Joined: Dec. 2007
|Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Nov. 09 2019,10:23)|
|Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Nov. 08 2019,22:18)|
|Quote (stevestory @ Nov. 08 2019,18:27)|
EricMHNovember 8, 2019 at 2:42 pm
Dembski is pessimistic about ID’s progress, but my experience talking with atheists is that ID has won. No one I talk to, except online, really believes in Darwinian evolution.
The big thing that Johnson did is ask the fundamental question: can natural processes create? Asking that question is the bomb that blew up naturalism.
What an idiot.
EricMH, Otangelo Grasso, and Bill Cole are the future of ID. Maybe with Joke Gallien in reserve in case their toaster breaks. :D
I think you underestimate Joke. With on-site like this, he is destined to be the leading spokesperson for ID.
| Ed, you are a liar and a loser. What you say is meaningless and most often immoral and spiteful. You are just a jealous imbecile.|
The Old Guard is going to be hard to beat. EricMH can't match this logic:
Nobody really needs a link to I.D. this speaker.
|Thus, when we follow the evidence where it leads, then we find that only Theism can account for the ‘miracle’ of the applicability of mathematics to our universe in the first place, and then we also find that only Christianity, and Christianity alone, out of all the Theistic worldviews, provides an empirically backed ‘unification’, (via the Shroud of Turin), between quantum theory and general relativity into the much sought after ‘theory of everything’.|
And that necessarily entails that Christianity, and Christianity alone, also provides the correct basis for the transcendent, eternal, and universal moral standard(s) that we all intuitively know, (like mathematics), to exist and to be true.