RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (245) < ... 167 168 169 170 171 [172] 173 174 175 176 177 ... >   
  Topic: Joe G.'s Tardgasm, How long can it last?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 474
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 23 2012,05:07   

Quote (Lou FCD @ Sep. 22 2012,11:00)
Crossposting this from the UD4 thread, because it's sure to tickle a few funny bones.

From this thread at Uncommonly Dense.



lol.

Joe's attempts to pretend he understands relativity and quantum fizzicks are as much fun as his typos:

Quote
As Einstein said the equation tells us they are DIFFERENT manifistations of the same thing.


I shudder to think what a 'manifistation' might entail.

--------------
Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad.

The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

  
k.e..



Posts: 2815
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 23 2012,06:20   

Quote (Soapy Sam @ Sep. 23 2012,13:07)
 
Quote (Lou FCD @ Sep. 22 2012,11:00)
Crossposting this from the UD4 thread, because it's sure to tickle a few funny bones.

From this thread at Uncommonly Dense.



lol.

Joe's attempts to pretend he understands relativity and quantum fizzicks are as much fun as his typos:

   
Quote
As Einstein said the equation tells us they are DIFFERENT manifistations of the same thing.


I shudder to think what a 'manifistation' might entail.

or indeed ....DIFFERENT.

Since DaveTard left there isn't anyone there who does hard science fiction anymore.

Joe seems to jump the shark every time he puts on his lab coat.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3220
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 24 2012,12:43   

Thanks to Olegt for reminding me about the crackpot index (http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html).

I decided to take a shot at Joe on this one.  I am NOT going to find a reference to every single piece that I say.  If you don't like my work, then feel free to ignore it.

+5 for even being considered to be on this list
+5 (+1 for every statement widely agreed to be false; examples "hail is not water", "mol is molecule", "mya is millenia ago", etc)
+6 (+3 for every statement that is logically inconsistent)
+50 (+5 points for every statement that is adhered to despite correction)
+20 (+5 points for every thought experiment that contradicts an actual experiment)
+30 (+10 points for each new term that is never defined)
+10 for saying a current theory is only a theory
+10 for saying that the current theory doesn't have a mechanism
+10 for claiming one's own work is on the cutting edge (ticks? really?)
+20 for saying how great your theory is without actually explaining it
+40 (+20 for every claim in which science fiction is used as a fact)
+70 (40 points for claiming that when your theory is finally appreciated, present-day science will be seen for the sham it truly is. (30 more points for fantasizing about show trials in which scientists who mocked your theories will be forced to recant.))
+50 for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no concrete testable predictions.for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no concrete testable predictions.

I've decided to add a few of my own:
+100 (+5 for every attempt to divert conversation from one's own notions by saying "you support your theory"
+500 (+5 for every attempt to divert conversation from one's own notions by cursing one's opponent)

So, Joe's (estimated) crackpot index is 926.  

I'm sure I'm missing a few things, so it's safe to say that Joe approaches 1,000 on the crackpot index.  Hmmm... I wonder how that compares to KF, Dembski, Wells, etc.  But I don't wonder enough to go check.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
JohnW



Posts: 2166
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 24 2012,13:06   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Sep. 24 2012,10:43)
Thanks to Olegt for reminding me about the crackpot index (http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html).

I decided to take a shot at Joe on this one.  I am NOT going to find a reference to every single piece that I say.  If you don't like my work, then feel free to ignore it.

+5 for even being considered to be on this list
+5 (+1 for every statement widely agreed to be false; examples "hail is not water", "mol is molecule", "mya is millenia ago", etc)
+6 (+3 for every statement that is logically inconsistent)
+50 (+5 points for every statement that is adhered to despite correction)
+20 (+5 points for every thought experiment that contradicts an actual experiment)
+30 (+10 points for each new term that is never defined)
+10 for saying a current theory is only a theory
+10 for saying that the current theory doesn't have a mechanism
+10 for claiming one's own work is on the cutting edge (ticks? really?)
+20 for saying how great your theory is without actually explaining it
+40 (+20 for every claim in which science fiction is used as a fact)
+70 (40 points for claiming that when your theory is finally appreciated, present-day science will be seen for the sham it truly is. (30 more points for fantasizing about show trials in which scientists who mocked your theories will be forced to recant.))
+50 for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no concrete testable predictions.for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no concrete testable predictions.

I've decided to add a few of my own:
+100 (+5 for every attempt to divert conversation from one's own notions by saying "you support your theory"
+500 (+5 for every attempt to divert conversation from one's own notions by cursing one's opponent)

So, Joe's (estimated) crackpot index is 926.  

I'm sure I'm missing a few things, so it's safe to say that Joe approaches 1,000 on the crackpot index.  Hmmm... I wonder how that compares to KF, Dembski, Wells, etc.  But I don't wonder enough to go check.

I was thinking of doing the same with batshit77, but that would mean goint through his gigantic steaming pile of tard, and I can't spare the neurons.

But we know batshit gave Joe a schooling on relativistic mass this weekend.  So batshit's been right on more things than has Joe (by a score of 1-0).  I think we can infer that CI(batshit77) < CI(Joe).

Even barmier than batshit77.  Even in the empty, anally-obsessed, god-addled abyss which I'm going to refer to as Joe's mind until I come up with a better word, that's got to sting a bit.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it.
- Robert Byers

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 24 2012,13:29   

Quote (JohnW @ Sep. 24 2012,14:06)
Even barmier than batshit77.  Even in the empty, anally-obsessed, god-addled abyss which I'm going to refer to as Joe's mind until I come up with a better word, that's got to sting a bit.



--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Ptaylor



Posts: 867
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 24 2012,16:15   

Joe triumphs in the I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I? school of logic in the TSZ thread:

 
Quote
To Scott D. Weitzenhoffer, whoever you are (posted by Mike Elzinga)- I have corrected it for you (corrections in italics)

 
Quote
   “Debating creationists evolutionists on the topic of evolution, creation or Intelligent Design, is rather like trying to play chess with a pigeon; it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory.”


And, unlike yours, we have plenty of evidence to support that.


UD link

--------------
“To surrender to ignorance and call it God has always been premature, and it remains premature today.” - Isaac Asimov

  
DaveH



Posts: 45
Joined: July 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 24 2012,16:27   

Don't know if this has been spotted... Our Hero turns up on The Loom.
Same old, same old contentless pish, nothing to see here.

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 474
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 25 2012,06:48   

Quote (DaveH @ Sep. 24 2012,16:27)
Don't know if this has been spotted... Our Hero turns up on The Loom.
Same old, same old contentless pish, nothing to see here.

He manages to completely reverse the role of sex:

 
Quote
There is no hope for evolution once sex hits the scene as it would take many more generations to do the same thing


Then brings 'geneticist' Sermonti in to support this horseshit:

 
Quote
whenever absent-minded Venus has taken the upper hand, forms have forgotten to make progress.


Which would explain why the tree of eukaryotes is overwhelmingly sexual, from root to twig-tip? And why most asexual eukaryotic lineages are short-lived on evolutionary timescales? And why GAs are turbo-charged by crossover?

--------------
Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad.

The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

  
k.e..



Posts: 2815
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 25 2012,08:37   

Quote (Soapy Sam @ Sep. 25 2012,14:48)
 
Quote (DaveH @ Sep. 24 2012,16:27)
Don't know if this has been spotted... Our Hero turns up on The Loom.
Same old, same old contentless pish, nothing to see here.

He manages to completely reverse the role of sex:

   
Quote
There is no hope for evolution once sex hits the scene as it would take many more generations to do the same thing


Then brings 'geneticist' Sermonti in to support this horseshit:

   
Quote
whenever absent-minded Venus has taken the upper hand, forms have forgotten to make progress.


Which would explain why the tree of eukaryotes is overwhelmingly sexual, from root to twig-tip? And why most asexual eukaryotic lineages are short-lived on evolutionary timescales? And why GAs are turbo-charged by crossover?

I noticed Joe made no mention of caek or dihydrogen monoxide.

I think he should consider another Lobotomy.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
fnxtr



Posts: 2037
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 25 2012,12:07   

Someone should get him started on chemtrails. That should be a laugh.

--------------
"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad

  
Henry J



Posts: 3964
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 25 2012,13:20   

Do you mean the chemistry of it, or the conspiracy?  :p

  
Freddie



Posts: 362
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 26 2012,05:37   

Quote (fnxtr @ Sep. 25 2012,12:07)
Someone should get him started on chemtrails. That should be a laugh.

why start on chemtrails when we're still having so much fun with H2O?



I've lost track, this is certainly beyond doubling down but is it tripling- or quadrupling-down at this point?

--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

  
k.e..



Posts: 2815
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 26 2012,06:36   

Quote (Freddie @ Sep. 26 2012,13:37)
Quote (fnxtr @ Sep. 25 2012,12:07)
Someone should get him started on chemtrails. That should be a laugh.

why start on chemtrails when we're still having so much fun with H2O?



I've lost track, this is certainly beyond doubling down but is it tripling- or quadrupling-down at this point?

I had to check the year Joe made that post.

He must have an IQ of around 70.

He really is a savant idiot.

No one else makes idiocy seem such a challenge.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 474
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 26 2012,07:18   

Quote (Freddie @ Sep. 26 2012,05:37)
       
Quote (fnxtr @ Sep. 25 2012,12:07)
Someone should get him started on chemtrails. That should be a laugh.

why start on chemtrails when we're still having so much fun with H2O?



I've lost track, this is certainly beyond doubling down but is it tripling- or quadrupling-down at this point?

The tripling-down point of water is that at which it stops being water and becomes one of two other things instead. The quadrupling-down point involves single molecules, which cannot have a phase. Even those chumps that edit Wikipedia have it wrong: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......f_water Forms of water! Snicker! A molecule of water! Mmmmmmffff!

--------------
Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad.

The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10000
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 01 2012,01:00   

Here's some EPIC TARD to start your work week. Reproduced, in full:

http://www.blogger.com/comment....9417072

Quote
Antarctica- Record Sea Ice Extent in 2012!
- Yup, that is correct- 2012 saw a record in Antarctica's sea ice extent. Oh but that was predicted by global warming.... Not


Ya See... the beauty of working in the quote mine is you don't need to read the article, just the headline. I mean it must support your preconceptions and ideology, right?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs....og.html

Quote
...If we look at current Arctic and Antarctic sea ice extents compared to their 1979-2000 averages, Arctic sea ice is almost 50 percent below average whereas Antarctic sea ice is just between 5 and 10 percent above average.

It’s not that we should dismiss the Antarctic difference from average. At some two standard deviations from (above) the mean, that signifies there’s just about a 5 percent chance of this happening (assuming a normal distribution). But the Arctic difference from average is in an entirely different universe statistically speaking, way, way beyond two standards deviations from (below) the mean.


Moreover, the long term rate of decline in Arctic ice obliterates the converse rate of increase in the Antarctic. In August, for example, Arctic sea ice is declining at a rate of 10 percent per decade since 1979 compared to an increase of 0.6 percent per decade in the Antarctic.


--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
k.e..



Posts: 2815
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 01 2012,08:54   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Oct. 01 2012,09:00)
Here's some EPIC TARD to start your work week. Reproduced, in full:

http://www.blogger.com/comment....9417072

 
Quote
Antarctica- Record Sea Ice Extent in 2012!
- Yup, that is correct- 2012 saw a record in Antarctica's sea ice extent. Oh but that was predicted by global warming.... Not


Ya See... the beauty of working in the quote mine is you don't need to read the article, just the headline. I mean it must support your preconceptions and ideology, right?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs......og.html

 
Quote
...If we look at current Arctic and Antarctic sea ice extents compared to their 1979-2000 averages, Arctic sea ice is almost 50 percent below average whereas Antarctic sea ice is just between 5 and 10 percent above average.

It’s not that we should dismiss the Antarctic difference from average. At some two standard deviations from (above) the mean, that signifies there’s just about a 5 percent chance of this happening (assuming a normal distribution). But the Arctic difference from average is in an entirely different universe statistically speaking, way, way beyond two standards deviations from (below) the mean.


Moreover, the long term rate of decline in Arctic ice obliterates the converse rate of increase in the Antarctic. In August, for example, Arctic sea ice is declining at a rate of 10 percent per decade since 1979 compared to an increase of 0.6 percent per decade in the Antarctic.

Joe doesn't get it that scientists who write for public consumption just like most writers want to capture a readers attention, so they will make a headline interesting to get above the noise level. If the title just said "Artic ice declined 30% in the last 30 years  while Antartic ice increased 1.8% over the same period" who would read it?

Not Joe.

That's why 'The Bourne Identity' was not called 'The Spy Who Forgot His Own Name (Which BTW Was Bourne)'.

....I wonder if Joe can distingush the difference between an Airport Novel and a fact.

Fucking Moron.

Maybe if the title said something like....'Homo-erotocism Blamed on Global Warming' Joe would read the whole article.

ETA: artistic flourish

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
Amadan



Posts: 1229
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 01 2012,08:57   

Quote (k.e.. @ Oct. 01 2012,14:54)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Oct. 01 2012,09:00)
Here's some EPIC TARD to start your work week. Reproduced, in full:

http://www.blogger.com/comment....9417072

 
Quote
Antarctica- Record Sea Ice Extent in 2012!
- Yup, that is correct- 2012 saw a record in Antarctica's sea ice extent. Oh but that was predicted by global warming.... Not


Ya See... the beauty of working in the quote mine is you don't need to read the article, just the headline. I mean it must support your preconceptions and ideology, right?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs......og.html

 
Quote
...If we look at current Arctic and Antarctic sea ice extents compared to their 1979-2000 averages, Arctic sea ice is almost 50 percent below average whereas Antarctic sea ice is just between 5 and 10 percent above average.

It’s not that we should dismiss the Antarctic difference from average. At some two standard deviations from (above) the mean, that signifies there’s just about a 5 percent chance of this happening (assuming a normal distribution). But the Arctic difference from average is in an entirely different universe statistically speaking, way, way beyond two standards deviations from (below) the mean.


Moreover, the long term rate of decline in Arctic ice obliterates the converse rate of increase in the Antarctic. In August, for example, Arctic sea ice is declining at a rate of 10 percent per decade since 1979 compared to an increase of 0.6 percent per decade in the Antarctic.

Joe doesn't get it that scientists who write for public consumption just like most writers want to capture a readers attention, so they will make a headline interesting to get above the noise level. If the title just said "Artic ice declined 30% in the last 30 years  while Antartic ice increased 1.8% over the same period" who would read it?

Not Joe.

That's why 'The Bourne Identity' was not called 'The Spy Who Forgot His Own Name (Which BTW Was Bourne)'.


Fucking Moron.

Maybe if the title said something like....'Homo-erotocism Blamed on Global Warming' Joe would read the whole article.

Depends on the illustrations used.

--------------
"People are always looking for natural selection to generate random mutations" - Densye  4-4-2011
JoeG BTW dumbass- some variations help ensure reproductive fitness so they cannot be random wrt it.

   
OgreMkV



Posts: 3220
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 07 2012,13:57   

As predicted, Joe has appeared at Skeptic Ink and blathered on about me being a coward and ID being perfectly OK with evolution and ID is no different than SETI and forensics.

I let him go for a few posts and then shut him down.  It's just not worth it.  That's my new home and I don't need his shit stinking up the place.  If he ever figures out what a mol is, maybe he can come back.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
The whole truth



Posts: 964
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 07 2012,19:45   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Oct. 07 2012,11:57)
As predicted, Joe has appeared at Skeptic Ink and blathered on about me being a coward and ID being perfectly OK with evolution and ID is no different than SETI and forensics.

I let him go for a few posts and then shut him down.  It's just not worth it.  That's my new home and I don't need his shit stinking up the place.  If he ever figures out what a mol is, maybe he can come back.

Maybe you should do a post on ghosts and haunted places, crop circles, zombies, Bigfoot, Nessie, UFOs, aliens living among humans or replacing humans (invasion of the body snatchers!), alien abductions and 'examinations', ancient aliens (and don't forget Stonehenge!), and/or other such things, and let joey comment on it. It would be hilarious. :p

Edited by The whole truth on Oct. 07 2012,17:46

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
OgreMkV



Posts: 3220
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 07 2012,20:31   

Quote (The whole truth @ Oct. 07 2012,19:45)
Quote (OgreMkV @ Oct. 07 2012,11:57)
As predicted, Joe has appeared at Skeptic Ink and blathered on about me being a coward and ID being perfectly OK with evolution and ID is no different than SETI and forensics.

I let him go for a few posts and then shut him down.  It's just not worth it.  That's my new home and I don't need his shit stinking up the place.  If he ever figures out what a mol is, maybe he can come back.

Maybe you should do a post on ghosts and haunted places, crop circles, zombies, Bigfoot, Nessie, UFOs, aliens living among humans or replacing humans (invasion of the body snatchers!), alien abductions and 'examinations', ancient aliens (and don't forget Stonehenge!), and/or other such things, and let joey comment on it. It would be hilarious. :p

Yeah, stonehenge has already come up, but I've moderated Joe.  He's not even an interesting troll.  Just 'Nuh huh!"

If he doesn't come back, then I'll lose about 700 hits a day, but I can live with that.  Maybe he'll post his weiner diatribes on his blog.

Not that it matters, I get about one hit a month from the stuff he's posted about me.  I'll have to check and see if he's posted about me yet.  A chocolate milkshake says he has.

eta:  Yay, I get a milkshake.  He's whined about me THREE times today.  What is it that he must whine about me so.

A 30 second review of his posts and I see that it's the exact same thing as every other whiney-ass diatribe he pulls.  "I already did that."  "ID isn't what you say" and "Nuh huh!"

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
The whole truth



Posts: 964
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 08 2012,02:39   

Just for you...



--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
The whole truth



Posts: 964
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 08 2012,02:57   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Oct. 07 2012,18:31)
Quote (The whole truth @ Oct. 07 2012,19:45)
 
Quote (OgreMkV @ Oct. 07 2012,11:57)
As predicted, Joe has appeared at Skeptic Ink and blathered on about me being a coward and ID being perfectly OK with evolution and ID is no different than SETI and forensics.

I let him go for a few posts and then shut him down.  It's just not worth it.  That's my new home and I don't need his shit stinking up the place.  If he ever figures out what a mol is, maybe he can come back.

Maybe you should do a post on ghosts and haunted places, crop circles, zombies, Bigfoot, Nessie, UFOs, aliens living among humans or replacing humans (invasion of the body snatchers!), alien abductions and 'examinations', ancient aliens (and don't forget Stonehenge!), and/or other such things, and let joey comment on it. It would be hilarious. :p

Yeah, stonehenge has already come up, but I've moderated Joe.  He's not even an interesting troll.  Just 'Nuh huh!"

If he doesn't come back, then I'll lose about 700 hits a day, but I can live with that.  Maybe he'll post his weiner diatribes on his blog.

Not that it matters, I get about one hit a month from the stuff he's posted about me.  I'll have to check and see if he's posted about me yet.  A chocolate milkshake says he has.

eta:  Yay, I get a milkshake.  He's whined about me THREE times today.  What is it that he must whine about me so.

A 30 second review of his posts and I see that it's the exact same thing as every other whiney-ass diatribe he pulls.  "I already did that."  "ID isn't what you say" and "Nuh huh!"

It's typical of joey to have a hissy fit about being blocked and/or banned even though he regularly blocks and/or bans me and others from his worthless blog. Not long ago I submitted several comments on his blog and none were posted, and that's almost always the case. I submitted some comments on his blog just a little while ago too and wonder if they will be posted.

And yeah, joey just regurgitates the same old IDiotic nonsense all the time and for some strange reason he thinks that he will convince every evolutionary scientist on Earth to believe in and worship tard. 'Delusional' doesn't even begin to describe joey.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
The whole truth



Posts: 964
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 08 2012,04:34   

And speaking of delusional joey, on Smilodon's Retreat he said:

"Intelligent Design is perfectly OK with mere complexity arising without a designer."

And he said:

"Complexity is defined."

Hey joey, which version of complexity is defined, mere complexity or some other version of complexity? Who defined them and what are the definitions? How many versions of complexity are there? Is there a distinct line between mere complexity and the other versions? What ID-specific tests do you do to differentiate the versions of complexity in objects or processes in nature?

Smilodon said this:

"Joe, first you have to be able to determine the difference between a designed thing and a not-designed thing."

And joey responded:

"Kevin, we can."

First of all joey, who's "we"? Second, list ten things in nature that were/are designed by the alleged designer and ten things that are not. Then, demonstrate how you determined that they are designed or not designed.

And hey joey, can you and the rest of the "we" clan determine whether the alleged designer was designed or not? If so, what is your determination and exactly how did you arrive at it?

Edited by The whole truth on Oct. 08 2012,02:40

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
BillB



Posts: 352
Joined: Aug. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 08 2012,05:11   

Joe:    
Quote


Robb,

Try to compress the works of Shakespear- CSI. Try to compress any encyclopedia- CSI. Even Stephen C. Meyer says CSI is not amendable to compression.

A protein sequence is not compressable- CSI.

So please reference Dembski and I will find Meyer’s quote.


Challenge accepted!

"Shakespeare complete.txt" 5.33MB -> ZIP -> "Shakespeare complete.zip" 1.98 MB

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3220
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 08 2012,08:25   

Quote (BillB @ Oct. 08 2012,05:11)
Joe:      
Quote


Robb,

Try to compress the works of Shakespear- CSI. Try to compress any encyclopedia- CSI. Even Stephen C. Meyer says CSI is not amendable to compression.

A protein sequence is not compressable- CSI.

So please reference Dembski and I will find Meyer’s quote.


Challenge accepted!

"Shakespeare complete.txt" 5.33MB -> ZIP -> "Shakespeare complete.zip" 1.98 MB

Better than 2:1.  That's pretty awesome.

And, that, Joey is the definition of 'information' as used in science. But not your definition because in your definition:


ACGTGCTAGCTAGCATCG
and
ACGTGCTAGCTAGCATAG

are not the same.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 08 2012,08:34   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Oct. 07 2012,21:31)
Quote (The whole truth @ Oct. 07 2012,19:45)
Quote (OgreMkV @ Oct. 07 2012,11:57)
As predicted, Joe has appeared at Skeptic Ink and blathered on about me being a coward and ID being perfectly OK with evolution and ID is no different than SETI and forensics.

I let him go for a few posts and then shut him down.  It's just not worth it.  That's my new home and I don't need his shit stinking up the place.  If he ever figures out what a mol is, maybe he can come back.

Maybe you should do a post on ghosts and haunted places, crop circles, zombies, Bigfoot, Nessie, UFOs, aliens living among humans or replacing humans (invasion of the body snatchers!), alien abductions and 'examinations', ancient aliens (and don't forget Stonehenge!), and/or other such things, and let joey comment on it. It would be hilarious. :p

Yeah, stonehenge has already come up, but I've moderated Joe.  He's not even an interesting troll.  Just 'Nuh huh!"

If he doesn't come back, then I'll lose about 700 hits a day, but I can live with that.  Maybe he'll post his weiner diatribes on his blog.

Not that it matters, I get about one hit a month from the stuff he's posted about me.  I'll have to check and see if he's posted about me yet.  A chocolate milkshake says he has.

eta:  Yay, I get a milkshake.  He's whined about me THREE times today.  What is it that he must whine about me so.

A 30 second review of his posts and I see that it's the exact same thing as every other whiney-ass diatribe he pulls.  "I already did that."  "ID isn't what you say" and "Nuh huh!"

does he really hit your blog 700 times a day?



--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3220
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 08 2012,08:49   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ Oct. 08 2012,08:34)
Quote (OgreMkV @ Oct. 07 2012,21:31)
Quote (The whole truth @ Oct. 07 2012,19:45)
 
Quote (OgreMkV @ Oct. 07 2012,11:57)
As predicted, Joe has appeared at Skeptic Ink and blathered on about me being a coward and ID being perfectly OK with evolution and ID is no different than SETI and forensics.

I let him go for a few posts and then shut him down.  It's just not worth it.  That's my new home and I don't need his shit stinking up the place.  If he ever figures out what a mol is, maybe he can come back.

Maybe you should do a post on ghosts and haunted places, crop circles, zombies, Bigfoot, Nessie, UFOs, aliens living among humans or replacing humans (invasion of the body snatchers!), alien abductions and 'examinations', ancient aliens (and don't forget Stonehenge!), and/or other such things, and let joey comment on it. It would be hilarious. :p

Yeah, stonehenge has already come up, but I've moderated Joe.  He's not even an interesting troll.  Just 'Nuh huh!"

If he doesn't come back, then I'll lose about 700 hits a day, but I can live with that.  Maybe he'll post his weiner diatribes on his blog.

Not that it matters, I get about one hit a month from the stuff he's posted about me.  I'll have to check and see if he's posted about me yet.  A chocolate milkshake says he has.

eta:  Yay, I get a milkshake.  He's whined about me THREE times today.  What is it that he must whine about me so.

A 30 second review of his posts and I see that it's the exact same thing as every other whiney-ass diatribe he pulls.  "I already did that."  "ID isn't what you say" and "Nuh huh!"

does he really hit your blog 700 times a day?


I can't actually tell.  700 seems a little excess, even for him.

But my new blog on Skeptic Ink has gotten 25 comments from him in less than 2 days.  All but 3 are replies to other comments. This is across 3 separate blog posts.  So he must be hitting it pretty hard.

Loftus summarily assigned Joe (and his i'mskeptical sock) as spam.  I'm perfectly OK with that.  Maybe if Joe was an interesting troll like AFDave, it would be different.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
Soapy Sam



Posts: 474
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 08 2012,09:11   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Oct. 08 2012,08:49)

So he must be hitting it pretty hard.

And going to your blog a lot in between. Fnarrr fnarrr!

--------------
Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad.

The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

  
The whole truth



Posts: 964
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 08 2012,16:24   

I see that the comments I submitted on joey's blog last night haven't been posted even though joey has been active on his blog since I submitted them.

Hey joey, how many comments are you blocking/banning from your blog? You say that people who do that are cowards, so according to your own words that makes you a coward, right?



Edited by The whole truth on Oct. 08 2012,14:37

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 1447
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 08 2012,21:15   

Quote (BillB @ Oct. 08 2012,05:11)
Joe:        
Quote


Robb,

Try to compress the works of Shakespear- CSI. Try to compress any encyclopedia- CSI. Even Stephen C. Meyer says CSI is not amendable to compression.

A protein sequence is not compressable- CSI.

So please reference Dembski and I will find Meyer’s quote.


Challenge accepted!

"Shakespeare complete.txt" 5.33MB -> ZIP -> "Shakespeare complete.zip" 1.98 MB

Yeah, but you cheated by smuggling in outside information from the computer!

Try doing it with some chewed gum and a piece of string and we'll be impressed!

--------------
JoeG: And by eating the cake you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.

  
  7348 replies since Feb. 24 2010,12:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (245) < ... 167 168 169 170 171 [172] 173 174 175 176 177 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]