RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < ... 211 212 213 214 215 [216] 217 218 219 220 221 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Robin



Posts: 1430
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,12:12   

P-E-T-R-O-L. That's a funny way to spell "water"!

--------------
we IDists rule in design for the flagellum and cilium largely because they do look designed.  Bilbo

The only reason you reject Thor is because, like a cushion, you bear the imprint of the biggest arse that sat on you. Louis

  
JohnW



Posts: 2268
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,12:17   

Quote (rossum @ Sep. 10 2012,09:51)
[quote=Occam's Toothbrush,Sep. 10 2012,11:31]
Quote (Henry J @ Sep. 09 2012,22:50)

Did you know you can calculate the CSI of water by counting the number of letters in the recipe?  
   
Quote
Water

Ingredients:

1 cup water

Directions:  

Add water.

Serves: 1 (serving size 1 cup)

Nah, this is the real recipe:

Quote
Water

Ingredients:

1 sachet dehydrated water

Directions:  

Add water.

Serves: 1 (serving size 1 cup)

Dehydrated water is very useful in the desert -- much lighter to carry.  Just add water and drink.

Don't forget to factor in the weight of all those extra bits of CSI.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it.
- Robert Byers

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 1492
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,14:10   

[quote=JohnW,Sep. 10 2012,12:17]
Quote (rossum @ Sep. 10 2012,09:51)
Quote (Occam's Toothbrush @ Sep. 10 2012,11:31)
 
Quote (Henry J @ Sep. 09 2012,22:50)

Did you know you can calculate the CSI of water by counting the number of letters in the recipe?  
     
Quote
Water

Ingredients:

1 cup water

Directions:  

Add water.

Serves: 1 (serving size 1 cup)

Nah, this is the real recipe:

 
Quote
Water

Ingredients:

1 sachet dehydrated water

Directions:  

Add water.

Serves: 1 (serving size 1 cup)

Dehydrated water is very useful in the desert -- much lighter to carry.  Just add water and drink.

Don't forget to factor in the weight of all those extra bits of CSI.

And by drinking the CSI containing water you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.

--------------
JoeG: And by eating the cake you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10237
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,14:58   

Quote (sparc @ Sep. 10 2012,11:27)
Looking for education on Montserrat I came across this:  
Quote
Win a house on Montserrat


edited for spelling

http://themoneyconverter.com/USD....CD.aspx

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,15:20   

hey, a 580 square foot mansion for 60K US, what a great fucking deal.  No wonder Gordon wants to live there

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Freddie



Posts: 366
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,15:27   

Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Sep. 10 2012,15:20)
hey, a 580 square foot mansion for 60K US, what a great fucking deal.  No wonder Gordon wants to live there

Who wouldn't want to live there with a vista such as this?



--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

  
Amadan



Posts: 1256
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,15:34   

Quote (Freddie @ Sep. 10 2012,21:27)
Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Sep. 10 2012,15:20)
hey, a 580 square foot mansion for 60K US, what a great fucking deal.  No wonder Gordon wants to live there

Who wouldn't want to live there with a vista such as this?


Living that close to the Soufrière Hills volcano, you would be in terrible danger of being overcome by the choking clouds of scorching hot gaseous emissions that follow explosive eruptions.

Technically, these are known as kyrospastic flows.

--------------
"People are always looking for natural selection to generate random mutations" - Densye  4-4-2011
JoeG BTW dumbass- some variations help ensure reproductive fitness so they cannot be random wrt it.

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 10237
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,15:37   

"kyrospastic flows"

You owe me new clean and pristine undercrackers. These ones won't dry!

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
DaveH



Posts: 48
Joined: July 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,15:53   

Quote (Amadan @ Sep. 10 2012,15:34)
Living that close to the Soufrière Hills volcano, you would be in terrible danger of being overcome by the choking clouds of scorching hot gaseous emissions that follow explosive eruptions.

Technically, these are known as kyrospastic flows.

I am forced to de-lurk briefly to say thank you for that comment.
My wife has to get up stupidly early for a train tomorrow, and you have woken her up by causing me to laugh like an hyaena on acid.

  
steve_h



Posts: 533
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,16:35   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 10 2012,15:51)
Dynese goes on vacation and the boys break the house.

I do believe that UD is broken. The home page isn't updating, no new threads are being added.

You can see new posts by clicking on the RSS link on the right somewhere - or by searching for 'a' as I did.

eta: (slaps forehead) Kyrospastic! just got it.

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3573
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,17:01   

Quote (steve_h @ Sep. 10 2012,16:35)
Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 10 2012,15:51)
Dynese goes on vacation and the boys break the house.

I do believe that UD is broken. The home page isn't updating, no new threads are being added.

You can see new posts by clicking on the RSS link on the right somewhere - or by searching for 'a' as I did.

eta: (slaps forehead) Kyrospastic! just got it.

I did peek, but came away grateful that some things remain hidden. Perhaps only logged in members get the correct home page. That would be nice.

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
olegt



Posts: 1387
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,19:35   

UD is turning into a black hole. We are observing relativistic time dilation. Sock puppets should get out asap.

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
Henry J



Posts: 4080
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,22:22   

Quote
UD is turning into a black hole. We are observing relativistic time dilation.

Isn't that contrary to their idiotology?

  
k.e..



Posts: 2934
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 11 2012,08:09   

Quote (DaveH @ Sep. 10 2012,23:53)
Quote (Amadan @ Sep. 10 2012,15:34)
Living that close to the Soufrière Hills volcano, you would be in terrible danger of being overcome by the choking clouds of scorching hot gaseous emissions that follow explosive eruptions.

Technically, these are known as kyrospastic flows.

I am forced to de-lurk briefly to say thank you for that comment.
My wife has to get up stupidly early for a train tomorrow, and you have woken her up by causing me to laugh like an hyaena on acid.

OK, HOMO!

WHERE AS KAIROFOCUS AKA GORDON ELLIOTT MULLINGS OF MONTSERRAT IS LIKE A RAT ON WARFARIN, YOU DARWINISTS ALWAYS TAKE THE HIGH GROUND.

davetard©

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 11 2012,08:27   

Hey!  Goddammit keep it down or you will wake up my fish louse on Ambien!

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Tracy P. Hamilton



Posts: 1238
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 11 2012,09:05   

Quote (olegt @ Sep. 10 2012,19:35)
UD is turning into a black hole. We are observing relativistic time dilation. Sock puppets should get out asap.

Fortunately, Hawking radiation will not lose the CSI needed to make a CAEK!

--------------
"Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV

"The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen

"We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

  
Tracy P. Hamilton



Posts: 1238
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 11 2012,09:06   

Quote (DaveH @ Sep. 10 2012,15:53)
Quote (Amadan @ Sep. 10 2012,15:34)
Living that close to the Soufrière Hills volcano, you would be in terrible danger of being overcome by the choking clouds of scorching hot gaseous emissions that follow explosive eruptions.

Technically, these are known as kyrospastic flows.

I am forced to de-lurk briefly to say thank you for that comment.
My wife has to get up stupidly early for a train tomorrow, and you have woken her up by causing me to laugh like an hyaena on acid.

Seconded!

--------------
"Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV

"The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen

"We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 12 2012,13:08   

Upright:  
Quote
By the way, you can see the practical benefits (of maintaining this enforced separation) in the comments coming from TSZ. Keith is literally in a full blown tantrum, rocking back and forth in his seat and kicking his feet. He and Onlooker act as if I myself invented biosemiosis, which is an incoherent argument with absolutely no basis in material fact. It simply cannot be allowed. You’ll also notice how the frontline scientists and researchers I have approached (i.e. Moran, Matzke, etc) have refused to get into a debate with me about it. It’s a no winner for them, and they have something to protect. They sure as hell are not going to engage in a public argument over the meaning of words like “arbitrary” and “information”. That’s beneath them. They will leave that to the internet’s bottom feeders like Patrick and Keith, who are unencumbered by the thought of appearing completely irrational.


No, really.

And, whatever you do, read the comment before that one then re-read the above.

So what's Upright scoring on the scale now anyway, as we've got to the "they are afraid to debate me" state now.

We can't be that far away from a YouTube video? Or photocopied A4 sheet he'll give away on street corners?

And Upright, debate comes after you've published a definitive version of your claim. Tard.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3573
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 12 2012,13:15   

It must hurt to clutch those pearls of wisdom so tightly.

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 10237
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 12 2012,13:26   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Sep. 12 2012,13:08)
Upright:    
Quote
By the way, you can see the practical benefits (of maintaining this enforced separation) in the comments coming from TSZ. Keith is literally in a full blown tantrum, rocking back and forth in his seat and kicking his feet. He and Onlooker act as if I myself invented biosemiosis, which is an incoherent argument with absolutely no basis in material fact. It simply cannot be allowed. You’ll also notice how the frontline scientists and researchers I have approached (i.e. Moran, Matzke, etc) have refused to get into a debate with me about it. It’s a no winner for them, and they have something to protect. They sure as hell are not going to engage in a public argument over the meaning of words like “arbitrary” and “information”. That’s beneath them. They will leave that to the internet’s bottom feeders like Patrick and Keith, who are unencumbered by the thought of appearing completely irrational.


No, really.

And, whatever you do, read the comment before that one then re-read the above.

So what's Upright scoring on the scale now anyway, as we've got to the "they are afraid to debate me" state now.

We can't be that far away from a YouTube video? Or photocopied A4 sheet he'll give away on street corners?

And Upright, debate comes after you've published a definitive version of your claim. Tard.

"many experts agree with me, but are scared to do so publically"..

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 12 2012,13:26   

causes hemorrhoids and polyps

i recommend colonic irrigation.  I hear Floyd Lee is looking for some of that too, maybe we can arrange a tupperware party tard-off

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3573
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 12 2012,13:36   

Quote
"many experts agree with me, but are scared to do so publicly"..


It's just his circle of friends.

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
Patrick



Posts: 555
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 12 2012,14:40   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Sep. 12 2012,14:08)
Upright:    
Quote
By the way, you can see the practical benefits (of maintaining this enforced separation) in the comments coming from TSZ. Keith is literally in a full blown tantrum, rocking back and forth in his seat and kicking his feet. He and Onlooker act as if I myself invented biosemiosis, which is an incoherent argument with absolutely no basis in material fact. It simply cannot be allowed. You’ll also notice how the frontline scientists and researchers I have approached (i.e. Moran, Matzke, etc) have refused to get into a debate with me about it. It’s a no winner for them, and they have something to protect. They sure as hell are not going to engage in a public argument over the meaning of words like “arbitrary” and “information”. That’s beneath them. They will leave that to the internet’s bottom feeders like Patrick and Keith, who are unencumbered by the thought of appearing completely irrational.


No, really.

And, whatever you do, read the comment before that one then re-read the above.

So what's Upright scoring on the scale now anyway, as we've got to the "they are afraid to debate me" state now.

We can't be that far away from a YouTube video? Or photocopied A4 sheet he'll give away on street corners?

And Upright, debate comes after you've published a definitive version of your claim. Tard.

I got a mention even though I don't even read UD anymore?

I must have really hurt Upright BiPed's feelings over at The Skeptical Zone.  I should meditate on the need to extend compassion even to screaming fuckwits those unable or unwilling to see the flaws in their deliberately evasive and nonsensical arguments.

Hmm, I seem to recall having an apology already written for a similar occasion . . .
Quote
I was raised to be polite, which forces me to consider apologizing to the denizens of Uncommon Descent. However, with the exception of Mrs. O'Leary, who was unfailingly charming in our email exchanges, and Atom, who had not been involved in the discussions but chose to publicly distance himself from vjtorley's actions, there isn't a person there I'd be interested in even having a beer with. Given that, I have to ask myself, to whom should I apologize? Those who claim to be practicing science but refuse to support their claims? Those who continue to lie in the face of clear evidence of their mendacity? Those who quote mine and try to defend their dishonesty? Those who support pseudonymity "for me but not for thee"? Those who are trying so desperately to misappropriate the respect earned by science for their own undeserving religious beliefs? Those who are all too ready to clutch their pearls at some imagined etiquette transgression while hypocritically behaving unbelievably rudely themselves? Those who arrogantly mock what they clearly don't understand? Those willing to censor their opponents rather than address their arguments? Those misogynists who ignore arguments, replying instead "Go away, little girl"? Those who remain willfully ignorant despite the myriad educational resources available to them? Those who deliberately build an insular community to support these behaviors?

No, these people do not deserve an apology. While most supporters of Intelligent Design Creationism are simply parroting what they hear while sitting in their pews, the IDC proponents at Uncommon Descent have chosen to actively proselytize. Despite the disingenuous ways in which they engage with people knowledgeable about science, they can't help but be exposed to the deep flaws in their own arguments. They cannot claim ignorance. That leaves stupidity, insanity, or wickedness. I find that the evidence supports a combination of all three.

Yeah, I need to work on the compassion.

  
Soapy Sam



Posts: 528
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 12 2012,16:18   

UBP          
Quote
You’ll also notice how the frontline scientists and researchers I have approached (i.e. Moran, Matzke, etc) have refused to get into a debate with me about it.

Yeah, they are afeared of ya. Not that they think you are a waste of time or anything.

I used to think UBP was a fucking dickhead. Then I saw him take his argument to TSZ, and thought "well, fair play mate". Now, I think UBP is a fucking dickhead. The pompous attempts to 'demolish' his opponents, smarmy 'I see through your subterfuge' stuff like this to 'onlooker':
       
Quote
By the way, you coming on this board and taking the 63 words of my #1 and #2 in the OP, and spending 260 words explicitly illuminating just how masterfully you could trim them down to just 23 words in a coherent statement that suits you, is not much of a demonstration of how incomprehensible the argument is. In fact, that was a rank amateur’s mistake, performed with great fanfare.

But don’t sweat it. It was obvious you wanted to show how smart you are.

People with great ideas always rehearse them interminably on blogs. It's the mark of a great idea. And the more punters you can suck into your cybersphere from their little bedrooms and studies across the globe, and then demolish with your withering contempt, the more embiggened you become.

The question remains: why do so many people spend so much time on the arguments of this charlatan?

--------------
Evolutionists trust entropy for creation of life but are like men who horse a crocodile to get across a river - niwrad.

The organism could already metabolize citrus. Joe G

If hail is made out of ice and ice came from ice via water, then hail is made out of ice. Joe G

  
khan



Posts: 1483
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 12 2012,16:31   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Sep. 12 2012,14:26)
"many experts agree with me, but are scared to do so publically"..

I've been reading that crap for for than 20 years "many people support me in email"

--------------
"It's as if all those words, in their hurry to escape from the loony, have fallen over each other, forming scrambled heaps of meaninglessness." -damitall

That's so fucking stupid it merits a wing in the museum of stupid. -midwifetoad

  
JonF



Posts: 571
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 12 2012,17:29   

To the tune of "My Bonnie Lies Over the Ocean":

    The Lurkers support me in e-mail
    They all think I'm great don't you know.
    You posters just don't understand me
    But soon you will reap what you sow.

    Lurkers, lurkers, lurkers support me, you'll see, you'll see
    Off in e-mail the lurkers support me, you'll see.

    The lurkers support me in e-mail
    "So why don't they post?" you all cry
    They're scared of your hostile intentions
    They just can't be as brave as I.

    Lurkers, lurkers, lurkers support me, you'll see, you'll see
    Off in e-mail the lurkers support me, you'll see.

    One day I'll round up all my lurkers
    We'll have a newsgroup of our own
    Without all this flak from you morons
    My lurkers will post round my throne.

    Lurkers, lurkers, lurkers support me, you'll see, you'll see
    Off in e-mail the lurkers support me, you'll see.

(Author is Jo Walton....)

  
fnxtr



Posts: 2138
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 12 2012,18:08   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 12 2012,11:36)
 
Quote
"many experts agree with me, but are scared to do so publicly"..


It's just his circle of friends jerks.


FTFY

--------------
"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1036
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 12 2012,20:39   

Quote (Patrick @ Sep. 12 2012,12:40)
 
Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Sep. 12 2012,14:08)
Upright:        
Quote
By the way, you can see the practical benefits (of maintaining this enforced separation) in the comments coming from TSZ. Keith is literally in a full blown tantrum, rocking back and forth in his seat and kicking his feet. He and Onlooker act as if I myself invented biosemiosis, which is an incoherent argument with absolutely no basis in material fact. It simply cannot be allowed. You’ll also notice how the frontline scientists and researchers I have approached (i.e. Moran, Matzke, etc) have refused to get into a debate with me about it. It’s a no winner for them, and they have something to protect. They sure as hell are not going to engage in a public argument over the meaning of words like “arbitrary” and “information”. That’s beneath them. They will leave that to the internet’s bottom feeders like Patrick and Keith, who are unencumbered by the thought of appearing completely irrational.


No, really.

And, whatever you do, read the comment before that one then re-read the above.

So what's Upright scoring on the scale now anyway, as we've got to the "they are afraid to debate me" state now.

We can't be that far away from a YouTube video? Or photocopied A4 sheet he'll give away on street corners?

And Upright, debate comes after you've published a definitive version of your claim. Tard.

I got a mention even though I don't even read UD anymore?

I must have really hurt Upright BiPed's feelings over at The Skeptical Zone.  I should meditate on the need to extend compassion even to screaming fuckwits those unable or unwilling to see the flaws in their deliberately evasive and nonsensical arguments.

Hmm, I seem to recall having an apology already written for a similar occasion . . .
   
Quote
I was raised to be polite, which forces me to consider apologizing to the denizens of Uncommon Descent. However, with the exception of Mrs. O'Leary, who was unfailingly charming in our email exchanges, and Atom, who had not been involved in the discussions but chose to publicly distance himself from vjtorley's actions, there isn't a person there I'd be interested in even having a beer with. Given that, I have to ask myself, to whom should I apologize? Those who claim to be practicing science but refuse to support their claims? Those who continue to lie in the face of clear evidence of their mendacity? Those who quote mine and try to defend their dishonesty? Those who support pseudonymity "for me but not for thee"? Those who are trying so desperately to misappropriate the respect earned by science for their own undeserving religious beliefs? Those who are all too ready to clutch their pearls at some imagined etiquette transgression while hypocritically behaving unbelievably rudely themselves? Those who arrogantly mock what they clearly don't understand? Those willing to censor their opponents rather than address their arguments? Those misogynists who ignore arguments, replying instead "Go away, little girl"? Those who remain willfully ignorant despite the myriad educational resources available to them? Those who deliberately build an insular community to support these behaviors?

No, these people do not deserve an apology. While most supporters of Intelligent Design Creationism are simply parroting what they hear while sitting in their pews, the IDC proponents at Uncommon Descent have chosen to actively proselytize. Despite the disingenuous ways in which they engage with people knowledgeable about science, they can't help but be exposed to the deep flaws in their own arguments. They cannot claim ignorance. That leaves stupidity, insanity, or wickedness. I find that the evidence supports a combination of all three.

Yeah, I need to work on the compassion.

In that thread, arrington barfed:

"UD Editors:  No one has come close to refuting UB’s thesis after 129 comments.  We are moving this post to the top of the page to give the materialists another chance."

129+ comments but how many are from "materialists"? Most "materialists" don't even know (or don't care) that UD or uptightbiped exist, and most "materialists" (one of arrington's labels for sane people) are blocked or have their posts deleted by arrington, or were banned long ago.

joey confirms that UD isn't interested in open and honest discussion:

"And Allan, seeing that you don’t have any evidence to support your position, what would you debate if you could post here?"  (my bold)

And speaking of joey, he said:

"As I said we can determine designed or not without having to know how."

The IDiots ("we") can determine design without knowing how. Yeah, all science so far. And that statement admits that all the assertions the IDiots come up with about how to determine design are ineffective and useless.

joey also demonstrates what drinking hydrogen peroxide has done to his pea brain:

"The terms are clearly understood by anyone who A) knows how to use a dictionary (or the English language)..."

That, from an illiterate bumpkin.

And from the safety of the UD sanctuary, joey blustered:

"But that is because you guys are the big C, as in Cowards."

"How we are perceived by a bunch of equivocating intellectual cowards is of no consequence."

"Obviously you don’t care how you are perceived…"

Obviously joey is unable to perceive himself and his IDiot comrades.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Tracy P. Hamilton



Posts: 1238
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,09:15   

Who was it that had a way of tracking UD traffic.  Was there an effect from the great banning of the cowards afraid to agree with Bully Arrington?

--------------
"Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV

"The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen

"We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

  
Amadan



Posts: 1256
Joined: Jan. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 13 2012,10:09   

Ras,

Who say ye is the Tard of Tards?

Speak!!

--------------
"People are always looking for natural selection to generate random mutations" - Densye  4-4-2011
JoeG BTW dumbass- some variations help ensure reproductive fitness so they cannot be random wrt it.

   
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < ... 211 212 213 214 215 [216] 217 218 219 220 221 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]