RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (10) < 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... >   
  Topic: Top Tard Quotes, Surely you save them too....< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 03 2008,23:40   

Har, har...I'd explain the difference, but that would be considered "witnessing" which is highly looked down upon by Lou.  Wouldn't want to get banned or anything.  Something tells me though, that I may be on his shit list very soon unless he isn't as sensitive as PZ & Skatje.

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10094
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 04 2008,00:02   

Quote (Ftk @ Jan. 03 2008,23:40)
Har, har...I'd explain the difference, but that would be considered "witnessing" which is highly looked down upon by Lou.  Wouldn't want to get banned or anything.  Something tells me though, that I may be on his shit list very soon unless he isn't as sensitive as PZ & Skatje.

Here miss, you've dropped your crown of thorns.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
IanBrown_101



Posts: 927
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 04 2008,05:27   

Quote (Ftk @ Jan. 04 2008,05:40)
Har, har...I'd explain the difference, but that would be considered "witnessing" which is highly looked down upon by Lou.  Wouldn't want to get banned or anything.  Something tells me though, that I may be on his shit list very soon unless he isn't as sensitive as PZ & Skatje.

So there is a difference between incest as the world is now, and incest if  theres only one family left?

[ye olde London towne paperboy voice]READ ALL AB-OUT IT! FTK DECLARES CHRISTIAN MORALITY TO BE TOTALLY SUBJECT-IVE![/ye olde London towne paperboy voice]

(and by extension god is therefore either mistaken or not perfect. Or both.)

--------------
I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest.

You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK

Roddenberry is my God.

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 04 2008,09:21   

Ian it could very well be that GAWD LIEKS TEH INSESSED.  

Since he is big on this theme of destruction regeneration, he has jumpstarted the flora and fauna of earth from pairs of creatures at least twice.  So that is a lot of generations of banging your sisters cousins second cousins nieces great granddaughters etc etc etc.  

For. Every. Species. On. The. Planet. Twice.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 08 2008,08:21   

Tard  This guy never fails to deliver some really potent shit.  Searing hot off of the stove too.

Quote
OUTKAST 01.08.08 AT 8:32 AM
The fact remains, and God-haters like Musing and RDean/donato will never be able to explain it, that if Evolution were true there would be millions of fossils of in-between creatures, plus half-dog/half-ape, half-human/half-elephant transitional creatures all over the earth.

What a total joke Evolution is


You forgot the Pygmies and Dwarves!

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
stevestory



Posts: 8878
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 08 2008,08:33   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ Jan. 04 2008,10:21)
So that is a lot of generations of banging your sisters cousins second cousins nieces great granddaughters etc etc etc.

It's a dirty job, but somebody's gotta do it...

   
keiths



Posts: 2041
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 08 2008,14:55   

From the folks who brought you Darwin's Deadly Legacy:


--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number.  -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don't belong there and thoughts into my mind that don't belong there. -- KF

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4361
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 08 2008,15:13   

And so The Lord God sayest unto Adam, "Thou must pullest my finger".

And it was so.

And thus The Lord God did think to himself, Holy Shit are these peole dumb! They shalt believest anything!  

And it was so.

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
Mr_Christopher



Posts: 1238
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 09 2008,12:28   

My current favorite tard quote (as seen in my signature):

Quote
At the same time that research in the Bible Code has taken off, research in a seemingly unrelated field has taken off as well, namely, biological design.

These two fields are in fact closely related.  This convergence of the Bible Code and biological design should not seem surprising

-William Dembski, PhD


Hey Bill, we don't find the convergence of the Bible Code and biological design surprising at all. Not one bit!  And yes we can see how they are both related.  

Chris!

--------------
Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

  
Mr_Christopher



Posts: 1238
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 09 2008,12:54   

Another favorite tard quote

   
Quote
Why is it important to know about angels? Why is it important to know about rocks and plants and animals? It's important because all of these are aspects of reality that impinge on us. The problem with the secular intelligentsia is that they deny those aspects of reality that are inconvenient to their world-picture. And since the intelligentsia are by definition intelligent (though rarely wise), they are able to rationalize away what they find inconvenient. This is what Bishop Sheen was getting at with the previous quote when he referred to the intelligentsia rationalizing evil, and this what Williams is so successful at unmasking in the intelligentsia's rejection of angels.

There exists an invisible world that is more real and weighty than our secular imaginations can fathom.

William Dembski, PhD


(emphasis mine)

Bill you are so right and I feel so unmasked!!!

You nailed it too - I don't reject the winged humanoid theory because there has never been a shred of evidence that they exist, I reject them because as you say it is inconvenient to [my]world-picture and boy oh boy I hate to be inconvenienced!  Thank you for "unmasking" my rejection of these winged humanoids you call "Angels"

I have a question for you, Dr Dembski, perhaps somewhere in one of your 5 PhDs you'll be able to come up with an answer.

If I accept the winged (bird) humanoid theory, should I also accept the winged (insect) humanoid theory as in fairies?  If we allow our world view to include Angels (in spite of the inconvenience and lack of evidence) should we also allow it to include fairies since they are nearly identical to Angels.  I mean the only difference is one has bird wings and the other has insect wings.  

Also, Billy, one more question.  Can you show me on a map where this "invisible world that is more real and weighty than our secular imaginations can fathom" is actually located?  That would be super cool if you could help me locate it.  My world now is pretty dang real so I'm really interested in this "invisible world" that is even "more real" (and "weighty") than the one I now call home.  

Thanks in advance, Bill!  Reading you sometimes is like even better than taking acid!

--------------
Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

  
Mr_Christopher



Posts: 1238
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 09 2008,13:03   

One more top tard quote for me :-)

Quote
"I'm concerned about...ID's claims to science are dishonest, confused, ignorant."
William Dembski PhD


Ok, so maybe I used a trick popularized by Dembski and his quote mining tards at the DI on that one...

See the full quote/drama here

--------------
Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

  
Assassinator



Posts: 479
Joined: Nov. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 12 2008,12:19   

A Dutch ID proponent (although he's not your avarage Behe, he's trying though at least not knowing that he sounds like a stuck and véry old record) has put this in his signature recently, I think because of our ID-disscussion:
Quote
What evidence would it take to prove your beliefs wrong?

So much arrogance from an IT-person, who had no training on biology, ecology and aaaaall evolution connected subjects.

  
Mister DNA



Posts: 466
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 12 2008,19:40   

I installed a Random Tard Quote Generator at the Church Burnin' Ebola Blog today, using some classic quotes from AtBC and FSTDT.

I figured I'd add this one here - it's from FSTDT, and quite possibly one of the stupidest things I've read on the internet:
Quote
One of the most basic laws in the universe is the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This states that as time goes by, entropy in an environment will increase. Evolution argues differently against a law that is accepted EVERYWHERE BY EVERYONE. Evolution says that we started out simple, and over time became more complex. That just isn't possible: UNLESS there is a giant outside source of energy supplying the Earth with huge amounts of energy. If there were such a source, scientists would certainly know about it.

Original Source

--------------
CBEB's: The Church Burnin' Ebola Blog
Thank you, Dr. Dembski. You are without peer when it comes to The Argument Regarding Design. - vesf

    
Henry J



Posts: 4046
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 12 2008,21:59   

Um. If I might ask, which side was the author of that quote on? Is it possible that he or she looked up and saw the light, so to speak? :p

Henry

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5377
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 12 2008,22:55   

Yeah, I think it was determined a while back that Poe's law should be appropriately invoked on that quote.

--------------
Lou FCD is still in school, so we should only count him as a baby biologist. -carlsonjok -deprecated
I think I might love you. Don't tell Deadman -Wolfhound

Work-friendly photography
NSFW photography

   
Mister DNA



Posts: 466
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 13 2008,12:13   

Quote (Lou FCD @ Jan. 12 2008,22:55)
Yeah, I think it was determined a while back that Poe's law should be appropriately invoked on that quote.

Are you sure? I checked the Smash Brothers' forum where that quote originated and the guy seemed sincere in his Tard (he followed it up with "the sun doesn't count because it doesn't bring dead plants back to life").

I'm not going to add any SuperSport quotes because I believe Poe applies in his case, but as a rule of thumb, if it comes from CARM or Christian Forums, it's got the Tard Seal of Approval™.

Which reminds me... I need to dig up some LittleNipper quotes from CF.

--------------
CBEB's: The Church Burnin' Ebola Blog
Thank you, Dr. Dembski. You are without peer when it comes to The Argument Regarding Design. - vesf

    
Paul Flocken



Posts: 290
Joined: Dec. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2008,08:45   

Here is an mildly amusing piece of tard (title: ALL WET) that I ripped out of a newspaper some time back, stuck in a book and promptly forgot.  I ran over it this morning and thought it belonged here.  I think my favorite tards are the ones who completely undercut their arguments by making the totally ignorant statements like "when the cold loses its energy, the snowflake will melt back to water"

The Tard in full:

All wet
EDITOR: The letter of Nov. 29 “It’s physics,” shows once again the circular logic of those trying to prove evolution, extrapolating life from non-life.

The example used of a snowflake formed from water vapor actually belongs to the 1st Law of Thermodynamics, the Conservation of Energy. This law states that matter and energy are not being created or destroyed, they only change from one form to another. Hence, the water molecule changes from gas to liquid to ice and back again, with the input of heat or cold. Yes, two systems have to work in conjunction to trade energy back and forth, but nothing new is being created.

… When the cold loses its energy, the snowflake will melt back to water. There’s no new life, no new form that wasn’t there before.

From where I sit, these two laws still blow your theory out of the water.

C-----a S-------h(name withheld to protect the guilty)

Wilmington

--------------
"The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie--deliberate, contrived, and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.  Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."-John F. Kennedy

  
JohnW



Posts: 2226
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 16 2008,10:59   

Quote (Paul Flocken @ Jan. 16 2008,06:45)
Here is an mildly amusing piece of tard (title: ALL WET) that I ripped out of a newspaper some time back, stuck in a book and promptly forgot.  I ran over it this morning and thought it belonged here.  I think my favorite tards are the ones who completely undercut their arguments by making the totally ignorant statements like "when the cold loses its energy, the snowflake will melt back to water"

The Tard in full:

All wet
EDITOR: The letter of Nov. 29 “It’s physics,” shows once again the circular logic of those trying to prove evolution, extrapolating life from non-life.

The example used of a snowflake formed from water vapor actually belongs to the 1st Law of Thermodynamics, the Conservation of Energy. This law states that matter and energy are not being created or destroyed, they only change from one form to another. Hence, the water molecule changes from gas to liquid to ice and back again, with the input of heat or cold. Yes, two systems have to work in conjunction to trade energy back and forth, but nothing new is being created.

… When the cold loses its energy, the snowflake will melt back to water. There’s no new life, no new form that wasn’t there before.

From where I sit, these two laws still blow your theory out of the water.

C-----a S-------h(name withheld to protect the guilty)

Wilmington

Quote
When the cold loses its energy


Beautiful.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it.
- Robert Byers

  
Henry J



Posts: 4046
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2008,20:32   

Quote
When the cold loses its energy


I wish the cold around where I live would lose some of it's energy... :p

(Metaphorically speaking, that is. :) )

Henry

  
Peter Henderson



Posts: 298
Joined: Aug. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 18 2008,05:03   

Quote
I wish the cold around where I live would lose some of it's energy


Immigrate to Norn Iron Henry ;)  It's never cold here in the winter (+13C today). Probably all that global warming.

Still, I don't know what all the fuss is about on this thread. All this crap can be found here:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/

on one well funded and beutifully maintained website. Millions of well educated Americans are buying into this rubbish (look how successful the creation museum has been).

We're no better though. here's one of our very own tards in action:

http://godtube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=f213f155a82244b4a696

http://godtube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=824a4e34f9293de3b15a

http://godtube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=a11c56ee30acd5455fce

I apologise if  some people find the above frustrating



;)

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5377
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 18 2008,06:05   

Quote (Peter Henderson @ Jan. 18 2008,06:03)
Still, I don't know what all the fuss is about on this thread.

Peter, it's kind of like amateur porn.  Sure, all the pros can do it bigger, better, with more refinement and higher standards of production, but the amateurs hold a certain je ne sais quoi for some of us.

Sure, Evel Knievel could jump 50 school buses on his rocket powered motorcycle in Madison Square Garden with fireworks and flaming hoops, miss the landing, and splatter all over the far wall.  Sometimes it's just more fun to watch your drunk neighbor Bob ride his bicycle off his roof and totally miss the swimming pool.

--------------
Lou FCD is still in school, so we should only count him as a baby biologist. -carlsonjok -deprecated
I think I might love you. Don't tell Deadman -Wolfhound

Work-friendly photography
NSFW photography

   
Bob O'H



Posts: 1967
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 18 2008,08:27   

Quote
I wish the cold around where I live would lose some of it's energy... :p

Ha!  That'll only happen when Hell freezes over.

--------------
ID theorists don’t postulate a designer for their arguments. - Crandaddy
There is no connection between a peppered moth, natural selection, and religion that I can see. - FtK

   
Peter Henderson



Posts: 298
Joined: Aug. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 18 2008,08:35   

Quote
Sometimes it's just more fun to watch your drunk neighbor Bob ride his bicycle off his roof and totally miss the swimming pool.


Nice one Lou . I see what you mean ! :D

  
Mister DNA



Posts: 466
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 18 2008,16:53   

I'm surprised our own Erasmus hasn't posted this yet:

ICR Defends Creationist Degree

There's some choice Tard there, including this response to Erasmus:

Quote
Erasmus #2: In your estimation, which civil rights laws would this be violating? By the way, I believe in creation science, and truly understand the earth is not 6000 yrs old. It’s more like 10,000, but no more than that.


6000 years? That's nuts! 10,000 is a much more reasonable estimate.

--------------
CBEB's: The Church Burnin' Ebola Blog
Thank you, Dr. Dembski. You are without peer when it comes to The Argument Regarding Design. - vesf

    
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2778
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 23 2008,07:10   

On UD, the blog where tolerance and openness are encouraged (NOT), russ wonders
Quote
How would a Darwinist explain his own abusive behavior in Darwinian terms? Why has nature selected for such behavior in him, but tolerant and patient behavior in the likes of you?


--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
Mr_Christopher



Posts: 1238
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 23 2008,09:42   

Yet another favorite tard quote, this is one where the IDist is openly lying:

Quote
can you or they provide any samples of things that intelligent design theory has predicted, which researchers have later determined to be true?

I have my own list of answers... - William Dembski, PhD


--------------
Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

  
Coyote



Posts: 21
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 23 2008,10:51   

Here is one from FreeRepublic (post #416 if the link does not go to the exact spot):

 
Quote
Here’s the great hting (for the evo side) most of the assumptions about past unkowns can’t be proven, but they sure can be shoved down our kids throats despite a complete lakcof evidence and biological support- infact- it’s worse than that- it’s shoved down our kids throats despite overwhelming evidences that show the impossibiltities of it and it’s called science? If the evidence backs them into a corner? Heck, no problem- just adjust the assumptions to suit your needs with hypothesis that also rests entirely on assumptions.

And no, this is not a spoof.

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4361
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 23 2008,11:04   

Quote (Coyote @ Jan. 23 2008,10:51)
Here is one from FreeRepublic (post #416 if the link does not go to the exact spot):

 
Quote
Here’s the great hting (for the evo side) most of the assumptions about past unkowns can’t be proven, but they sure can be shoved down our kids throats despite a complete lakcof evidence and biological support- infact- it’s worse than that- it’s shoved down our kids throats despite overwhelming evidences that show the impossibiltities of it and it’s called science? If the evidence backs them into a corner? Heck, no problem- just adjust the assumptions to suit your needs with hypothesis that also rests entirely on assumptions.

And no, this is not a spoof.

Ouch!  Based on the mentions by the writer of "shoving it down the kids throats", I think someone needs to dial 911 and report them for child abuse.  (Highlights mine, because I can.)

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 24 2008,08:30   

Soon To Be Tard-Fest

I am posting this in anticipation of there being some wonderful material to put here from my favorite fundie idiot blog.

I would love to see some of you guys over there.  I'm afraid you might have to register.  i can't remember.

The poster (Harrison S Key) is a particularly stupid talking head over there and is not a bit scared to make grandiose pronouncements on topics that he knows absolutely jack-f-ing-shit about.  I would like to take him snipe huntin'.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5377
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 24 2008,09:57   

Oh yeah, that's looking like a great new place to mine for Tard.

Quote (StuBob @ 01.24.08 at 10:11 am)
OK, I’m going to propose we do something totally and uncharacteristically scientific here.
 

That would actually be refreshing already.  But alas, StuBob shows exactly why doing something scientific is totally uncharacteristic of his lot:

Quote (StuBob @ 01.24.08 at 10:11 am)
Instead of, ahem, devolving into a discussion about the relative merits of Intelligent Design, how about we actually get some posts on the actual topic of “The Hopeful Monster”?

Why don’t some of you scientists tell what you believe and why? “Creationists are stupid” is boorish, boring, and leaves the real subject unaddressed.


He forgot "accurate".

Edited to add the link.

Edited by Lou FCD on Jan. 24 2008,10:58

--------------
Lou FCD is still in school, so we should only count him as a baby biologist. -carlsonjok -deprecated
I think I might love you. Don't tell Deadman -Wolfhound

Work-friendly photography
NSFW photography

   
  297 replies since June 28 2007,14:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (10) < 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]