Joined: Oct. 2011
|Quote (OgreMkV @ Oct. 23 2011,07:52)|
|Quote (forastero @ Oct. 23 2011,03:40)|
|Again more so called pseudoempericism and to say that no kinds of radiometric contamination are alterations occurred in billions or even thousands of years is as ridiculous as saying dinosaur soft tissue can last millions of years.|
And your first and only link is a bit broad wouldn’t you say? Thus, I just went to the first book and whata ya know. http://books.google.com/books?i....f=false
It wasnt just Cambrian explosions, but Ordovician explosions, Silurian explosion, Devonian explosions, carboniferous explosions, Triassic explosion, Jurassic explosion, Cretaceous explosion, Paleocene explosion, Eocene explosion, Oligocene explosion, Miocene explosion, Pleistocene explosions.
..and no good evidence for intermediates so your priests came up with super sun god powered punctuated equilibrium
You are making claims, then you need to support them. Please provide evidence for you assertion that any of the fundamental forces in our universe have changed over time. The mere fact that you are using a computer shows that this is wrong.
Further, astronomers can see backwards in time and observe that the fundamental forces of our universe are the same 13 billion years ago as the are now.
You can just ignore the evidence, but it just makes you look like a dummy. Sorry, but that's the way it is.
Now, as to the book... here's what it says in regards to an explosion:
The term 'Big Bang' implies some sort of explosion, which is a not wholly inappropriate analogy, except that the Big Bang was not an explosion in space, but an explosion of space.
So, what exploded? It couldn't have been a thermonuclear explosion as you think since matter didn't exist at the time of the Big Bang. It couldn't have been matter/anti-matter, etc.
Do you see that word 'analogy'? A not wholly appropriate analogy.
You are making an argument about AN ANALOGY. This is just another strawman argument and has absolutely nothing to do with reality.
-Uniformitarianism is pseudoscience because in reality our sun is dying, the earths rotational spin is slowing, Lunar rotations are dissipating, ocean currents are slowing, the earth's internal heat is cooling, tectonics is slowing, star migration is slowing, the magnetic field is weakening, the hydrologic cycle is drying up, oceanic tides are weakening, fruits and vegetables of today have lost large percentages of their mineral content over the last 50 years, bones are becoming less dense, etc.......
-I used nuclear explosion as just one of the ways some scientists explain the big bang but why on earth do you deny that nucleosynthesis explosions? Do you also deny nucleosynthesis from supernova explosions?
-I'm actually mostly just answering all the questions since you refuse to answer how mutations and natural selection creates life