RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (249) < ... 163 164 165 166 167 [168] 169 170 171 172 173 ... >   
  Topic: Joe G.'s Tardgasm, How long can it last?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 17 2012,12:43   

Joe, do you ever get tired of taking it from clowns?

JoeTard: "Let me see your thumbs!"

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 10065
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 17 2012,13:15   

Joe is also having problems with the concept of "prediction", but I'm not surprised given his limited understanding of science.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3260
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 17 2012,13:41   

Joe doesn't even seem to understand what 'corwardice' is.  My reply...

Quote
BTW: Have you read the Sensuous Curmedgeon's "about" page?  He specifically states that his blog is not for debate.  It is for the dissemination (not insemination, Joe) of events about the religious war on science.  That's it.  

If you want to debate someone, then feel free.  I'm always happy to debate you... at AtBC where it is unmoderated and neither of us have the ability to delete or otherwise alter posts.  You don't because you continually get beat there.

Who is the coward Joe? I still have questions for you that you haven't answered.  You can't answer them so you ignore them.  You have never said "I don't know" or "I was wrong".  It takes a real man to admit he was wrong about something.

A real coward is afraid to have his ideas put to the test.  He's afraid of admitting what he is.  He's afraid of stating what he really thinks about his own ideas.

Someone like you Joe.  Sorry, but it's the truth.  Who's the designer, Joe?  Everyone knows it's God.  Every other ID proponent admits it's God, unless there are reporters around, but they do.  Your buddy Behe admitted it in a court of law.  So why don't you?  Because then you have to admit that ID has no evidence, just miracles.  For whatever reason, you can't handle that.

I don't ban you because I'm afraid of you or your idiotic ideas.  I ban you because you are a rude, foul-mouthed, jerk with megalomaniacal delusions.  I don't want you pissing all over my nice clean floor.  You clean yourself up and pretend to be nice (and answer questions asked of you instead of trying to divert attention away from what you just said) and you'll be allowed to post again.

It's your choice, but it's my blog.

Of course, you can always find me at AtBC, but you just pop in now and again, and run away whenever someone asks you questions you can't handle.


--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
The whole truth



Posts: 971
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 18 2012,05:54   

Hey joey g, since you block a lot of comments on your blog-o-tard, I'll ask you this here:

Does a butterfly have more "CSI" than a moth? There are more letters in the word butterfly than in the word moth so according to what you've said about measuring "CSI" do you think that butterflies have more "CSI" than moths?

The Free Dictionary.com has these definitions:

moth: Any of numerous insects of the order Lepidoptera, generally distinguished from butterflies by their nocturnal activity, hairlike or feathery antennae, stout bodies, and the frenulum that holds the front and back wings together.

butterfly: Any of various insects of the order Lepidoptera, characteristically having slender bodies, knobbed antennae, and four broad, usually colorful wings.

Even though there are more letters in the word butterfly than in the word moth, there are more letters in the definition of the word moth than in the definition of the word butterfly, at least in the definitions on The Free Dictionary.com site. In your measuring information-revisited post on your blog-o-tard you say that a simple character count of the definition of an aardvark (that you quoted) reveals 202 characters which translates into 1010 bits of information/ specified complexity. According to you then, moths have more "CSI" than butterflies because the characters (or letters) in a definition should be counted and converted to "bits", and there are more characters in the definition of 'moth' than in the definition of 'butterfly'.

You also say:

"Now what do we do when all we have is an object?

One way of figuring out how much information it contains is to figure out how (the simplest way) to make it.

Then you write down the procedure without wasting words/ characters and count those bits. The point is that you have to capture the actions required and translate that into bits. That is if you want to use CSI. However by doing all of that you have already determined the thing was designed Now you are just trying to determine how much work was involved."

Tell me joey, do the definitions of aardvark, or moth, or butterfly describe how to make an an aardvark, a moth, or a butterfly? Can you describe how to make an aardvark, a moth, or a butterfly? Do you have a recipe handy for making those things, and does the recipe measure and show the amount of "CSI" in those things? Can you describe the simplest way and how much work is involved in making an aardvark, a moth, or a butterfly and can you capture and demonstrate the actions required?

And one more question for now joey:

How can anyone as brain-dead as you even remember to breathe?

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 18 2012,07:00   

Joe
Quote
Behe’s point, btw, is that even if “poof” was the mechanism, so what? Science only cares about reality- and if reality says “poof” did it then science has to deal with that.

LOL.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10065
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 18 2012,12:00   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Aug. 18 2012,07:00)
Joe
Quote
Behe’s point, btw, is that even if “poof” was the mechanism, so what? Science only cares about reality- and if reality says “poof” did it then science has to deal with that.

LOL.

Wow - ID has two mechanisms now - 'poof' and 'design'!  Thanks Joe!

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
k.e..



Posts: 2836
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 18 2012,23:32   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 18 2012,20:00)
 
Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Aug. 18 2012,07:00)
Joe
   
Quote
Behe’s point, btw, is that even if “poof” was the mechanism, so what? Science only cares about reality- and if reality says “poof” did it then science has to deal with that.

LOL.

Wow - ID has two mechanisms now - 'poof' and 'design'!  Thanks Joe!

No  ......it's still the one thing.

Miracle's r us by ...erm ....cough.God.rustle..clunk teh Designer

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 495
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 20 2012,07:29   

Joe, Joe, Joe ... sigh      
Quote
Does translation follow any known rules of chemistry? There isn’t any physio-chemical connection between the codon and the amino acid it represents- you do realize that, petrushka?

Yes, Joe. Chemistry plays no part in the translation system. None. Little elves look it all up in a big book.

--------------
Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad.

The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3545
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 20 2012,08:14   

Petrushka has never posted at UD under any other name and never will. I'm sure, however, that he's flattered to be confused with mp.

PT has never reregistered at a site from which he has been banned.

Unlike joseph.

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
keiths



Posts: 2040
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 20 2012,13:03   

Quote (Joe @ August 20 2012, 6:39 am)
Except the ToE doesn’t explain junk DNA- ya see natural selection was supposed to be a designer mimic, not a design screw-up.


Link

--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number.  -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don’t belong there and thoughts into my mind that don’t belong there. -- KF

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3260
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 20 2012,13:49   

Quote (keiths @ Aug. 20 2012,13:03)
Quote (Joe @ August 20 2012, 6:39 am)
Except the ToE doesn’t explain junk DNA- ya see natural selection was supposed to be a designer mimic, not a design screw-up.


Link

Further evidence that JoeG really doesn't know what evolution is.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
midwifetoad



Posts: 3545
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 20 2012,14:21   

Quote (keiths @ Aug. 20 2012,13:03)
Quote (Joe @ August 20 2012, 6:39 am)
Except the ToE doesn’t explain junk DNA- ya see natural selection was supposed to be a designer mimic, not a design screw-up.


Link

Argumentum ad provocative title.

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 495
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 21 2012,02:46   

Quote (keiths @ Aug. 20 2012,13:03)
   
Quote (Joe @ August 20 2012, 6:39 am)
Except the ToE doesn’t explain junk DNA- ya see natural selection was supposed to be a designer mimic, not a design screw-up.


Link

So junk DNA is explained by deliberate Design because of redundancy, cryptic function or some such. But it can't be produced by a ... ummm ... 'designer mimic', because it is evidence of shit designer-mimicry? Got it.

--------------
Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad.

The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

  
The whole truth



Posts: 971
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2012,02:52   

Hey joey, are you ever going to respond to my questions above, or are you too much a coward?

And on your blog-o-tard, blipey asked you:

"You're the one who said CSI pertains to origins. But you seem to also think that CSI can be measured in extant populations? Just asking fo clarification."

And you belched:

"Dembski said it- Lizzie Liddle agrees"

So? Is that an appeal to authority? And do you have proof that EL agrees? And what exactly does she allegedly agree with?

And you spewed:

"You're fucking hopeless- we can see if CSI is present and it is in the minimal organism."

Who's "we"? You can't "see if CSI is present" in ANYthing joey. And what is a "minimal organism"?

You also vomited:

"We study objects/ structures/ events to see if CSI is present."

Who's "We"? Hey joey, how much "CSI" is there in a banana, an aardvark, a moth, and a butterfly? Show your calculations.

And when you drooled:

"we can see if CSI is present and it is in the minimal organism."

Richard Hughes asked you:

"Can you show your mathematical workings, or are you bullshitting again?"

And you lied:

"I showed my mathematical workings Richie- ya see YOU are the total bullshitting faggot."

Lots of people have asked you many times to calculate the alleged "CSI" in living things and in non-living things, and you NEVER actually do it, even though you lie, lie, and lie some more by claiming that you have done it. So, joey-the-lying-coward-for-allah, let's see your "mathematical workings" that calculate the alleged "CSI" in a banana, an aardvark, a moth, a butterfly, a human, a chimp, a tick, a watermelon, and gordo mullings' pompous, lying ass before and after you've french kissed it.

By the way joey, does the alleged "intelligent designer" (allah/god) have any "CSI" in it? If so, how and where did that "CSI" originate, and how and where did the alleged "intelligent designer" (allah/god) originate? Remember, "ID" and "CSI" are "all about origins", according to you. So show your EVIDENCE of the origin of the alleged "intelligent designer" (allah/god) and the origin of "CSI" in the alleged "intelligent designer" (allah/god).

Edited by The whole truth on Aug. 22 2012,00:54

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 1463
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2012,09:35   

Quote
Joetard:

And by eating the cake you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.


linky

I still want to know how many calories are in an ounce of information.

Does chocolate information have more calories than vanilla info?

--------------
JoeG: And by eating the cake you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 495
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2012,11:39   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Aug. 22 2012,09:35)
Quote
Joetard:

And by eating the cake you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.


linky

I still want to know how many calories are in an ounce of information.

Does chocolate information have more calories than vanilla info?

I'd like to know how the cake-information knows to make molecules of me if I eat it and dog-info if I drop it on the floor.

--------------
Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad.

The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

  
Amadan



Posts: 1240
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 22 2012,19:18   

Quote (Soapy Sam @ Aug. 22 2012,17:39)
   
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Aug. 22 2012,09:35)
   
Quote
Joetard:

And by eating the cake you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.


linky

I still want to know how many calories are in an ounce of information.

Does chocolate information have more calories than vanilla info?

I'd like to know how the cake-information knows to make molecules of me if I eat it and dog-info if I drop it on the floor.

Oh that's easy! The information in Spot's DNA codes for "Dog, Not Anthro".

Yours, in contrast, codes for "Dagnammit! Not an Animal!"

[Insert joke about 'double he-licks' here]

--------------
"People are always looking for natural selection to generate random mutations" - Densye  4-4-2011
JoeG BTW dumbass- some variations help ensure reproductive fitness so they cannot be random wrt it.

   
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 1463
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 25 2012,08:59   

Meanwhile, back at the tard farm, dickless Joe Gallien is ratcheting up the rhetoric against Dr. Liddle:

 
Quote
JoeTard: You are confused as the septic zone promotes bald assertions and demonstrates a total lack of posting in good faith.

They couldn’t support the claims of their position if their lives depended on it. But that doesn’t stop them from baldly declaring that their position has all the evidence and can account for everything.

I have called out Liz, many times, for her bald assertions and all she does is repeat them. And that is beyond pathetic.

So perhaps when they lose their cowardice and actually start trying to support their position more IDists will start showing up over there. But I don’t see that happening in my life time.


The cowardly piece of shit got his ass handed to him at TSZ, them got himself banned for posting porn, then throws rocks at people from a place where he knows they can't answer.  Joe Gallien has to be the most cowardly douche I've ever seen.

--------------
JoeG: And by eating the cake you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 495
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 25 2012,14:30   

This is what Joe reckons:
       
Quote
The sad part is neither Toronto nor any other septic zone regular can use abduction nor induction to infer materialism.

To infer materialism they need to employ full-blown bald declarations. But at least they have themselves convinced that their “methodology” works.

A posting itself constructed entirely from bald declarations. Well done, Joemeister, nice piece of irony. There are some cookies in the jar.

KF reckons, during a mild rebuke on the tone of that last:
       
Quote
You are a valuable and effective commenter at UD

And so he is. So he is.

Pricelessly, KF's deprecates Joe's use of "septic zone" because it justifies the excesses of those comfortable in "swamp mud". Pole-vaulted straight over the moral high ground there, KF!

--------------
Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad.

The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3260
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 25 2012,15:29   

Quote (Soapy Sam @ Aug. 25 2012,14:30)
This is what Joe reckons:
         
Quote
The sad part is neither Toronto nor any other septic zone regular can use abduction nor induction to infer materialism.

To infer materialism they need to employ full-blown bald declarations. But at least they have themselves convinced that their “methodology” works.

A posting itself constructed entirely from bald declarations. Well done, Joemeister, nice piece of irony. There are some cookies in the jar.

KF reckons, during a mild rebuke on the tone of that last:
         
Quote
You are a valuable and effective commenter at UD

And so he is. So he is.

Pricelessly, KF's deprecates Joe's use of "septic zone" because it justifies the excesses of those comfortable in "swamp mud". Pole-vaulted straight over the moral high ground there, KF!

From Joe's favorite source (wikipedia)

Quote
In philosophy, the theory of materialism holds that the only thing that exists is matter or energy; that all things are composed of material and all phenomena (including consciousness) are the result of material interactions. In other words, matter is the only substance, and reality is identical with the actually occurring states of energy and matter.


Tell you what Joe, you provide evidence of something that is neither matter nor energy that can affect and interact with matter and energy... then we'll talk.

What he really means is "Science thinks God doesn't exist and that sucks for my beliefs."

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
keiths



Posts: 2040
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 27 2012,21:48   

More bluster from Big Bad Joe:
Quote
You and your ilk are obsessed with me. And for good reason- when they try to push evolutionism on my daughter I will see them in Court. And they will not be able to pin my fight against evolutionism on any religion- heck my daughter barely understands the concept.


Edited by keiths on Aug. 27 2012,19:49

--------------
And the set of natural numbers is also the set that starts at 0 and goes to the largest number.  -- Joe G

Please stop putting words into my mouth that don’t belong there and thoughts into my mind that don’t belong there. -- KF

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3260
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 27 2012,21:52   

Quote (keiths @ Aug. 27 2012,21:48)
More bluster from Big Bad Joe:
Quote
You and your ilk are obsessed with me. And for good reason- when they try to push evolutionism on my daughter I will see them in Court. And they will not be able to pin my fight against evolutionism on any religion- heck my daughter barely understands the concept.

Several thoughts leaped into my mind upon reading this:

1) Oh shit, he's reproduced...
2) I don't believe it's possible
3) Oh that poor, poor child
4) He's not gonna take anything to court... the coward
5) even if he did, they'd laugh his ass right out of court
6) There's always private schools for that child
7) That poor, poor child who I hope will quickly realize what an utter ass her 'dad' is.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
Glen Davidson



Posts: 752
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 27 2012,21:59   

Quote (keiths @ Aug. 27 2012,21:48)
More bluster from Big Bad Joe:
 
Quote
You and your ilk are obsessed with me. And for good reason- when they try to push evolutionism on my daughter I will see them in Court. And they will not be able to pin my fight against evolutionism on any religion- heck my daughter barely understands the concept.

If it's "like father like daughter," she likely understands almost no concepts.

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
The whole truth



Posts: 971
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 27 2012,22:22   

Quote (keiths @ Aug. 27 2012,19:48)
More bluster from Big Bad Joe:
 
Quote
You and your ilk are obsessed with me. And for good reason- when they try to push evolutionism on my daughter I will see them in Court. And they will not be able to pin my fight against evolutionism on any religion- heck my daughter barely understands the concept.

Hmm, joey g has said that when his SON goes to high school and they teach him about evolution, joey will not only see "them" in court but will make the the "evotards" squirm on the witness stand under his direct examination.

joey g (the obsessed liar for allah) has a lot of delusions.

Hey joey, I have a feeling that your daughter doesn't understand (through no fault of her own) much of anything due to having a brain-dead father sperm donor like you. The insane crap you obviously 'teach' her (and your son) is child abuse.

And why are you waiting to file a lawsuit joey? Surely something about evolution has been mentioned or taught in the schools your kids attend. If nothing else there has got to be books in the school library that are about evolution and/or Darwin or at least mention them. Get that lawsuit going joey! I love a good laugh, and any suit you bring is bound to be a howler!

By the way joey, do you make your wife and daughter wear a burka?

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Soapy Sam



Posts: 495
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 28 2012,06:39   

Joe

(tldr URLs, inc!)
   
Quote
I definitely need to tone it down but you need to lighten up, just a little

For once, Joe, I agree with you. KF is primed to take offence on a hair-trigger. But ... you see how this occurred? You pointed KF at a reference to him on TSZ that included a 'don't link to porn' joke. Most people 'got' that it was a joke about your 'tunie' post. Whether or not you did, I don't know. But KF immediately goes into 'how-dare-they' high dudgeon, the facts are laid out, and it blows up in your face.  

Personally, I think some of the abuse you get is a tad OTT. But you are hardly a cork bobbing in currents over which you have no control!

--------------
Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad.

The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3545
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 28 2012,07:22   

For what it's worth I find Joe less offensive than KF. I tend to tune out potty mouth, unless it's also humorous. But KF is consistently humorless. That's a great failing in debate.

KF only has one nail. It's dreadfull boring, but he hammers it consistently. Joe seems to have a bucket of unsorted nails, picking whatever fits right now, regardless of whether he contradicts something he said five minutes ago.

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 495
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 28 2012,12:11   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Aug. 28 2012,07:22)
For what it's worth I find Joe less offensive than KF. I tend to tune out potty mouth, unless it's also humorous. But KF is consistently humorless. That's a great failing in debate.

KF only has one nail. It's dreadfull boring, but he hammers it consistently. Joe seems to have a bucket of unsorted nails, picking whatever fits right now, regardless of whether he contradicts something he said five minutes ago.

Mmmm, I see Joe as an irritating kid, KF as a pompous ass.  

Although I can't say every 'evilutionist' is a laugh riot, humourlessness and a lack of self-awareness do seem to afflict the ID crowd. The general po-faced pomposity of KF, WJM, BA, UBP et al is in itself a source of chuckles.

--------------
Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad.

The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

  
Joe G



Posts: 1324
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 28 2012,12:26   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Aug. 20 2012,13:49)
Quote (keiths @ Aug. 20 2012,13:03)
Quote (Joe @ August 20 2012, 6:39 am)
Except the ToE doesn’t explain junk DNA- ya see natural selection was supposed to be a designer mimic, not a design screw-up.


Link

Further evidence that JoeG really doesn't know what evolution is.

What an ignorant fuck youy are, Kevin.

from Larry Moran

Quote
What are these predictions of "Darwinism"? It's surely not pseudogenes since no evolutionary theory that I know of predicted pseudogenes. Bacteria don't have many pseudogenes and that's perfectly consistent with evolutionary theory. Plant genomes have lots of pseudogenes and that's perfectly consistent with evolutionary theory. Yeast has a few pseudogenes but not nearly as many as plants and that's perfectly consistent with modern evolutionary theory.

Is "News" referring to junk DNA in general? That's not a prediction of "Darwinism" or any evolutionary theory that I know of. The fact that bacteria have very little junk DNA has never been taken as a fact that overthrows modern evolutionary theory. I'm unaware of any evolutionary biologist who predicted back in the 1960s that most of the mammalian genome would be junk and that this prediction was a requirement of modern evolutionary theory. The arguments of Avise et al. are not based on the "premise" that most of our genome is junk, they're based on the evidence that pseudogenes exist.


It is NOT a prediction and the theory can live with or without junk DNA- which means it doesn't explain it beyond saying "there it is".

But anyway niice to see you are still a coward afraid to make a case and can just spew your lies.

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t


BTW: Joe, our position (i.e. evolution) does NOT require that there existed a species of ape-humans with 47 chromosomes.-Kevin McCarthy, ignorant of genetics

   
Joe G



Posts: 1324
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 28 2012,12:28   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Aug. 27 2012,21:52)
Quote (keiths @ Aug. 27 2012,21:48)
More bluster from Big Bad Joe:
 
Quote
You and your ilk are obsessed with me. And for good reason- when they try to push evolutionism on my daughter I will see them in Court. And they will not be able to pin my fight against evolutionism on any religion- heck my daughter barely understands the concept.

Several thoughts leaped into my mind upon reading this:

1) Oh shit, he's reproduced...
2) I don't believe it's possible
3) Oh that poor, poor child
4) He's not gonna take anything to court... the coward
5) even if he did, they'd laugh his ass right out of court
6) There's always private schools for that child
7) That poor, poor child who I hope will quickly realize what an utter ass her 'dad' is.

She already knows what a total asshole coward Kevin R McCarthy is.

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t


BTW: Joe, our position (i.e. evolution) does NOT require that there existed a species of ape-humans with 47 chromosomes.-Kevin McCarthy, ignorant of genetics

   
Joe G



Posts: 1324
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 28 2012,12:30   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Aug. 25 2012,08:59)
Meanwhile, back at the tard farm, dickless Joe Gallien is ratcheting up the rhetoric against Dr. Liddle:

 
Quote
JoeTard: You are confused as the septic zone promotes bald assertions and demonstrates a total lack of posting in good faith.

They couldn’t support the claims of their position if their lives depended on it. But that doesn’t stop them from baldly declaring that their position has all the evidence and can account for everything.

I have called out Liz, many times, for her bald assertions and all she does is repeat them. And that is beyond pathetic.

So perhaps when they lose their cowardice and actually start trying to support their position more IDists will start showing up over there. But I don’t see that happening in my life time.


The cowardly piece of shit got his ass handed to him at TSZ, them got himself banned for posting porn, then throws rocks at people from a place where he knows they can't answer.  Joe Gallien has to be the most cowardly douche I've ever seen.

1- No evidence that I got my ass handed to me over on TSZ

2- No evidence that i posted porn

3- YOU are just one of the biggest cowardly piece-of-shit ever- along with all you evo stroke-butties

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t


BTW: Joe, our position (i.e. evolution) does NOT require that there existed a species of ape-humans with 47 chromosomes.-Kevin McCarthy, ignorant of genetics

   
  7455 replies since Feb. 24 2010,12:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (249) < ... 163 164 165 166 167 [168] 169 170 171 172 173 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]