Joined: Jan. 2006
|Quote (Patrick @ Feb. 14 2012,11:30)|
You mean stuff like this:
|ďThe problem here is that after 2,000 years, it is impossible to prove something like, say, the resurrection.Ē|
Well, it depends on what you are willing to accept for proof. If you are willing to accept the overwhelming historical record, including hundreds of eyewitnesses, then yes the resurrection can be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
followed by this:
|I never said we have the testimony of hundreds of eyewitnesses. I said the record states there were hundreds of eyewitnesses.|
A record written decades after the alleged events by persons unknown with political axes to grind, Barry? †This is what passes for evidence in Colorado courts?
We know that talking lions exist because "The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe is set partly in London, which is a real city even to this day and is historically documented through various sources. Plus Aslan's death was witnessed independently by Lucy, Susan, the white witch and and bunch of talking forest creatures.
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine