RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < ... 137 138 139 140 141 [142] 143 144 145 146 147 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3265
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,07:55   

Quote (k.e.. @ May 08 2012,05:28)
Is RB a preacher?

Well,

he talks a lot
says things that are totally incomprehensible
the things that are comprehensible are wrong
doesn't answer questions
is all about putting God back into the classrooms
doesn't understand the US Constitution

So... yeah, I guess he is a preacher.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,08:08   

Gordo has a shit fit over a comment I (as Peter Griffin) wrote months ago...

http://www.uncommondescent.com/culture....fidence

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Henry J



Posts: 4008
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,10:06   

Quote (CeilingCat @ May 08 2012,03:49)
Here's our old friend, Robert Byers, today:    
Quote
6 Robert Byers May 8, 2012 at 2:27 am
The Asian chicks look cute but are they creationists??

Sounds like he's just disoriented.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10071
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,10:14   

I actually made it to the end! Where he has the gall to say this:

Quote
...So, let no-one say that there was not adequate opportunity for a reply on the merits at UD as a forum.


FFS! Mininal intersection with reality. But you keep hiding in your pillow fort, KF. Your moaning about being outed is hillarious, you used to reference your own tripe all the time with your full name on the website. IDIOT.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,10:19   

Quote (Richardthughes @ May 08 2012,10:14)
I actually made it to the end! Where he has the gall to say this:

Quote
...So, let no-one say that there was not adequate opportunity for a reply on the merits at UD as a forum.


FFS! Mininal intersection with reality. But you keep hiding in your pillow fort, KF. Your moaning about being outed is hillarious, you used to reference your own tripe all the time with your full name on the website. IDIOT.

FFS, how is that true while Peter Griffin is banned?

KF == moron.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Patrick



Posts: 549
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,12:20   

Off topic, but I'm really wondering why people on the Skeptical Zone keep leaving Joe links to pictures of bunnies.  Is there an Internet meme I missed during its five minutes of glory or are rabbits to Joe what clowns are to DaveScot?

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1254
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,13:10   

Quote (CeilingCat @ May 08 2012,04:49)
This is kinda cute.  Bully Arrington has a few words about Those Pesky Ads on UD:    
Quote
Some of you have written privately to complain about some of the ads that show up on this site.  Believe me, we are not always thrilled with them ourselves.  However, we have a contract with an online ad company and the revenue we receive from these ads is a major factor in helping us keep this site operating.
And also, please buy my book.

Barry also notes that different people see different ads.  Which is true, the ads are targeted.  Which ads you see depend mostly on what you've been looking at recently on the intertubes.  Remember a few months ago when someone [male] complained about all the ads for women's lingerie?

Here's our old friend, Robert Byers, today:    
Quote
6 Robert Byers May 8, 2012 at 2:27 am
The Asian chicks look cute but are they creationists??

It's filed under "Intelligent Design". Are they trying to tell us something?

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1254
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,13:12   

Quote (Patrick @ May 08 2012,12:20)
Off topic, but I'm really wondering why people on the Skeptical Zone keep leaving Joe links to pictures of bunnies.  Is there an Internet meme I missed during its five minutes of glory or are rabbits to Joe what clowns are to DaveScot?

An internet meme proudly created by our very own Amadan:

http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin....y205448


And I better not be ninja'ed by him!

Edited for spellography

Edited by Kattarina98 on May 08 2012,13:14

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
JohnW



Posts: 2200
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,13:14   

Quote (Patrick @ May 08 2012,10:20)
Off topic, but I'm really wondering why people on the Skeptical Zone keep leaving Joe links to pictures of bunnies.  Is there an Internet meme I missed during its five minutes of glory or are rabbits to Joe what clowns are to DaveScot?

See here.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it.
- Robert Byers

  
Zachriel



Posts: 2594
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,14:55   

Quote
kairosfocus: In particular, I must note how this post plainly reflects a violation of confidence of correspondence in the teeth of an explicit act of protest regarding earlier violation of confidence.

We did not quote anything that kairosfocus wrote to us privately. We did quote what he wrote publicly. The only thing we mentioned about our correspondence was that he demanded an apology for a comment before allowing any further communication. Furthermore, we told him that we would be posting our comments on AtBC, provided a link, and invited him to read our comments here.

Quote
kairosfocus: I asked Zachriel to cease and desist from further communication with me  

Which we did, but we are certainly not going to refrain from discussing his public statements.

Quote
kairosfocus: It therefore evident from this thread that he has twisted my request that he respect confidentiality, into a ducking of issues and trumpeted that to the public elsewhere. Shameless.

We happened to have archived the email exchange — just in case kairosfocus insists upon dredging it up.

--------------
There is only one Tard. The Tard is One.

   
Patrick



Posts: 549
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,15:14   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 08 2012,14:12)
Quote (Patrick @ May 08 2012,12:20)
Off topic, but I'm really wondering why people on the Skeptical Zone keep leaving Joe links to pictures of bunnies.  Is there an Internet meme I missed during its five minutes of glory or are rabbits to Joe what clowns are to DaveScot?

An internet meme proudly created by our very own Amadan:

http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin....y205448


And I better not be ninja'ed by him!

Edited for spellography

Ah, I thought it had the aura of AtBC about it, thanks.

I wonder if Elizabeth considers bunnies to be in good faith.

  
JohnW



Posts: 2200
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,15:24   

Quote (Zachriel @ May 08 2012,12:55)
Quote
kairosfocus: In particular, I must note how this post plainly reflects a violation of confidence of correspondence in the teeth of an explicit act of protest regarding earlier violation of confidence.

We did not quote anything that kairosfocus wrote to us privately. We did quote what he wrote publicly. The only thing we mentioned about our correspondence was that he demanded an apology for a comment before allowing any further communication. Furthermore, we told him that we would be posting our comments on AtBC, provided a link, and invited him to read our comments here.

 
Quote
kairosfocus: I asked Zachriel to cease and desist from further communication with me  

Which we did, but we are certainly not going to refrain from discussing his public statements.

 
Quote
kairosfocus: It therefore evident from this thread that he has twisted my request that he respect confidentiality, into a ducking of issues and trumpeted that to the public elsewhere. Shameless.

We happened to have archived the email exchange — just in case kairosfocus insists upon dredging it up.

Most of his post is the usual KF meltdown-by-numbers (yes, there are strawmen soaked in oil of ad hominems).  But I liked this:
Quote
It is plain to me that Zachriel, the pseudonymous advocate of darwinism, has violated trust because he thought it would be to his advantage and he could get away with it. Let the record reflect this, for all to see.

How dare you use a pseudonym when talking about Gordon E Mullings, Zachriel!  The nerve!

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it.
- Robert Byers

  
Woodbine



Posts: 746
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,15:46   

Can't think of anything worse than having Kairosfocus invade my inbox!


  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10071
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,15:57   

Quote (Woodbine @ May 08 2012,15:46)
Can't think of anything worse than having Kairosfocus invade my inbox!


Where'd you get that picture of Bob'O?

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
The whole truth



Posts: 972
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,17:43   

Quote (JohnW @ May 08 2012,13:24)
 
Quote (Zachriel @ May 08 2012,12:55)
   
Quote
kairosfocus: In particular, I must note how this post plainly reflects a violation of confidence of correspondence in the teeth of an explicit act of protest regarding earlier violation of confidence.

We did not quote anything that kairosfocus wrote to us privately. We did quote what he wrote publicly. The only thing we mentioned about our correspondence was that he demanded an apology for a comment before allowing any further communication. Furthermore, we told him that we would be posting our comments on AtBC, provided a link, and invited him to read our comments here.

     
Quote
kairosfocus: I asked Zachriel to cease and desist from further communication with me  

Which we did, but we are certainly not going to refrain from discussing his public statements.

     
Quote
kairosfocus: It therefore evident from this thread that he has twisted my request that he respect confidentiality, into a ducking of issues and trumpeted that to the public elsewhere. Shameless.

We happened to have archived the email exchange — just in case kairosfocus insists upon dredging it up.

Most of his post is the usual KF meltdown-by-numbers (yes, there are strawmen soaked in oil of ad hominems).  But I liked this:
   
Quote
It is plain to me that Zachriel, the pseudonymous advocate of darwinism, has violated trust because he thought it would be to his advantage and he could get away with it. Let the record reflect this, for all to see.

How dare you use a pseudonym when talking about Gordon E Mullings, Zachriel!  The nerve!


Yeah, as if "Kairosfocus" is the real, not pseudonymous name of gordon elliott mullings of Manjack, Montserrat.



--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Zachriel



Posts: 2594
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,18:03   

Quote (JohnW @ May 08 2012,15:24)
Most of his post is the usual KF meltdown-by-numbers (yes, there are strawmen soaked in oil of ad hominems).  But I liked this:
Quote
It is plain to me that Zachriel, the pseudonymous advocate of darwinism, has violated trust because he thought it would be to his advantage and he could get away with it. Let the record reflect this, for all to see.

How dare you use a pseudonym when talking about Gordon E Mullings, Zachriel!  The nerve!

Or this:

Quote
If after a couple of days or so, it is evident that the thread is heading for the sort of breakdown ...


--------------
There is only one Tard. The Tard is One.

   
Schroedinger's Dog



Posts: 1691
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 08 2012,18:11   

The real question is: if KF lives in the Carribeans, why does he use tan-in-a-can?

--------------
"Hail is made out of water? Are you really that stupid?" Joe G

"I have a better suggestion, Kris. How about a game of hide and go fuck yourself instead." Louis

"The reason people use a crucifix against vampires is that vampires are allergic to bullshit" Richard Pryor

   
CeilingCat



Posts: 1650
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 09 2012,00:29   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 08 2012,13:12)
 
Quote (Patrick @ May 08 2012,12:20)
Off topic, but I'm really wondering why people on the Skeptical Zone keep leaving Joe links to pictures of bunnies.  Is there an Internet meme I missed during its five minutes of glory or are rabbits to Joe what clowns are to DaveScot?

An internet meme proudly created by our very own Amadan:

http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin....y205448


And I better not be ninja'ed by him!

Edited for spellography

Mike Gene also has a pronounced rabbit fetish.  See his web site for examples.

--------------
Like every other academic field, philosophy of religion has its share of hacks and mediocrities.   Edward Feser

‘Anything is a “real possibility” in the mind of one seeking to deny the obvious.’ – William J Murray

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 1650
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 09 2012,00:36   

Does anybody have experience ordering internet advertisements?

Is it possible, and if so, approximately what would it cost to purchase ads that would appear only on UD?

I'm thinking of something like:      
Quote

     Is your KAIROS in FOCUS?

 Write to Gordon E. Mullings, Esq
    Manjack Heights, Montserrat.

Please enclose $2.50 in cash or stamps.
             ADULTS ONLY!!

Something like that would be worth a couple hundred bucks to me.

Some of you can probably think of better advertisements?

--------------
Like every other academic field, philosophy of religion has its share of hacks and mediocrities.   Edward Feser

‘Anything is a “real possibility” in the mind of one seeking to deny the obvious.’ – William J Murray

  
JLT



Posts: 740
Joined: Jan. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: May 09 2012,02:34   

Good grief, guys. Do you really want to go down that rabbit hole again? I mean, it's fun and all to provoke another KF meltdown, and he unquestionably deserves it. But, really?
I'm all for using pseudonyms and I expect other people to use my pseudonym even if they happen to know my real name and even (especially) if they happen to disagree with me. I know that KF is a hugh hypocrite who is only fake outraged if he is "outed" and doesn't have a problem with "outing" other people. But how can I continue feeling morally superior if we do the same thing? ;)
/tone trolling

--------------
"Random mutations, if they are truly random, will affect, and potentially damage, any aspect of the organism, [...]
Thus, a realistic [computer] simulation [of evolution] would allow the program, OS, and hardware to be affected in a random fashion." GilDodgen, Frilly shirt owner

  
REC



Posts: 552
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 09 2012,10:36   

Isn't is clear that clown takes every supposed or real slight against him, and feeds his christian persecution/martyrdom complex with it.

Nothing would get him off faster than actually being targeted by some Darwinist heathens.

  
JohnW



Posts: 2200
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 09 2012,11:30   

Quote (JLT @ May 09 2012,00:34)
Good grief, guys. Do you really want to go down that rabbit hole again? I mean, it's fun and all to provoke another KF meltdown, and he unquestionably deserves it. But, really?
I'm all for using pseudonyms and I expect other people to use my pseudonym even if they happen to know my real name and even (especially) if they happen to disagree with me. I know that KF is a hugh hypocrite who is only fake outraged if he is "outed" and doesn't have a problem with "outing" other people. But how can I continue feeling morally superior if we do the same thing? ;)
/tone trolling

I don't think any of us have ever provoked a Gordshite meltdown.  He's entirely self-provoking.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it.
- Robert Byers

  
JLT



Posts: 740
Joined: Jan. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: May 09 2012,14:04   

Quote (JohnW @ May 09 2012,17:30)
I don't think any of us have ever provoked a Gordshite meltdown.  He's entirely self-provoking.

True.

--------------
"Random mutations, if they are truly random, will affect, and potentially damage, any aspect of the organism, [...]
Thus, a realistic [computer] simulation [of evolution] would allow the program, OS, and hardware to be affected in a random fashion." GilDodgen, Frilly shirt owner

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4360
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 09 2012,20:06   

Quote (JohnW @ May 09 2012,11:30)
Quote (JLT @ May 09 2012,00:34)
Good grief, guys. Do you really want to go down that rabbit hole again? I mean, it's fun and all to provoke another KF meltdown, and he unquestionably deserves it. But, really?
I'm all for using pseudonyms and I expect other people to use my pseudonym even if they happen to know my real name and even (especially) if they happen to disagree with me. I know that KF is a hugh hypocrite who is only fake outraged if he is "outed" and doesn't have a problem with "outing" other people. But how can I continue feeling morally superior if we do the same thing? ;)
/tone trolling

I don't think any of us have ever provoked a Gordshite meltdown.  He's entirely self-provoking.

Well, if we're going to have fun with Gordo, the Monster Of Montserrat, we'd better hurry up, because I predict that he will soon be linked to gruesome sex-crimes, and subsequently locked up for a long, long time.  Someone that suppressed has GOT to be More Icky Than Ricky*

Remember, we always thought we'd have Kent "Dr. Dino" to kick around!

*Santorum.  Google it, but not if you are Louis's mother...

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
noncarborundum



Posts: 320
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 09 2012,22:58   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 08 2012,13:12)
 
Quote (Patrick @ May 08 2012,12:20)
Off topic, but I'm really wondering why people on the Skeptical Zone keep leaving Joe links to pictures of bunnies.  Is there an Internet meme I missed during its five minutes of glory or are rabbits to Joe what clowns are to DaveScot?

An internet meme proudly created by our very own Amadan:

http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin....y205448


And I better not be ninja'ed by him!

Edited for spellography

Not to step on Amadan's priority or anything, but when I first read his bunny post I wondered if he'd been influenced by this, which I had seen several days earlier and thought was absolutely wonderful.

--------------
"The . . . um . . . okay, I was genetically selected for blue eyes.  I know there are brown eyes, because I've observed them, but I can't do it.  Okay?  So . . . um . . . coz that's real genetic selection, not the nonsense Giberson and the others are talking about." - DO'L

  
CeilingCat



Posts: 1650
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 10 2012,00:09   

Quote (JLT @ May 09 2012,02:34)
Good grief, guys. Do you really want to go down that rabbit hole again? I mean, it's fun and all to provoke another KF meltdown, and he unquestionably deserves it. But, really?
I'm all for using pseudonyms and I expect other people to use my pseudonym even if they happen to know my real name and even (especially) if they happen to disagree with me. I know that KF is a hugh hypocrite who is only fake outraged if he is "outed" and doesn't have a problem with "outing" other people. But how can I continue feeling morally superior if we do the same thing? ;)
/tone trolling

Personally, my main worry is the possible devastation to the northern half of Montserrat if KF's enormous ego ever explodes.  The volcano that destroyed the southern half of the island (an Act of God by the way, ask any insurance salesman) would be nothing compared to that.

But it would be fun to watch, though.  I wonder if we'd see the glow from Wisconsin?

--------------
Like every other academic field, philosophy of religion has its share of hacks and mediocrities.   Edward Feser

‘Anything is a “real possibility” in the mind of one seeking to deny the obvious.’ – William J Murray

  
Amadan



Posts: 1240
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 10 2012,01:41   

Quote (noncarborundum @ May 10 2012,04:58)
Quote (Kattarina98 @ May 08 2012,13:12)
   
Quote (Patrick @ May 08 2012,12:20)
Off topic, but I'm really wondering why people on the Skeptical Zone keep leaving Joe links to pictures of bunnies.  Is there an Internet meme I missed during its five minutes of glory or are rabbits to Joe what clowns are to DaveScot?

An internet meme proudly created by our very own Amadan:

http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin....y205448


And I better not be ninja'ed by him!

Edited for spellography

Not to step on Amadan's priority or anything, but when I first read his bunny post I wondered if he'd been influenced by this, which I had seen several days earlier and thought was absolutely wonderful.

Guilty, M'Lud

Edited by Amadan on May 10 2012,07:41

--------------
"People are always looking for natural selection to generate random mutations" - Densye  4-4-2011
JoeG BTW dumbass- some variations help ensure reproductive fitness so they cannot be random wrt it.

   
JLT



Posts: 740
Joined: Jan. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: May 10 2012,02:32   

Quote (CeilingCat @ May 10 2012,06:09)
Quote (JLT @ May 09 2012,02:34)
Good grief, guys. Do you really want to go down that rabbit hole again? I mean, it's fun and all to provoke another KF meltdown, and he unquestionably deserves it. But, really?
I'm all for using pseudonyms and I expect other people to use my pseudonym even if they happen to know my real name and even (especially) if they happen to disagree with me. I know that KF is a hugh hypocrite who is only fake outraged if he is "outed" and doesn't have a problem with "outing" other people. But how can I continue feeling morally superior if we do the same thing? ;)
/tone trolling

Personally, my main worry is the possible devastation to the northern half of Montserrat if KF's enormous ego ever explodes.  The volcano that destroyed the southern half of the island (an Act of God by the way, ask any insurance salesman) would be nothing compared to that.

But it would be fun to watch, though.  I wonder if we'd see the glow from Wisconsin?

Not sure about the glow, but the hot air that'd be released all at once would certainly increase global temperature.

--------------
"Random mutations, if they are truly random, will affect, and potentially damage, any aspect of the organism, [...]
Thus, a realistic [computer] simulation [of evolution] would allow the program, OS, and hardware to be affected in a random fashion." GilDodgen, Frilly shirt owner

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1254
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 10 2012,02:36   

Bias in science!!!eleven111

Who will pounce on it, News or Hunter? My bet is on News just as soon as she finds it; will take several days, though.

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
JLT



Posts: 740
Joined: Jan. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: May 10 2012,02:59   

BarryA annoys the YECs at UD:
 
Quote
No matter how long and hard you argue with a YEC proponent you will never convince him based on appeals to the evidence.  Yes, he has the same evidence that you do, but he interprets that evidence within a different interpretive framework.  You might think his interpretive framework is flawed, but you cannot say, as a matter of strict logic, that his interpretive framework must necessarily be flawed.  In other words, you must admit that as a matter of strict logic it is possible for light to be slower now than it was in the past.  And given the premise of some YECs that light is in fact slower now than it was in the past is, their conclusions might then follow.  

He then proceeds to liken the poor YECs with the evil, evil TEs while simultanously criticising the TEs for ignoring the Bible.
 
Quote
TEs are like YECs in this respect — they cling to a scientific view that runs counter to the obvious evidence because of their prior commitments. [...]

Now notice the similarity between TEs and YECs:  Everyone concedes that the universe appears to be billions of years old; everyone concedes that living things appear to have been designed for a purpose.  YECs say the first appearance is an illusion.  TEs  say the second appearance is an illusion. [...]

YECs reject the “obvious” conclusion about the age of the universe because of their prior commitments.  Why do TEs reject the “obvious” conclusion about the design of living things?  Further, why do TEs reject that obvious conclusion in the very teeth of the Biblical injunction to regard the appearance of design as proof of God’s existence (Romans 1).

Too funny.

They all seem to have given up on pretending it is all about science. Although Dembski is still trying:
 
Quote
Theologically speaking, ID imposes few limits and is compatible with God acting at all levels of creation and through all modes of causation. When design is detected, God is active. And when design is not detected, God is still active. This doesn't make ID contentless. Rather, it means that ID is largely neutral with respect to one's doctrine of God, a fact that should not be surprising given that ID is compatible not only with Judeo-Christian theism but also with just about any religious view that regards purpose as basic to reality. ID's content is scientific, not religious or theological. Insofar as it has metaphysical implications, it is in challenging naturalism.

LOL.

--------------
"Random mutations, if they are truly random, will affect, and potentially damage, any aspect of the organism, [...]
Thus, a realistic [computer] simulation [of evolution] would allow the program, OS, and hardware to be affected in a random fashion." GilDodgen, Frilly shirt owner

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < ... 137 138 139 140 141 [142] 143 144 145 146 147 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]