Joined: Jan. 2006
FTK is back and
even more precisely as unpleasantly stupid and bigoted as ever!
Extra! Extra! Read all about it!
|I stand by my position that a bunch of sexual deviants proudly and publically displaying their way of life is no less disgusting than the act of a pedofile.|
Because, apparently, being flamboyantly and publicly homosexual is equivalent to fucking a child. Yay!
Here's a little scenario:
"In crossing a heath, suppose I pitched my foot against a homosexual couple, and were asked how disgusting the act they were engaging in were; I might possibly answer, that, for anything I knew to the contrary, it it was pretty disgusting to me personally: nor would it perhaps be very easy to show the absurdity of this answer.
But suppose I had found a paedophile raping a child upon the ground, and it should be inquired how disgusting that act happened to be in that place; I should hardly think of the answer I had before given, that for anything I knew, the paedophilic act were more than merely personally disgusting. There must have existed, at some time, and at some place or other, an act of violation of consent, who raped the child for the purpose which we will not speculate upon; who, despite the act perhaps being that between a male and a female, every indication of consent, every manifestation of ability to engage willingly, which existed in the child, is not present in the act I encounter..."
FTK is, frankly, too fucking stupid, to be able to distinguish between "some act that I find personally unpleasant" and "some act that is a deliberate act of violation AND is personally unpleasant". This "it's all perversion" horseshit is merely a smokescreen for her bigotry. I remain unfooled. If she can't see the difference between "two consenting adults engaging in an act she dislikes" and "one adult violating a child unable to give its consent" then there is no hope for her. I might have said something like it before.