...BTW, as much as I pick on her, I really like Dr. Liddle. I may have mistaken her stubborn insistence on sticking to her guns (in the face of what I perceive as overwhelming and irrefutable arguments to the contrary) as intellectual dishonesty, and if I did I apologize. Dr. Liddle, I hope you continue to post here. As frustrating as you can be, this would be a boring site if we did not have someone from the other side to joust with. And it is fun to joust with you.



Yes, it will be a boring site, Blowhard Barry.

Dude, the brakes are on the handlebars.

Backpedalling doesn't work.

he sounds like he haz a sad



--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Tracy P. Hamilton



Posts: 1238
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,23:32   

Kairosfocus gives a QM lecture:

Quote
The predominant concept of the benzine ring structure; sometimes this is viewed as a superposition of individual bond structures. At any rate the possibility of quantum systems based on superposed "parent" states is acknowledged. indeed, this is held to be so for, for instance, the Carboxylic acid group, -COOH


1) Individual bond structures are not wave functions, so their combination is not superposition.  In superposition states you can collapse the wave function to one term.
You cannot get kekule' benzene.
2) The orbital approximation uses PRODUCTS of one electron functions called orbitals.  Superpositions are sums.
3) Additional improvements are to better describe a single stationary state.
4) COOH has a bouble bond and a single bond.  COO- has two identical C-O bonds

Entangled photons at LHC - now thats-a superpositiona!

--------------
"Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV

"The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen

"We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 1670
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2012,23:53   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Feb. 13 2012,08:31)
Has Barry Arrington stopped having sex with his mother? Yes or no.

No excuses for not responding, and no wishy-washy answers.

Jupiter!

--------------
Like every other academic field, philosophy of religion has its share of hacks and mediocrities.  Edward Feser

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < ... 92 93 94 95 96 [97] 98 99 100 101 102 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]