RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < ... 210 211 212 213 214 [215] 216 217 218 219 220 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 1510
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 08 2012,16:27   

No votes yet for the yappy little turd Behe?

--------------
JoeG: And by eating the cake you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 08 2012,18:56   

Quote (J-Dog @ Sep. 08 2012,14:52)
STOP!  

If we are talking about the All-Time Tard, it just has to be Dr. Dr. Dembski.  Period end of story.

There is nobody as blind, pathetic, myopic, yet convinced they are right in the annals of annals...

He is the alph and the omega of tard with a beta-version of brains.  The yin and the yang and the yo-yo of tard.

He can throw out big words like a true pedant, but believe in angels.  He can debate Christopher Hitchens badly, but believe in his black little heart that he won.  

He is All Tard All The Time.  He is The Dr. Dr. Of Tard.

added in edit:  Look upon His Big Pile Of Steaming Tard and Despair!

I'll tally that vote, my hirsute upright walking old buddy

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
KCdgw



Posts: 368
Joined: Sep. 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 08 2012,21:38   

I nominate "Ilion", aka Troy D.Hailey, for the specialty "Wandering Jew" award, for migrating from forum to forum, like an unwelcome Gypsy caravan, pedding his homegrown "Human Chromosome 2 disproves evolution" theory.

--------------
Those who know the truth are not equal to those who love it-- Confucius

  
sparc



Posts: 1722
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 08 2012,23:05   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 08 2012,10:34)
If you go too far back you reach a point where dissent was not entirely irrational. I would say the final tipping point was reached in the late 60s with the nearly simultaneous arrival of DNA, neutral theory and plate tectonics.

I'm not trying to say you could build a consillient theory of ID  or YEC, but you could still point to major gaps.

That era also saw the introduction of evolution into high school texts. Prior to 1970, evolution wasn't mentioned. So in one sense, the space race and the emphasis on science triggered by Sputnik ushered in the era of TARD.

It was at the exhibition "Century 21" in the US Science Pavillion during the world fair in Seattle 1962. They had displays on evolution, genetics (two 3D models of DNA one of which was actually wrongly displaying left-handedness) and plate tectonics. An extra bonus that today would piss of free will creationists was life perfomances with doves in a Skinner box. More than 6 million visitors joined the celebration of science and it is quite likely that the exhibition had a much bigger impact than the services that have been held in the different chappels on the fair campus.

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
sparc



Posts: 1722
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 08 2012,23:32   

Quote (J-Dog @ Sep. 08 2012,13:52)
STOP!  

If we are talking about the All-Time Tard, it just has to be Dr. Dr. Dembski.  Period end of story.

There is nobody as blind, pathetic, myopic, yet convinced they are right in the annals of annals...

He is the alph and the omega of tard with a beta-version of brains.  The yin and the yang and the yo-yo of tard.

He can throw out big words like a true pedant, but believe in angels.  He can debate Christopher Hitchens badly, but believe in his black little heart that he won.  

He is All Tard All The Time.  He is The Dr. Dr. Of Tard.

added in edit:  Look upon His Big Pile Of Steaming Tard and Despair!

Due to recent events I voted for KF rather than Dembski. However, this was before I saw his latest UD post to which he never came back. Instead, he didn't care that cooks like KF, BA77 and Joe took over one of his threads and ignored legitimate questions. IMHO Dembski is just cynical and I wonder if he still is a beleaving Christian or if he isn't rather only pretending to be a True Christian© to secure his income.

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,08:49   

Quote (sparc @ Sep. 09 2012,00:32)
Quote (J-Dog @ Sep. 08 2012,13:52)
STOP!  

If we are talking about the All-Time Tard, it just has to be Dr. Dr. Dembski.  Period end of story.

There is nobody as blind, pathetic, myopic, yet convinced they are right in the annals of annals...

He is the alph and the omega of tard with a beta-version of brains.  The yin and the yang and the yo-yo of tard.

He can throw out big words like a true pedant, but believe in angels.  He can debate Christopher Hitchens badly, but believe in his black little heart that he won.  

He is All Tard All The Time.  He is The Dr. Dr. Of Tard.

added in edit:  Look upon His Big Pile Of Steaming Tard and Despair!

Due to recent events I voted for KF rather than Dembski. However, this was before I saw his latest UD post to which he never came back. Instead, he didn't care that cooks like KF, BA77 and Joe took over one of his threads and ignored legitimate questions. IMHO Dembski is just cynical and I wonder if he still is a beleaving Christian or if he isn't rather only pretending to be a True Christian© to secure his income.

a colleague of mine is from a foreign country, very foreign, and he has not quite come to understand amurrikkka yet.  aside:  hell... i aint either, and some of my people were here running around in feathers and beads trying to kill all of you white men when youns first got here.  

but anyhoo my buddy tells me very matter of factly that he is sure that all preachers and religious leaders are 100% aware that they are liars frauds and conmen, in other words not a single one of them can believe the things they say.  

he say religious beliefs are for the people in the pews, the ones who don't question.  common people.  small people.  he says all of this without a hint of disdain, and I accept it because what I think he is saying is that they do not have the ambition to command others that is required to be a preacher and not that these people are lesser for not possessing such a drive.

i think he might be right

So, yeah, DrDr Billybillly sure as shit knows he is a fraud. Too bad that this sort of dissonance doesn't have immediate or longterm consequences.  waiting for attrition is a bitch.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Patrick



Posts: 555
Joined: July 2011

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,08:49   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Sep. 08 2012,17:27)
No votes yet for the yappy little turd Behe?

Behe is like lite beer compared to the crystal meth of kairosfocus or the heroin of Dembski.

Plus, he did so much good for the pro-science side at Dover that it's hard to consider him a cdesign proponentsist.

  
k.e..



Posts: 2995
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,08:58   

I'm nominating Dr Berlinski-Berlinksi.

For the best ID interviewer of hisself in the 3rd person.

AND!!!!

Steve Fuller for being the most full of it ID POMOTARD™

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3588
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,10:22   

I do think there should be a separate category for those who have the intellect and still choose the dark side.

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
tsig



Posts: 322
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,11:03   

Quote (olegt @ Sep. 07 2012,07:02)
PaV chimes in with some weapons-grade po-mo bullshit:
   
Quote
I think, for the sake of simplicity (and, hopefully, clarity) we should take a very simplistic view of what entropy is: it’s basically directionless-ness. It is a ‘loss’ of ‘direction’.

Alas, clarity is nowhere to be found. He begins with explaining how he understands Clausius's version of the second law:
   
Quote
No cyclic process is possible whose sole outcome is transfer of heat from a cooler body to a hotter body

This statement presupposes: (1) that the bodies are either separate from one another, or, that there are separate areas of one body–a ‘hotter’ and a ‘cooler’ area, and (2) that the ‘flow’ of energy/heat goes in only ONE ‘direction’: from hot to cold. Flow itself is likewise a vector quantity and, hence, itself implies a ‘direction’.

What we seem to go round and round on here at UD is this notion of ‘directionality,’ and it seems that what we loose sight of is this minimal amount of ‘directionality’ that entropy requires.

Round and round he goes and then comes to this gem:
   
Quote
(N.B. Again, this irreducible ‘directionality’ that entropy requires can be lost sight of even in a classical thermodynamic equations like dU = TdS – pdV. On the r.h.s., the first term amounts to dQ, which is the already present ‘internal energy’ of the system. On the l.h.s., dU is the change in ‘internal energy’. Finally, the second term on the r.h.s. is pressure x volume. What is perhaps hidden here is that pressure equals Force/Area. And, again, force is a vector quantity, and, so, has ‘direction.’ To change the heat content of something, ‘work’ has to be done, and pdV is what accomplishes it. Now, if you heat up a pressure cooker, the pressure will always be at right angles to the container’s walls–i.e., it is a NON-RANDOM orientation of forces!

This is the critical point: an entropy change always has a direction. This is exactly what the 2LofT tells us, but, we usually lose track of it. Nevertheless, it’s there.

I hate to break it to you, PaV, but dQ is NOT "the already present ‘internal energy’ of the system." It is the amount of heat received by the system. And although force indeed is a vector quantity, its direction has nothing whatsoever to do with the direction of heat transfer. It's hard to sound any more clueless that this!

It goes downhill from there as PaV channels his long-lost knowledge of calculus:
   
Quote
Let’s look at an example that Sal uses in the second part of his recent post on entropy.

He tells us that the change in entropy, S, is equal to the integral (sum) over the initial and final values of dQ/T. (N.B. the ‘initial’ value of dQ/T is always higher than the final value of dQ/T, revealing again, this hidden directionality. Normally, in any given mathematical expression, there is no need for the initial value to be ‘less’ than the final–they just need to be different)

PaV clearly used to be able to do integrals, but he does not understand them now, so all he can do is wax poetic about them. Not surprisingly, he looks at Sal's calculation of entropy and says thanks, but no thanks:
   
Quote
But let’s move on.
Sal then adds:

Perhaps to make the formula more accessible, let us suppose we have a 1000 watt heater running for 100 seconds that contributes to the boiling of water (already at 373.2?K). What is the entropy contribution due this burst of energy from the heater?

Well, let’s turn this around (change it’s ‘direction’): what would happen if we had a 1000 watt (electric) heater surrounded by water that was boiling, and then we added steam to the system that was generated by a nuclear reactor. Would this produce electricity? Of course not! This energy-producing system only works in one direction!

Nevertheless, it is possible to take the steam that a nuclear reactor produces and then produce electricity! But this is an entirely different process/system, and, it is a process/system that is given its ‘directionality’ via intelligent design of engineers.

And, here we have it. This is the nub of the issue, I believe. Darwinists want to convince us that if ‘steam’ is available (analogously, the energy of the sun), then ‘electricity’ can be produced (analogously, the ‘direction’ of entropy can be reversed).

So the music goes in here, goes round and round and comes out there. Directionality disproves Eventuality!!!

 :O

  
tsig



Posts: 322
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,11:06   

Quote (k.e.. @ Sep. 07 2012,08:41)
Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Sep. 06 2012,16:29)
ceiling quat that is some good shite.  classic davetard beating up on fundie dummies while taking swipes at everyone in the sunday school classroom

 
Quote

DaveScotMay 9, 2008 at 11:52 am

Barry

Sorry, but I AM responding to you. I can’t help it that you contradicted yourself and made your question invalid by so doing.

Dig it: you asked if the bayonetting of babies was wrong in all times and places then you went on to restrict the times and places to those times and places where the God of Abraham didn’t command the killing.

You can’t have your cake and eat it too, Barry. It’s all times and places, which must by definition include the times and places described in the Old Testament, or it isn’t all times and places.

This is not a distraction but rather a fair answer to your original question and ignoring your later contradiction which you imposed when you didn’t know how to respond to that answer.


yeah barry fuck you gaah you are such a loser JEEZ




 
Quote

DaveScotMay 9, 2008 at 11:55 am

Jonathan Sarfarti

The only crass thing here is the image of the creator you cling to.





PETA JESUSSSSS!!!!!

 
Quote
DaveScotMay 9, 2008 at 12:03 pm

Stephen

We already know that some killing is justified.

Not according to Christ. The problem here is that most Christians talk the talk but don’t even come close to walking the walk. I’m more of a follower of Christ than the vast majority of so-called self-annointed church going Christians. I at least try to walk the walk and know very well when I’m not walking it. Most of rest of you are in deep denial about your own sinful behaviors. Every time you kill another living thing that isn’t harming you in any way you’re doing something that Christ avoided like the plague. No killing of anything is a common thread in many religions including, properly interpreted, Christianity. Admit that your animal desire to eat the flesh of other animals is, in the modern world where you have no problem (it’s very healthy in fact) subsisting on fruits and vegetables, a hedonistic practice. Stop lying to yourself that it’s anything other than hedonistic animal behavior.




WAT

yeah ok dave LMAOOOOOO

YEAH OK, HOMOS!

I TRIED TO TELL BILL THAT ASSBACKWARDS BULL DYKE CANADIAN "REPORTER" WOULD FUCK UP HIS BLOG AND I PRIVATELY TOLD HIM BARRY WAS AN ASS LICKER BUT WHAT THE FUCK?

BILL GOT THE FREE RIDE AGAIN AND WHO AM I TO ARGUE?

THOSE OLD TESTAMENT TARDS OUGHT TO READ THE BOOK OF JOB, HE WAS AGNOSTIC TOO YOU KNOW.

© davetard

Bill got HOISTED on Barry's Petard.

  
Glen Davidson



Posts: 752
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,11:11   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 09 2012,10:22)
I do think there should be a separate category for those who have the intellect and still choose the dark side.

Phillip Johnson.

Oh sure, he didn't know better when he read Denton's ridiculous junk (since he's a lawyer, without much science background), but he's had plenty of opportunity to learn since then, and decided that he would just dig in his heels.

The strokes likely reduced capacity in later years, but not at first.

Dembski doesn't know what intellectual honesty is, he just wants to triumph over the bullies that damaged him emotionally as a kid, and who he eventually decided were atheists/evolutionists (father issues, likely, too--at the least he blames Daddy for not protecting him).  He wants to kill us, although I'm sure he's decided it's something else (reduce us to the horror he is, for instance).  Knowing better isn't an issue for him.  

Klinghoffer's about the same as Dembski, he just reveals his ressentiment more.  I might go with Klinghoffer as king tard, but he's such an inconsequential little yapping mutt, it's hard to care more than just to correct the most egregious lies.

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
tsig



Posts: 322
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,11:17   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ Sep. 07 2012,12:11)
Zachriel's ballot is far too good to not share, but if you would like to vote please send me a PM with a nominee for Top Tard and a few lines explaining your choice.  I'll count over the weekend and post monday unless i don't

and by all means let us continue the public discussion of these "personalities"

whatever happened to Jerry?  HmmmMM?  you know what to do

I nominate Dave S. as a heritage candidate.

While he's gone the policies he established live on.

  
tsig



Posts: 322
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,11:24   

Quote (sparc @ Sep. 08 2012,23:32)
Quote (J-Dog @ Sep. 08 2012,13:52)
STOP!  

If we are talking about the All-Time Tard, it just has to be Dr. Dr. Dembski.  Period end of story.

There is nobody as blind, pathetic, myopic, yet convinced they are right in the annals of annals...

He is the alph and the omega of tard with a beta-version of brains.  The yin and the yang and the yo-yo of tard.

He can throw out big words like a true pedant, but believe in angels.  He can debate Christopher Hitchens badly, but believe in his black little heart that he won.  

He is All Tard All The Time.  He is The Dr. Dr. Of Tard.

added in edit:  Look upon His Big Pile Of Steaming Tard and Despair!

Due to recent events I voted for KF rather than Dembski. However, this was before I saw his latest UD post to which he never came back. Instead, he didn't care that cooks like KF, BA77 and Joe took over one of his threads and ignored legitimate questions. IMHO Dembski is just cynical and I wonder if he still is a beleaving Christian or if he isn't rather only pretending to be a True Christian© to secure his income.

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3588
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,11:25   

Behe has a secure job. The others would find themselves permanently unemployed if they admitted being wrong. I think the recent descent into anti-monkey drivel reflects a desire to appeal to the base of contributors.

It's probably a good marketing move to avoid winning in the school systems. Permanent victimhood is permanent employment.

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
N.Wells



Posts: 864
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,13:24   

Quote
[From PaV] Well, let’s turn this around (change its ‘direction’): what would happen if we had a 1000 watt (electric) heater surrounded by water that was boiling, and then we added steam to the system that was generated by a nuclear reactor. Would this produce electricity? Of course not! This energy-producing system only works in one direction!  Nevertheless, it is possible to take the steam that a nuclear reactor produces and then produce electricity! But this is an entirely different process/system, and, it is a process/system that is given its ‘directionality’ via intelligent design of engineers......This is the nub of the issue, I believe. Darwinists want to convince us that if ‘steam’ is available (analogously, the energy of the sun), then ‘electricity’ can be produced (analogously, the ‘direction’ of entropy can be reversed).


Wow, I never thought of it like that.  Of course, heat differentials in systems of water and water vapor never, ever, ever produce electricity other than in systems designed by intelligent designers, especially if we are talking about funky hippy solar energy.  NOT.  Quite apart from begging the question in terms of electricity generated in photosynthesis, how about
http://www.impactlab.net/wp-cont....ng2.jpg
http://images.tweaktown.com/imageba....776.jpg  

The tard is deep in this one.


Hovind, Gish, & Henry Morris deserve some sort of award in the ongoing competition.  Perhaps a collective award for exceptional increase in entropy in the system of human knowledge (closed-system category).   :)

  
Glen Davidson



Posts: 752
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,13:28   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 09 2012,11:25)
Behe has a secure job. The others would find themselves permanently unemployed if they admitted being wrong. I think the recent descent into anti-monkey drivel reflects a desire to appeal to the base of contributors.

It's probably a good marketing move to avoid winning in the school systems. Permanent victimhood is permanent employment.

Some success would be welcome to them, though, and would likely keep many of the YECs from attacking them for apostasy.  

As it stands, they've pretty much lost across the board, except for Louisiana's law, which no one cares about, because they just taught creationism, or at least left out evolution, even without that law.

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,13:46   

Quote (Glen Davidson @ Sep. 09 2012,14:28)
Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 09 2012,11:25)
Behe has a secure job. The others would find themselves permanently unemployed if they admitted being wrong. I think the recent descent into anti-monkey drivel reflects a desire to appeal to the base of contributors.

It's probably a good marketing move to avoid winning in the school systems. Permanent victimhood is permanent employment.

Some success would be welcome to them, though, and would likely keep many of the YECs from attacking them for apostasy.  

As it stands, they've pretty much lost across the board, except for Louisiana's law, which no one cares about, because they just taught creationism, or at least left out evolution, even without that law.

Glen Davidson

JUST WAIT, DARWINIST

http://amused-muse.blogspot.com/2010....oo.html

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3588
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,14:09   

I   bet you evotards think solar energy can make water flow uphill without the aid of a designer.

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
fnxtr



Posts: 2152
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,15:01   

Quote (N.Wells @ Sep. 09 2012,11:24)
SNIP

How many frickin' times are they going to reword the 747-in-a-junkyard trope?

It's almost like Pav is the 'materialistic' one, he sees the whole world as just chunks of inert machinery, magically assembled and activated, not messy, sloppy chemistry, physics, and biology.

Sad, really.

--------------
"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad

  
SLP



Posts: 136
Joined: Dec. 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,17:16   

Quote (KCdgw @ Sep. 08 2012,21:38)
I nominate "Ilion", aka Troy D.Hailey, for the specialty "Wandering Jew" award, for migrating from forum to forum, like an unwelcome Gypsy caravan, pedding his homegrown "Human Chromosome 2 disproves evolution" theory.

Please tell me that clown is not STILL peddling that?

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1110
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,18:32   

Quote (N.Wells @ Sep. 09 2012,11:24)
 
Quote
[From PaV] Well, let’s turn this around (change its ‘direction’): what would happen if we had a 1000 watt (electric) heater surrounded by water that was boiling, and then we added steam to the system that was generated by a nuclear reactor. Would this produce electricity? Of course not! This energy-producing system only works in one direction!  Nevertheless, it is possible to take the steam that a nuclear reactor produces and then produce electricity! But this is an entirely different process/system, and, it is a process/system that is given its ‘directionality’ via intelligent design of engineers......This is the nub of the issue, I believe. Darwinists want to convince us that if ‘steam’ is available (analogously, the energy of the sun), then ‘electricity’ can be produced (analogously, the ‘direction’ of entropy can be reversed).


Wow, I never thought of it like that.  Of course, heat differentials in systems of water and water vapor never, ever, ever produce electricity other than in systems designed by intelligent designers, especially if we are talking about funky hippy solar energy.  NOT.  Quite apart from begging the question in terms of electricity generated in photosynthesis, how about
http://www.impactlab.net/wp-cont....ng2.jpg
http://images.tweaktown.com/imageba....776.jpg  

The tard is deep in this one.


Hovind, Gish, & Henry Morris deserve some sort of award in the ongoing competition.  Perhaps a collective award for exceptional increase in entropy in the system of human knowledge (closed-system category).   :)

And how do joey's wet electricity assertions figure into what pav is saying?

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Henry J



Posts: 4098
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,21:50   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 09 2012,13:09)
I   bet you evotards think solar energy can make water flow uphill without the aid of a designer.

No. See, what the solar energy does is evaporate the water, after which it isn't liquid so it isn't water any more until it rains somewhere. So it doesn't have to flow!

So there!!111!!!one!!!

  
paragwinn



Posts: 409
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,22:03   

Quote (Henry J @ Sep. 09 2012,19:50)
   
Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 09 2012,13:09)
I   bet you evotards think solar energy can make water flow uphill without the aid of a designer.

No. See, what the solar energy does is evaporate the water, after which it isn't liquid so it isn't water any more until it rains somewhere. So it doesn't have to flow!

So there!!111!!!one!!!

Unless it hails or snows or only one H2O molecule (or mol) arrives (remember, those dont count as water). In those cases, you have to wait longer for the water to appear via solar energy.

eta: indefinite pronoun corrective caught in my teeth that are still under warranty sold to me by the distracting straw-blonde man who would look smoking hot oiled up so as not to burn in the sun while grilling herring in a red tie.

--------------
All women build up a resistance [to male condescension]. Apparently, ID did not predict that. -Kristine 4-19-11
F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc. The whole thing is F/N ridiculous -Seversky on KF footnote fetish 8-20-11
Sigh. Really Bill? - Barry Arrington

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3588
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 09 2012,22:28   

Joe's personal source of wet electricity.

http://www.amazon.com/Wet-Sto....g+alarm

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
k.e..



Posts: 2995
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,07:54   

Quote (paragwinn @ Sep. 10 2012,06:03)
 
Quote (Henry J @ Sep. 09 2012,19:50)
       
Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 09 2012,13:09)
I   bet you evotards think solar energy can make water flow uphill without the aid of a designer.

No. See, what the solar energy does is evaporate the water, after which it isn't liquid so it isn't water any more until it rains somewhere. So it doesn't have to flow!

So there!!111!!!one!!!

Unless it hails or snows or only one H2O molecule (or mol) arrives (remember, those dont count as water). In those cases, you have to wait longer for the water to appear via solar energy.

eta: indefinite pronoun corrective caught in my teeth that are still under warranty sold to me by the distracting straw-blonde man who would look smoking hot oiled up so as not to burn in the sun while grilling herring in a red tie.

...urrr?
I never drink water because fish fuck in it


HARHAR THIS IS YOU IN A BEARSKIN COAT AND BOWLER HAT.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 3588
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,08:51   

Dynese goes on vacation and the boys break the house.

I do believe that UD is broken. The home page isn't updating, no new threads are being added.

Edited by midwifetoad on Sep. 10 2012,11:21

--------------
”let’s not make a joke of ourselves.”

Pat Robertson

  
sparc



Posts: 1722
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,11:27   

Looking for education on Montserrat I came across this:
Quote
Win a house on Montserrat


edited for spelling

Edited by sparc on Sep. 10 2012,11:28

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
Occam's Toothbrush



Posts: 554
Joined: April 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,11:31   

Quote (Henry J @ Sep. 09 2012,22:50)
       
Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 09 2012,13:09)
I   bet you evotards think solar energy can make water flow uphill without the aid of a designer.

No. See, what the solar energy does is evaporate the water, after which it isn't liquid so it isn't water any more until it rains somewhere. So it doesn't have to flow!

So there!!111!!!one!!!

Did you know you can calculate the CSI of water by counting the number of letters in the recipe?  
 
Quote
Water

Ingredients:

1 cup water

Directions:  

Add water.

Serves: 1 (serving size 1 cup)

It also works for ice:
   
Quote
Ice

Ingredients:

1 cup water


Oh wait, that can't be right.  Ice isn't made of water.  Nevermind.

--------------
"Molecular stuff seems to me not to be biology as much as it is a more atomic element of life" --Creo nut Robert Byers
------
"You need your arrogant ass kicked, and I would LOVE to be the guy who does it. Where do you live?" --Anger Management Problem Concern Troll "Kris"

  
rossum



Posts: 186
Joined: Dec. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 10 2012,11:51   

[quote=Occam's Toothbrush,Sep. 10 2012,11:31]
Quote (Henry J @ Sep. 09 2012,22:50)

Did you know you can calculate the CSI of water by counting the number of letters in the recipe?  
   
Quote
Water

Ingredients:

1 cup water

Directions:  

Add water.

Serves: 1 (serving size 1 cup)

Nah, this is the real recipe:

Quote
Water

Ingredients:

1 sachet dehydrated water

Directions:  

Add water.

Serves: 1 (serving size 1 cup)

Dehydrated water is very useful in the desert -- much lighter to carry.  Just add water and drink.

--------------
The ultimate truth is that there is no ultimate truth.

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < ... 210 211 212 213 214 [215] 216 217 218 219 220 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]