|The whole truth
Joined: Jan. 2012
|Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ June 26 2012,07:39)|
|It seems that "Joe" has been at this longer then I imagined. |
Here are some posts from "Ark Guy", a very very YEC creationist active in 2003-4. Anybody see any similarities to caek boy's "style" of writing?
|I still have not seen any real proof that the earth looks old. This is an un-proven statement that the evos keep repeating always failing to prove their point.|
I had said CERTAIN aspects of the creation had apparent history.
Such as the apparent age of Adam.
Not all of creation had an apparent history.
|In the bible God said he did it. |
In the science books it says God didn't.
Is this really too much of a concept for you guys to grasp?
|I don't really care what Darwin thinks.|
I care what evolution says, and how they say it. Currently evolution says there is no need for a God and this view is shoved down our throats.
Let me ask you this, do you believe in Intelligent design ? Behe style? or are you in the camp of the other 99% of evolutionist who argue against Behe claiming God had no part in evolution?
|What part is anti-God?|
Well the part that says God what not required...duh.
Or can you show me a public school text book that says God was behind the formation of the universe, formation of the planet, abiogenesis and the director behind the making of man from primitive life.
Now if you can't, then hush up.
It is a known fact that evolution is anti-God and shoved down our throats.
|Exactly...and the bible tells us in the accounts presented in Genesis and in the ten commandments that it took six literal days...or can you show me otherwise with scripture references|
|Funny how the Theo-Evos on this forum never argue for intelligent design...instead they PUSH evolution by random mutation that is selected by nature.|
Now if evolutions is just plain pure and simple natural chance...then why God?
Besides if God used evolution, then why not just say so in the creation story? If God used evolution then why did he say six days? Why did he say Adam was created from the dust? Why did he say Eve was made form his side?
Why not say just man was created from pre-existing animals? I mean, if God used evolution.
There are a total of 867 posts from Aug 2003 to Jan 2004. The funny thing is that even the "turn the other cheek" gang get pissed off with him, and it seems his YEC leanings are out in the open.
|KINDS, not species were on the ark.|
I wanted to correct a Theo-Evo strawman.
The YEC's do not claim that 2 of every species of animals were on board the ark.
I always hear this claim from the anti-ark crowd...how could two of every species fit on the ark. I just wish they would have done their homwork prior to posting such strawman statements.
Actually Noah had brought KINDS of animals onto the ark.
In a sense, but not exactly, it would be like Noah bringing on board Genera, or in other words, two species of all the seperate species that belonged to and were to represent that particular genera, or KIND.
The following is a list from Noahs Ark A feasibilty Study
Number of animals genus (Male & Female) present from each order-class on the ark.
|Nope...The differance is between micro-evolution and macro-evolution.|
Micro-evolution requires no mutations. The changes is just a variation with in already established genes.
Macro-evolution is the molecules to fish to lizard to ape to man theory held to by the Theo-evo sect and not the YEC's.
|There were about 8,000 kind of animals on the ark. |
Fish were not included.
From these 8,000 kinds of animals left off of the ark speciation occured and formed todays current species of animals.
and on and on and on.
Joe, you YEC you.
LOL @ JOE.
That sure does appear to be joe, and I've seen him push the ark feasibility study bullshit elsewhere.
Fellatio is in fact a type of sodomy - gordon e mullings
I don't even know what that means- "study CSI". - joe g
Joe G is the only person I have ever encountered who could start a fight in an empty room and still manage to lose. - Amadan