Joined: July 2006
|Scientists may have figured out the chemistry that sparked the beginning of life on Earth.|
The new findings map out a series of simple, efficient chemical reactions that could have formed molecules of RNA, a close cousin of DNA, from the basic materials available more than 3.85 billion years ago, researchers report online May 13 in Nature.
ďThis is a very impressive piece of work ó a really excellent analysis,Ē comments chemist James Ferris of the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y.
The new research lends support to the idea that RNA-based life-forms were the first step toward the evolution of modern life. Called the RNA world hypothesis, the idea was first proposed some 40 years ago. But until now, scientists couldnít figure out the chemical reactions that created the earliest RNA molecules.
|The team took a different approach, starting with a common precursor molecule that had a bit of the sugar and the base. ďBasically, we took half a base, added that to half a sugar, added the other piece of base, and so on,Ē Sutherland says. ďThe key turned out to be the order that the ingredients are added and the way you put them together ó like making a soufflť.Ē|
Another difference is that Sutherland and his team added the phosphate to the mix earlier than in past experiments. Having the phosphate around so early helped the later stages of the reaction happen more quickly and efficiently, the scientists say.
The starting materials and the conditions of the reaction are consistent with models of the geochemistry of an early Earth, the team says.
ďBut while this is a step forward, itís not the whole picture,Ē Ferris points out. ďItís not as simple as putting compounds in a beaker and mixing it up. Itís a series of steps. You still have to stop and purify and then do the next step, and that probably didnít happen in the ancient world.Ē
Better move that gap back a bit Denial.
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
if there are even critical flaws in Gaugerís work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand