RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (246) < ... 164 165 166 167 168 [169] 170 171 172 173 174 ... >   
  Topic: Joe G.'s Tardgasm, How long can it last?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3221
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 28 2012,13:13   

Hi JoeG.  Show this to your purported offspring...

"Joe, what is the evidence for a designer?  What is the hypothesis that is used in experiments to test for a designer?  What is the unit of measurement for information?  How do you measure said information for an organism (you pick, but show your work)?  What values for said information indicate design?  Why?  Is it a scale or is it fixed?  Why?  What is materialism (trick question)?  What is evolution?"

Now, Joe, coward.  Answer the questions.  These are the things you've been preaching about for well over 3 years now (that I'm aware of).  Answer the questions... unless you can't (and we both know you can't).

Answer the questions or admit that your entire set of ID notions are based on your belief in them and faith that there is an intelligent designer.

Or you can do as normal and try to redirect the conversation, call me names, cuss at me, or run away to your blog and put up scathing posts about me that only you and Richard ever see.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 28 2012,13:33   

Joe!  Been a while, have you been doing some research in the lab?  Tell us about it!

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
olegt



Posts: 1375
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 28 2012,13:40   

Quote (Joe G @ Aug. 28 2012,12:30)
1- No evidence that I got my ass handed to me over on TSZ

Your ass has been handed to you. You just can't find it with both hands.

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
Henry J



Posts: 3964
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 28 2012,13:57   

Junk DNA wasn't predicted that I know of, but it does not contradict the theory.

  
The whole truth



Posts: 964
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 28 2012,15:22   

Quote (Joe G @ Aug. 28 2012,10:30)
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Aug. 25 2012,08:59)
Meanwhile, back at the tard farm, dickless Joe Gallien is ratcheting up the rhetoric against Dr. Liddle:

   
Quote
JoeTard: You are confused as the septic zone promotes bald assertions and demonstrates a total lack of posting in good faith.

They couldn’t support the claims of their position if their lives depended on it. But that doesn’t stop them from baldly declaring that their position has all the evidence and can account for everything.

I have called out Liz, many times, for her bald assertions and all she does is repeat them. And that is beyond pathetic.

So perhaps when they lose their cowardice and actually start trying to support their position more IDists will start showing up over there. But I don’t see that happening in my life time.


The cowardly piece of shit got his ass handed to him at TSZ, them got himself banned for posting porn, then throws rocks at people from a place where he knows they can't answer.  Joe Gallien has to be the most cowardly douche I've ever seen.

1- No evidence that I got my ass handed to me over on TSZ

2- No evidence that i posted porn

3- YOU are just one of the biggest cowardly piece-of-shit ever- along with all you evo stroke-butties



--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 10006
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 28 2012,16:29   

Joe is very lucky to have the stern hand of KF correcting him. Joe knows his place - subservient and grovelling to KF.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3221
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 28 2012,21:12   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 28 2012,16:29)
Joe is very lucky to have the stern hand of KF correcting him. Joe knows his place - subservient and grovelling to KF.

Hey Joe, you sending your 'offspring' here to see what a chicken you are?  Can't even answer some basic questions about your own position?

Have a bunny... naw, not even worth the effort to put up a pic.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 28 2012,22:45   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 28 2012,16:29)
Joe is very lucky to have the stern hand of KF correcting him. Joe knows his place - subservient and grovelling to KF.

Didn't he admit to posting porn on the thread where KF smacks his ass?  Wouldn't that contradict his claim of there being no evidence of his posting porn?  I can't be bothered to go look for it--once was enough but I'm sure you intrepid tard-miners will not disappoint.

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
Soapy Sam



Posts: 475
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 29 2012,03:01   

Quote (blipey @ Aug. 28 2012,22:45)
   
Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 28 2012,16:29)
Joe is very lucky to have the stern hand of KF correcting him. Joe knows his place - subservient and grovelling to KF.

Didn't he admit to posting porn on the thread where KF smacks his ass?  Wouldn't that contradict his claim of there being no evidence of his posting porn?  I can't be bothered to go look for it--once was enough but I'm sure you intrepid tard-miners will not disappoint.

On a technicality, he is arguing that the 'tunie' image is not pornographic. (So KF must be absolutely OK with it...?) He has also argued that he did not post it to several sites, but to one, with links on the other sites. All of which makes it just fine and dandy. No further questions, Your Honor.

--------------
Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad.

The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3511
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 29 2012,14:47   

Quote

43
Joe August 29, 2012 at 1:33 pm

For the record, the translation of nucleotides into amino acids is not a chemical reaction and cannot be described by chemical reactions.

Therefor what dr who sez about “that’s all we observe when we actually physically examine life” demonstrates either deception or ignorance on his part.


http://tinyurl.com/9762bz4....9762bz4

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 1451
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 29 2012,14:56   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Aug. 29 2012,14:47)
   
Quote

43
Joe August 29, 2012 at 1:33 pm

For the record, the translation of nucleotides into amino acids is not a chemical reaction and cannot be described by chemical reactions.

Therefor what dr who sez about “that’s all we observe when we actually physically examine life” demonstrates either deception or ignorance on his part.


http://tinyurl.com/9762bz4....9762bz4

JoeTard provides more "no way anyone could possibly be that stupid!" moments than all the other IDiots put together.

--------------
JoeG: And by eating the cake you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.

  
Tracy P. Hamilton



Posts: 1232
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 29 2012,15:14   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Aug. 29 2012,14:56)
Quote (midwifetoad @ Aug. 29 2012,14:47)
   
Quote

43
Joe August 29, 2012 at 1:33 pm

For the record, the translation of nucleotides into amino acids is not a chemical reaction and cannot be described by chemical reactions.

Therefor what dr who sez about “that’s all we observe when we actually physically examine life” demonstrates either deception or ignorance on his part.


http://tinyurl.com/9762bz4....9762bz4

JoeTard provides more "no way anyone could possibly be that stupid!" moments than all the other IDiots put together.

For the record, and oh what a record of IDiocy it is!

If Joe wishes to equivocate on the definition of chemical reaction (whether dimer formation without forming covalent bonds is a "reaction" etc), the argument is still stupid.

--------------
"Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV

"The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen

"We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10006
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 29 2012,15:24   

Quote (Soapy Sam @ Aug. 29 2012,03:01)
Quote (blipey @ Aug. 28 2012,22:45)
     
Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 28 2012,16:29)
Joe is very lucky to have the stern hand of KF correcting him. Joe knows his place - subservient and grovelling to KF.

Didn't he admit to posting porn on the thread where KF smacks his ass?  Wouldn't that contradict his claim of there being no evidence of his posting porn?  I can't be bothered to go look for it--once was enough but I'm sure you intrepid tard-miners will not disappoint.

On a technicality, he is arguing that the 'tunie' image is not pornographic. (So KF must be absolutely OK with it...?) He has also argued that he did not post it to several sites, but to one, with links on the other sites. All of which makes it just fine and dandy. No further questions, Your Honor.

He's cherry picked a definition that he then has to still misinterpret to claim "it's not porn".

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2012....hy.html

Cherry picked:

"Pictures, movies and writing about sex are sometimes called pornography (or porn). Pornography is a picture, movie or writing that is created to make people get sexually excited."

I believe that image was created "make people get sexually excited". Which people, I'm not sure. It may not work, but that was the intent, I believe.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
iconofid



Posts: 32
Joined: July 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 29 2012,15:42   

Quote (Tracy P. Hamilton @ Aug. 29 2012,15:14)
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Aug. 29 2012,14:56)
Quote (midwifetoad @ Aug. 29 2012,14:47)
     
Quote

43
Joe August 29, 2012 at 1:33 pm

For the record, the translation of nucleotides into amino acids is not a chemical reaction and cannot be described by chemical reactions.

Therefor what dr who sez about “that’s all we observe when we actually physically examine life” demonstrates either deception or ignorance on his part.


http://tinyurl.com/9762bz4....9762bz4

JoeTard provides more "no way anyone could possibly be that stupid!" moments than all the other IDiots put together.

For the record, and oh what a record of IDiocy it is!

If Joe wishes to equivocate on the definition of chemical reaction (whether dimer formation without forming covalent bonds is a "reaction" etc), the argument is still stupid.

Joe's actually disputing dr. who's claim (on TSZ) that life is a chemical phenomenon.

So he mentions something in life which is a chemical phenomenon.  :D

Well done Joe!

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3221
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 29 2012,16:15   

Quote (iconofid @ Aug. 29 2012,15:42)
Quote (Tracy P. Hamilton @ Aug. 29 2012,15:14)
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Aug. 29 2012,14:56)
 
Quote (midwifetoad @ Aug. 29 2012,14:47)
     
Quote

43
Joe August 29, 2012 at 1:33 pm

For the record, the translation of nucleotides into amino acids is not a chemical reaction and cannot be described by chemical reactions.

Therefor what dr who sez about “that’s all we observe when we actually physically examine life” demonstrates either deception or ignorance on his part.


http://tinyurl.com/9762bz4....9762bz4

JoeTard provides more "no way anyone could possibly be that stupid!" moments than all the other IDiots put together.

For the record, and oh what a record of IDiocy it is!

If Joe wishes to equivocate on the definition of chemical reaction (whether dimer formation without forming covalent bonds is a "reaction" etc), the argument is still stupid.

Joe's actually disputing dr. who's claim (on TSZ) that life is a chemical phenomenon.

So he mentions something in life which is a chemical phenomenon.  :D

Well done Joe!

Because everyone knows RNA is transcribed using a sonic screwdriver.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
OgreMkV



Posts: 3221
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,09:29   

Joey, the moron of doom vomited forth:
 
Quote
I see that Allan Miller has gone off of the edge- earth to Allan- there isn’t any physio-chemical connection between the nucleotide (codon) and the amino acid it represents- the codon does not become the amino acid via some chemical reaction.

Yes there are chemical connections/ bonds between the nucleotides. Yes there are chemical connections/ bonds between the tRNA and its amino acid. Yes there are chemical connections/ bonds between the amino acids in the polypeptide. And all of that is irrelevant to what I said.


Let's see what 35 seconds of reading on the interwebs says on the topic.  I use wikipedia because (sadly) that's all that's needed.

 
Quote
Aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (an enzyme) catalyzes the bonding between specific tRNAs and the amino acids that their anticodon sequences call for. The product of this reaction is an aminoacyl-tRNA molecule. This aminoacyl-tRNA travels inside the ribosome, where mRNA codons are matched through complementary base pairing to specific tRNA anticodons. The ribosome has three sites for tRNA to bind. They are the aminoacyl site (abbreviated A), the peptidyl site (abbreviated P) and the exit site (abbreviated E). With respect to the mRNA, the three sites are oriented 5’to 3’ E-P-A, because ribosomes moves toward the 3' end of mRNA. The A site binds the incoming tRNA with the complementary codon on the mRNA. The P site holds the tRNA with the growing polypeptide chain. The E site holds the tRNA without its amino acid. When an aminoacyl-tRNA initially binds to its corresponding codon on the mRNA, it is in the A site. Then, a peptide bond forms between the amino acid of the tRNA in the A site and the amino acid of the charged tRNA in the P site. The growing polypeptide chain is transferred to the tRNA in the A site. Translocation occurs, moving the tRNA in the P site, now without an amino acid, to the E site; the tRNA that was in the A site, now charged with the polypeptide chain, is moved to the P site. The tRNA in the E site leaves and another aminoacyl-tRNA enters the A site to repeat the process
Wikipedia - Translation

my bolding

Yep, no chemistry or anything like that here...

Hey Joe, in your own words... what is a 'peptide bond'?

eta.

If I understand what you are saying Joey Bunny, your claim is that because DNA is transcribed into mRNA and then translated into proteins, that there is no direct chemical linkage between the DNA and the protein.

I guess you could argue that point, if you knew nothing about the biochemistry of how the entire system works.  The simple fact that there is a 1:1 correspondence between DNA nucleotides and RNA nucleotides and a 1:1 correspondence between tRNA and mRNA and a 1:1 correspondence  between amino acids and tRNA... nope doesn't mean a thing.  There's absolutely no chemical linkage between anything.  It's all just totally random... isn't that what you're saying, moron?

Edited by OgreMkV on Aug. 30 2012,09:38

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
Soapy Sam



Posts: 475
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,10:15   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Aug. 30 2012,09:29)
 The simple fact that there is a 1:1 correspondence between DNA nucleotides and RNA nucleotides and a 1:1 correspondence between tRNA and mRNA and a 1:1 correspondence  between amino acids and tRNA... nope doesn't mean a thing.

A small quibblette - only the first is a 1:1 correspondence. More than 1 tRNA can dock to the same mRNA codon due to 'wobble', and multiple tRNAs get charged by the same aaRS. Which are actually chemical reasons why Joe is wrong. The 'real' code isn't a neat reversible lookup matrix, like ASCII or something. If it were all 1:1, he might have a better point on 'information' - though it would still be chemistry.

--------------
Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad.

The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,10:17   

Ogre: "If I understand what you are saying Joey Bunny"

I think it's cute how you credit Joe with actually having an argument rather than just typing random phrases.

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
OgreMkV



Posts: 3221
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,10:58   

Quote (Soapy Sam @ Aug. 30 2012,10:15)
Quote (OgreMkV @ Aug. 30 2012,09:29)
 The simple fact that there is a 1:1 correspondence between DNA nucleotides and RNA nucleotides and a 1:1 correspondence between tRNA and mRNA and a 1:1 correspondence  between amino acids and tRNA... nope doesn't mean a thing.

A small quibblette - only the first is a 1:1 correspondence. More than 1 tRNA can dock to the same mRNA codon due to 'wobble', and multiple tRNAs get charged by the same aaRS. Which are actually chemical reasons why Joe is wrong. The 'real' code isn't a neat reversible lookup matrix, like ASCII or something. If it were all 1:1, he might have a better point on 'information' - though it would still be chemistry.

hmm... cool... so there's all these different ways that mutations to the protein can happen, even if the DNA isn't mutated.

Cool.  

Thanks for the info!

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,11:04   

Quote (blipey @ Aug. 30 2012,11:17)
Ogre: "If I understand what you are saying Joey Bunny"

I think it's cute how you credit Joe with actually having an argument rather than just typing random phrases.

i think OM should write a joetard algorithm.  would be really simple programming i bet.  some function to use clusters of buzz words then random alliterative draws from a population of vulgarities and slightly spoonerized curses, punctuated with ya see, IOW, and other assburger type spittle flecked typo rants.  hell for all i know there are three or four of you guys pretending to be this moron

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Joe G



Posts: 1324
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,11:50   

Quote (olegt @ Aug. 28 2012,13:40)
Quote (Joe G @ Aug. 28 2012,12:30)
1- No evidence that I got my ass handed to me over on TSZ

Your ass has been handed to you. You just can't find it with both hands.

Oleg- YOU are my ass and no one handed you to me. You did so very willingly.

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t


BTW: Joe, our position (i.e. evolution) does NOT require that there existed a species of ape-humans with 47 chromosomes.-Kevin McCarthy, ignorant of genetics

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 10006
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,11:52   

Quote (Joe G @ Aug. 30 2012,11:50)
Quote (olegt @ Aug. 28 2012,13:40)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Aug. 28 2012,12:30)
1- No evidence that I got my ass handed to me over on TSZ

Your ass has been handed to you. You just can't find it with both hands.

Oleg- YOU are my ass and no one handed you to me. You did so very willingly.

Your favourite ass is KF's, isn't it toady? Licky licky, there's a good gimp. You love your 'corrections'.

Edited by Richardthughes on Aug. 30 2012,12:00

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Joe G



Posts: 1324
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,11:54   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Aug. 28 2012,13:13)
Hi JoeG.  Show this to your purported offspring...

"Joe, what is the evidence for a designer?  What is the hypothesis that is used in experiments to test for a designer?  What is the unit of measurement for information?  How do you measure said information for an organism (you pick, but show your work)?  What values for said information indicate design?  Why?  Is it a scale or is it fixed?  Why?  What is materialism (trick question)?  What is evolution?"

Now, Joe, coward.  Answer the questions.  These are the things you've been preaching about for well over 3 years now (that I'm aware of).  Answer the questions... unless you can't (and we both know you can't).

Answer the questions or admit that your entire set of ID notions are based on your belief in them and faith that there is an intelligent designer.

Or you can do as normal and try to redirect the conversation, call me names, cuss at me, or run away to your blog and put up scathing posts about me that only you and Richard ever see.

Faggot Kevin-

The DESIGN is evidence for the designer and I told you how to determine design from not. IOW the hypothesis is the same as it is for arcaeology and forensics-> namely that when agenicies act they tend to leave traces of their actions behind. But seeing that you are an ignorant fuck you won't understand that.
I have also told you how to measure information in an organism. Again your faggot ignorance means nothing to me.

As for what is evolution, well I provided several definitions in my debate opening with you. Again your ignorance, while amusing, means nothing.

And yes my daughter read the debate and that is how she knows that you are a lying coward.

--------------
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t


BTW: Joe, our position (i.e. evolution) does NOT require that there existed a species of ape-humans with 47 chromosomes.-Kevin McCarthy, ignorant of genetics

   
Amadan



Posts: 1230
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,12:09   

Ah Joe! You're back!



How we missed you.

--------------
"People are always looking for natural selection to generate random mutations" - Densye  4-4-2011
JoeG BTW dumbass- some variations help ensure reproductive fitness so they cannot be random wrt it.

   
OgreMkV



Posts: 3221
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,12:31   

Quote (Joe G @ Aug. 30 2012,11:54)
Quote (OgreMkV @ Aug. 28 2012,13:13)
Hi JoeG.  Show this to your purported offspring...

"Joe, what is the evidence for a designer?  What is the hypothesis that is used in experiments to test for a designer?  What is the unit of measurement for information?  How do you measure said information for an organism (you pick, but show your work)?  What values for said information indicate design?  Why?  Is it a scale or is it fixed?  Why?  What is materialism (trick question)?  What is evolution?"

Now, Joe, coward.  Answer the questions.  These are the things you've been preaching about for well over 3 years now (that I'm aware of).  Answer the questions... unless you can't (and we both know you can't).

Answer the questions or admit that your entire set of ID notions are based on your belief in them and faith that there is an intelligent designer.

Or you can do as normal and try to redirect the conversation, call me names, cuss at me, or run away to your blog and put up scathing posts about me that only you and Richard ever see.

Faggot Kevin-

The DESIGN is evidence for the designer and I told you how to determine design from not. IOW the hypothesis is the same as it is for arcaeology and forensics-> namely that when agenicies act they tend to leave traces of their actions behind. But seeing that you are an ignorant fuck you won't understand that.
I have also told you how to measure information in an organism. Again your faggot ignorance means nothing to me.

As for what is evolution, well I provided several definitions in my debate opening with you. Again your ignorance, while amusing, means nothing.

And yes my daughter read the debate and that is how she knows that you are a lying coward.

Nope Joe, you have never told anyone a way to unambiguously determine if some object, any object, is designed or not.  

I'll tell you what, I learn by example more than telling.  So give me an example, explaining what you do and why and why the values you determine (measure or calculate) do what you say they do.

You have never, ever done that.  All you have every been able to point to is an 'example' of how you determined that the definition (from a dictionary) of aardvark is some number of bits.  You have never explained what value of bits separates design from non-design (and why).  You have never explained why all the examples we give you of random information larger than the values you specify are not designed.

You don't do much of anything except yell.  You aren't a very good teacher are you?

You have NEVER told us how to measure information in an organism.  You have described how to measure the information in the English language of a dictionary definition of aardvark, but even that is incorrect in regards to Shannon information.

My ignorance is not the issue.  Your inability to teach and explain your own position is the issue.  I have never met anyone who feels so passionately about a subject, yet absolutely refuses to tell all the wonders of it to someone else.  You are, without a doubt, weird.

Evolution is not under discussion here... still.

Your 'daughter' really read the debate?  Seriously?  So she knows that you didn't address a single point that I made.  You utterly failed to understand the entire point of the debate.  And you completely failed to convince anyone that you even know what you are talking about.

Can your 'daughter' do calculations for the amount of information in an organism?  Can she determine design from non-design?  Maybe she would be willing to come here and explain it, because you sure as heck can't.

Tell me Joe, what's your definition of coward... you keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it means.  You're the one who gave an empty parking lot as your address when someone offered to meet you.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,13:24   

Quote
my daughter read the debate




--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Amadan



Posts: 1230
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,13:57   

A pedal moutza?

--------------
"People are always looking for natural selection to generate random mutations" - Densye  4-4-2011
JoeG BTW dumbass- some variations help ensure reproductive fitness so they cannot be random wrt it.

   
OgreMkV



Posts: 3221
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,15:21   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ Aug. 30 2012,13:24)
Quote
my daughter read the debate



I don't get it... but it's kinda creepy

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
Henry J



Posts: 3964
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,17:32   

That's one way to toe the line?

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 30 2012,23:05   

srsly what in the fuck is he talking about my daughter read the debate and knows how much of a huge pussy you are

i would love to be a fly on the wall of that trailer. but i bet competition is stiff!

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
  7368 replies since Feb. 24 2010,12:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (246) < ... 164 165 166 167 168 [169] 170 171 172 173 174 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]